saveliberty
Diamond Member
- Oct 12, 2009
- 58,756
- 10,842
- 2,030
We are in the unenviable position of having to defend Prof. Seidman's free speech rights ironicly.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We are in the unenviable position of having to defend Prof. Seidman's free speech rights ironicly.
Megyn Kelly Challenges Professor Who Wants America to Give Up U.S. Constitution
By Billy Hallowell
12/7/2013
Many Americans were shocked to learn about Georgetown University Professor Louis Michael Seidmans advocation for the U.S. to abandon the Constitution the central document that has helped spawn Americas growth and progression for hundreds of years. As previously reported, the constitutional expert recently noted his belief (via an op-ed) that a blind allegiance to the outdated document is perilous. On Friday, he defended his controversial views about some purportedly evil provisions in the Constitution in an interview with Fox News Megyn Kelly.
[Excerpt]
Read more:
Megyn Kelly Challenges Professor Who Wants America to Give Up U.S. Constitution (Plus: Judge Napolitano Reacts!) | Video | TheBlaze.com
Are you saying the carpet doesn't match the drapes?I challenged her to put down the bleach bottle once. Never heard back.
I agree with Megyn, what he's saying is interesting and thought provoking. For crying out loud, don't blindly write off what he is saying, lest you give credence to his points.
Yet still, that raises the question, with what would you replace it?
Megyn Kelly Challenges Professor Who Wants America to Give Up U.S. Constitution
The only thing needed to be given up is the guns, once all guns are gone, and out of the control of the average schmoe, then we will be able to create laws and remove them to serve our interests when and where we see fit, at that point if it tickles our fancy, we can just abolish the constitution, or bring it back when needed for certain situations.
Megyn Kelly Challenges Professor Who Wants America to ‘Give Up’ U.S. Constitution
By Billy Hallowell
12/7/2013
Many Americans were shocked to learn about Georgetown University Professor Louis Michael Seidman’s advocation for the U.S. to abandon the Constitution — the central document that has helped spawn America’s growth and progression for hundreds of years. As previously reported, the constitutional expert recently noted his belief (via an op-ed) that a blind allegiance to the outdated document is perilous. On Friday, he defended his controversial views about some purportedly “evil” provisions in the Constitution in an interview with Fox News’ Megyn Kelly.
[Excerpt]
Read more:
Megyn Kelly Challenges Professor Who Wants America to ‘Give Up’ U.S. Constitution (Plus: Judge Napolitano Reacts!) | Video | TheBlaze.com
Megyn should pose nude in Playboy.
Admit it - you would buy it.Megyn Kelly Challenges Professor Who Wants America to ‘Give Up’ U.S. Constitution
By Billy Hallowell
12/7/2013
Many Americans were shocked to learn about Georgetown University Professor Louis Michael Seidman’s advocation for the U.S. to abandon the Constitution — the central document that has helped spawn America’s growth and progression for hundreds of years. As previously reported, the constitutional expert recently noted his belief (via an op-ed) that a blind allegiance to the outdated document is perilous. On Friday, he defended his controversial views about some purportedly “evil” provisions in the Constitution in an interview with Fox News’ Megyn Kelly.
[Excerpt]
Read more:
Megyn Kelly Challenges Professor Who Wants America to ‘Give Up’ U.S. Constitution (Plus: Judge Napolitano Reacts!) | Video | TheBlaze.com
Megyn should pose nude in Playboy.
And you should eat your own liver.
Laying back and playing dead when someone assaults the Constitution is not what made America great. Wise planning and sensible discussion backed with a belief in higher principles is. Causing mankind to be subservient to a large federal government is something our forbears eschewed and solicited a system of human rights to procure liberty to succeeding generations--if we can keep it.I agree with Megyn, what he's saying is interesting and thought provoking. For crying out loud, don't blindly write off what he is saying, lest you give credence to his points.
I think that we can.
He has no points...The Constitution hasn't had anything more than lip service paid to it for at least the last century.I agree with Megyn, what he's saying is interesting and thought provoking. For crying out loud, don't blindly write off what he is saying, lest you give credence to his points.
The very notion that he claims that we've paid "blind allegiance" to it, when generations of politicians and bureaucrats have worked overtime to circumvent and plain old ignore its constraints, betray him as a crank from the word go.
Megyn Kelly Challenges Professor Who Wants America to Give Up U.S. Constitution
By Billy Hallowell
12/7/2013
Many Americans were shocked to learn about Georgetown University Professor Louis Michael Seidmans advocation for the U.S. to abandon the Constitution the central document that has helped spawn Americas growth and progression for hundreds of years. As previously reported, the constitutional expert recently noted his belief (via an op-ed) that a blind allegiance to the outdated document is perilous. On Friday, he defended his controversial views about some purportedly evil provisions in the Constitution in an interview with Fox News Megyn Kelly.
[Excerpt]
Read more:
Megyn Kelly Challenges Professor Who Wants America to Give Up U.S. Constitution (Plus: Judge Napolitano Reacts!) | Video | TheBlaze.com
megyn kelly challenges professor who wants america to give up u.s. Constitution
I wonder if the guy can apply for citizenship in Cuba or somewhere. I am so sick of these pseudo intellectuals spouting this crap. It's disgusting that these radicals are actually teaching young people. They seek to indoctrinate and spread their narrow views and they have successfully dumbed down millions of people.
If that's true, than I agree, scrap it. We need laws intended for free people, unrestrained by any other person's notions of acceptable morality or religiousness.
If that's true, than I agree, scrap it. We need laws intended for free people, unrestrained by any other person's notions of acceptable morality or religiousness.
If people were angles, we wouldn't need government. If politicians were angles, we wouldn't need the Constitution. If both were angles, we wouldn't need the 2nd Amendment.