Immanuel
Gold Member
- May 15, 2007
- 16,828
- 2,269
- 183
For the record CG, I think it was you or TGG that used the word dishonorable in a question to me. I only followed through with it. I call them corrupt.
Actually, I believe the conversation went like this:
Immanuel says: Both are as liberal as they can be. One big difference is that Romney isn't afraid to let everyone know that he has more wealth than God; while Obama is little more than the common man that wants to be king of the world. Neither one of them have/had any intention of doing what is right for the American people.
There are plenty of differences such as which freedom each of them want to take away from us next, but the goal is all in the same. Of course, that comes from the party elite more than the man who would be President, but whichever one it would have been was still going to be beholden to their masters.
Sorry, I am in a really pissy mood this week.
Immie
TheGreatGatsby says: Yea. I followed Romney's personal life, career and campaign and I can tell you that's not the case. He's an honorable man. Obama is the scum of the earth.
Immanuel says: Sorry, I just don't agree on the honorable part.
Immie
As for the word "care", it was used in the context of "give a shit about" not in the context of providing for or taking care of.
Immie
I know what context you used it in. And, I don't care if some politician gives a shit about me. If I want someone to give a shit about me, I'll look to those closest to me, not some government buffoon. Their job is to give a shit about the country, not give a shit about me.
And that was exactly the context it was used in... giving a shit about the country. You happen to be part of "this country". Politicians don't give a shit about this nation... you being part of this nation means they don't give a shit about you. It is really pretty simple. Even TDM can figure that out.
As for the honorable part, had it been me, I would have simply said he was corrupt. I used TGG's word rather than changing it. It wasn't my choice of words, but if you ask me, one who is corrupt is not honorable, so, I did not change the wording. TGG seem to believe the man is a saint and above corruption. I do not have the same belief, therefore, if you want to play semantic games, I would say that the man is in fact dishonorable.
Immie
Last edited: