Luddly Neddite
Diamond Member
- Sep 14, 2011
- 63,947
- 9,980
- 2,040
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hmmm.. Looks as if Obama was wrong. Romney did not call Russia a threat and he did support government guarantees for Detroit.He just didn't support Obama circumventing bankruptcy law and paying off the unions for their political support.Mitt Romney has changed every position he's had for the last two years in the last three weeks.
Remember "Geo Political Foe" and the news it made? Romney never said it.
Let Detroit go "Bankrupt". Never wrote that article.
Out of Afghanistan by 2014. Good idea. Never had any other position.
The question here is if a candidate can change every position in the last couple of weeks, and the press doesn't challenge him, can anyone say anything and win? What does that say about American Politics????
One note. Tag apologized to Obama with "dad" watching on stage after the debate when the families were "mingling". I think dad made him do it. He really looked like he was "begging". Talk about "apology tour".
See my sig - or click here
Pants On Fire Mitt Romney tells 616 Lies in 33 Weeks | Addicting Info
===========================
I know that some are saying the little twerp apologized to the president of the United States but did he really?
===========================
Yes, he DID say it.
Romney: Russia Is 'No. 1 Geopolitical Foe' - YouTube
Pretty bad when luddy calls you a lying sack of shit, rdean.
LOL
Go read his post again.
Ninny.
I'm genuinely curious if Romney claimed that he never said Russia is a geo political foe, because that's not what he said at the debate last night. Also, in regards to that op-ed article he wrote, he didn't choose the title...the NYT did.
And destroy his silly strawman arguments?
LOL
I'm genuinely curious if Romney claimed that he never said Russia is a geo political foe, because that's not what he said at the debate last night. Also, in regards to that op-ed article he wrote, he didn't choose the title...the NYT did.
Romney was quibbling about whether he said "threat" or "foe". And while he may not have chosen the title, he said in subsequent interviews that letting the Auto Industry go bankrupt was the right thing to do. If you read the OpEd, he wanted those things to happen because he thought price of American labor was to high and that the Auto industry should "consolidate". In other words, monopoly and a destruction of Unions.
That's not what he's saying now by the way. He wants people get jobs and to make "higher wages". But really, unless the government introduces some sort of legislation to make that happen, without labor unions, and fewer places to work..wages will stay stagnant.
And destroy his silly strawman arguments?
LOL
I'm genuinely curious if Romney claimed that he never said Russia is a geo political foe, because that's not what he said at the debate last night. Also, in regards to that op-ed article he wrote, he didn't choose the title...the NYT did.
Romney was quibbling about whether he said "threat" or "foe". And while he may not have chosen the title, he said in subsequent interviews that letting the Auto Industry go bankrupt was the right thing to do. If you read the OpEd, he wanted those things to happen because he thought price of American labor was to high and that the Auto industry should "consolidate". In other words, monopoly and a destruction of Unions.
That's not what he's saying now by the way. He wants people get jobs and to make "higher wages". But really, unless the government introduces some sort of legislation to make that happen, without labor unions, and fewer places to work..wages will stay stagnant.
And destroy his silly strawman arguments?
LOL
I'm genuinely curious if Romney claimed that he never said Russia is a geo political foe, because that's not what he said at the debate last night. Also, in regards to that op-ed article he wrote, he didn't choose the title...the NYT did.
Romney was quibbling about whether he said "threat" or "foe". And while he may not have chosen the title, he said in subsequent interviews that letting the Auto Industry go bankrupt was the right thing to do. If you read the OpEd, he wanted those things to happen because he thought price of American labor was to high and that the Auto industry should "consolidate". In other words, monopoly and a destruction of Unions.
That's not what he's saying now by the way. He wants people get jobs and to make "higher wages". But really, unless the government introduces some sort of legislation to make that happen, without labor unions, and fewer places to work..wages will stay stagnant.
Romney is using a totally new method on running for political office. I don't know of anyone that has tried this tack before, I mean of being all things to all people. Speaking to the general public he is liberal, to his party he is conservative. Does his party know if this is real or a new political strategy, sort of a wink wink strategy. Makes one wonder does the man have no principles at all, or is this a new method and it might work? And the bigger question if it does work what will it mean for America?
YOU? Of all people, preaching the bible?
I just hate it when non-christians preach the bible.
SHAME on you.
He'll say ANYTHING to get elected. The dupes are a disgrace.
Mitt Romney has changed every position he's had for the last two years in the last three weeks.
Remember "Geo Political Foe" and the news it made? Romney never said it.
Let Detroit go "Bankrupt". Never wrote that article.
Out of Afghanistan by 2014. Good idea. Never had any other position.
The question here is if a candidate can change every position in the last couple of weeks, and the press doesn't challenge him, can anyone say anything and win? What does that say about American Politics????
One note. Tag apologized to Obama with "dad" watching on stage after the debate when the families were "mingling". I think dad made him do it. He really looked like he was "begging". Talk about "apology tour".
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hY_7pH5XV_w]Romney: Russia Is 'No. 1 Geopolitical Foe' - YouTube[/ame]
I'm genuinely curious if Romney claimed that he never said Russia is a geo political foe, because that's not what he said at the debate last night. Also, in regards to that op-ed article he wrote, he didn't choose the title...the NYT did.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hY_7pH5XV_w]Romney: Russia Is 'No. 1 Geopolitical Foe' - YouTube[/ame]And destroy his silly strawman arguments?
LOL
I'm genuinely curious if Romney claimed that he never said Russia is a geo political foe, because that's not what he said at the debate last night. Also, in regards to that op-ed article he wrote, he didn't choose the title...the NYT did.
Edit:: It's at the 40 second mark. *shrugs* He does go on later though... So watch the whole thing.
Just... Because
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHDASkfrFUg]Mitt Romney: Russia is a geopolitical foe - YouTube[/ame]