Maduro Goons Shoot Samaritans & Starving Citizens [semi-satire]

bripat9643

Diamond Member
Apr 1, 2011
169,997
47,201
2,180
Leftists actually defend this piece of shit. His days are numbered.


Armed troops loyal to President Maduro opened fire on the good Samaritans trying to bring food aid to desperately hungry Venezuelans—killing two and wounding another dozen or so. According to Maduro, “the aid is an attack on the sovereignty of my country. It is not for outsiders to decide what or how much Venezuelans should eat. That is my prerogative.”

Major media outlets in the US variously characterized the Army’s attack on the unarmed victims as a “clash” (Reuters), “standoff” (CNN), “showdown” (New York Times), and “face-off” (Wall Street Journal). An off-the-record explanation was offered by a CNN reporter: “look, Trump has already taken sides against Maduro’s wrecking of the country’s economy. Clearly, that is an intrusion on its sovereignty. Just because the results of Maduro’s policies aren’t liked by some citizens doesn’t give them the right to collude with foreigners to undermine them. We are merely presenting an unbiased description of the situation.”
 
IMG_0379.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Leftists actually defend this piece of shit. His days are numbered.


Armed troops loyal to President Maduro opened fire on the good Samaritans trying to bring food aid to desperately hungry Venezuelans—killing two and wounding another dozen or so. According to Maduro, “the aid is an attack on the sovereignty of my country. It is not for outsiders to decide what or how much Venezuelans should eat. That is my prerogative.”

Major media outlets in the US variously characterized the Army’s attack on the unarmed victims as a “clash” (Reuters), “standoff” (CNN), “showdown” (New York Times), and “face-off” (Wall Street Journal). An off-the-record explanation was offered by a CNN reporter: “look, Trump has already taken sides against Maduro’s wrecking of the country’s economy. Clearly, that is an intrusion on its sovereignty. Just because the results of Maduro’s policies aren’t liked by some citizens doesn’t give them the right to collude with foreigners to undermine them. We are merely presenting an unbiased description of the situation.”
How does Venezuelan socialism create billionaires?

The “Permanent War State” Aims to Plunder Venezuela - Wilkerson and Jay

"Yeah, the commercial interest in Venezuela is very connected to the Koch brothers. Number one, the Koch brothers owned part of 25 percent of a fertilizer company that Chavez nationalized, and the Koch brothers were not very happy about.

"It’s interesting that one of the partners in that fertilizer company was a guy named Mendoza, who’s on the Forbes list of billionaires. Supposed socialist dictatorship; how is there still a billionaire on the Forbes list who still, not only is he a billionaire, but he controls much of the food supply of Venezuela."

Your boy Guaido comes from one of the most violent "opposition" parties best known for burning alive supporters of Maduro.
71cBXja3tpL._UY445_.jpg

Yet?
 
Leftists actually defend this piece of shit. His days are numbered.


Armed troops loyal to President Maduro opened fire on the good Samaritans trying to bring food aid to desperately hungry Venezuelans—killing two and wounding another dozen or so. According to Maduro, “the aid is an attack on the sovereignty of my country. It is not for outsiders to decide what or how much Venezuelans should eat. That is my prerogative.”

Major media outlets in the US variously characterized the Army’s attack on the unarmed victims as a “clash” (Reuters), “standoff” (CNN), “showdown” (New York Times), and “face-off” (Wall Street Journal). An off-the-record explanation was offered by a CNN reporter: “look, Trump has already taken sides against Maduro’s wrecking of the country’s economy. Clearly, that is an intrusion on its sovereignty. Just because the results of Maduro’s policies aren’t liked by some citizens doesn’t give them the right to collude with foreigners to undermine them. We are merely presenting an unbiased description of the situation.”
Sounds like you have a problem with Maduro’s nationalism
 
Leftists actually defend this piece of shit. His days are numbered.


Armed troops loyal to President Maduro opened fire on the good Samaritans trying to bring food aid to desperately hungry Venezuelans—killing two and wounding another dozen or so. According to Maduro, “the aid is an attack on the sovereignty of my country. It is not for outsiders to decide what or how much Venezuelans should eat. That is my prerogative.”

Major media outlets in the US variously characterized the Army’s attack on the unarmed victims as a “clash” (Reuters), “standoff” (CNN), “showdown” (New York Times), and “face-off” (Wall Street Journal). An off-the-record explanation was offered by a CNN reporter: “look, Trump has already taken sides against Maduro’s wrecking of the country’s economy. Clearly, that is an intrusion on its sovereignty. Just because the results of Maduro’s policies aren’t liked by some citizens doesn’t give them the right to collude with foreigners to undermine them. We are merely presenting an unbiased description of the situation.”
Sounds like you have a problem with Maduro’s nationalism
So "nationalism" means mowing down innocent people with automatic weapons? That sounds more like socialism:

Katyn massacre - Wikipedia
 
Leftists actually defend this piece of shit. His days are numbered.


Armed troops loyal to President Maduro opened fire on the good Samaritans trying to bring food aid to desperately hungry Venezuelans—killing two and wounding another dozen or so. According to Maduro, “the aid is an attack on the sovereignty of my country. It is not for outsiders to decide what or how much Venezuelans should eat. That is my prerogative.”

Major media outlets in the US variously characterized the Army’s attack on the unarmed victims as a “clash” (Reuters), “standoff” (CNN), “showdown” (New York Times), and “face-off” (Wall Street Journal). An off-the-record explanation was offered by a CNN reporter: “look, Trump has already taken sides against Maduro’s wrecking of the country’s economy. Clearly, that is an intrusion on its sovereignty. Just because the results of Maduro’s policies aren’t liked by some citizens doesn’t give them the right to collude with foreigners to undermine them. We are merely presenting an unbiased description of the situation.”
Sounds like you have a problem with Maduro’s nationalism
So "nationalism" means mowing down innocent people with automatic weapons? That sounds more like socialism:

Katyn massacre - Wikipedia
Foreigners are interfering in the sovereignty of his nation, aka globalism. Sounds like you’re suggestig nationalism can sometimes be a problem.
 
Leftists actually defend this piece of shit. His days are numbered.


Armed troops loyal to President Maduro opened fire on the good Samaritans trying to bring food aid to desperately hungry Venezuelans—killing two and wounding another dozen or so. According to Maduro, “the aid is an attack on the sovereignty of my country. It is not for outsiders to decide what or how much Venezuelans should eat. That is my prerogative.”

Major media outlets in the US variously characterized the Army’s attack on the unarmed victims as a “clash” (Reuters), “standoff” (CNN), “showdown” (New York Times), and “face-off” (Wall Street Journal). An off-the-record explanation was offered by a CNN reporter: “look, Trump has already taken sides against Maduro’s wrecking of the country’s economy. Clearly, that is an intrusion on its sovereignty. Just because the results of Maduro’s policies aren’t liked by some citizens doesn’t give them the right to collude with foreigners to undermine them. We are merely presenting an unbiased description of the situation.”
Sounds like you have a problem with Maduro’s nationalism
So "nationalism" means mowing down innocent people with automatic weapons? That sounds more like socialism:

Katyn massacre - Wikipedia
Foreigners are interfering in the sovereignty of his nation, aka globalism. Sounds like you’re suggestig nationalism can sometimes be a problem.

I'm sure you're just as concerned about illegals doing the same thing here in the U.S. right?
 
Leftists actually defend this piece of shit. His days are numbered.


Armed troops loyal to President Maduro opened fire on the good Samaritans trying to bring food aid to desperately hungry Venezuelans—killing two and wounding another dozen or so. According to Maduro, “the aid is an attack on the sovereignty of my country. It is not for outsiders to decide what or how much Venezuelans should eat. That is my prerogative.”

Major media outlets in the US variously characterized the Army’s attack on the unarmed victims as a “clash” (Reuters), “standoff” (CNN), “showdown” (New York Times), and “face-off” (Wall Street Journal). An off-the-record explanation was offered by a CNN reporter: “look, Trump has already taken sides against Maduro’s wrecking of the country’s economy. Clearly, that is an intrusion on its sovereignty. Just because the results of Maduro’s policies aren’t liked by some citizens doesn’t give them the right to collude with foreigners to undermine them. We are merely presenting an unbiased description of the situation.”
Sounds like you have a problem with Maduro’s nationalism
So "nationalism" means mowing down innocent people with automatic weapons? That sounds more like socialism:

Katyn massacre - Wikipedia
Foreigners are interfering in the sovereignty of his nation, aka globalism. Sounds like you’re suggestig nationalism can sometimes be a problem.

I'm sure you're just as concerned about illegals doing the same thing here in the U.S. right?
A little bit. I’m not hysterical about it.
 
Leftists actually defend this piece of shit. His days are numbered.


Armed troops loyal to President Maduro opened fire on the good Samaritans trying to bring food aid to desperately hungry Venezuelans—killing two and wounding another dozen or so. According to Maduro, “the aid is an attack on the sovereignty of my country. It is not for outsiders to decide what or how much Venezuelans should eat. That is my prerogative.”

Major media outlets in the US variously characterized the Army’s attack on the unarmed victims as a “clash” (Reuters), “standoff” (CNN), “showdown” (New York Times), and “face-off” (Wall Street Journal). An off-the-record explanation was offered by a CNN reporter: “look, Trump has already taken sides against Maduro’s wrecking of the country’s economy. Clearly, that is an intrusion on its sovereignty. Just because the results of Maduro’s policies aren’t liked by some citizens doesn’t give them the right to collude with foreigners to undermine them. We are merely presenting an unbiased description of the situation.”
Sounds like you have a problem with Maduro’s nationalism
So "nationalism" means mowing down innocent people with automatic weapons? That sounds more like socialism:

Katyn massacre - Wikipedia
Foreigners are interfering in the sovereignty of his nation, aka globalism. Sounds like you’re suggestig nationalism can sometimes be a problem.
Bringing food and medicine is "interfering?" Do you suppose Trump would send soldiers to mow down people bringing food and medicine to the Unites States? Can you name any capitalist country that would do so?

You're a special kind of douchebag.
 
Leftists actually defend this piece of shit. His days are numbered.


Armed troops loyal to President Maduro opened fire on the good Samaritans trying to bring food aid to desperately hungry Venezuelans—killing two and wounding another dozen or so. According to Maduro, “the aid is an attack on the sovereignty of my country. It is not for outsiders to decide what or how much Venezuelans should eat. That is my prerogative.”

Major media outlets in the US variously characterized the Army’s attack on the unarmed victims as a “clash” (Reuters), “standoff” (CNN), “showdown” (New York Times), and “face-off” (Wall Street Journal). An off-the-record explanation was offered by a CNN reporter: “look, Trump has already taken sides against Maduro’s wrecking of the country’s economy. Clearly, that is an intrusion on its sovereignty. Just because the results of Maduro’s policies aren’t liked by some citizens doesn’t give them the right to collude with foreigners to undermine them. We are merely presenting an unbiased description of the situation.”
Sounds like you have a problem with Maduro’s nationalism
So "nationalism" means mowing down innocent people with automatic weapons? That sounds more like socialism:

Katyn massacre - Wikipedia
Foreigners are interfering in the sovereignty of his nation, aka globalism. Sounds like you’re suggestig nationalism can sometimes be a problem.

I'm sure you're just as concerned about illegals doing the same thing here in the U.S. right?

It seems he just endorsed shooting illegal aliens on the border.
 
Leftists actually defend this piece of shit. His days are numbered.


Armed troops loyal to President Maduro opened fire on the good Samaritans trying to bring food aid to desperately hungry Venezuelans—killing two and wounding another dozen or so. According to Maduro, “the aid is an attack on the sovereignty of my country. It is not for outsiders to decide what or how much Venezuelans should eat. That is my prerogative.”

Major media outlets in the US variously characterized the Army’s attack on the unarmed victims as a “clash” (Reuters), “standoff” (CNN), “showdown” (New York Times), and “face-off” (Wall Street Journal). An off-the-record explanation was offered by a CNN reporter: “look, Trump has already taken sides against Maduro’s wrecking of the country’s economy. Clearly, that is an intrusion on its sovereignty. Just because the results of Maduro’s policies aren’t liked by some citizens doesn’t give them the right to collude with foreigners to undermine them. We are merely presenting an unbiased description of the situation.”
Sounds like you have a problem with Maduro’s nationalism
So "nationalism" means mowing down innocent people with automatic weapons? That sounds more like socialism:

Katyn massacre - Wikipedia
Foreigners are interfering in the sovereignty of his nation, aka globalism. Sounds like you’re suggestig nationalism can sometimes be a problem.

I'm sure you're just as concerned about illegals doing the same thing here in the U.S. right?
A little bit. I’m not hysterical about it.

You're only concerned about getting more dem voters.
 
Leftists actually defend this piece of shit. His days are numbered.


Armed troops loyal to President Maduro opened fire on the good Samaritans trying to bring food aid to desperately hungry Venezuelans—killing two and wounding another dozen or so. According to Maduro, “the aid is an attack on the sovereignty of my country. It is not for outsiders to decide what or how much Venezuelans should eat. That is my prerogative.”

Major media outlets in the US variously characterized the Army’s attack on the unarmed victims as a “clash” (Reuters), “standoff” (CNN), “showdown” (New York Times), and “face-off” (Wall Street Journal). An off-the-record explanation was offered by a CNN reporter: “look, Trump has already taken sides against Maduro’s wrecking of the country’s economy. Clearly, that is an intrusion on its sovereignty. Just because the results of Maduro’s policies aren’t liked by some citizens doesn’t give them the right to collude with foreigners to undermine them. We are merely presenting an unbiased description of the situation.”
Sounds like you have a problem with Maduro’s nationalism
So "nationalism" means mowing down innocent people with automatic weapons? That sounds more like socialism:

Katyn massacre - Wikipedia
Foreigners are interfering in the sovereignty of his nation, aka globalism. Sounds like you’re suggestig nationalism can sometimes be a problem.
Bringing food and medicine is "interfering?" Do you suppose Trump would send soldiers to mow down people bringing food and medicine to the Unites States? Can you name any capitalist country that would do so?

You're a special kind of douchebag.
I wouldn’t put anything past your dotard. He treats all other strongmen dictators like Kings; Maduro got him wrong somehow.
 
Sounds like you have a problem with Maduro’s nationalism
So "nationalism" means mowing down innocent people with automatic weapons? That sounds more like socialism:

Katyn massacre - Wikipedia
Foreigners are interfering in the sovereignty of his nation, aka globalism. Sounds like you’re suggestig nationalism can sometimes be a problem.

I'm sure you're just as concerned about illegals doing the same thing here in the U.S. right?
A little bit. I’m not hysterical about it.

You're only concerned about getting more dem voters.
I’ve already got plenty of Dem voters. If numbers and the will of the people mattered, maybe then you’d be right about me. That’s not how the system works.
 
So "nationalism" means mowing down innocent people with automatic weapons? That sounds more like socialism:

Katyn massacre - Wikipedia
Foreigners are interfering in the sovereignty of his nation, aka globalism. Sounds like you’re suggestig nationalism can sometimes be a problem.

I'm sure you're just as concerned about illegals doing the same thing here in the U.S. right?
A little bit. I’m not hysterical about it.

You're only concerned about getting more dem voters.
I’ve already got plenty of Dem voters. If numbers and the will of the people mattered, maybe then you’d be right about me. That’s not how the system works.

So you're running for office?
 
Leftists actually defend this piece of shit. His days are numbered.


Armed troops loyal to President Maduro opened fire on the good Samaritans trying to bring food aid to desperately hungry Venezuelans—killing two and wounding another dozen or so. According to Maduro, “the aid is an attack on the sovereignty of my country. It is not for outsiders to decide what or how much Venezuelans should eat. That is my prerogative.”

Major media outlets in the US variously characterized the Army’s attack on the unarmed victims as a “clash” (Reuters), “standoff” (CNN), “showdown” (New York Times), and “face-off” (Wall Street Journal). An off-the-record explanation was offered by a CNN reporter: “look, Trump has already taken sides against Maduro’s wrecking of the country’s economy. Clearly, that is an intrusion on its sovereignty. Just because the results of Maduro’s policies aren’t liked by some citizens doesn’t give them the right to collude with foreigners to undermine them. We are merely presenting an unbiased description of the situation.”
Sounds like you have a problem with Maduro’s nationalism
So "nationalism" means mowing down innocent people with automatic weapons? That sounds more like socialism:

Katyn massacre - Wikipedia
Foreigners are interfering in the sovereignty of his nation, aka globalism. Sounds like you’re suggestig nationalism can sometimes be a problem.
Bringing food and medicine is "interfering?" Do you suppose Trump would send soldiers to mow down people bringing food and medicine to the Unites States? Can you name any capitalist country that would do so?

You're a special kind of douchebag.
I wouldn’t put anything past your dotard. He treats all other strongmen dictators like Kings; Maduro got him wrong somehow.

The US government didn't send the food and medicine, douchebag. Speaking of strongmen dictators like kings:

iu


obama_us_gabon-d3d191a3cf784802d97d929ebab0ea5577a34daa.jpg

iu

iu

iu

iu

iu

iu
 
Sounds like you have a problem with Maduro’s nationalism
So "nationalism" means mowing down innocent people with automatic weapons? That sounds more like socialism:

Katyn massacre - Wikipedia
Foreigners are interfering in the sovereignty of his nation, aka globalism. Sounds like you’re suggestig nationalism can sometimes be a problem.
Bringing food and medicine is "interfering?" Do you suppose Trump would send soldiers to mow down people bringing food and medicine to the Unites States? Can you name any capitalist country that would do so?

You're a special kind of douchebag.
I wouldn’t put anything past your dotard. He treats all other strongmen dictators like Kings; Maduro got him wrong somehow.

The US government didn't send the food and medicine, douchebag. Speaking of strongmen dictators like kings:

iu


obama_us_gabon-d3d191a3cf784802d97d929ebab0ea5577a34daa.jpg

iu

iu

iu

iu

iu

iu
Obama did not cover up murders for them or praise their leadership styles. But you’re “b-b-b-b-b-but Obamaaaaaaaaa :crybaby::crybaby::crybaby:” is noted.

Anyways your assault on Maduro’s nationalism and support for Guaido’s globalism is curious.
 
So "nationalism" means mowing down innocent people with automatic weapons? That sounds more like socialism:

Katyn massacre - Wikipedia
Foreigners are interfering in the sovereignty of his nation, aka globalism. Sounds like you’re suggestig nationalism can sometimes be a problem.
Bringing food and medicine is "interfering?" Do you suppose Trump would send soldiers to mow down people bringing food and medicine to the Unites States? Can you name any capitalist country that would do so?

You're a special kind of douchebag.
I wouldn’t put anything past your dotard. He treats all other strongmen dictators like Kings; Maduro got him wrong somehow.

The US government didn't send the food and medicine, douchebag. Speaking of strongmen dictators like kings:

iu


obama_us_gabon-d3d191a3cf784802d97d929ebab0ea5577a34daa.jpg

iu

iu

iu

iu

iu

iu
Obama did not cover up murders for them or praise their leadership styles. But you’re “b-b-b-b-b-but Obamaaaaaaaaa :crybaby::crybaby::crybaby:” is noted.

Anyways your assault on Maduro’s nationalism and support for Guaido’s globalism is curious.

What murder did Trump cover up?

Obama gave $150 billion to a country that throws gays off of tall buildings.
 
Leftists actually defend this piece of shit. His days are numbered.


Armed troops loyal to President Maduro opened fire on the good Samaritans trying to bring food aid to desperately hungry Venezuelans—killing two and wounding another dozen or so. According to Maduro, “the aid is an attack on the sovereignty of my country. It is not for outsiders to decide what or how much Venezuelans should eat. That is my prerogative.”

Major media outlets in the US variously characterized the Army’s attack on the unarmed victims as a “clash” (Reuters), “standoff” (CNN), “showdown” (New York Times), and “face-off” (Wall Street Journal). An off-the-record explanation was offered by a CNN reporter: “look, Trump has already taken sides against Maduro’s wrecking of the country’s economy. Clearly, that is an intrusion on its sovereignty. Just because the results of Maduro’s policies aren’t liked by some citizens doesn’t give them the right to collude with foreigners to undermine them. We are merely presenting an unbiased description of the situation.”
Sounds like you have a problem with Maduro’s nationalism
So "nationalism" means mowing down innocent people with automatic weapons? That sounds more like socialism:

Katyn massacre - Wikipedia
Foreigners are interfering in the sovereignty of his nation, aka globalism. Sounds like you’re suggestig nationalism can sometimes be a problem.

I'm sure you're just as concerned about illegals doing the same thing here in the U.S. right?

It seems he just endorsed shooting illegal aliens on the border.
Not that there's anything wrong with that.
 

Forum List

Back
Top