Marie Yovanovitch: Exactly why Would Trump fire her?

[Mac-7]

Watching Marie Yovanovitch testimony I'm troubled as to why Trump would want her terminated?
According to her she did nothing wrong. Didn't any conflicts with Trump's foreign agenda.
She was pursuing ways to help insure USA tax dollars spent wisely in Ukraine.
Sounds all honest and straight forward.

So what exactly did she do wrong that caused her termination?

“According to her she did nothing wrong.”

According to the new president of ukraine she was was loyal to the old president and hostile to the new president

That alone makes her damaged goods

But trump does not have to explain why he fired her

No, Trump doesn't have to explain anything. And the people don't have to explain why he is going to lose the election next year in historic numbers.

he is going to lose the election next year in historic numbers.

Dont bet the rent money on that

 

[charwin95]

Watching Marie Yovanovitch testimony I'm troubled as to why Trump would want her terminated?
According to her she did nothing wrong. Didn't any conflicts with Trump's foreign agenda.
She was pursuing ways to help insure USA tax dollars spent wisely in Ukraine.
Sounds all honest and straight forward.

So what exactly did she do wrong that caused her termination?

According to her she did nothing wrong-think about that-I didn do nuffin. It is Trump's choice for any reason. And I don't trust these long time gummint workers-they have buddies and favors to call in.

No one argues that a President doesn't have the authority to recall any ambassador.

What is being pointed out is that this had nothing to do with any assessment by the State Department- but instead was the result of a smear campaign by Trump's private attorney, Sean Hannity and a corrupt Ukrainian official.

What is really scary about this is how gullible Trump appears to be. He ignores everyone with actual experience in Ukraine, he ignores an entire department dedicated to diplomacy- and instead goes with what Giuliani and Hannity tell him.

And that is dangerous.

/——-/ “He ignores everyone with actual experience in Ukraine,”
You understand there is good experience and bad experience? Obozo did nothing when Putin annexed part of Ukraine. You probably cheered him on. Trump got them the weapons they needed.

You know that is a big lie.
When Putin annexed Ukraine...... Obama applied crippling economic sanctions immediately. Without delay.

At the same time he installed missile system EIS in Poland and Romania next to Putin ass.

 

[Billiejeens]

Watching Marie Yovanovitch testimony I'm troubled as to why Trump would want her terminated?
According to her she did nothing wrong. Didn't any conflicts with Trump's foreign agenda.
She was pursuing ways to help insure USA tax dollars spent wisely in Ukraine.
Sounds all honest and straight forward.

So what exactly did she do wrong that caused her termination?

“According to her she did nothing wrong.”

According to the new president of ukraine she was was loyal to the old president and hostile to the new president

That alone makes her damaged goods

But trump does not have to explain why he fired her

No, Trump doesn't have to explain anything. And the people don't have to explain why he is going to lose the election next year in historic numbers.

All 3 markets closed record highs today
Rasmussen has the daily tracker up this week
You'll die a bitter old women before you ever see a Democrat President again.

 

[Syriusly]

Watching Marie Yovanovitch testimony I'm troubled as to why Trump would want her terminated?
According to her she did nothing wrong. Didn't any conflicts with Trump's foreign agenda.
She was pursuing ways to help insure USA tax dollars spent wisely in Ukraine.
Sounds all honest and straight forward.

So what exactly did she do wrong that caused her termination?

its more about her corruption and deep state activities through the state depts civil society2.0 program,,,not to mention her part in the 2016 collusion between the DNC and former ukraine officials,,,

Her corruption?

You know the way you could really try to prove any of those things?

Get Pompeo up on the witness stand and testify to his knowledge of those things.

Get Rudolf Giuliani up on the witness stand and testify to his knowledge of those things.

Oh hell- if Sean Hannity has any actual first hand knowledge of any corruption by Ambassador Yovanovitch- get him up there on the stand.

If Republicans have any actual evidence to support your claims- why aren't they calling as witnesses those people?

But instead- like your Orange Messiah- you just smear and libel a person who has supported the United States for decades.

Because that is what you Trump Tweenkies do.

Your comment: "actual first hand knowledge of any corruption" says it all.

Did she have any first hand knowledge?

Yovanovitch didn't claim to have any first hand knowledge or otherwise of any crimes committed by Trump.

Do you have any evidence that she was corrupt?

Why do you think that Trump and the Republicans don't want Pompeo and Giuliani to testify- to refute everything that Sondland, and Taylor and the others have and will testify to?

 

[JustAGuy1]

Watching Marie Yovanovitch testimony I'm troubled as to why Trump would want her terminated?
According to her she did nothing wrong. Didn't any conflicts with Trump's foreign agenda.
She was pursuing ways to help insure USA tax dollars spent wisely in Ukraine.
Sounds all honest and straight forward.

So what exactly did she do wrong that caused her termination?

Two things, it doesn't matter and he can Term her for whatever he wishes.He is the "decider" and the authority to do so.
End of story.

 

[Syriusly]

All she has done is bitch and moan about getting fired.

Presented zero evidence that Trump did anything wrong.

Impeachment scam getting weaker with every lame witness the goofy Democrat's call on to testify. ... ..

All the dems seem to have are witnesses loaded with their own personal opinions. Opinions are not evidence, especially when we have de facto evidence - the transcript We also have the President of Ukraine and his staff, who have all said, numerous times, that they were never pressured to investigate the Bidens or Burisma.

Rumors, gossip, innuendo and speculative opinions based upon second and thirdhand accounts, is not evidence.

Except of course- Taylor reported his first hand conversations with Ukrainian officials and with Sondland.

Sondland has testified as to his firsthand knowledge of funds being withheld for the President's personal benefit.

Except of course for the facts.

Meanwhile of course the GOP continue to smear anyone who dares testify to the House.

 

[Syriusly]

All she has done is bitch and moan about getting fired.

And presented zero evidence that Trump did anything wrong.

Impeachment scam getting weaker with every lame witness the goofy Democrat's call on to testify. ... ..

Democrat Misogyny was on display today. The Pencil Necked Geek refused to allow a Republican broad to ask a question. That was, IMHO, a disgrace and shows him to be a chauvinistic piece of shit.

'Republican broad'

Yeah- its the Democrats who are misogynists.......lol

Schiff didn't allow anyone to ask questions when it wasn't the proper time.

 

[JustAGuy1]

Watching Marie Yovanovitch testimony I'm troubled as to why Trump would want her terminated?
According to her she did nothing wrong. Didn't any conflicts with Trump's foreign agenda.
She was pursuing ways to help insure USA tax dollars spent wisely in Ukraine.
Sounds all honest and straight forward.

So what exactly did she do wrong that caused her termination?

its more about her corruption and deep state activities through the state depts civil society2.0 program,,,not to mention her part in the 2016 collusion between the DNC and former ukraine officials,,,

Her corruption?

You know the way you could really try to prove any of those things?

Get Pompeo up on the witness stand and testify to his knowledge of those things.

Get Rudolf Giuliani up on the witness stand and testify to his knowledge of those things.

Oh hell- if Sean Hannity has any actual first hand knowledge of any corruption by Ambassador Yovanovitch- get him up there on the stand.

If Republicans have any actual evidence to support your claims- why aren't they calling as witnesses those people?

But instead- like your Orange Messiah- you just smear and libel a person who has supported the United States for decades.

Because that is what you Trump Tweenkies do.

He has every right to term her, he needs no reason

 

[Cellblock2429]

Watching Marie Yovanovitch testimony I'm troubled as to why Trump would want her terminated?
According to her she did nothing wrong. Didn't any conflicts with Trump's foreign agenda.
She was pursuing ways to help insure USA tax dollars spent wisely in Ukraine.
Sounds all honest and straight forward.

So what exactly did she do wrong that caused her termination?

According to her she did nothing wrong-think about that-I didn do nuffin. It is Trump's choice for any reason. And I don't trust these long time gummint workers-they have buddies and favors to call in.

No one argues that a President doesn't have the authority to recall any ambassador.

What is being pointed out is that this had nothing to do with any assessment by the State Department- but instead was the result of a smear campaign by Trump's private attorney, Sean Hannity and a corrupt Ukrainian official.

What is really scary about this is how gullible Trump appears to be. He ignores everyone with actual experience in Ukraine, he ignores an entire department dedicated to diplomacy- and instead goes with what Giuliani and Hannity tell him.

And that is dangerous.

/——-/ “He ignores everyone with actual experience in Ukraine,”
You understand there is good experience and bad experience? Obozo did nothing when Putin annexed part of Ukraine. You probably cheered him on. Trump got them the weapons they needed.

You know that is a big lie.
When Putin annexed Ukraine...... Obama applied crippling economic sanctions immediately. Without delay.

At the same time he installed missile system EIS in Poland and Romania next to Putin ass.

/——/ Did he do that before or after he had more flexibility? And did it work?

 

[Dick Foster]

All she has done is bitch and moan about getting fired.

Presented zero evidence that Trump did anything wrong.

Impeachment scam getting weaker with every lame witness the goofy Democrat's call on to testify. ... ..

Then go back to jerking off to pics of Melania and Ivanka if you’re bored.

You do you! And I mean that literally.

You're just jealous that you can't jerk off to Hillary or Pelosi. Or maybe you do and that's your whole problem. LOL

 

[Billiejeens]

All she has done is bitch and moan about getting fired.

Presented zero evidence that Trump did anything wrong.

Impeachment scam getting weaker with every lame witness the goofy Democrat's call on to testify. ... ..

All the dems seem to have are witnesses loaded with their own personal opinions. Opinions are not evidence, especially when we have de facto evidence - the transcript We also have the President of Ukraine and his staff, who have all said, numerous times, that they were never pressured to investigate the Bidens or Burisma.

Rumors, gossip, innuendo and speculative opinions based upon second and thirdhand accounts, is not evidence.

Except of course- Taylor reported his first hand conversations with Ukrainian officials and with Sondland.

Sondland has testified as to his firsthand knowledge of funds being withheld for the President's personal benefit.

Except of course for the facts.

Meanwhile of course the GOP continue to smear anyone who dares testify to the House.

You are so used to lying and not being called on it, that you dont even try.

You lie.

 

[Syriusly]

All she has done is bitch and moan about getting fired.

Presented zero evidence that Trump did anything wrong.

Impeachment scam getting weaker with every lame witness the goofy Democrat's call on to testify. ... ..

All the dems seem to have are witnesses loaded with their own personal opinions. Opinions are not evidence, especially when we have de facto evidence - the transcript We also have the President of Ukraine and his staff, who have all said, numerous times, that they were never pressured to investigate the Bidens or Burisma.

Rumors, gossip, innuendo and speculative opinions based upon second and thirdhand accounts, is not evidence.

In reality - they don't need evidence
This is not a court or a trial
This is an infomercial designed to make people not like the President simply because he does not follow established protocol
He is President because he does not follow established protocol
So that may not be a great strategy.

And by 'not following established protocol' you mean not using the Office of the President to secretly ask a foreign government to publicly announce that they are investigating his political rival.

Yeah- Trump- he is just breaking with established prototocol......oh wait.....didn't Nixon do something like that?

 

[Syriusly]

All she has done is bitch and moan about getting fired.

And presented zero evidence that Trump did anything wrong.

Impeachment scam getting weaker with every lame witness the goofy Democrat's call on to testify. ... ..

I think she has testified truthfully. Not all of her answers were pro Dems.

There were a couple of lies, but none of it is relevant to what they are supposed to be investigating.

Were you let go - yes
Did you like it - no
Were you embarrassed - yes

yeah that's probably true

Feel free to share those lies? I am very curious.

 

[OldLady]

In reality - they don't need evidence
This is not a court or a trial
This is an infomercial designed to make people not like the President simply because he does not follow established protocol
He is President because he does not follow established protocol
So that may not be a great strategy.

The deep state bureaucrats are looking like a bunch of whiny, over emotional, gossipy drama queens. It's scary that these are the people we depend upon to help this nation maneuver around all the craziness that is international politics.

That's why they have career diplomats, and ambassadors like Yovanovitch. So whiny babies like Trump don't need to get involved in adult conversations.

 

[keepitreal]

Watching Marie Yovanovitch testimony I'm troubled as to why Trump would want her terminated?
According to her she did nothing wrong. Didn't any conflicts with Trump's foreign agenda.
She was pursuing ways to help insure USA tax dollars spent wisely in Ukraine.
Sounds all honest and straight forward.

So what exactly did she do wrong that caused her termination?

Why should he keep Obama's people?

 

[Syriusly]

So Yovanoivitch got fired for doing a crappy job. .

Link please.

 

[OldLady]

Watching Marie Yovanovitch testimony I'm troubled as to why Trump would want her terminated?
According to her she did nothing wrong. Didn't any conflicts with Trump's foreign agenda.
She was pursuing ways to help insure USA tax dollars spent wisely in Ukraine.
Sounds all honest and straight forward.

So what exactly did she do wrong that caused her termination?

“According to her she did nothing wrong.”

According to the new president of ukraine she was was loyal to the old president and hostile to the new president

That alone makes her damaged goods

But trump does not have to explain why he fired her

No, Trump doesn't have to explain anything. And the people don't have to explain why he is going to lose the election next year in historic numbers.

All 3 markets closed record highs today
Rasmussen has the daily tracker up this week
You'll die a bitter old women before you ever see a Democrat President again.

I'll take whomever--as long as it's not Trump.

 

[charwin95]

Watching Marie Yovanovitch testimony I'm troubled as to why Trump would want her terminated?
According to her she did nothing wrong. Didn't any conflicts with Trump's foreign agenda.
She was pursuing ways to help insure USA tax dollars spent wisely in Ukraine.
Sounds all honest and straight forward.

So what exactly did she do wrong that caused her termination?

According to her she did nothing wrong-think about that-I didn do nuffin. It is Trump's choice for any reason. And I don't trust these long time gummint workers-they have buddies and favors to call in.

No one argues that a President doesn't have the authority to recall any ambassador.

What is being pointed out is that this had nothing to do with any assessment by the State Department- but instead was the result of a smear campaign by Trump's private attorney, Sean Hannity and a corrupt Ukrainian official.

What is really scary about this is how gullible Trump appears to be. He ignores everyone with actual experience in Ukraine, he ignores an entire department dedicated to diplomacy- and instead goes with what Giuliani and Hannity tell him.

And that is dangerous.

/——-/ “He ignores everyone with actual experience in Ukraine,”
You understand there is good experience and bad experience? Obozo did nothing when Putin annexed part of Ukraine. You probably cheered him on. Trump got them the weapons they needed.

You know that is a big lie.
When Putin annexed Ukraine...... Obama applied crippling economic sanctions immediately. Without delay.

At the same time he installed missile system EIS in Poland and Romania next to Putin ass.

/——/ Did he do that before or after he had more flexibility? And did it work?

He did that right away after the annexation.

 

[The Original Tree]

Watching Marie Yovanovitch testimony I'm troubled as to why Trump would want her terminated?
According to her she did nothing wrong. Didn't any conflicts with Trump's foreign agenda.
She was pursuing ways to help insure USA tax dollars spent wisely in Ukraine.
Sounds all honest and straight forward.

So what exactly did she do wrong that caused her termination?

She participated in helping to Propagate The Dirty Dossier.

She met with The Clinton Campaign in order to help them plan various ways to Smear Trump during The Campaign, and there is documented evidence of that.

She also publicly criticized and insulted President Trump in front of other Ukrainian Public Officials and Diplomats.

She should have been fired 3 years ago.

 

[Syriusly]

All she has done is bitch and moan about getting fired.

And has presented zero evidence that Trump did anything wrong.

Impeachment scam getting weaker with every lame witness the goofy Democrat's call on to testify. ... ..

Yovanovitch is a lgbtq bitch monster from the state department's traitorous LGBTQ anti-Trump squad .
Jo

Always fascinating to hear from Trump's homophobic misogynist base.

And fascinating how they think calling a woman a bitch and gay is a sure fire smear job.