Marion Morrison
Diamond Member
- Feb 10, 2017
- 59,298
- 16,837
- 2,190
- Banned
- #21
Ain't no polar bears here, reckon we killed them all.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Well, as it turns out, humans developed sentience and reason and are no longer compelled at all times to act like an amoeba acting out its natural reaction to a stimulus.It is in the bear's nature to scavenge or hunt for food. It is in a Human's nature to resist being killed and or eaten.
What is there to argue about?
Although I have never encountered a polar bear in my area, I understand they are quite large and eat meat, including human meat.
Therefore I would consider it quite reasonable to sentiently decide to shoot it, dead, and even a few more times to make sure.
Ain't no polar bears here, reckon we killed them all.
Well, as it turns out, humans developed sentience and reason and are no longer compelled at all times to act like an amoeba acting out its natural reaction to a stimulus.It is in the bear's nature to scavenge or hunt for food. It is in a Human's nature to resist being killed and or eaten.
What is there to argue about?
Although I have never encountered a polar bear in my area, I understand they are quite large and eat meat, including human meat.
Therefore I would consider it quite reasonable to sentiently decide to shoot it, dead, and even a few more times to make sure.
maybe humans shouldn't be killing endangered species, trumpkin.
Or you could use that sentience to first discern that encroaching on its territory and risking its life so that you can get a photo opportunity may be an unethical and even immoral choice.Therefore I would consider it quite reasonable to sentiently decide to shoot it, dead, and even a few more times to make sure.
Perhaps if you didn’t thing it was ok to kill polar bears I wouldn’t think you were a trumpkin.Sorry, not a trumpkin , that's your first dumb thing. If you don't see the second, well, you might just be dumb enough to be eaten by an endangered species. There is irony for ya!
Or you could use that sentience to first discern that encroaching on its territory and risking its life so that you can get a photo opportunity may be an unethical and even immoral choice.Therefore I would consider it quite reasonable to sentiently decide to shoot it, dead, and even a few more times to make sure.
Or you could use that sentience to first discern that encroaching on its territory and risking its life so that you can get a photo opportunity may be an unethical and even immoral choice.Therefore I would consider it quite reasonable to sentiently decide to shoot it, dead, and even a few more times to make sure.
That's not accurate. Nobody is suggesting he should have rolled over and been killed. They are suggesting he should not have been there in the first place.Again, animals over people.
Good for you. I hold no such delusion.I believe humans hold dominion over animals. I go where I want, animals look out for me, not the other way around.
Did you ask him?That's not accurate. Nobody is suggesting he should have rolled over and been killed. They are suggesting he should not have been there in the first place.Again, animals over people.
Did he have a ticket?
Good for you. I hold no such delusion.I believe humans hold dominion over animals. I go where I want, animals look out for me, not the other way around.
Cant harm something that is dead already...unless you overcook it, I guess...Good for you. I hold no such delusion.I believe humans hold dominion over animals. I go where I want, animals look out for me, not the other way around.
I would never harm an animal ... except at almost every meal...
Cant harm something that is dead already...unless you overcook it, I guess...Good for you. I hold no such delusion.I believe humans hold dominion over animals. I go where I want, animals look out for me, not the other way around.
I would never harm an animal ... except at almost every meal...
Did you ask him?That's not accurate. Nobody is suggesting he should have rolled over and been killed. They are suggesting he should not have been there in the first place.Again, animals over people.
Did he have a ticket?
How did it die? You don't know? Of course not...don't wanna get your hands dirty....Cant harm something that is dead already...unless you overcook it, I guess...Good for you. I hold no such delusion.I believe humans hold dominion over animals. I go where I want, animals look out for me, not the other way around.
I would never harm an animal ... except at almost every meal...
It didn't die of old age.