Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
relevant for tuning out to be 1000% stupid and responsible for killing 120 million slowly through starvation while capitalism just eliminated 40% of the planet's poverty the instant China switched to it from Marxism. Do you think Hitler's commentary on culture remains relevant too??His [Marx's] criticisms of capitalism remain relevant to this day.Bookworms Turn Into SnakesKarl Marx's philosophy centers on the relationship between capital and labor. Without labor he has no philosophy for you and Matthew to pervert.On account of automation, if you take out the human labor part, then you end up with the Marxist model, purely, don't you?
This is exactly the challenge. How to further Marx's observational model when not only what he calls the essence of human is eliminated, but labor itself too.
There's no reason to take Marx seriously at all. He was a sheltered rich kid living all his life in an isolated fantasy world, whether in the Ivory Tower or in romantic poverty.
Marx didn't kill anyone stupid. He was a philosopher, not an autocrat.relevant for tuning out to be 1000% stupid and responsible for killing 120 million slowly through starvation while capitalism just eliminated 40% of the planet's poverty the instant China switched to it from Marxism. Do you think Hitler's commentary on culture remains relevant too??His [Marx's] criticisms of capitalism remain relevant to this day.Bookworms Turn Into SnakesKarl Marx's philosophy centers on the relationship between capital and labor. Without labor he has no philosophy for you and Matthew to pervert.On account of automation, if you take out the human labor part, then you end up with the Marxist model, purely, don't you?
This is exactly the challenge. How to further Marx's observational model when not only what he calls the essence of human is eliminated, but labor itself too.
There's no reason to take Marx seriously at all. He was a sheltered rich kid living all his life in an isolated fantasy world, whether in the Ivory Tower or in romantic poverty.
Marx didn't kill anyone stupid. He was a philosopher, not an autocrat.relevant for tuning out to be 1000% stupid and responsible for killing 120 million slowly through starvation while capitalism just eliminated 40% of the planet's poverty the instant China switched to it from Marxism. Do you think Hitler's commentary on culture remains relevant too??His [Marx's] criticisms of capitalism remain relevant to this day.Bookworms Turn Into SnakesKarl Marx's philosophy centers on the relationship between capital and labor. Without labor he has no philosophy for you and Matthew to pervert.
This is exactly the challenge. How to further Marx's observational model when not only what he calls the essence of human is eliminated, but labor itself too.
There's no reason to take Marx seriously at all. He was a sheltered rich kid living all his life in an isolated fantasy world, whether in the Ivory Tower or in romantic poverty.
Marx didn't kill anyone stupid. He was a philosopher, not an autocrat.relevant for tuning out to be 1000% stupid and responsible for killing 120 million slowly through starvation while capitalism just eliminated 40% of the planet's poverty the instant China switched to it from Marxism. Do you think Hitler's commentary on culture remains relevant too??His [Marx's] criticisms of capitalism remain relevant to this day.Bookworms Turn Into SnakesThis is exactly the challenge. How to further Marx's observational model when not only what he calls the essence of human is eliminated, but labor itself too.
There's no reason to take Marx seriously at all. He was a sheltered rich kid living all his life in an isolated fantasy world, whether in the Ivory Tower or in romantic poverty.
yes the philosopher of communism, a philosophy that slowly starved 120 million to death. Its a true love story with American liberals in the audience cheering them on
How did you pick the world's greatest evil to be your object of love??
Where exactly did Marx say that replacing labor with machines is necessary? And where did he say that labor defined human existence?Karl Marx's philosophy centers on the relationship between capital and labor. Without labor he has no philosophy for you and Matthew to pervert.On account of automation, if you take out the human labor part, then you end up with the Marxist model, purely, don't you?
This is exactly the challenge. How to further Marx's observational model when not only what he calls the essence of human is eliminated, but labor itself too.
Estranged Labour, Marx, 1844What, then, constitutes the alienation of labor?
First, the fact that labor is external to the worker, i.e., it does not belong to his intrinsic nature; that in his work, therefore, he does not affirm himself but denies himself, does not feel content but unhappy, does not develop freely his physical and mental energy but mortifies his body and ruins his mind. The worker therefore only feels himself outside his work, and in his work feels outside himself. He feels at home when he is not working, and when he is working he does not feel at home. His labor is therefore not voluntary, but coerced; it is forced labor. It is therefore not the satisfaction of a need; it is merely a means to satisfy needs external to it. Its alien character emerges clearly in the fact that as soon as no physical or other compulsion exists, labor is shunned like the plague. External labor, labor in which man alienates himself, is a labor of self-sacrifice, of mortification. Lastly, the external character of labor for the worker appears in the fact that it is not his own, but someone else’s, that it does not belong to him, that in it he belongs, not to himself, but to another. Just as in religion the spontaneous activity of the human imagination, of the human brain and the human heart, operates on the individual independently of him – that is, operates as an alien, divine or diabolical activity – so is the worker’s activity not his spontaneous activity. It belongs to another; it is the loss of his self.
Bookworms Turn Into SnakesKarl Marx's philosophy centers on the relationship between capital and labor. Without labor he has no philosophy for you and Matthew to pervert.On account of automation, if you take out the human labor part, then you end up with the Marxist model, purely, don't you?
This is exactly the challenge. How to further Marx's observational model when not only what he calls the essence of human is eliminated, but labor itself too.
There's no reason to take Marx seriously at all. He was a sheltered rich kid living all his life in an isolated fantasy world, whether in the Ivory Tower or in romantic poverty.
Marx didn't kill anyone stupid. He was a philosopher, not an autocrat.relevant for tuning out to be 1000% stupid and responsible for killing 120 million slowly through starvation while capitalism just eliminated 40% of the planet's poverty the instant China switched to it from Marxism. Do you think Hitler's commentary on culture remains relevant too??His [Marx's] criticisms of capitalism remain relevant to this day.Bookworms Turn Into Snakes
There's no reason to take Marx seriously at all. He was a sheltered rich kid living all his life in an isolated fantasy world, whether in the Ivory Tower or in romantic poverty.
yes the philosopher of communism, a philosophy that slowly starved 120 million to death. Its a true love story with American liberals in the audience cheering them on
How did you pick the world's greatest evil to be your object of love??
That wasn't Marx, that was Lenin and the soviets. Pretty evil indeed.
So what nations have practiced Marxian communism?Marx didn't kill anyone stupid. He was a philosopher, not an autocrat.relevant for tuning out to be 1000% stupid and responsible for killing 120 million slowly through starvation while capitalism just eliminated 40% of the planet's poverty the instant China switched to it from Marxism. Do you think Hitler's commentary on culture remains relevant too??His [Marx's] criticisms of capitalism remain relevant to this day.Bookworms Turn Into SnakesThis is exactly the challenge. How to further Marx's observational model when not only what he calls the essence of human is eliminated, but labor itself too.
There's no reason to take Marx seriously at all. He was a sheltered rich kid living all his life in an isolated fantasy world, whether in the Ivory Tower or in romantic poverty.
yes the philosopher of communism, a philosophy that slowly starved 120 million to death. Its a true love story with American liberals in the audience cheering them on
How did you pick the world's greatest evil to be your object of love??
We do have a distribution problem.
So what nations have practiced Marxian communism?Marx didn't kill anyone stupid. He was a philosopher, not an autocrat.relevant for tuning out to be 1000% stupid and responsible for killing 120 million slowly through starvation while capitalism just eliminated 40% of the planet's poverty the instant China switched to it from Marxism. Do you think Hitler's commentary on culture remains relevant too??His [Marx's] criticisms of capitalism remain relevant to this day.Bookworms Turn Into Snakes
There's no reason to take Marx seriously at all. He was a sheltered rich kid living all his life in an isolated fantasy world, whether in the Ivory Tower or in romantic poverty.
yes the philosopher of communism, a philosophy that slowly starved 120 million to death. Its a true love story with American liberals in the audience cheering them on
How did you pick the world's greatest evil to be your object of love??
Therefore only machinization and automation gives capitalist future perspectives, he noted.
So are we to assume that you know of no country that has actually practiced Marxian communism?So what nations have practiced Marxian communism?Marx didn't kill anyone stupid. He was a philosopher, not an autocrat.relevant for tuning out to be 1000% stupid and responsible for killing 120 million slowly through starvation while capitalism just eliminated 40% of the planet's poverty the instant China switched to it from Marxism. Do you think Hitler's commentary on culture remains relevant too??His [Marx's] criticisms of capitalism remain relevant to this day.
yes the philosopher of communism, a philosophy that slowly starved 120 million to death. Its a true love story with American liberals in the audience cheering them on
How did you pick the world's greatest evil to be your object of love??
132 have tried and rang up the greatest death toll in all human history, but lets keep trying to get it right!!! We can put a limit of 200 million more dead before we give up!
So are we to assume that you know of no country that has actually practiced Marxian communism?So what nations have practiced Marxian communism?Marx didn't kill anyone stupid. He was a philosopher, not an autocrat.relevant for tuning out to be 1000% stupid and responsible for killing 120 million slowly through starvation while capitalism just eliminated 40% of the planet's poverty the instant China switched to it from Marxism. Do you think Hitler's commentary on culture remains relevant too??
yes the philosopher of communism, a philosophy that slowly starved 120 million to death. Its a true love story with American liberals in the audience cheering them on
How did you pick the world's greatest evil to be your object of love??
132 have tried and rang up the greatest death toll in all human history, but lets keep trying to get it right!!! We can put a limit of 200 million more dead before we give up!
Marx's philosophy hasn't killed anyone either.Marx didn't kill anyone stupid. He was a philosopher, not an autocrat.relevant for tuning out to be 1000% stupid and responsible for killing 120 million slowly through starvation while capitalism just eliminated 40% of the planet's poverty the instant China switched to it from Marxism. Do you think Hitler's commentary on culture remains relevant too??His [Marx's] criticisms of capitalism remain relevant to this day.Bookworms Turn Into SnakesThis is exactly the challenge. How to further Marx's observational model when not only what he calls the essence of human is eliminated, but labor itself too.
There's no reason to take Marx seriously at all. He was a sheltered rich kid living all his life in an isolated fantasy world, whether in the Ivory Tower or in romantic poverty.
yes the philosopher of communism, a philosophy that slowly starved 120 million to death. Its a true love story with American liberals in the audience cheering them on
How did you pick the world's greatest evil to be your object of love??
Karl Marx's philosophy centers on the relationship between capital and labor. Without labor he has no philosophy for you and Matthew to pervert.On account of automation, if you take out the human labor part, then you end up with the Marxist model, purely, don't you?
This is exactly the challenge. How to further Marx's observational model when not only what he calls the essence of human is eliminated, but labor itself too.
Technically thats true it was not the philosophy but merely its implementation. No Marx, no philosophy, no 120 million human souls slowly starved to death.Marx's philosophy hasn't killed anyone either.Marx didn't kill anyone stupid. He was a philosopher, not an autocrat.relevant for tuning out to be 1000% stupid and responsible for killing 120 million slowly through starvation while capitalism just eliminated 40% of the planet's poverty the instant China switched to it from Marxism. Do you think Hitler's commentary on culture remains relevant too??His [Marx's] criticisms of capitalism remain relevant to this day.Bookworms Turn Into Snakes
There's no reason to take Marx seriously at all. He was a sheltered rich kid living all his life in an isolated fantasy world, whether in the Ivory Tower or in romantic poverty.
yes the philosopher of communism, a philosophy that slowly starved 120 million to death. Its a true love story with American liberals in the audience cheering them on
How did you pick the world's greatest evil to be your object of love??
Oddly enough the philosophy is still with us, waiting for capitalism to alienate the planet's population in significant majorities. The inherent contradictions that Marx saw in capitalism, still there. The massive accumulation of wealth into fewer hands continues, along with it the means to control the political process. Even the brain dead conservatives have started to question the "benefits" of globalized free trade. The philosophy is still relevant because capitalism hasn't delivered on its promise to fully liberate the people! Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite!Technically thats true it was not the philosophy but merely its implementation. No Marx, no philosophy, no 120 million human souls slowly starved to death.Marx's philosophy hasn't killed anyone either.Marx didn't kill anyone stupid. He was a philosopher, not an autocrat.relevant for tuning out to be 1000% stupid and responsible for killing 120 million slowly through starvation while capitalism just eliminated 40% of the planet's poverty the instant China switched to it from Marxism. Do you think Hitler's commentary on culture remains relevant too??His [Marx's] criticisms of capitalism remain relevant to this day.
yes the philosopher of communism, a philosophy that slowly starved 120 million to death. Its a true love story with American liberals in the audience cheering them on
How did you pick the world's greatest evil to be your object of love??
we should keep trying though until we hit 200 million more dead! Persistence counts when you're a brain dead liberal.
Karl Marx's philosophy centers on the relationship between capital and labor. Without labor he has no philosophy for you and Matthew to pervert.On account of automation, if you take out the human labor part, then you end up with the Marxist model, purely, don't you?
This is exactly the challenge. How to further Marx's observational model when not only what he calls the essence of human is eliminated, but labor itself too.
Marxist Progressives eliminated 100 million humans, so I guess mass graves are an integral part of Progressive economics
