*Marxism Coming To America?*

[Uncensored2008]

Sorry bout that,


1. But this guy in the video says he see's the signs it is!
2. He draws from some good examples.
3. And is able to show the why's and how's.
4. Just take a look at it, he makes sense.
5. Link:"Marxism in America" Lt. Gen. (Ret.) W.G. Boykin Video |


6. I don't know how to bring in youtube clips, but go see it.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

????

Coming?

The Stalinist democrat party is 100% Marxist as we speak.

Demonstrate for us Marxist philosophy in the Democrat party, teach? With citations from Marx.

And you'll give me a cookie?

{
Karl Marx, considered the founding figure in the rise of communism, divided all persons into two classes: the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. Marx said that the bourgeoisie control all the wealth, they own the factories and other means of economic production, and they exploit and abuse the proletariat to profit off of their productivity or surplus value.

In the U.S. political arena, the Democrat Party has used the language of Marx in the sense of stating, as Marx did, that workers should enjoy better pay, a decent standard of living, and good health care. They are the political party that understands the needs of workers, so they say in every campaign. They are the defenders of the rights of Marx’s proletariat.

The one great characteristic of Marx’s theory of society is that it has is a great flaw, in that Marx only spoke about the private sector of the economy, he never talked about the public sector. But this oversight may be due to the fact that industrialized society was just beginning in the Western world when Marx wrote. He saw the new rise of capitalism/industrialism as having exploitive characteristics.

It is important to understand that Karl Marx never spoke of food stamps, welfare, and free health care as a remedy for the exploitation of the worker. He held that workers should unite together and run the government so that all are treated equally and no one class exploits the other; that the wages and benefits to workers should be fair and equitable. So when Democrats take the language of Marxism and use it to enable entitlement creation they are not following Marx’s theory of class society.



Read more: A Marxist View of the Democrats' Entitlement Economy
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook}

 

[frigidweirdo]

Sorry bout that,


1. But this guy in the video says he see's the signs it is!
2. He draws from some good examples.
3. And is able to show the why's and how's.
4. Just take a look at it, he makes sense.
5. Link:"Marxism in America" Lt. Gen. (Ret.) W.G. Boykin Video |


6. I don't know how to bring in youtube clips, but go see it.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

How well is the Communist Party of the USA doing right now?


The youth wing seems to have disappeared in 2015, and their membership is "over 5,000", wow.

They haven't run for the presidency since 1984. But they do have a chairman, vice chairman and vice vice chairman, get that.

They've simply gone to endorsing democrats, which is fitting.

Do you know why? Do you know why the Nazis all go and endorse the Republicans?

Lack of choice, a political system where everyone has only two choices. Hardly a choice and definitely not democracy.

Deflection doesn't change the fact.

Deflection? Where the fuck do you see deflection? I answered the question that was posed. If that's deflection, then you have a problem.

 

[Tehon]

Sorry bout that,


1. But this guy in the video says he see's the signs it is!
2. He draws from some good examples.
3. And is able to show the why's and how's.
4. Just take a look at it, he makes sense.
5. Link:"Marxism in America" Lt. Gen. (Ret.) W.G. Boykin Video |


6. I don't know how to bring in youtube clips, but go see it.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

????

Coming?

The Stalinist democrat party is 100% Marxist as we speak.

Demonstrate for us Marxist philosophy in the Democrat party, teach? With citations from Marx.

And you'll give me a cookie?

{
Karl Marx, considered the founding figure in the rise of communism, divided all persons into two classes: the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. Marx said that the bourgeoisie control all the wealth, they own the factories and other means of economic production, and they exploit and abuse the proletariat to profit off of their productivity or surplus value.

In the U.S. political arena, the Democrat Party has used the language of Marx in the sense of stating, as Marx did, that workers should enjoy better pay, a decent standard of living, and good health care. They are the political party that understands the needs of workers, so they say in every campaign. They are the defenders of the rights of Marx’s proletariat.

The one great characteristic of Marx’s theory of society is that it has is a great flaw, in that Marx only spoke about the private sector of the economy, he never talked about the public sector. But this oversight may be due to the fact that industrialized society was just beginning in the Western world when Marx wrote. He saw the new rise of capitalism/industrialism as having exploitive characteristics.

It is important to understand that Karl Marx never spoke of food stamps, welfare, and free health care as a remedy for the exploitation of the worker. He held that workers should unite together and run the government so that all are treated equally and no one class exploits the other; that the wages and benefits to workers should be fair and equitable. So when Democrats take the language of Marxism and use it to enable entitlement creation they are not following Marx’s theory of class society.



Read more: A Marxist View of the Democrats' Entitlement Economy
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook}

So when Democrats take the language of Marxism and use it to enable entitlement creation they are not following Marx’s theory of class society.

Thank you!

 

[frigidweirdo]

How well is the Communist Party of the USA doing right now?

Don't we call them Democrats?

No.

Communists stand for something. Democrats don't Neither do Republicans. The two main parties are working so hard at attracting enough votes, which usually means more than 50%, to be able to bother with things like principles.

Colin Powell was asked if he'd run for president, he said no, and explained that he'd annoy most people by saying what he actually thinks.

 

[dudmuck]

Sorry bout that,


1. But this guy in the video says he see's the signs it is!
2. He draws from some good examples.
3. And is able to show the why's and how's.
4. Just take a look at it, he makes sense.
5. Link:"Marxism in America" Lt. Gen. (Ret.) W.G. Boykin Video |


6. I don't know how to bring in youtube clips, but go see it.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

This guy was talking about all sorts of stuff that has nothing to do with Marxism.
But he did mention something that should give Trump supports and orgasm: Commissioning of officers in time of national crisis to work directly for president.

 

[Tehon]

Sorry bout that,


1. But this guy in the video says he see's the signs it is!
2. He draws from some good examples.
3. And is able to show the why's and how's.
4. Just take a look at it, he makes sense.
5. Link:"Marxism in America" Lt. Gen. (Ret.) W.G. Boykin Video |


6. I don't know how to bring in youtube clips, but go see it.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

????

Coming?

The Stalinist democrat party is 100% Marxist as we speak.

Demonstrate for us Marxist philosophy in the Democrat party, teach? With citations from Marx.

And you'll give me a cookie?

{
Karl Marx, considered the founding figure in the rise of communism, divided all persons into two classes: the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. Marx said that the bourgeoisie control all the wealth, they own the factories and other means of economic production, and they exploit and abuse the proletariat to profit off of their productivity or surplus value.

In the U.S. political arena, the Democrat Party has used the language of Marx in the sense of stating, as Marx did, that workers should enjoy better pay, a decent standard of living, and good health care. They are the political party that understands the needs of workers, so they say in every campaign. They are the defenders of the rights of Marx’s proletariat.

The one great characteristic of Marx’s theory of society is that it has is a great flaw, in that Marx only spoke about the private sector of the economy, he never talked about the public sector. But this oversight may be due to the fact that industrialized society was just beginning in the Western world when Marx wrote. He saw the new rise of capitalism/industrialism as having exploitive characteristics.

It is important to understand that Karl Marx never spoke of food stamps, welfare, and free health care as a remedy for the exploitation of the worker. He held that workers should unite together and run the government so that all are treated equally and no one class exploits the other; that the wages and benefits to workers should be fair and equitable. So when Democrats take the language of Marxism and use it to enable entitlement creation they are not following Marx’s theory of class society.



Read more: A Marxist View of the Democrats' Entitlement Economy
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook}

So when Democrats take the language of Marxism and use it to enable entitlement creation they are not following Marx’s theory of class society.

Thank you!

How thoughtless of me.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

One thing is for certain. Marxists better be afraid of Marxism coming to America, because at that point, many of us will feel completely justified and gleeful in mercilessly killing each and every last one of those motherfuckers. Not even kidding. Dead commies or Valhalla. Commies are best served getting the fuck out of here and taking their trash elsewhere. Their lives depend on it.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Sorry bout that,


1. But this guy in the video says he see's the signs it is!
2. He draws from some good examples.
3. And is able to show the why's and how's.
4. Just take a look at it, he makes sense.
5. Link:"Marxism in America" Lt. Gen. (Ret.) W.G. Boykin Video |


6. I don't know how to bring in youtube clips, but go see it.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

????

Coming?

The Stalinist democrat party is 100% Marxist as we speak.

Demonstrate for us Marxist philosophy in the Democrat party, teach? With citations from Marx.

And you'll give me a cookie?

{
Karl Marx, considered the founding figure in the rise of communism, divided all persons into two classes: the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. Marx said that the bourgeoisie control all the wealth, they own the factories and other means of economic production, and they exploit and abuse the proletariat to profit off of their productivity or surplus value.

In the U.S. political arena, the Democrat Party has used the language of Marx in the sense of stating, as Marx did, that workers should enjoy better pay, a decent standard of living, and good health care. They are the political party that understands the needs of workers, so they say in every campaign. They are the defenders of the rights of Marx’s proletariat.

The one great characteristic of Marx’s theory of society is that it has is a great flaw, in that Marx only spoke about the private sector of the economy, he never talked about the public sector. But this oversight may be due to the fact that industrialized society was just beginning in the Western world when Marx wrote. He saw the new rise of capitalism/industrialism as having exploitive characteristics.

It is important to understand that Karl Marx never spoke of food stamps, welfare, and free health care as a remedy for the exploitation of the worker. He held that workers should unite together and run the government so that all are treated equally and no one class exploits the other; that the wages and benefits to workers should be fair and equitable. So when Democrats take the language of Marxism and use it to enable entitlement creation they are not following Marx’s theory of class society.



Read more: A Marxist View of the Democrats' Entitlement Economy
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook}

So when Democrats take the language of Marxism and use it to enable entitlement creation they are not following Marx’s theory of class society.

Thank you!

Ah, the "Perfect Actor" logical fallacy. (Sometimes represented as "No True Scotsman")

Over the years, Communists have attempted to excuse the savagery of Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Pot, etc. by claiming that since they failed to recite dogma precisely, they weren't "Real Communists."

You are employing the same logical fallacy in you defense of the Stalinist democrats. George Soros (as front man for a larger nefarious group) has done exactly what his mentor Lenin did; adapted Marxism to fit the goals of the party.

The basic concept of a tiny ruling elite, Bezos, Musk, Zuckerberg, owning and controlling all assets, including the people remains the same. Castro had his pet terrorist Che, Bernie has the ANTIFA brown shirts and Black Lives matter. Stalin had Charlie Chaplin to propagandize through film, the Stalinist democrats have all of Hollywood. Natalie Portman, Affleck, Daemon , et al.

The "Make America Venezuela Again" democrats have adapted the message to appeal to a changed world. Remember, Karl Marx was the first Millennial. An academic who never applied his studies to anything worthwhile. Who lived off of his family money until that ran out and then bummed from anyone who would support him afterwords. Marx had all kinds of ideas, with zero practical experience in life.

Steny Hoyer and George Soros have to adapt the fantasy world of Marx to reality.

 

[Uncensored2008]

One thing is for certain. Marxists better be afraid of Marxism coming to America, because at that point, many of us will feel completely justified and gleeful in mercilessly killing each and every last one of those motherfuckers. Not even kidding. Dead commies or Valhalla. Commies are best served getting the fuck out of here and taking their trash elsewhere. Their lives depend on it.

Make America Great Again, or Make America Venezuela - this is the choice we face.

 

[Theowl32]

Sorry bout that,


1. But this guy in the video says he see's the signs it is!
2. He draws from some good examples.
3. And is able to show the why's and how's.
4. Just take a look at it, he makes sense.
5. Link:"Marxism in America" Lt. Gen. (Ret.) W.G. Boykin Video |


6. I don't know how to bring in youtube clips, but go see it.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

They call it progressivism, but its communism.

Of course it is all FEUDALISM, just so you know.

 

[Votto]

I would say from the mouth of babes but even children are smarter than Maxine Waters Marx.

Do you see the fecal matter in the background snickering that Maxine has just blown their cover?

Not that the docile and ignorant American public gives a damn.

 

[Tehon]

Sorry bout that,


1. But this guy in the video says he see's the signs it is!
2. He draws from some good examples.
3. And is able to show the why's and how's.
4. Just take a look at it, he makes sense.
5. Link:"Marxism in America" Lt. Gen. (Ret.) W.G. Boykin Video |


6. I don't know how to bring in youtube clips, but go see it.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

????

Coming?

The Stalinist democrat party is 100% Marxist as we speak.

Demonstrate for us Marxist philosophy in the Democrat party, teach? With citations from Marx.

And you'll give me a cookie?

{
Karl Marx, considered the founding figure in the rise of communism, divided all persons into two classes: the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. Marx said that the bourgeoisie control all the wealth, they own the factories and other means of economic production, and they exploit and abuse the proletariat to profit off of their productivity or surplus value.

In the U.S. political arena, the Democrat Party has used the language of Marx in the sense of stating, as Marx did, that workers should enjoy better pay, a decent standard of living, and good health care. They are the political party that understands the needs of workers, so they say in every campaign. They are the defenders of the rights of Marx’s proletariat.

The one great characteristic of Marx’s theory of society is that it has is a great flaw, in that Marx only spoke about the private sector of the economy, he never talked about the public sector. But this oversight may be due to the fact that industrialized society was just beginning in the Western world when Marx wrote. He saw the new rise of capitalism/industrialism as having exploitive characteristics.

It is important to understand that Karl Marx never spoke of food stamps, welfare, and free health care as a remedy for the exploitation of the worker. He held that workers should unite together and run the government so that all are treated equally and no one class exploits the other; that the wages and benefits to workers should be fair and equitable. So when Democrats take the language of Marxism and use it to enable entitlement creation they are not following Marx’s theory of class society.



Read more: A Marxist View of the Democrats' Entitlement Economy
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook}

So when Democrats take the language of Marxism and use it to enable entitlement creation they are not following Marx’s theory of class society.

Thank you!

Ah, the "Perfect Actor" logical fallacy. (Sometimes represented as "No True Scotsman")

Over the years, Communists have attempted to excuse the savagery of Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Pot, etc. by claiming that since they failed to recite dogma precisely, they weren't "Real Communists."

You are employing the same logical fallacy in you defense of the Stalinist democrats. George Soros (as front man for a larger nefarious group) has done exactly what his mentor Lenin did; adapted Marxism to fit the goals of the party.

The basic concept of a tiny ruling elite, Bezos, Musk, Zuckerberg, owning and controlling all assets, including the people remains the same. Castro had his pet terrorist Che, Bernie has the ANTIFA brown shirts and Black Lives matter. Stalin had Charlie Chaplin to propagandize through film, the Stalinist democrats have all of Hollywood. Natalie Portman, Affleck, Daemon , et al.

The "Make America Venezuela Again" democrats have adapted the message to appeal to a changed world. Remember, Karl Marx was the first Millennial. An academic who never applied his studies to anything worthwhile. Who lived off of his family money until that ran out and then bummed from anyone who would support him afterwords. Marx had all kinds of ideas, with zero practical experience in life.

Steny Hoyer and George Soros have to adapt the fantasy world of Marx to reality.

Hey, you were the one that made the claim that Democrats were 100% Marxist. I only asked for a demonstration of your point. Which you failed to do, bigly.

Apparently you have no words of your own to express your thoughts so you appealed to a higher "authority". One that seems to refute any point you were making.

It is important to understand that Karl Marx never spoke of food stamps, welfare, and free health care as a remedy for the exploitation of the worker.

 

[Rustic]

Marxism came and went in America 70 years ago.

Social democracy on the other hand is thriving across the developed world.

Stop believing mouth breathers and check out the real definitions of those terms.

Socialism/Communism/progressivism are a cancer to any sort of freedom... keep that shit to yourselves the rest of us want nothing to do with it...

 

[Rustic]

Sorry bout that,


1. But this guy in the video says he see's the signs it is!
2. He draws from some good examples.
3. And is able to show the why's and how's.
4. Just take a look at it, he makes sense.
5. Link:"Marxism in America" Lt. Gen. (Ret.) W.G. Boykin Video |


6. I don't know how to bring in youtube clips, but go see it.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

1950s called . They want their paranoia back .

You are poisoning the well by falling in it so often

 

[ptbw forever]

Sorry bout that,


1. But this guy in the video says he see's the signs it is!
2. He draws from some good examples.
3. And is able to show the why's and how's.
4. Just take a look at it, he makes sense.
5. Link:"Marxism in America" Lt. Gen. (Ret.) W.G. Boykin Video |


6. I don't know how to bring in youtube clips, but go see it.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Marxism will die with the baby boomers.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Hey, you were the one that made the claim that Democrats were 100% Marxist.

As they indeed are

I only asked for a demonstration of your point. Which you failed to do, bigly.

"Failed" by showing that the Stalinist democrats seek the control of the means of production by the state/oligarchy

Apparently you have no words of your own to express your thoughts so you appealed to a higher "authority". One that seems to refute any point you were making.

It is important to understand that Karl Marx never spoke of food stamps, welfare, and free health care as a remedy for the exploitation of the worker.

Amusing that you are reduced to out of context snippets.

"In the past eighty years Democrats chose to use the rhetoric of Marxism to construct an entitlement state. Since FDR the Democrat Party has also used its political power to expand government’s control of all aspects of life. This expansion has long outgrown its mission of reducing exploitation of workers and has created a new form of social exploitation. In short, Democrats have replaced Marx’s two classes, the bourgeoisie and proletariat, with two new, different classes based on government control of the economy and society. These two Democrat-created classes are the Democrat Bourgeoisie and the Entitlementariat."

 

[Tehon]

Hey, you were the one that made the claim that Democrats were 100% Marxist.

As they indeed are

I only asked for a demonstration of your point. Which you failed to do, bigly.

"Failed" by showing that the Stalinist democrats seek the control of the means of production by the state/oligarchy

Apparently you have no words of your own to express your thoughts so you appealed to a higher "authority". One that seems to refute any point you were making.

It is important to understand that Karl Marx never spoke of food stamps, welfare, and free health care as a remedy for the exploitation of the worker.

Amusing that you are reduced to out of context snippets.

"In the past eighty years Democrats chose to use the rhetoric of Marxism to construct an entitlement state. Since FDR the Democrat Party has also used its political power to expand government’s control of all aspects of life. This expansion has long outgrown its mission of reducing exploitation of workers and has created a new form of social exploitation. In short, Democrats have replaced Marx’s two classes, the bourgeoisie and proletariat, with two new, different classes based on government control of the economy and society. These two Democrat-created classes are the Democrat Bourgeoisie and the Entitlementariat."

The snips are not out of context at all. You just produced another that refutes your claim.

"In the past eighty years Democrats chose to use the rhetoric of Marxism to construct an entitlement state. Since FDR the Democrat Party has also used its political power to expand government’s control of all aspects of life. This expansion has long outgrown its mission of reducing exploitation of workers and has created a new form of social exploitation. In short, Democrats have replaced Marx’s two classes, the bourgeoisie and proletariat, with two new, different classes based on government control of the economy and society. These two Democrat-created classes are the Democrat Bourgeoisie and the Entitlementariat."

You claim the Democrats are Marxist, yet your article says the Democrats used Marxist rhetoric and created something foreign to Marxist philosophy.

Why are you so intent on refuting your own talking point?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Hey, you were the one that made the claim that Democrats were 100% Marxist.

As they indeed are

I only asked for a demonstration of your point. Which you failed to do, bigly.

"Failed" by showing that the Stalinist democrats seek the control of the means of production by the state/oligarchy

Apparently you have no words of your own to express your thoughts so you appealed to a higher "authority". One that seems to refute any point you were making.

It is important to understand that Karl Marx never spoke of food stamps, welfare, and free health care as a remedy for the exploitation of the worker.

Amusing that you are reduced to out of context snippets.

"In the past eighty years Democrats chose to use the rhetoric of Marxism to construct an entitlement state. Since FDR the Democrat Party has also used its political power to expand government’s control of all aspects of life. This expansion has long outgrown its mission of reducing exploitation of workers and has created a new form of social exploitation. In short, Democrats have replaced Marx’s two classes, the bourgeoisie and proletariat, with two new, different classes based on government control of the economy and society. These two Democrat-created classes are the Democrat Bourgeoisie and the Entitlementariat."

The snips are not out of context at all. You just produced another that refutes your claim.

"In the past eighty years Democrats chose to use the rhetoric of Marxism to construct an entitlement state. Since FDR the Democrat Party has also used its political power to expand government’s control of all aspects of life. This expansion has long outgrown its mission of reducing exploitation of workers and has created a new form of social exploitation. In short, Democrats have replaced Marx’s two classes, the bourgeoisie and proletariat, with two new, different classes based on government control of the economy and society. These two Democrat-created classes are the Democrat Bourgeoisie and the Entitlementariat."

You claim the Democrats are Marxist, yet your article says the Democrats used Marxist rhetoric and created something foreign to Marxist philosophy.

Why are you so intent on refuting your own talking point?

The Stalinist democrats have adapted Marxism to their own purpose, just as Lenin did. Just as Mao did.

 

[Tehon]

Hey, you were the one that made the claim that Democrats were 100% Marxist.

As they indeed are

I only asked for a demonstration of your point. Which you failed to do, bigly.

"Failed" by showing that the Stalinist democrats seek the control of the means of production by the state/oligarchy

Apparently you have no words of your own to express your thoughts so you appealed to a higher "authority". One that seems to refute any point you were making.

It is important to understand that Karl Marx never spoke of food stamps, welfare, and free health care as a remedy for the exploitation of the worker.

Amusing that you are reduced to out of context snippets.

"In the past eighty years Democrats chose to use the rhetoric of Marxism to construct an entitlement state. Since FDR the Democrat Party has also used its political power to expand government’s control of all aspects of life. This expansion has long outgrown its mission of reducing exploitation of workers and has created a new form of social exploitation. In short, Democrats have replaced Marx’s two classes, the bourgeoisie and proletariat, with two new, different classes based on government control of the economy and society. These two Democrat-created classes are the Democrat Bourgeoisie and the Entitlementariat."

The snips are not out of context at all. You just produced another that refutes your claim.

"In the past eighty years Democrats chose to use the rhetoric of Marxism to construct an entitlement state. Since FDR the Democrat Party has also used its political power to expand government’s control of all aspects of life. This expansion has long outgrown its mission of reducing exploitation of workers and has created a new form of social exploitation. In short, Democrats have replaced Marx’s two classes, the bourgeoisie and proletariat, with two new, different classes based on government control of the economy and society. These two Democrat-created classes are the Democrat Bourgeoisie and the Entitlementariat."

You claim the Democrats are Marxist, yet your article says the Democrats used Marxist rhetoric and created something foreign to Marxist philosophy.

Why are you so intent on refuting your own talking point?

The Stalinist democrats have adapted Marxism to their own purpose, just as Lenin did. Just as Mao did.

That makes them deceitful opportunists, not Marxists.

You are being no less deceitful than Democrats when you conflate them with Marxist philosophy.

Of course we know it as part of your indoctrination in capitalist economics.

 

[Wry Catcher]

The "real" definitions are irrelevant navel gazing.


Fact is that American politicians, of both parties, have taken the worst aspects of Soviet Communism and fascism, and fused them into one ungodly authoritarian statist mess.

LOL, The specter ^^^ of a hack from the past. Still a purveyor of conspiracy postulates with no evidence but the meme a deep state exists in the US, echoed over and over and over by others of his ilk.

Real definitions support valid premises & conclusions in deductive arguments, and may support a conclusion in an inductive argument. Of course no deep state comment opinion is valid or supported by biased opinions of echo chamber members.