danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #41
Which economies are, "aggressive capitalism"?You do know there's a difference between an mixed economy and an marxist one? right???
jeezz
Marxist nations trend to be dictatorships or very controlling of their political process. You will see (or seen) this in Cuba or the USSR. What might come as a shock to you is "social democracies" or mixed economy states trend to very democratic and many of them are far more freer politically then the Untied states offering in some cases half a dozen choices for their voters. Some examples of this is Sweden, France, Germany, etc....
Another difference is the marxist state micromanages everything and control production outright...There is little or no capitalism or private sector in these states at least not the kind that a person can freely create ideas without government signing off on it...Can you please point out what state that is considered first world does this? You can't. But you will find that every single one of them have governments regulating their economies(standards and rules) and promoting human rights, workers standards and investing in their own societies....Governments purpose within an mixed economy doesn't control the production as it is true it doesn't do a very good job at it, but instead acts as moderator which makes it work far better for everyone then a pure capitalist society would.
Dude, we wouldn't do away with labor or the private sector...Has Sweden, Germany, Japan, South Korea or any number of mixed economies that you're attempted to call marxist societies. lol. Fuck no.
Learn the difference...
Mixed economies have proven to fall behind aggressive capitalism. So I don't understand how they work. The only exception seems China.