Louisiana Strikes Down Gay Marriage Ban

[Luddly Neddite]

It's one thing for one gay man in a robe overruling the will of the majority. It's quite another to pretend that the ruling is the will of the majority.

My condolences to the gays that will suffer for this foolishness.

So, the only possible reason for a judge to abide by the Constitution is he's gay.

You're a dumb, anti-America Pootarian.

 

[Bush92]

It's one thing for one gay man in a robe overruling the will of the majority. It's quite another to pretend that the ruling is the will of the majority.

My condolences to the gays that will suffer for this foolishness.

So, the only possible reason for a judge to abide by the Constitution is he's gay.

You're a dumb, anti-America Pootarian.

He is saying the judge, in California previous to this, don't know if the judge was also gay, but they interject their own sexual peccadillos into the ruling.

 

[mdk]

Explain again how the majority get what they want over the minority including depriving us of our liberty and property because we are a democracy who believe in mob rule, yet the majority can be overruled by one guy in a robe?

The will of the majority is irrelevant when it violates the Constitution.

 

[TheOldSchool]

It's one thing for one gay man in a robe overruling the will of the majority. It's quite another to pretend that the ruling is the will of the majority.

My condolences to the gays that will suffer for this foolishness.

In home country gays stay locked in basement for to not embarrass dear Leader. Is shame gays in America must suffer for to be in public.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

RWs would put camera's in our bedrooms.

 

[Bush92]

Explain again how the majority get what they want over the minority including depriving us of our liberty and property because we are a democracy who believe in mob rule, yet the majority can be overruled by one guy in a robe?

The will of the majority is irrelevant when it violates the Constitution.

The violation is from these activist judges who trample states right. But, you are a liberal so democracy means shit to you. Supreme Court ruling two summers ago was wrong.

 

[mdk]

There'll be partying in the French Quarter tonight.

There is a party in the French Quarter. I got Category Five drunk on Hurricanes at Pat O'Briens and plastered off Pimms at The Napoleon House during my last trip. Good times.

 

[mdk]

Explain again how the majority get what they want over the minority including depriving us of our liberty and property because we are a democracy who believe in mob rule, yet the majority can be overruled by one guy in a robe?

The will of the majority is irrelevant when it violates the Constitution.

The violation is from these activist judges who trample states right. But, you are a liberal so democracy means shit to you. Supreme Court ruling two summers ago was wrong.

They are only activist judges when they don't rule the way you wish. States do not have a right to pass laws that violate the Constitution.

 

[JakeStarkey]

States do not have the right to violate the civil liberties of due process and equal treatment.

That to all our reactionary far right clever clogs is why the 14th Amendment was passed.

Try it this way: majority don't be violating minority rights, yo.

 

[dcraelin]

The will of the majority is irrelevant when it violates the Constitution.

The bill of rights would not exist if it were not for the will of the Majority.....will of the majority is the only thing that gives the Constitution its legitimacy

http://www.usmessageboard.com/data/photos/l/2/2480-1378315917-ae01c96fbc1d7f92f67d6e6e2e04c65b.jpg

 

[Vandalshandle]

The will of the majority is irrelevant when it violates the Constitution.

The bill of rights would not exist if it were not for the will of the Majority.....will of the majority is the only thing that gives the Constitution its legitimacy

http://www.usmessageboard.com/data/photos/l/2/2480-1378315917-ae01c96fbc1d7f92f67d6e6e2e04c65b.jpg

Well, if the man who had a decades long sexual relationship with his slave, and then enslaved his own children, said it, it must be sacred wisdom of the highest order.

 

[mdk]

The will of the majority is irrelevant when it violates the Constitution.

The bill of rights would not exist if it were not for the will of the Majority.....will of the majority is the only thing that gives the Constitution its legitimacy

http://www.usmessageboard.com/data/photos/l/2/2480-1378315917-ae01c96fbc1d7f92f67d6e6e2e04c65b.jpg

The Bills of Rights would be useless if states got to cherry pick Amendments they do not feel like following.

 

[Bush92]

The will of the majority is irrelevant when it violates the Constitution.

The bill of rights would not exist if it were not for the will of the Majority.....will of the majority is the only thing that gives the Constitution its legitimacy

http://www.usmessageboard.com/data/photos/l/2/2480-1378315917-ae01c96fbc1d7f92f67d6e6e2e04c65b.jpg

Well, if the man who had a decades long sexual relationship with his slave, and then enslaved his own children, said it, it must be sacred wisdom of the highest order.

What the fuck are you babbling about. No prof of this relationship.

 

[bodecea]

Explain again how the majority get what they want over the minority including depriving us of our liberty and property because we are a democracy who believe in mob rule, yet the majority can be overruled by one guy in a robe?

That whole you can't vote away sone ones rights and thus judges as their job is too rule on such matters....

Don't like it, then blame the founders. Or you know, democrats like you like to do

Nobody's rights were voted away. Gay marriage is not a right.

Just as much as regular civil marriage is.

 

[bodecea]

Explain again how the majority get what they want over the minority including depriving us of our liberty and property because we are a democracy who believe in mob rule, yet the majority can be overruled by one guy in a robe?

That whole you can't vote away sone ones rights and thus judges as their job is too rule on such matters....

Don't like it, then blame the founders. Or you know, democrats like you like to do

Nobody's rights were voted away. Gay marriage is not a right.

14th Amendment peaches....this is the wrong website for you. Perhaps something about shapes and colors is more your speed?

14th Amendment is the most misused and misquoted in history. Repeal that sonofabitch.

I think you should encourage the Republican Party to put that down in their national platform.

 

[Bush92]

The will of the majority is irrelevant when it violates the Constitution.

The bill of rights would not exist if it were not for the will of the Majority.....will of the majority is the only thing that gives the Constitution its legitimacy

http://www.usmessageboard.com/data/photos/l/2/2480-1378315917-ae01c96fbc1d7f92f67d6e6e2e04c65b.jpg

The Bills of Rights would be useless if states got to cherry pick Amendments they do not feel like following.

Where does bill of rights talk about sexual preference?

 

[Bush92]

Explain again how the majority get what they want over the minority including depriving us of our liberty and property because we are a democracy who believe in mob rule, yet the majority can be overruled by one guy in a robe?

That whole you can't vote away sone ones rights and thus judges as their job is too rule on such matters....

Don't like it, then blame the founders. Or you know, democrats like you like to do

Nobody's rights were voted away. Gay marriage is not a right.

14th Amendment peaches....this is the wrong website for you. Perhaps something about shapes and colors is more your speed?

14th Amendment is the most misused and misquoted in history. Repeal that sonofabitch.

I think you should encourage the Republican Party to put that down in their national platform.

They should.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Explain again how the majority get what they want over the minority including depriving us of our liberty and property because we are a democracy who believe in mob rule, yet the majority can be overruled by one guy in a robe?

The will of the majority is irrelevant when it violates the Constitution.

The violation is from these activist judges who trample states right. But, you are a liberal so democracy means shit to you. Supreme Court ruling two summers ago was wrong.

In that case, the Constitution violates "state's rights".

 

[Jroc]

Louisiana judge Gay marriage ban unconstitutional

One more down.

Wrong title moron. Judge rules against the people of Louisiana. Louisiana did not overturn anything

 

[Plasmaball]

Louisiana judge Gay marriage ban unconstitutional

One more down.

Wrong title moron. Judge rules against the people of Louisiana. Louisiana did not overturn anything

Hey we filled our quota today on stupid. Please come back tomorrow.