Minnesota is trying to rig the 2024 election

TroglocratsRdumb

Diamond Member
Aug 11, 2017
36,082
46,096
2,915

The case centers around the Fourteenth Amendment, specifically Section 3’s “Insurrection Clause.” Plaintiffs argue President Trump’s actions on January 6, 2021, disqualify him from appearing on the ballot.
Similar lawsuits have been filed in other states, including Colorado, where a state trial judge heard arguments all week.
The Supreme Court has never ruled on this provision of the Fourteenth Amendment, leading to the novel approach to use it to keep Trump off the ballot.

Trump’s attorneys argue that the amendment does not apply to presidents. The text of the amendment references Senators, Representatives, and Presidential electors, as well as other federal officials, but not the presidents.

The oath the amendment specifies, which is sworn by those listed officials, is not the same oath sworn by presidents. The presidential oath is prescribed separately in the Constitution.

Trump’s attorneys further argue that neither Minnesota law nor federal law allow the courts to strike a candidate from the ballot.

Specific to Trump’s case, his legal team insists that what occurred on January 6, 2001 was not an insurrection and that Trump himself was not responsible.

Comment:
The Crazy Democrat Cult claims that they are saving our "democracy".
Their version of "democracy" means removing opponents from the ballot, rigged elections, mass voter fraud, ballot stuffing, neo-marxist one party rule, police state surveillance and suppression....
 

The case centers around the Fourteenth Amendment, specifically Section 3’s “Insurrection Clause.” Plaintiffs argue President Trump’s actions on January 6, 2021, disqualify him from appearing on the ballot.
Similar lawsuits have been filed in other states, including Colorado, where a state trial judge heard arguments all week.
The Supreme Court has never ruled on this provision of the Fourteenth Amendment, leading to the novel approach to use it to keep Trump off the ballot.

Trump’s attorneys argue that the amendment does not apply to presidents. The text of the amendment references Senators, Representatives, and Presidential electors, as well as other federal officials, but not the presidents.

The oath the amendment specifies, which is sworn by those listed officials, is not the same oath sworn by presidents. The presidential oath is prescribed separately in the Constitution.

Trump’s attorneys further argue that neither Minnesota law nor federal law allow the courts to strike a candidate from the ballot.

Specific to Trump’s case, his legal team insists that what occurred on January 6, 2001 was not an insurrection and that Trump himself was not responsible.

Comment:
The Crazy Democrat Cult claims that they are saving our "democracy".
Their version of "democracy" means removing opponents from the ballot, rigged elections, mass voter fraud, ballot stuffing, neo-marxist one party rule, police state surveillance and suppression....
To be more clear, Democrats are trying to rig elections, again!
 
Boy ya woud think they wouldnt care since its a solid blue shithole
Minnesota has one of the best qualities of life, one of the longest life expectancies, and is overall one of the best governed states in the country. This is all statistics.
 
Minnesota has one of the best qualities of life, one of the longest life expectancies, and is overall one of the best governed states in the country. This is all statistics.
So well governed that dozens of business which were HQ-ed near the borders with the Dakotas, Iowa, and Wisconsin have had jumped those borders into a better business environment.....So well governed, that 3M has to be begged and pleaded to not move their HQ out of the state every few years....So well governed that the MPLS 3rd Precinct still doesn't have a HQ, three years after a violent goon squad burned it to through and through.

Yeah, "well governed". :icon_rolleyes:
 

The case centers around the Fourteenth Amendment, specifically Section 3’s “Insurrection Clause.” Plaintiffs argue President Trump’s actions on January 6, 2021, disqualify him from appearing on the ballot.
Similar lawsuits have been filed in other states, including Colorado, where a state trial judge heard arguments all week.
The Supreme Court has never ruled on this provision of the Fourteenth Amendment, leading to the novel approach to use it to keep Trump off the ballot.

Trump’s attorneys argue that the amendment does not apply to presidents. The text of the amendment references Senators, Representatives, and Presidential electors, as well as other federal officials, but not the presidents.

The oath the amendment specifies, which is sworn by those listed officials, is not the same oath sworn by presidents. The presidential oath is prescribed separately in the Constitution.

Trump’s attorneys further argue that neither Minnesota law nor federal law allow the courts to strike a candidate from the ballot.

Specific to Trump’s case, his legal team insists that what occurred on January 6, 2001 was not an insurrection and that Trump himself was not responsible.

Comment:
The Crazy Democrat Cult claims that they are saving our "democracy".
Their version of "democracy" means removing opponents from the ballot, rigged elections, mass voter fraud, ballot stuffing, neo-marxist one party rule, police state surveillance and suppression....
They can't keep him off the ballot.
 
Minnesota has one of the best qualities of life, one of the longest life expectancies, and is overall one of the best governed states in the country. This is all statistics.
Yeah no. MPLS shithole central Gov almost doubled the budget spending 16 billion surplus, worst roads in the country. South MPLS is solid somali.....and people are leaving......wonder why that would be eh
 

The case centers around the Fourteenth Amendment, specifically Section 3’s “Insurrection Clause.” Plaintiffs argue President Trump’s actions on January 6, 2021, disqualify him from appearing on the ballot.
Similar lawsuits have been filed in other states, including Colorado, where a state trial judge heard arguments all week.
The Supreme Court has never ruled on this provision of the Fourteenth Amendment, leading to the novel approach to use it to keep Trump off the ballot.

Trump’s attorneys argue that the amendment does not apply to presidents. The text of the amendment references Senators, Representatives, and Presidential electors, as well as other federal officials, but not the presidents.

The oath the amendment specifies, which is sworn by those listed officials, is not the same oath sworn by presidents. The presidential oath is prescribed separately in the Constitution.

Trump’s attorneys further argue that neither Minnesota law nor federal law allow the courts to strike a candidate from the ballot.

Specific to Trump’s case, his legal team insists that what occurred on January 6, 2001 was not an insurrection and that Trump himself was not responsible.

Comment:
The Crazy Democrat Cult claims that they are saving our "democracy".
Their version of "democracy" means removing opponents from the ballot, rigged elections, mass voter fraud, ballot stuffing, neo-marxist one party rule, police state surveillance and suppression....
It's just the latest Democrat scam to cheat elections.

Like the "Interstate Popular Vote Compact" which is totally unConstitutional, but they tried that crap as early as 2017.

What they ought to be is hanged for being the traitors that they are.

Don't even try to tell me the 2020 election was legit with BS like this going on.

Democrat leftist shitlords are scared to death of the truth and Democracy.
 
Minnesota has one of the best qualities of life, one of the longest life expectancies, and is overall one of the best governed states in the country. This is all statistics.
How many Somalians are in Minneapolis, shitlord?

That place may have to be white phosphoroused.
 
It's just the latest Democrat scam to cheat elections.

Like the "Interstate Popular Vote Compact" which is totally unConstitutional, but they tried that crap as early as 2017.

What they ought to be is hanged for being the traitors that they are.

Don't even try to tell me the 2020 election was legit with BS like this going on.

Democrat leftist shitlords are scared to death of the truth and Democracy.

Maybe I am dense, but what about the IPVC is unconstitutional? There's nothing in the Constitution specifying that the popular vote winner in each state automatically gets that state's electoral votes.
 
Maybe I am dense, but what about the IPVC is unconstitutional? There's nothing in the Constitution specifying that the popular vote winner in each state automatically gets that state's electoral votes.
Yeah, you're a stupid turd. Learn moar.
 

Forum List

Back
Top