Massachusetts Attorney General writes law banning assault weapons.!!!

[ShootSpeeders]

The attorney general is just a cop and is not allowed to write laws.!!!!

Massachusetts Attorney General Unilaterally Rewrites the State's Gun Laws , by Charles C. W. Cooke, National Review

july 20 2016 Without the legislature, without the governor, and without any form of public consultation, the attorney general of Massachusetts has today rewritten the state’s 1998 Gun Control Act. In an edict sent out this morning, AG Maura Healey explained that the law no longer meant what it had meant since 1998, but instead would mean what she wanted it to mean.

Writing in the Boston Globe, Healey outlined the changes: The Massachusetts assault weapons ban mirrors the federal ban Congress allowed to expire in 2004. It prohibits the sale of specific weapons like the Colt AR-15 and AK-47 and explicitly bans “copies or duplicates” of those weapons. But gun manufacturers have taken it upon themselves to define what a “copy” or “duplicate” weapon is. They market “state compliant” copycat versions of their assault weapons to Massachusetts buyers. They sell guns without a flash suppressor or folding or telescoping stock, for example, small tweaks that do nothing to limit the lethalness of the weapon. That will end now.

On Wednesday, we are sending a directive to all gun manufacturers and dealers that makes clear that the sale of these copycat assault weapons is illegal in Massachusetts. With this directive, we will ensure we get the full protection intended when lawmakers enacted our assault weapons ban, not the watered-down version of those protections offered by gun manufacturers.

 

[Judicial review]

The attorney general is just a cop and is not allowed to write laws.!!!!

Massachusetts Attorney General Unilaterally Rewrites the State's Gun Laws , by Charles C. W. Cooke, National Review

july 20 2016 Without the legislature, without the governor, and without any form of public consultation, the attorney general of Massachusetts has today rewritten the state’s 1998 Gun Control Act. In an edict sent out this morning, AG Maura Healey explained that the law no longer meant what it had meant since 1998, but instead would mean what she wanted it to mean.

Writing in the Boston Globe, Healey outlined the changes: The Massachusetts assault weapons ban mirrors the federal ban Congress allowed to expire in 2004. It prohibits the sale of specific weapons like the Colt AR-15 and AK-47 and explicitly bans “copies or duplicates” of those weapons. But gun manufacturers have taken it upon themselves to define what a “copy” or “duplicate” weapon is. They market “state compliant” copycat versions of their assault weapons to Massachusetts buyers. They sell guns without a flash suppressor or folding or telescoping stock, for example, small tweaks that do nothing to limit the lethalness of the weapon. That will end now.

On Wednesday, we are sending a directive to all gun manufacturers and dealers that makes clear that the sale of these copycat assault weapons is illegal in Massachusetts. With this directive, we will ensure we get the full protection intended when lawmakers enacted our assault weapons ban, not the watered-down version of those protections offered by gun manufacturers.

That AG credentials need to be checked including any judge that upholds it because any attorney can deem it unconstitutional before it gets to the USSC. Make sure you investigate the original wording of the law that it was not altered by backdoor attorney's before being written down which is also unconstitutional. That also would warrant immediate release of anybody victim jailed due to that law the way it was altered before or after this AG in MA or nationwide including other federal laws.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

The constitution says obama can't write laws either but he's written or re-written lots of them during his 8 years. The most lawless president in history and now other dems are copying him.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

Like to hear this witch justify her usurpation of the legislature. She would probably say, like Obama, that since the legislators are not doing anything, she is forced to take matters into her own hands.

 

[Judicial review]

Like to hear this witch justify her usurpation of the legislature. She would probably say, like Obama, that since the legislators are not doing anything, she is forced to take matters into her own hands.

You blame her or the people she represents? Who does she represent?