JohnnyApplesack
Gold Member
- Feb 8, 2011
- 2,660
- 355
- 130
McCain's a little late to the party but at least he showed up
Trump is one clueless POS, who the hell voted for this dope?
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
McCain: I'm 'Almost Speechless' Over Report Of Trump's Remarks To Russians
- Thread starter JohnnyApplesack
- Start date
McCain's a little late to the party but at least he showed up
Trump is one clueless POS, who the hell voted for this dope?
blastoff
Undocumented Reg. User
Almost, huh? Well, it's a start.
JohnnyApplesack
Gold Member
- Feb 8, 2011
- 2,660
- 355
- 130
- Thread starter
- #3
Almost, huh? Well, it's a start.
agreed, I would prefer he remains speechless forever, except on the rare occasions when he shows some backbone
- Mar 3, 2013
- 81,950
- 43,320
- 2,605
McCain's a little late to the party but at least he showed up
Trump is one clueless POS, who the hell voted for this dope?
Enough people, in enough areas, to elect him president.Trump is one clueless POS, who the hell voted for this dope?
One of these days, you'll figure that out.
JohnnyApplesack
Gold Member
- Feb 8, 2011
- 2,660
- 355
- 130
- Thread starter
- #5
McCain's a little late to the party but at least he showed up
Trump is one clueless POS, who the hell voted for this dope?
Enough people, in enough areas, to elect him president.Trump is one clueless POS, who the hell voted for this dope?
One of these days, you'll figure that out.
yeah, by a -3,000,000 votes
- Mar 3, 2013
- 81,950
- 43,320
- 2,605
McCain's a little late to the party but at least he showed up
Trump is one clueless POS, who the hell voted for this dope?
Enough people, in enough areas, to elect him president.Trump is one clueless POS, who the hell voted for this dope?
One of these days, you'll figure that out.
yeah, by a -3,000,000 votes
and about 70 electorals.
Which is what decides the presidency.
"One of these days, you'll figure that out."
JohnnyApplesack
Gold Member
- Feb 8, 2011
- 2,660
- 355
- 130
- Thread starter
- #7
McCain's a little late to the party but at least he showed up
Trump is one clueless POS, who the hell voted for this dope?
Enough people, in enough areas, to elect him president.Trump is one clueless POS, who the hell voted for this dope?
One of these days, you'll figure that out.
yeah, by a -3,000,000 votes
and about 70 electorals.
Which is what decides the presidency.
"One of these days, you'll figure that out."
yep, much lower than Clinton or Obama
weird how the last two repub presidents lost the popular vote, eh?
blastoff
Undocumented Reg. User
McCain's a little late to the party but at least he showed up
Trump is one clueless POS, who the hell voted for this dope?
Enough people, in enough areas, to elect him president.Trump is one clueless POS, who the hell voted for this dope?
One of these days, you'll figure that out.
Applaud your optimism but the scrotum of tiny crabapples won't ever figure out something so obvious.
MrShangles
Gold Member
- May 27, 2015
- 1,817
- 347
- 140
McCain's a little late to the party but at least he showed up
Trump is one clueless POS, who the hell voted for this dope?
Enough people, in enough areas, to elect him president.Trump is one clueless POS, who the hell voted for this dope?
One of these days, you'll figure that out.
yeah, by a -3,000,000 votes
To bad for you, that doesn't matter!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- Mar 3, 2013
- 81,950
- 43,320
- 2,605
McCain's a little late to the party but at least he showed up
Trump is one clueless POS, who the hell voted for this dope?
Enough people, in enough areas, to elect him president.Trump is one clueless POS, who the hell voted for this dope?
One of these days, you'll figure that out.
yeah, by a -3,000,000 votes
and about 70 electorals.
Which is what decides the presidency.
"One of these days, you'll figure that out."
yep, much lower than Clinton or Obama
weird how the last two repub presidents lost the popular vote, eh?
weird how the last two repub presidents lost the popular vote, eh?
and yet were elected president.
but then,
"One of these days, you'll figure that out."
McCain's a little late to the party but at least he showed up
Trump is one clueless POS, who the hell voted for this dope?
Enough people, in enough areas, to elect him president.Trump is one clueless POS, who the hell voted for this dope?
One of these days, you'll figure that out.
yeah, by a -3,000,000 votes
and about 70 electorals.
Which is what decides the presidency.
"One of these days, you'll figure that out."
yep, much lower than Clinton or Obama
weird how the last two repub presidents lost the popular vote, eh?
Repubs will never win another pop vote, or likely even an election, without realizing their regressive platform no longer serves the majority of Americans.
- Mar 3, 2013
- 81,950
- 43,320
- 2,605
McCain's a little late to the party but at least he showed up
Trump is one clueless POS, who the hell voted for this dope?
Enough people, in enough areas, to elect him president.Trump is one clueless POS, who the hell voted for this dope?
One of these days, you'll figure that out.
Applaud your optimism but the scrotum of tiny crabapples won't ever figure out something so obvious.
Just think....
one extra rally, in 3-4 flyover states, could have won her the presidency...
Shame she didn't have the political experience to know that
JohnnyApplesack
Gold Member
- Feb 8, 2011
- 2,660
- 355
- 130
- Thread starter
- #13
McCain's a little late to the party but at least he showed up
Trump is one clueless POS, who the hell voted for this dope?
Enough people, in enough areas, to elect him president.Trump is one clueless POS, who the hell voted for this dope?
One of these days, you'll figure that out.
yeah, by a -3,000,000 votes
To bad for you, that doesn't matter!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
no, too bad for the country
look away from Faux News and check out the damage so far
- Mar 3, 2013
- 81,950
- 43,320
- 2,605
McCain's a little late to the party but at least he showed up
Trump is one clueless POS, who the hell voted for this dope?
Enough people, in enough areas, to elect him president.Trump is one clueless POS, who the hell voted for this dope?
One of these days, you'll figure that out.
yeah, by a -3,000,000 votes
and about 70 electorals.
Which is what decides the presidency.
"One of these days, you'll figure that out."
yep, much lower than Clinton or Obama
weird how the last two repub presidents lost the popular vote, eh?
Repubs will never win another pop vote, or likely even an election, without realizing their regressive platform no longer serves the majority of Americans.
or likely even an election,
Didn't the Left make that claim when Bush was elected in 200?
Iceweasel
Diamond Member
We've been hearing that shit for 30 years.
McCain's a little late to the party but at least he showed up
Trump is one clueless POS, who the hell voted for this dope?
Enough people, in enough areas, to elect him president.Trump is one clueless POS, who the hell voted for this dope?
One of these days, you'll figure that out.
yeah, by a -3,000,000 votes
and about 70 electorals.
Which is what decides the presidency.
"One of these days, you'll figure that out."
yep, much lower than Clinton or Obama
weird how the last two repub presidents lost the popular vote, eh?
Repubs will never win another pop vote, or likely even an election, without realizing their regressive platform no longer serves the majority of Americans.
I'm talking future and you use evidence from the past? Not surprising. Not relevant.Repubs will never win another pop vote, or likely even an election, without realizing their regressive platform no longer serves the majority of Americans.Enough people, in enough areas, to elect him president.
One of these days, you'll figure that out.
yeah, by a -3,000,000 votes
and about 70 electorals.
Which is what decides the presidency.
"One of these days, you'll figure that out."
yep, much lower than Clinton or Obama
weird how the last two repub presidents lost the popular vote, eh?or likely even an election,
Didn't the Left make that claim when Bush was elected in 200?
- Mar 3, 2013
- 81,950
- 43,320
- 2,605
I'm talking future and you use evidence from the past? Not surprising. Not relevant.Repubs will never win another pop vote, or likely even an election, without realizing their regressive platform no longer serves the majority of Americans.yeah, by a -3,000,000 votes
and about 70 electorals.
Which is what decides the presidency.
"One of these days, you'll figure that out."
yep, much lower than Clinton or Obama
weird how the last two repub presidents lost the popular vote, eh?or likely even an election,
Didn't the Left make that claim when Bush was elected in 200?
Only a fool would consider history not relevant.
the left said It in 2000
2004 proved them wrong
said it again in 2005
2016 proved them wrong.
you're saying it again in 2017
How long before you're proven wrong again?
2020?
2024?
If you keep letting the elite decide who your candidate is, you'll be switching back and forth every 4-8 years.
Stop promoting Kerrys and Clintons
stop electing people with more baggage than they can carry
Staaawp it. GOP elected the worst candidate ever run.I'm talking future and you use evidence from the past? Not surprising. Not relevant.Repubs will never win another pop vote, or likely even an election, without realizing their regressive platform no longer serves the majority of Americans.and about 70 electorals.
Which is what decides the presidency.
"One of these days, you'll figure that out."
yep, much lower than Clinton or Obama
weird how the last two repub presidents lost the popular vote, eh?or likely even an election,
Didn't the Left make that claim when Bush was elected in 200?
Only a fool would consider history not relevant.
the left said It in 2000
2004 proved them wrong
said it again in 2005
2016 proved them wrong.
you're saying it again in 2017
How long before you're proven wrong again?
2020?
2024?
If you keep letting the elite decide who your candidate is, you'll be switching back and forth every 4-8 years.
Stop promoting Kerrys and Clintons
stop electing people with more baggage than they can carry
- Mar 3, 2013
- 81,950
- 43,320
- 2,605
Second worseStaaawp it. GOP elected the worst candidate ever run.I'm talking future and you use evidence from the past? Not surprising. Not relevant.Repubs will never win another pop vote, or likely even an election, without realizing their regressive platform no longer serves the majority of Americans.yep, much lower than Clinton or Obama
weird how the last two repub presidents lost the popular vote, eh?or likely even an election,
Didn't the Left make that claim when Bush was elected in 200?
Only a fool would consider history not relevant.
the left said It in 2000
2004 proved them wrong
said it again in 2005
2016 proved them wrong.
you're saying it again in 2017
How long before you're proven wrong again?
2020?
2024?
If you keep letting the elite decide who your candidate is, you'll be switching back and forth every 4-8 years.
Stop promoting Kerrys and Clintons
stop electing people with more baggage than they can carry
You forgot Hillary
2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 111,984
- 52,273
- 2,290
McCain's a little late to the party but at least he showed up
Trump is one clueless POS, who the hell voted for this dope?
mccain is a republican member of the democrat party...who cares what he says...?
Similar threads
- Replies
- 147
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 21
- Views
- 243
- Replies
- 5
- Views
- 158
- Replies
- 6
- Views
- 146
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 3
- Views
- 16
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8139
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 472
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-