Meghan McCain tells us how she really feels!

affirmative action was put in place for a reason and yes now there is not a need for it in most
aspects.
And as for the homeless with mental illness maybe they should be able to have health care so they can seek out help for their illness.Rich people use therapy as verbal masterbation while others can't afforf the help they need.And as for racistsmaybe we should put them in constration camps just like we did to the Japanese!
And as for homeless people I worked at a large city park where many homeless people lived and quite a few of them were vets! I also cleaned up after them quite a bit. Tell me a person who shits in a drinking fountain for no reason is sane!
 
affirmative action was put in place for a reason and yes now there is not a need for it in most
aspects.
And as for the homeless with mental illness maybe they should be able to have health care so they can seek out help for their illness.Rich people use therapy as verbal masterbation while others can't afforf the help they need.And as for racistsmaybe we should put them in constration camps just like we did to the Japanese!

I realize it was put in place for a reason but I do not consider than reason a legitimate one.

After we put racists in concentration camps, who's next? Blondes? Democrats? Republicans? Fat people? Skinny people?

I see as WAY more public hatred displayed/voiced by Republicans/conservatives and Democrats/liberals than I do racists. Gues it just depends on what you hate, huh?

Y'know, an un-PC as it is to say, some people are just FUBAR in the head. medical care is akin to throwing money down the toilet.

Whose money do you propose to fix all this with? You want to add even more punishment onto what the successful already get just lifted from their pockets you can sleep good at night?

How about doing what we used to do? We kept nuts in nuthouses instead of the city park.
 
Oh, and you can't call me sexist until I complain about kirk wearing lipstick.:cool:
But you might not like me because I am get finacial aide because I am single mom but I couldn't get seven years ago because my parents made to much but not enough to pay for all of my college.Another way the middle class get screwed!!
 
How about doing what we used to do? We kept nuts in nuthouses instead of the city park.

wasn't it dear ole Ronnie who opened up those nuthouses and let them all run free?
 
wasn't it dear ole Ronnie who opened up those nuthouses and let them all run free?

I really don't know who it was, nor do I care. People who are incapable of rational thought or caring for themselves do not need to be wandering the streets.

Throwing them out on the street was wrong, no matter who did it. They stink, are a nuisance, and in some instances dangerous to both themselves and others.

I have NO problem with my tax dollars going toward taking care of those who TRULY NEED the care and have never said otherwise. There is a time and place for certain social policies that just make good sense that I do not and never have opposed.

This would be one of them.
 
this is all stupid...

$mad-hatter-2.jpg

Madness! Madness I say! :lol:
 
But you might not like me because I am get finacial aide because I am single mom but I couldn't get seven years ago because my parents made to much but not enough to pay for all of my college.Another way the middle class get screwed!!

Don't assume. I've been a single parent.

And my daughter got nothing for college because I make too much money. Been there done that.
 
Whose money do you propose to fix all this with? You want to add even more punishment onto what the successful already get just lifted from their pockets you can sleep good at night?

How about doing what we used to do? We kept nuts in nuthouses instead of the city park.
And to keep them in those nuthouses wouldn't that cost money so wouldn't that be money lifted from the successful. I guess we should just back to the way it was in this country when we first began not paying federal taxes and looked at how well that turned out. Didn't we have to come back and change the way were organized. I guess we wouldn't have had the civil war then either because the south wouldn't have been so pissed at the north so therefore we still have slavery, that would make the KKK happy and so there in long wrong we wouldn't of needed affirmative action because we would still own the minorities!
And also putting them in a nuthouse would be helping them in a way! Are you a socialist!
 
Don't assume. I've been a single parent.

And my daughter got nothing for college because I make too much money. Been there done that.
Maybe Michelle Obama parent's couldn't either! And would you have her not being educated and on welfare so you can support her!
 
Don't assume. I've been a single parent.

And my daughter got nothing for college because I make too much money. Been there done that.
But if we want higher education to cost less that also means we are a socialist! I guess I am a socialist. For one I want socialized medicine. For one I had to get pregnant to get health care even though I was working 50 to 60 hours a week and had been there at least a year but I had no health care.
 
And to keep them in those nuthouses wouldn't that cost money so wouldn't that be money lifted from the successful. I guess we should just back to the way it was in this country when we first began not paying federal taxes and looked at how well that turned out. Didn't we have to come back and change the way were organized. I guess we wouldn't have had the civil war then either because the south wouldn't have been so pissed at the north so therefore we still have slavery, that would make the KKK happy and so there in long wrong we wouldn't of needed affirmative action because we would still own the minorities!
And also putting them in a nuthouse would be helping them in a way! Are you a socialist!

Ummm ... there is no logic to your post. It's disjointed and there is no clear progression from the beginning that adds up to affirmative action.

I'm a pragmatist. As stated in my response to silence, I have no problem with social programs that work and have a reason and aren't merely perfect examples of bureaucratic bloat, fraud and waste.

I am for reform of the government and spending our money only on things it should be spent on, something NEITHER party is going to offer or change.
 
But if we want higher education to cost less that also means we are a socialist! I guess I am a socialist. For one I want socialized medicine. For one I had to get pregnant to get health care even though I was working 50 to 60 hours a week and had been there at least a year but I had no health care.

How is wanting higher education to cost less socialist? And I don't see how that ties into healthcare.

What you're saying is you want Big Brother to take care of you at my expense. No thanks. I'll take care of myself, and you should do the same.
 
Ummm ... there is no logic to your post. It's disjointed and there is no clear progression from the beginning that adds up to affirmative action.

I'm a pragmatist. As stated in my response to silence, I have no problem with social programs that work and have a reason and aren't merely perfect examples of bureaucratic bloat, fraud and waste.

I am for reform of the government and spending our money only on things it should be spent on, something NEITHER party is going to offer or change.
My point is if we still had slavery we wouldn't need affirmative action. ANd you missed what I was saying. We pay taxes for a reason and and yes some of those tax dollars go to stupid projects as in Wassila, what those earmarks pay for. Shouldn't city property taxes or state taxdollars of paid for them. Why should I have to pay for a hockey rink in Alaska.
And my post wasn't really suppose to be logical!
 
How is wanting higher education to cost less socialist? And I don't see how that ties into healthcare.

What you're saying is you want Big Brother to take care of you at my expense. No thanks. I'll take care of myself, and you should do the same.

I do take care of myself and I pay taxes also and if making companies offer people you work full time provide health for such employees worked then we would not need socialized medicine. Look at companies like Walmart and Kmart, which I worked for the latter .they work you 40 hours for five weeks and the 6th week where you would become elible for health care they cut you down to 31 hours.
 
Don't assume. I've been a single parent.

And my daughter got nothing for college because I make too much money. Been there done that.
on a lighter note I do commend you for being a single parent and this might be sexist but it restores my belief in men alittle. Maybe you can teach my son's father a few things.
 
I really don't know who it was, nor do I care. People who are incapable of rational thought or caring for themselves do not need to be wandering the streets.

Throwing them out on the street was wrong, no matter who did it. They stink, are a nuisance, and in some instances dangerous to both themselves and others.

I have NO problem with my tax dollars going toward taking care of those who TRULY NEED the care and have never said otherwise. There is a time and place for certain social policies that just make good sense that I do not and never have opposed.

This would be one of them.

I agree with you 1000%!

Downside of Reagan legacy

As president, though, Reagan pursued policies that were short-sighted, reckless and, for many, hurtful. His economic legacy is one of deplorable disregard for the consequences of his actions, and the ramifications of Reagan's decisions remain with us to this day.

but it was Reagan and we still feel the devastating affects of his actions today..
 

Forum List

Back
Top