Gold Member
- Apr 26, 2011
- 2,979
- 500
- 130
A federal wildlife biologist whose observation in 2004 of presumably drowned polar bears in the Arctic helped to galvanize the global warming movement has been placed on administrative leave and is being investigated for scientific misconduct...Charles Monnett, an Anchorage-based scientist with the U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement, or BOEMRE, was told July 18 that he was being put on leave, pending results of an investigation into "integrity issues." (APNewsBreak: Arctic scientist under investigation - Yahoo! News)
The central premise behind the theory of anthropological global warming, without which the entire belief falls apart, is that CO2either man-made or naturally occurringcauses heat to be trapped in the atmosphere, unable to escape.
NASA satellite data from the years 2000 through 2011 show the Earth's atmosphere is allowing far more heat to be released into space than alarmist computer models have predicted, reports a new study in the peer-reviewed science journal Remote Sensing(http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylt=AkJkxs.../**http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/3/8/1603/pdf). The study indicates far less future global warming will occur than United Nations computer models have predicted, and supports prior studies indicating increases in atmospheric carbon dioxidetrap far less heat than alarmists have claimed.
"Study co-author Dr. Roy Spencer, a principal research scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville and U.S. Science Team Leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer flying on NASA's Aqua satellite, reports that real-world data from NASA's Terra satellite contradict multiple assumptions fed into alarmist computer models."
"In addition to finding that far less heat is being trapped than alarmist computer models have predicted, the NASA satellite data show the atmosphere begins shedding heat into space long before United Nations computer models predicted." (New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism - Yahoo! News)
I'm sure Dr. Roy Spencer will soon be dragged over the coals and labeled a denier. These new findings confirm what has already been reported: that, despite man-made CO2 emissions growing by a third, from 1998-2008 global temperatures did not rise.
There are people who want to regulate CO2 in the name of combating global warming. These keepers of the faith have told us that having pets is bad for the environment (Britain's problem with pets: they're bad for the planet | Environment | The Guardian), having children is the worst thing you can do, and the government has a moral obligation to regulate the population in the name of combating global warming (Are Babies Bad for the Environment? : Scientific American Podcast). In Australia they are combating global warming by slaughtering camels (Australia: Killing Camels for Carbon Credits? - Ecocentric - TIME.com).
Once you except the flawed premise that CO2, a vital element without which life would not exist, is a pollutant and must be regulated there is literally no end to which your life may be controlled. These religious extremists want to regulate something that all humans breath out, that plants and bacteria breathe in, all based on the faith that it is causing the planet to warm.
There are going to be plenty of leftists respond by saying they are more educated and intelligent and that anyone who has doubts about man-made global warming is akin to a holocaust denier. That the existence of global warming is just a easily proven as the genocide committed by Nazi's, and they refuse to except any evidence to the contrary; even though the environmental left has been incorrect about every prediction made going back to the 1960's. Worldwide famine, over population, running out of oil, global climate cooling/warming/change--and for the most part they are saying the same damn thing.
You want to know where this unwavering religious-like faith comes from? This is the Captain Planet Generation, indoctrinated from youth into this idea. The theory of global warming is no more complicated than this:
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2zZa9vz1Rk]‪Captain Planet CO2 brainwashing‬‏ - YouTube[/ame]
The central premise behind the theory of anthropological global warming, without which the entire belief falls apart, is that CO2either man-made or naturally occurringcauses heat to be trapped in the atmosphere, unable to escape.
NASA satellite data from the years 2000 through 2011 show the Earth's atmosphere is allowing far more heat to be released into space than alarmist computer models have predicted, reports a new study in the peer-reviewed science journal Remote Sensing(http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylt=AkJkxs.../**http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/3/8/1603/pdf). The study indicates far less future global warming will occur than United Nations computer models have predicted, and supports prior studies indicating increases in atmospheric carbon dioxidetrap far less heat than alarmists have claimed.
"Study co-author Dr. Roy Spencer, a principal research scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville and U.S. Science Team Leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer flying on NASA's Aqua satellite, reports that real-world data from NASA's Terra satellite contradict multiple assumptions fed into alarmist computer models."
"In addition to finding that far less heat is being trapped than alarmist computer models have predicted, the NASA satellite data show the atmosphere begins shedding heat into space long before United Nations computer models predicted." (New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism - Yahoo! News)
I'm sure Dr. Roy Spencer will soon be dragged over the coals and labeled a denier. These new findings confirm what has already been reported: that, despite man-made CO2 emissions growing by a third, from 1998-2008 global temperatures did not rise.
There are people who want to regulate CO2 in the name of combating global warming. These keepers of the faith have told us that having pets is bad for the environment (Britain's problem with pets: they're bad for the planet | Environment | The Guardian), having children is the worst thing you can do, and the government has a moral obligation to regulate the population in the name of combating global warming (Are Babies Bad for the Environment? : Scientific American Podcast). In Australia they are combating global warming by slaughtering camels (Australia: Killing Camels for Carbon Credits? - Ecocentric - TIME.com).
Once you except the flawed premise that CO2, a vital element without which life would not exist, is a pollutant and must be regulated there is literally no end to which your life may be controlled. These religious extremists want to regulate something that all humans breath out, that plants and bacteria breathe in, all based on the faith that it is causing the planet to warm.
There are going to be plenty of leftists respond by saying they are more educated and intelligent and that anyone who has doubts about man-made global warming is akin to a holocaust denier. That the existence of global warming is just a easily proven as the genocide committed by Nazi's, and they refuse to except any evidence to the contrary; even though the environmental left has been incorrect about every prediction made going back to the 1960's. Worldwide famine, over population, running out of oil, global climate cooling/warming/change--and for the most part they are saying the same damn thing.
You want to know where this unwavering religious-like faith comes from? This is the Captain Planet Generation, indoctrinated from youth into this idea. The theory of global warming is no more complicated than this:
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2zZa9vz1Rk]‪Captain Planet CO2 brainwashing‬‏ - YouTube[/ame]