Do you? This thread wouldn't exist if McCain hadn't rejected Hagee's endorsement. Right? The only implication of coziness is the one you dreamed up.
Your first sentence is nonsense. Obama is a candidate for the US Presidency. Of course his personal religious views have something to do with your, and everyone else's lives, and THAT is a coziness that exists.
You can brush off a political endorsement because you don't agree with the beliefs of the organization doing the endorsing. You can't brush off your personal pastor of 20+ years and expect anyone capable of rational thought to buy it.
Again, the comparison doesn't exist without having to invent it.
You and I are going to keep going around and around on this. If you think the Rev Wright thing makes me happy, it doesn't. And if McCain were the person he was in 2000, I might well have cast my vote for him. Hagee is just a symptom of what ails him, IMO. And I think it's clear from the policy positions he's taking that McCain has traded a chunk of his soul to the good rev's Hagee and Parsley. And for me, that's a deal-breaker. Obviously, other issues are more relevant to you. Don't think for a second that the Rev Wright issue doesn't trouble me. Don't think for a second that I'm comfortable with it. I'd be lying if I said it didn't make me cringe. But the question I ask is this: Is Rev Wright going to shape U.S. policy? The answer's no. Are Hagee and Parsley? Well, yes, why do you think they have a relationship with McCain (the guy who called them "agents of intolerance") in the first place?