Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Oh, an investigation by the NYT...well that certainly settles it. Everybody zip it now.
The NYT interviewed hundreds of Libyans with an understanding of the situation
Who did Republicans talk to?
Did the NYT interview any of the survivors that the Justice and State Departments blocked access to...I'd be interested in hearing from them.
. But the Republican arguments appear to conflate purely local extremist organizations like Ansar al-Shariah with Al Qaedas international terrorist network. The only intelligence connecting Al Qaeda to the attack was an intercepted phone call that night from a participant in the first wave of the attack to a friend in another African country who had ties to members of Al Qaeda, according to several officials briefed on the call. But when the friend heard the attackers boasts, he sounded astonished, the officials said, suggesting he had no prior knowledge of the assault.
Poor rw, I've poste Al Jazeera that connect them to Al Qaeda.
You lose kid.
The NYT interviewed hundreds of Libyans with an understanding of the situation
Who did Republicans talk to?
Did the NYT interview any of the survivors that the Justice and State Departments blocked access to...I'd be interested in hearing from them.
Like the guy who lied about even being there?
So much for the Republican campaign against Hillary
A Deadly Mix in Benghazi - The New York Times
Months of investigation by The New York Times, centered on extensive interviews with Libyans in Benghazi who had direct knowledge of the attack there and its context, turned up no evidence that Al Qaeda or other international terrorist groups had any role in the assault.
RW, did you ever doubt Obama...is this article all it took to restore your confidence??
Months of investigation by The New York Times, centered on extensive interviews with Libyans in Benghazi who had direct knowledge of the attack there and its context, turned up no evidence that Al Qaeda or other international terrorist groups had any role in the assault. The attack was led, instead, by fighters who had benefited directly from NATO’s extensive air power and logistics support during the uprising against Colonel Qaddafi. And contrary to claims by some members of Congress, it was fueled in large part by anger at an American-made video denigrating Islam.
A fuller accounting of the attacks suggests lessons for the United States that go well beyond Libya. It shows the risks of expecting American aid in a time of desperation to buy durable loyalty, and the difficulty of discerning friends from allies of convenience in a culture shaped by decades of anti-Western sentiment. Both are challenges now hanging over the American involvement in Syria’s civil conflict.
The attack also suggests that, as the threats from local militants around the region have multiplied, an intensive focus on combating Al Qaeda may distract from safeguarding American interests.
RW, did you ever doubt Obama...is this article all it took to restore your confidence??
Do you have anything to add other than "blah, blah, blah ... NYT ... blah .. blah .. ."?
These threads are pointless - no one wants the truth, RW ... they prove it with every moronic post.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
. But the Republican arguments appear to conflate purely local extremist organizations like Ansar al-Shariah with Al Qaedas international terrorist network. The only intelligence connecting Al Qaeda to the attack was an intercepted phone call that night from a participant in the first wave of the attack to a friend in another African country who had ties to members of Al Qaeda, according to several officials briefed on the call. But when the friend heard the attackers boasts, he sounded astonished, the officials said, suggesting he had no prior knowledge of the assault.
Poor rw, I've poste Al Jazeera that connect them to Al Qaeda.
You lose kid.
These threads are pointless - no one wants the truth, RW ... they prove it with every moronic post.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
LOL, you can't read can you?
These threads are pointless - no one wants the truth, RW ... they prove it with every moronic post.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
LOL, you can't read can you?
If you have a god damn point, please make it.
The New York Times has simply started the process of cleansing Bengazi in preparation for Hillary's Clinton's presidential campaign.
It is the Pravda of the Democratic Party.
LOL, you can't read can you?
If you have a god damn point, please make it.
Quote: Originally Posted by rightwinger View Post
. In this case, a central figure in the attack was an eccentric, malcontent militia leader, Ahmed Abu Khattala, according to numerous Libyans present at the time. American officials briefed on the American criminal investigation into the killings call him a prime suspect. Mr. Abu Khattala declared openly and often that he placed the United States not far behind Colonel Qaddafi on his list of infidel enemies. But he had no known affiliations with terrorist groups, and he had escaped scrutiny from the 20-person C.I.A. station in Benghazi that was set up to monitor the local situation.
Ahmed Abu Khattala
Ahmed Abu Khattala heads the Benghazi-based Ansar al-Sharia group
Read more: Islamist group leader Ahmed Abu Khattala named as mastermind behind U.S. consulate massacre in Benghazi | Mail Online
Ahmed-Abu-Khattala-named-mastermind-U-S-consulate-massacre-Benghazi.html#ixzz2ooJWG17P
[/COLOR]
Ansar al-Sharia has also been suspected in the violent attacks in the Mount Chaambi area near the Algerian border, including the killing of eight soldiers last month.
Laradeyh blamed the Salafist movement for liaising with Al-Qaeda's North African affiliate and announced the group as a terrorist group.
Ansar al-Sharia is considered one of the most radical groups that emerged after the secular autocrat Zine al-Abidine Ben Ali was toppled in 2011.
The Ansar leader Saifallah Benahssine, also known as Abu Iyadh, is a former al-Qaeda fighter in Afghanistan sought by police for allegedly inciting an attack on the US embassy in Tunis in September 2012.
Ansar al-Sharia blamed for Tunisia killings - Africa - Al Jazeera English
See how easy that was nutjob?
He is a Terrorist leader with ties to Al Qaeda.[/B]
His very first point is proven false in no more than 5 minutes with non partisan sources.
The premise of the article is bullshit as is your defense of the moron.
So much for the Republican campaign against Hillary
A Deadly Mix in Benghazi - The New York Times
Months of investigation by The New York Times, centered on extensive interviews with Libyans in Benghazi who had direct knowledge of the attack there and its context, turned up no evidence that Al Qaeda or other international terrorist groups had any role in the assault.
If you have a god damn point, please make it.
Quote: Originally Posted by rightwinger View Post
. In this case, a central figure in the attack was an eccentric, malcontent militia leader, Ahmed Abu Khattala, according to numerous Libyans present at the time. American officials briefed on the American criminal investigation into the killings call him a prime suspect. Mr. Abu Khattala declared openly and often that he placed the United States not far behind Colonel Qaddafi on his list of infidel enemies. But he had no known affiliations with terrorist groups, and he had escaped scrutiny from the 20-person C.I.A. station in Benghazi that was set up to monitor the local situation.
Ahmed Abu Khattala
Ahmed Abu Khattala heads the Benghazi-based Ansar al-Sharia group
Read more: Islamist group leader Ahmed Abu Khattala named as mastermind behind U.S. consulate massacre in Benghazi | Mail Online
Ahmed-Abu-Khattala-named-mastermind-U-S-consulate-massacre-Benghazi.html#ixzz2ooJWG17P
[/COLOR]
Ansar al-Sharia has also been suspected in the violent attacks in the Mount Chaambi area near the Algerian border, including the killing of eight soldiers last month.
Laradeyh blamed the Salafist movement for liaising with Al-Qaeda's North African affiliate and announced the group as a terrorist group.
Ansar al-Sharia is considered one of the most radical groups that emerged after the secular autocrat Zine al-Abidine Ben Ali was toppled in 2011.
The Ansar leader Saifallah Benahssine, also known as Abu Iyadh, is a former al-Qaeda fighter in Afghanistan sought by police for allegedly inciting an attack on the US embassy in Tunis in September 2012.
Ansar al-Sharia blamed for Tunisia killings - Africa - Al Jazeera English
See how easy that was nutjob?
He is a Terrorist leader with ties to Al Qaeda.[/B]
His very first point is proven false in no more than 5 minutes with non partisan sources.
The premise of the article is bullshit as is your defense of the moron.
Sorry man - I don't speak cut and paste.
Really not even sure what you are trying to relate in that mess of a thread you claim as "victory."
what an embarrassing thread for rightwinger
