Man-hating feminist judge in Larry Nassar case crossed line. Remove & disbar

ShootSpeeders

Gold Member
May 13, 2012
20,232
2,363
280
Was Nassar even guilty.? Looks like he was beaten down and forced to plead guilty. The state was clearly out to get him. The media also.

The moment the judge in the Larry Nassar case crossed a line

jan 25 2o18 Many of us have watched in horror as victim after victim testified at the sentencing hearing for Larry Nassar, the doctor who pleaded guilty to molesting US gymnasts under his care. Though Nassar had admitted to molesting seven victims, Judge Rosemarie Aquilina opened the courtroom in this phase to anyone wishing to speak, including victims of Nassar who were not part of the official case.

Ultimately, there were more than 160 witnesses, including numerous Olympic athletes, who gave gut-wrenching testimony about his effect on their lives.

On Wednesday, Judge Aquilina sentenced Nassar to 40 to 175 years in prison — a sentence she assured him means he will die in prison, since it will be served subsequent to a 60-year sentence in another case for possession of child pornography. “I have signed your death warrant,” she announced.

Throughout the sentencing hearing, Aquilina was praised for her compassion towards victims, and her comments Wednesday drew further exultant commentary. But her words to Nassar should make us uncomfortable. That’s because, perhaps without realizing it, Aquilina overstepped her bounds as a judge and adopted the role of victim advocate.

She told Nassar, “It is my honor and privilege to sentence you,” and observed, at one point: “Our Constitution does not allow for cruel and unusual punishment. If it did … I would allow some or many people to do to him what he did to others.”

That is a human reaction, but it is one you’d expect to be expressed by a victim rather than a judge. (Many observers, including me, heard the “do to him what he did to others” line as a not-so-coded expression of a hope that Nassar would be raped in prison.)

Throughout the proceedings, which were televised, Aquilina essentially transformed herself into a champion for a movement. It is understandable to feel empathy for previously voiceless victims, especially ones whose testimony took such bravery. But there are crucial distinctions between judge and advocate, and she traversed those lines repeatedly.

She talked to victims as though she were their confidante, telling one, “The monster who took advantage of you is going to wither, much like the scene in The Wizard of Oz where the water gets poured on the witch and the witch withers away.”

She passionately thanked victims and called them “superheroes.”
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #3
Did the "victims" have any evidence other than their word??. We saw with roy moore that all whores need in america is an accusation. " He abused me and i want a million bucks."
 
Hmmm, who knew you were a moron. Why we all did of course! The facts are that NONE of these women are going to make any money off of the prick because he had none. One young girl committed suicide after his assaults, so that is pretty fucking compelling evidence that he is indeed a scumbag.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #8
Hmmm, who knew you were a moron. Why we all did of course! The facts are that NONE of these women are going to make any money off of the prick because he had none. .

Hey einstein. They're gonna sue michigan state and the olympics and everyone else in sight. THINK
 
Did the "victims" have any evidence other than their word??. We saw with roy moore that all whores need in america is an accusation. " He abused me and i want a million bucks."
FY!, most of the gymnasts were 12, 13 years old and were told to do what the doctor says. In many instances there were other adults in the room while he molested them although the adults were not aware of what he was doing while the girl was under a sheet.
 
FY!, most of the gymnasts were 12, 13 years old and were told to do what the doctor says. In many instances there were other adults in the room while he molested them although the adults were not aware of what he was doing while the girl was under a sheet.

So you admit there is no actual evidence. thank you
 
Judge won't allow child porn convictions to be used in Nassar trial - Lansing State Journal
Lansing State Journal › local › 2017/11/03

Nov 3, 2017 · Judge rules that Larry Nassar's federal child pornography convictions and the evidence that led to them can't be used during his Ingham County trial.


He’s guilty.
Now, go screw your self.

People plead guilty all the time when they see they are being framed.
I honestly don’t know what to think, but then again with your history, well...

HAHAHA. You call than an "answer". Are you so dumb you think it's correct for judges to take sides in a case???
 
Hmmm, who knew you were a moron. Why we all did of course! The facts are that NONE of these women are going to make any money off of the prick because he had none. .

Hey einstein. They're gonna sue michigan state and the olympics and everyone else in sight. THINK






I have, they should sue those groups, they allowed a perv to abuse young girls and women. Funny how you think that speeders should be killed, but actual fucking predators you have no problem with. You are one fucked up individual.
 
Did the "victims" have any evidence other than their word??. We saw with roy moore that all whores need in america is an accusation. " He abused me and i want a million bucks."

Look man there is no way you can spin it to make Nassar look innocent. The son of a bitch should be hung!
 
Was Nassar even guilty.? Looks like he was beaten down and forced to plead guilty. The state was clearly out to get him. The media also.

The moment the judge in the Larry Nassar case crossed a line

jan 25 2o18 Many of us have watched in horror as victim after victim testified at the sentencing hearing for Larry Nassar, the doctor who pleaded guilty to molesting US gymnasts under his care. Though Nassar had admitted to molesting seven victims, Judge Rosemarie Aquilina opened the courtroom in this phase to anyone wishing to speak, including victims of Nassar who were not part of the official case.

Ultimately, there were more than 160 witnesses, including numerous Olympic athletes, who gave gut-wrenching testimony about his effect on their lives.

On Wednesday, Judge Aquilina sentenced Nassar to 40 to 175 years in prison — a sentence she assured him means he will die in prison, since it will be served subsequent to a 60-year sentence in another case for possession of child pornography. “I have signed your death warrant,” she announced.

Throughout the sentencing hearing, Aquilina was praised for her compassion towards victims, and her comments Wednesday drew further exultant commentary. But her words to Nassar should make us uncomfortable. That’s because, perhaps without realizing it, Aquilina overstepped her bounds as a judge and adopted the role of victim advocate.

She told Nassar, “It is my honor and privilege to sentence you,” and observed, at one point: “Our Constitution does not allow for cruel and unusual punishment. If it did … I would allow some or many people to do to him what he did to others.”

That is a human reaction, but it is one you’d expect to be expressed by a victim rather than a judge. (Many observers, including me, heard the “do to him what he did to others” line as a not-so-coded expression of a hope that Nassar would be raped in prison.)

Throughout the proceedings, which were televised, Aquilina essentially transformed herself into a champion for a movement. It is understandable to feel empathy for previously voiceless victims, especially ones whose testimony took such bravery. But there are crucial distinctions between judge and advocate, and she traversed those lines repeatedly.

She talked to victims as though she were their confidante, telling one, “The monster who took advantage of you is going to wither, much like the scene in The Wizard of Oz where the water gets poured on the witch and the witch withers away.”

She passionately thanked victims and called them “superheroes.”


That is a human reaction, but it is one you’d expect to be expressed by a victim rather than a judge. (Many observers, including me, heard the “do to him what he did to others” line as a not-so-coded expression of a hope that Nassar would be raped in prison.)

I don't think his fellow prisoners need the judge to give them any kind of message, coded or otherwise, to see who will fill his dance card first. I figure there will be no more high pitched tones when he farts
 

Forum List

Back
Top