Do you really not see the intellectual dishonesty in that statement? Not being rude, just wondering is all.
just because bush did it at a slower rate than obama doesn't change the overall numbers (I assume that is what you are referring to)
So you do recognize the intellectual dishonesty. OK. At least you admit that yer comparing apples to oranges. Carry on with your fallacy then.
so when I say bush has appointed more I am still correct right