Medical Journal Suggests Loss of Employment for Any Person Who Refuses to Take COVID-19 Vaccine

[JustAGuy1]

BIG LEAGUE WELLNESS
Medical Journal Suggests Loss of Employment for Any Person Who Refuses to Take COVID-19 Vaccine


An article in the New England Journal of Medicine has suggested that “substantive penalties” be used to enforce compliance in taking the upcoming COVID-19 vaccine, including loss of employment.

The journal published an article on June 26 titled, “Ensuring Uptake of Vaccines against SARS-CoV-2.” They suggested that the suspension of employment would be a less coercive manner of enforcing vaccine compliance than fines or other criminal penalties.

The report states that “state mandates should not be structured as compulsory vaccination (absolute requirements); instead, noncompliance should incur a penalty.”

Latest: ANTIFA Throws What Appears to be a BOMB At the Hatfield Federal Courthouse

“Nevertheless, because of the infectiousness and dangerousness of the virus, relatively substantive penalties could be justified, including employment suspension or stay-at-home orders for persons in designated high-priority groups who refuse vaccination. Neither fines nor criminal penalties should be used, however; fines disadvantage the poor, and criminal penalties invite legal challenges on procedural due-process grounds. Both are bad public health policy for a Covid-19 vaccine because they may stoke distrust without improving uptake,” the report continues.

The authors of the report are particularly perturbed that fewer than half of Americans plan to get the COVID-19 inoculation when it is available. They are focused on public policy proposal that would coerce more Americans into getting stuck with the shot.

Medical Journal Suggests Loss of Employment for Any Person Who Refuses to Take COVID-19 Vaccine - Big League Politics

The Orwellian nightmare is really starting to take shape due to the pandemic.

bigleaguepolitics.com

What country do we live in again?

 

[boedicca]

BIG LEAGUE WELLNESS
Medical Journal Suggests Loss of Employment for Any Person Who Refuses to Take COVID-19 Vaccine


An article in the New England Journal of Medicine has suggested that “substantive penalties” be used to enforce compliance in taking the upcoming COVID-19 vaccine, including loss of employment.

The journal published an article on June 26 titled, “Ensuring Uptake of Vaccines against SARS-CoV-2.” They suggested that the suspension of employment would be a less coercive manner of enforcing vaccine compliance than fines or other criminal penalties.

The report states that “state mandates should not be structured as compulsory vaccination (absolute requirements); instead, noncompliance should incur a penalty.”

Latest: ANTIFA Throws What Appears to be a BOMB At the Hatfield Federal Courthouse

“Nevertheless, because of the infectiousness and dangerousness of the virus, relatively substantive penalties could be justified, including employment suspension or stay-at-home orders for persons in designated high-priority groups who refuse vaccination. Neither fines nor criminal penalties should be used, however; fines disadvantage the poor, and criminal penalties invite legal challenges on procedural due-process grounds. Both are bad public health policy for a Covid-19 vaccine because they may stoke distrust without improving uptake,” the report continues.

The authors of the report are particularly perturbed that fewer than half of Americans plan to get the COVID-19 inoculation when it is available. They are focused on public policy proposal that would coerce more Americans into getting stuck with the shot.

Medical Journal Suggests Loss of Employment for Any Person Who Refuses to Take COVID-19 Vaccine - Big League Politics

The Orwellian nightmare is really starting to take shape due to the pandemic.

bigleaguepolitics.com

What country do we live in again?

Amerikka

 

[toobfreak]

BIG LEAGUE WELLNESS
Medical Journal Suggests Loss of Employment for Any Person Who Refuses to Take COVID-19 Vaccine


An article in the New England Journal of Medicine has suggested that “substantive penalties” be used to enforce compliance in taking the upcoming COVID-19 vaccine, including loss of employment.

The journal published an article on June 26 titled, “Ensuring Uptake of Vaccines against SARS-CoV-2.” They suggested that the suspension of employment would be a less coercive manner of enforcing vaccine compliance than fines or other criminal penalties.

The report states that “state mandates should not be structured as compulsory vaccination (absolute requirements); instead, noncompliance should incur a penalty.”

Latest: ANTIFA Throws What Appears to be a BOMB At the Hatfield Federal Courthouse

“Nevertheless, because of the infectiousness and dangerousness of the virus, relatively substantive penalties could be justified, including employment suspension or stay-at-home orders for persons in designated high-priority groups who refuse vaccination. Neither fines nor criminal penalties should be used, however; fines disadvantage the poor, and criminal penalties invite legal challenges on procedural due-process grounds. Both are bad public health policy for a Covid-19 vaccine because they may stoke distrust without improving uptake,” the report continues.

The authors of the report are particularly perturbed that fewer than half of Americans plan to get the COVID-19 inoculation when it is available. They are focused on public policy proposal that would coerce more Americans into getting stuck with the shot.

Medical Journal Suggests Loss of Employment for Any Person Who Refuses to Take COVID-19 Vaccine - Big League Politics

The Orwellian nightmare is really starting to take shape due to the pandemic.

bigleaguepolitics.com

What country do we live in again?

Soooo, 99.99% of the people all take the vaccine protecting them, but the 0.01% who don't take it are still such a threat to society they should be stamped out like a bug?

Gee, you've just made my mind up for me: anything the system wants me to do THAT BADLY they are willing to murder me over if I don't comply, I HAVE NO CHOICE BUT TO RESIST DOING WITH EVERY LAST FIBER OF MY BEING!

 

[jc456]

QUOTE="toobfreak, post: 25169471, member: 63059"]

BIG LEAGUE WELLNESS
Medical Journal Suggests Loss of Employment for Any Person Who Refuses to Take COVID-19 Vaccine


An article in the New England Journal of Medicine has suggested that “substantive penalties” be used to enforce compliance in taking the upcoming COVID-19 vaccine, including loss of employment.

The journal published an article on June 26 titled, “Ensuring Uptake of Vaccines against SARS-CoV-2.” They suggested that the suspension of employment would be a less coercive manner of enforcing vaccine compliance than fines or other criminal penalties.

The report states that “state mandates should not be structured as compulsory vaccination (absolute requirements); instead, noncompliance should incur a penalty.”

Latest: ANTIFA Throws What Appears to be a BOMB At the Hatfield Federal Courthouse

“Nevertheless, because of the infectiousness and dangerousness of the virus, relatively substantive penalties could be justified, including employment suspension or stay-at-home orders for persons in designated high-priority groups who refuse vaccination. Neither fines nor criminal penalties should be used, however; fines disadvantage the poor, and criminal penalties invite legal challenges on procedural due-process grounds. Both are bad public health policy for a Covid-19 vaccine because they may stoke distrust without improving uptake,” the report continues.

The authors of the report are particularly perturbed that fewer than half of Americans plan to get the COVID-19 inoculation when it is available. They are focused on public policy proposal that would coerce more Americans into getting stuck with the shot.

Medical Journal Suggests Loss of Employment for Any Person Who Refuses to Take COVID-19 Vaccine - Big League Politics

The Orwellian nightmare is really starting to take shape due to the pandemic.

bigleaguepolitics.com

What country do we live in again?

Soooo, 99.99% of the people all take the vaccine protecting them, but the 0.01% who don't take it are still such a threat to society they should be stamped out like a bug?

Gee, you've just made my mind up for me: anything the system wants me to do THAT BADLY they are willing to murder me over if I don't comply, I HAVE NO CHOICE BUT TO RESIST DOING WITH EVERY LAST FIBER OF MY BEING!
[/QUOTE]


Indeed

 

[shockedcanadian]

BIG LEAGUE WELLNESS
Medical Journal Suggests Loss of Employment for Any Person Who Refuses to Take COVID-19 Vaccine


An article in the New England Journal of Medicine has suggested that “substantive penalties” be used to enforce compliance in taking the upcoming COVID-19 vaccine, including loss of employment.

The journal published an article on June 26 titled, “Ensuring Uptake of Vaccines against SARS-CoV-2.” They suggested that the suspension of employment would be a less coercive manner of enforcing vaccine compliance than fines or other criminal penalties.

The report states that “state mandates should not be structured as compulsory vaccination (absolute requirements); instead, noncompliance should incur a penalty.”

Latest: ANTIFA Throws What Appears to be a BOMB At the Hatfield Federal Courthouse

“Nevertheless, because of the infectiousness and dangerousness of the virus, relatively substantive penalties could be justified, including employment suspension or stay-at-home orders for persons in designated high-priority groups who refuse vaccination. Neither fines nor criminal penalties should be used, however; fines disadvantage the poor, and criminal penalties invite legal challenges on procedural due-process grounds. Both are bad public health policy for a Covid-19 vaccine because they may stoke distrust without improving uptake,” the report continues.

The authors of the report are particularly perturbed that fewer than half of Americans plan to get the COVID-19 inoculation when it is available. They are focused on public policy proposal that would coerce more Americans into getting stuck with the shot.

Medical Journal Suggests Loss of Employment for Any Person Who Refuses to Take COVID-19 Vaccine - Big League Politics

The Orwellian nightmare is really starting to take shape due to the pandemic.

bigleaguepolitics.com

What country do we live in again?

Precisely why some are weary. Billionaires won't have to worry about such penalties. Many want to revert the USA back to the nation you separated from centuries ago. The new Kings and Queens live in Hollywood and ride on yachts. The serfs do as they are ordered...or else...

 

[SeaGal]

BIG LEAGUE WELLNESS
Medical Journal Suggests Loss of Employment for Any Person Who Refuses to Take COVID-19 Vaccine


...“Nevertheless, because of the infectiousness and dangerousness of the virus, relatively substantive penalties could be justified, including employment suspension or stay-at-home orders for persons in designated high-priority groups who refuse vaccination. Neither fines nor criminal penalties should be used, however; fines disadvantage the poor, and criminal penalties invite legal challenges on procedural due-process grounds. Both are bad public health policy for a Covid-19 vaccine because they may stoke distrust without improving uptake,” the report continues.


What country do we live in again?

All I can say is WOW.

A group of medical professionals trying to circumvent the legal system urging a government entity to pressure private businesses to 'punish' employees who refuse to take a vaccine, (paid for by whom?) a decision that should be between an individual and their physician only. I guess HIPPAA be damned - wonder who's going to get rich on the vaccine?

 

[shockedcanadian]

BIG LEAGUE WELLNESS
Medical Journal Suggests Loss of Employment for Any Person Who Refuses to Take COVID-19 Vaccine


...“Nevertheless, because of the infectiousness and dangerousness of the virus, relatively substantive penalties could be justified, including employment suspension or stay-at-home orders for persons in designated high-priority groups who refuse vaccination. Neither fines nor criminal penalties should be used, however; fines disadvantage the poor, and criminal penalties invite legal challenges on procedural due-process grounds. Both are bad public health policy for a Covid-19 vaccine because they may stoke distrust without improving uptake,” the report continues.


What country do we live in again?

All I can say is WOW.

A group of medical professionals trying to circumvent the legal system urging a government entity to pressure private businesses to 'punish' employees who refuse to take a vaccine, (paid for by whom?) a decision that should be between an individual and their physician only. I guess HIPPAA be damned - wonder who's going to get rich on the vaccine?

This pressure of private businesses has been going on for a century in Canada. Instead of health officials, it's covert police on behalf of the government and/or their "gang".

Welcome to your future. So many wanted to move to Canada, but it seems you are importing the rest of the worlds socialists ways. As I've screamed 1000x, even to some heavy hitters on twitter who understand history, "the worst aspect of socialism is not economic...."

Welcome to centralized, unrelenting power. We are seeing it unfolding across the West due to this pandemic like never before.

 

[irosie91]

the FACTS are that vaccines are MANDATORY for all kinds of situations.------PUBLIC SCHOOL, MILITARY,
EMPLOYMENT IN HOSPITALS ----etc The wording of the DEMAND seems abrupt do me-----but it really not so FAR OUT

 

[jc456]

BIG LEAGUE WELLNESS
Medical Journal Suggests Loss of Employment for Any Person Who Refuses to Take COVID-19 Vaccine


...“Nevertheless, because of the infectiousness and dangerousness of the virus, relatively substantive penalties could be justified, including employment suspension or stay-at-home orders for persons in designated high-priority groups who refuse vaccination. Neither fines nor criminal penalties should be used, however; fines disadvantage the poor, and criminal penalties invite legal challenges on procedural due-process grounds. Both are bad public health policy for a Covid-19 vaccine because they may stoke distrust without improving uptake,” the report continues.


What country do we live in again?

All I can say is WOW.

A group of medical professionals trying to circumvent the legal system urging a government entity to pressure private businesses to 'punish' employees who refuse to take a vaccine, (paid for by whom?) a decision that should be between an individual and their physician only. I guess HIPPAA be damned - wonder who's going to get rich on the vaccine?

hippa anyone?

 

[jc456]

the FACTS are that vaccines are MANDATORY for all kinds of situations.------PUBLIC SCHOOL, MILITARY,
EMPLOYMENT IN HOSPITALS ----etc The wording of the DEMAND seems abrupt do me-----but it really not so FAR OUT

I know of no mandatory vaccine. which ones?

 

[shockedcanadian]

the FACTS are that vaccines are MANDATORY for all kinds of situations.------PUBLIC SCHOOL, MILITARY,
EMPLOYMENT IN HOSPITALS ----etc The wording of the DEMAND seems abrupt do me-----but it really not so FAR OUT

Here is the response I would have "if YOU get the vaccine and can no longer catch the virus, why in the hell do you care if I want to risk my life or not? It won't impact you".

 

[SeaGal]

the FACTS are that vaccines are MANDATORY for all kinds of situations.------PUBLIC SCHOOL, MILITARY,
EMPLOYMENT IN HOSPITALS ----etc The wording of the DEMAND seems abrupt do me-----but it really not so FAR OUT

It's very far-out. It's one thing to have a vaccine as a requirement of 'entry' into a school (which can be exempted, btw) or a military or health care professional position...another entirely to require a vaccine to keep your job....at a bank, a carwash, a grocery store, etc. I don't know how they get around HIPPAA with this one.

 

[irosie91]

the FACTS are that vaccines are MANDATORY for all kinds of situations.------PUBLIC SCHOOL, MILITARY,
EMPLOYMENT IN HOSPITALS ----etc The wording of the DEMAND seems abrupt do me-----but it really not so FAR OUT

I know of no mandatory vaccine. which ones?

I am not current on the CDC protocols. Used to be
DPT for kids then came the POLIO vaccines----PLUS-PpD and chest Xray for hospital work
and once you are in the military------you get punctured like a pin-cushion to fulfill an ever changing list of requirements. <<<< not a complete list.

 

[Cecilie1200]

BIG LEAGUE WELLNESS
Medical Journal Suggests Loss of Employment for Any Person Who Refuses to Take COVID-19 Vaccine


An article in the New England Journal of Medicine has suggested that “substantive penalties” be used to enforce compliance in taking the upcoming COVID-19 vaccine, including loss of employment.

The journal published an article on June 26 titled, “Ensuring Uptake of Vaccines against SARS-CoV-2.” They suggested that the suspension of employment would be a less coercive manner of enforcing vaccine compliance than fines or other criminal penalties.

The report states that “state mandates should not be structured as compulsory vaccination (absolute requirements); instead, noncompliance should incur a penalty.”

Latest: ANTIFA Throws What Appears to be a BOMB At the Hatfield Federal Courthouse

“Nevertheless, because of the infectiousness and dangerousness of the virus, relatively substantive penalties could be justified, including employment suspension or stay-at-home orders for persons in designated high-priority groups who refuse vaccination. Neither fines nor criminal penalties should be used, however; fines disadvantage the poor, and criminal penalties invite legal challenges on procedural due-process grounds. Both are bad public health policy for a Covid-19 vaccine because they may stoke distrust without improving uptake,” the report continues.

The authors of the report are particularly perturbed that fewer than half of Americans plan to get the COVID-19 inoculation when it is available. They are focused on public policy proposal that would coerce more Americans into getting stuck with the shot.

Medical Journal Suggests Loss of Employment for Any Person Who Refuses to Take COVID-19 Vaccine - Big League Politics

The Orwellian nightmare is really starting to take shape due to the pandemic.

bigleaguepolitics.com

What country do we live in again?

It's not what country we live in. It's what country THEY WANT us to live in.

 

[irosie91]

the FACTS are that vaccines are MANDATORY for all kinds of situations.------PUBLIC SCHOOL, MILITARY,
EMPLOYMENT IN HOSPITALS ----etc The wording of the DEMAND seems abrupt do me-----but it really not so FAR OUT

Here is the response I would have "if YOU get the vaccine and can no longer catch the virus, why in the hell do you care if I want to risk my life or not? It won't impact you".

your response is remarkedly shallow. There are actually conditions that ATTENUATE the effectiveness of vaccines. A carrier can be a danger to an immunodeficient person

 

[Cecilie1200]

BIG LEAGUE WELLNESS
Medical Journal Suggests Loss of Employment for Any Person Who Refuses to Take COVID-19 Vaccine


...“Nevertheless, because of the infectiousness and dangerousness of the virus, relatively substantive penalties could be justified, including employment suspension or stay-at-home orders for persons in designated high-priority groups who refuse vaccination. Neither fines nor criminal penalties should be used, however; fines disadvantage the poor, and criminal penalties invite legal challenges on procedural due-process grounds. Both are bad public health policy for a Covid-19 vaccine because they may stoke distrust without improving uptake,” the report continues.


What country do we live in again?

All I can say is WOW.

A group of medical professionals trying to circumvent the legal system urging a government entity to pressure private businesses to 'punish' employees who refuse to take a vaccine, (paid for by whom?) a decision that should be between an individual and their physician only. I guess HIPPAA be damned - wonder who's going to get rich on the vaccine?

It's definitely a violation of HIPAA for employers to even ASK the employees if they got the vaccine.

 

[JustAGuy1]

I will not be getting the vaccine. Gates is saying it may take several injections. no conflict of interest there.

 

[August West]

It shouldn`t be difficult to have a data base of everyone who has had the vaccine. Employers won`t need to ask. Its also a way of finding out if the job applicant has a measurable IQ.

 

[Fueri]

Losing your job is way better than fines.

Interesting math.

What about people that don't work. Will they lose their benefits checks then?

Sticky wicket using any sorts of means to compel people. They should not under any circumstances start undertaking this sort of initiative on this matter or any other. Sticky wicket, meet slippery slope.

 

[SeaGal]

This pressure of private businesses has been going on for a century in Canada. Instead of health officials, it's covert police on behalf of the government and/or their "gang".

Welcome to your future. So many wanted to move to Canada, but it seems you are importing the rest of the worlds socialists ways. As I've screamed 1000x, even to some heavy hitters on twitter who understand history, "the worst aspect of socialism is not economic...."

Welcome to centralized, unrelenting power. We are seeing it unfolding across the West due to this pandemic like never before.

Hopefully our Constitution with its 10th Amendment will retard the growth of a 'centralized, unrelenting power'. I can't figure out how so many people ignore the fact, in all of our history, that absolute power crushes humanity and is inherently corrupt.