- Thread starter
- #141
Are you now understanding the relationship between McCain's resistence to earmarks and the result of the exact opposite doctrines by the Democrats, and where that has led us?
He wouldn't have turned over the reins to Pelosi.
Did you see the same embarrassing behavior from this President tonight, when he told the press that Michelle was calling him so he had to run....with Clinton there to hold his hand.
Almost as embarrassing as the constant bows to every third world leader he could find....
"just how bad the economy would be and for how long."
OMG.
How do you know what the results would have been if the government has not thrown a trillion dollars at the problem???
Had that ever been tried?
Yes.
And it actually worked.
"Are you convinced he would not have bailed out banks, etc., and their collapse would have been good for us? Do you think he could have designed a more effective stimulus program?"
No, I don't know that...
"Republican and Democratic office holders show a similar presumption to dominate and fewer differences in tastes, habits, opinions, and sources of income among one another than between both and the rest of the country. They think, look, and act as a class.
Differences between Bushes, Clintons, and Obamas are of degree, not kind. "
The American Spectator : America's Ruling Class -- And the Perils of Revolution
So, on the one hand we know we have a total screw-up, on the other a chance that a different plan would have been in effect.
How can you expect me to blame what didn't happen?
PC, I have no idea what this post of yours means.
Well, neither does she, so perhaps finally you two have found something you have in common.
But, we have lots in common, Carby...the difference is that the right warned about this President, and WALLAH! it came to pass!
And the left chose to vote for him anyway...and now they have egg on their collective (pun intended) faces and have to bang their heads against the wall.
(Too many synecdoches?)