Lindsey Graham Wants Witnesses

something changed after ms lindsey met up with donny for a few rounds of golf. i bet that's when president tinkles told graham that putin knows about all the little boys in his closet & better become donny's #1 cheerleader if he wants them to stay in that closet.
You guys used to love Putin, until he told your man child where to go. After Obama wanted to give America to him.
Make stuff up much? WHO exactly “loved Putin”?
Quotes please

i know, right? gee, i remember when pootey poot gassd his own citizens out for the evening just enjoying themselves at the theater cause they were unlucky enough to have been caught up in a terrorist/hostage situation.

sure not much to love about a creature who could do that.
you must have missed this, which has been posted for so many times, but you're an idiot.



no.... believe me - i have SEEN that a million times because that is all you can dredge up. that WAS before all the sanctions withheld AND the spies thrown out, AND their compounds were closed down. now........... run along & get a link showing exactly what 'flexibility' that turned out to be. i've asked every time & nobody can show me.

lol. ya wonder why.

I don't need anything else. that's omission dumb fk.
 
Should we not see all the available evidence in a case of this import?
the evidence that was voted on sure. you should go talk to the left. they voted for this and it's obvious you think it's weak or doesn't do it. odd. hmmm then take the articles back and go get the witnesses you need and the gop need, investigate some more and revote. the senate isn't for that investigation, that's what the house is for. fk

originally, turtle boy wasn't going to allow ANY evidence that the house had already but enough (R)s said that was wrong & he caved. not even wanting the evidence already gathered?

huh... why would that be? cause he knows what they already have is damaging?
you didn't answer the question loser fk. why do the left need more witnesses if their articles are so strong? explain

they want ALL the witness' to testify to corroborate the evidence & witness that have been presented. the bigger more LOGICAL question would be that:

WHY if donny had nothing to hide & them thar witness' that he's trying really really hard to stop from testifying, & all the hard copy evidence that shirley could set him free is being with held, is he hiding EVERYTHING?
then why didn't they bring them in prior to the vote? you know they voted right? please tell me you know this. Wasn't that the house job?

shaming something you can't control is very humorous. I tell you. Where's your remarks for Biden then?

because they are all tied up in court. mcghan was subpeaned in april & the decision is still in play & bolton's deputy, charles kupperman sued to not testify & bolton was gonna do the same & THAT decision was just made, where he lost but there was no real time table as to when that woulda happened. kupperman lost & that is why bolton now says he'll testify because he would have lost too.
 
You guys used to love Putin, until he told your man child where to go. After Obama wanted to give America to him.
Make stuff up much? WHO exactly “loved Putin”?
Quotes please

i know, right? gee, i remember when pootey poot gassd his own citizens out for the evening just enjoying themselves at the theater cause they were unlucky enough to have been caught up in a terrorist/hostage situation.

sure not much to love about a creature who could do that.
you must have missed this, which has been posted for so many times, but you're an idiot.



no.... believe me - i have SEEN that a million times because that is all you can dredge up. that WAS before all the sanctions withheld AND the spies thrown out, AND their compounds were closed down. now........... run along & get a link showing exactly what 'flexibility' that turned out to be. i've asked every time & nobody can show me.

lol. ya wonder why.

I don't need anything else. that's omission dumb fk.


that was not. nothing ever came of it, nothing concrete was discussed & tell me how wrong it is to mislead an agent of a hostile government for diplomatic reasons when no agreement was being discussed... you're outa gas.
 
Should we not see all the available evidence in a case of this import?
the evidence that was voted on sure. you should go talk to the left. they voted for this and it's obvious you think it's weak or doesn't do it. odd. hmmm then take the articles back and go get the witnesses you need and the gop need, investigate some more and revote. the senate isn't for that investigation, that's what the house is for. fk
So you only want SOME of the evidence.

I wonder why
The Uncovering – Mike Rogers’ Investigation, Section 702 FISA...
The FBI’s Private Contractors – FISA Abuse, the Steele Dossier & A...

There you go...........Evidence of Crimes and Misdemeanors from ...........OOPS...........OBAMA.
I heard this morning that Senator Grassley is looking at the DoD for Information on all of this now.

Chuck Grassley Expands Probe into DoD Contracts Awarded to Stefan Halper over Spying Concerns | National Review
 
the evidence that was voted on sure. you should go talk to the left. they voted for this and it's obvious you think it's weak or doesn't do it. odd. hmmm then take the articles back and go get the witnesses you need and the gop need, investigate some more and revote. the senate isn't for that investigation, that's what the house is for. fk

originally, turtle boy wasn't going to allow ANY evidence that the house had already but enough (R)s said that was wrong & he caved. not even wanting the evidence already gathered?

huh... why would that be? cause he knows what they already have is damaging?
you didn't answer the question loser fk. why do the left need more witnesses if their articles are so strong? explain

they want ALL the witness' to testify to corroborate the evidence & witness that have been presented. the bigger more LOGICAL question would be that:

WHY if donny had nothing to hide & them thar witness' that he's trying really really hard to stop from testifying, & all the hard copy evidence that shirley could set him free is being with held, is he hiding EVERYTHING?
then why didn't they bring them in prior to the vote? you know they voted right? please tell me you know this. Wasn't that the house job?

shaming something you can't control is very humorous. I tell you. Where's your remarks for Biden then?

because they are all tied up in court. mcghan was subpeaned in april & the decision is still in play & bolton's deputy, charles kupperman sued to not testify & bolton was gonna do the same & THAT decision was just made, where he lost but there was no real time table as to when that woulda happened. kupperman lost & that is why bolton now says he'll testify because he would have lost too.
nope, they never took it to court. The next step is to wait, not vote. so that's on them. not on the senate. sorry fk. And dude, you can rate smiley faces at me all you want, it's still a rating. And, ....I don't give a fk. you're the goof.

they didn't even bring subpoena's for all of what they supposedly wanted to question. dude, yo're such a loser.
 
something changed after ms lindsey met up with donny for a few rounds of golf. i bet that's when president tinkles told graham that putin knows about all the little boys in his closet & better become donny's #1 cheerleader if he wants them to stay in that closet.
You guys used to love Putin, until he told your man child where to go. After Obama wanted to give America to him.
Make stuff up much? WHO exactly “loved Putin”?
Quotes please

i know, right? gee, i remember when pootey poot gassd his own citizens out for the evening just enjoying themselves at the theater cause they were unlucky enough to have been caught up in a terrorist/hostage situation.

sure not much to love about a creature who could do that.
you must have missed this, which has been posted for so many times, but you're an idiot.



no.... believe me - i have SEEN that a million times because that is all you can dredge up. that WAS before all the sanctions withheld AND the spies thrown out, AND their compounds were closed down. now........... run along & get a link showing exactly what 'flexibility' that turned out to be. i've asked every time & nobody can show me.

lol. ya wonder why.

Obama did let Putin have the flexibility to interfere with our elections, I mean that's what you loons say.
 
Make stuff up much? WHO exactly “loved Putin”?
Quotes please

i know, right? gee, i remember when pootey poot gassd his own citizens out for the evening just enjoying themselves at the theater cause they were unlucky enough to have been caught up in a terrorist/hostage situation.

sure not much to love about a creature who could do that.
you must have missed this, which has been posted for so many times, but you're an idiot.



no.... believe me - i have SEEN that a million times because that is all you can dredge up. that WAS before all the sanctions withheld AND the spies thrown out, AND their compounds were closed down. now........... run along & get a link showing exactly what 'flexibility' that turned out to be. i've asked every time & nobody can show me.

lol. ya wonder why.

I don't need anything else. that's omission dumb fk.


that was not. nothing ever came of it, nothing concrete was discussed & tell me how wrong it is to mislead an agent of a hostile government for diplomatic reasons when no agreement was being discussed... you're outa gas.

it's called the dossier. we know.
 
You guys used to love Putin, until he told your man child where to go. After Obama wanted to give America to him.
Make stuff up much? WHO exactly “loved Putin”?
Quotes please

i know, right? gee, i remember when pootey poot gassd his own citizens out for the evening just enjoying themselves at the theater cause they were unlucky enough to have been caught up in a terrorist/hostage situation.

sure not much to love about a creature who could do that.
you must have missed this, which has been posted for so many times, but you're an idiot.



no.... believe me - i have SEEN that a million times because that is all you can dredge up. that WAS before all the sanctions withheld AND the spies thrown out, AND their compounds were closed down. now........... run along & get a link showing exactly what 'flexibility' that turned out to be. i've asked every time & nobody can show me.

lol. ya wonder why.

Obama did let Putin have the flexibility to interfere with our elections, I mean that's what you loons say.

remember obammy laughed at that thought. it's called dossier.
 
Should we not see all the available evidence in a case of this import?
the evidence that was voted on sure. you should go talk to the left. they voted for this and it's obvious you think it's weak or doesn't do it. odd. hmmm then take the articles back and go get the witnesses you need and the gop need, investigate some more and revote. the senate isn't for that investigation, that's what the house is for. fk
So you only want SOME of the evidence.

I wonder why
The Uncovering – Mike Rogers’ Investigation, Section 702 FISA...
The FBI’s Private Contractors – FISA Abuse, the Steele Dossier & A...

There you go...........Evidence of Crimes and Misdemeanors from ...........OOPS...........OBAMA.
I heard this morning that Senator Grassley is looking at the DoD for Information on all of this now.

Chuck Grassley Expands Probe into DoD Contracts Awarded to Stefan Halper over Spying Concerns | National Review
One of the contractors Admiral Rogers SHUT DOWN...........for spying on thousands of Americans.........ILLEGALLY..........as the articles I put up show.............In VIOLATION 85% of the time via minimization reporting 702 rules....................Not just that................they gave out CLASSIFIED data to people WITHOUT THE NEED TO KNOW..............

Which is a FELONY CRIME...........Imagine that.
 
Make stuff up much? WHO exactly “loved Putin”?
Quotes please

i know, right? gee, i remember when pootey poot gassd his own citizens out for the evening just enjoying themselves at the theater cause they were unlucky enough to have been caught up in a terrorist/hostage situation.

sure not much to love about a creature who could do that.
you must have missed this, which has been posted for so many times, but you're an idiot.



no.... believe me - i have SEEN that a million times because that is all you can dredge up. that WAS before all the sanctions withheld AND the spies thrown out, AND their compounds were closed down. now........... run along & get a link showing exactly what 'flexibility' that turned out to be. i've asked every time & nobody can show me.

lol. ya wonder why.

Obama did let Putin have the flexibility to interfere with our elections, I mean that's what you loons say.

remember obammy laughed at that thought. it's called dossier.

I know, and he said nobody could meddle in our elections. Another Obama lie.
 
i know, right? gee, i remember when pootey poot gassd his own citizens out for the evening just enjoying themselves at the theater cause they were unlucky enough to have been caught up in a terrorist/hostage situation.

sure not much to love about a creature who could do that.
you must have missed this, which has been posted for so many times, but you're an idiot.



no.... believe me - i have SEEN that a million times because that is all you can dredge up. that WAS before all the sanctions withheld AND the spies thrown out, AND their compounds were closed down. now........... run along & get a link showing exactly what 'flexibility' that turned out to be. i've asked every time & nobody can show me.

lol. ya wonder why.

Obama did let Putin have the flexibility to interfere with our elections, I mean that's what you loons say.

remember obammy laughed at that thought. it's called dossier.

I know, and he said nobody could meddle in our elections. Another Obama lie.

Adam Schitt's is interfering right now in 2020. And he wants the people to lose their voting rights. hly fk. this dude is a fking traitor with ten capital T's. He despises our constitution.

And that mthr fkr is on the floor of our senate spewing his traitorous talk. What's shameful is not one mthr fking senator has said anything about it.
 
you must have missed this, which has been posted for so many times, but you're an idiot.



no.... believe me - i have SEEN that a million times because that is all you can dredge up. that WAS before all the sanctions withheld AND the spies thrown out, AND their compounds were closed down. now........... run along & get a link showing exactly what 'flexibility' that turned out to be. i've asked every time & nobody can show me.

lol. ya wonder why.

Obama did let Putin have the flexibility to interfere with our elections, I mean that's what you loons say.

remember obammy laughed at that thought. it's called dossier.

I know, and he said nobody could meddle in our elections. Another Obama lie.

Adam Schitt's is interfering right now in 2020. And he wants the people to lose their voting rights. hly fk. this dude is a fking traitor with ten capital T's.

The thing is, Schiff is guaranteeing Trump's reelection.
 
Should we not see all the available evidence in a case of this import?
the evidence that was voted on sure. you should go talk to the left. they voted for this and it's obvious you think it's weak or doesn't do it. odd. hmmm then take the articles back and go get the witnesses you need and the gop need, investigate some more and revote. the senate isn't for that investigation, that's what the house is for. fk
So you only want SOME of the evidence.

I wonder why

No, what I want is Democrats to live by what they have said publicly and they stated there is enough evidence already to convict and remove Trump.

So are you disagreeing with their statements and believe more evidence?

I am not responding for the other poster but jumping in...
 
Should we not see all the available evidence in a case of this import?
the evidence that was voted on sure. you should go talk to the left. they voted for this and it's obvious you think it's weak or doesn't do it. odd. hmmm then take the articles back and go get the witnesses you need and the gop need, investigate some more and revote. the senate isn't for that investigation, that's what the house is for. fk
So you only want SOME of the evidence.

I wonder why

No, what I want is Democrats to live by what they have said publicly and they stated there is enough evidence already to convict and remove Trump.

So are you disagreeing with their statements and believe more evidence?

I am not responding for the other poster but jumping in...
I want them to defend the articles and evidence they voted on. They don't get to say, but, but, but. No, they voted. Therefore, they were done.
 
Should we not see all the available evidence in a case of this import?
the evidence that was voted on sure. you should go talk to the left. they voted for this and it's obvious you think it's weak or doesn't do it. odd. hmmm then take the articles back and go get the witnesses you need and the gop need, investigate some more and revote. the senate isn't for that investigation, that's what the house is for. fk
So you only want SOME of the evidence.

I wonder why

No, what I want is Democrats to live by what they have said publicly and they stated there is enough evidence already to convict and remove Trump.

So are you disagreeing with their statements and believe more evidence?

I am not responding for the other poster but jumping in...
I want them to defend the articles and evidence they voted on. They don't get to say, but, but, but. No, they voted. Therefore, they were done.

The Obstruction of Congress was weak but I did call it before it happened because I knew that is what they were gunning for.

They can not scream Obstruction until they have exhausted the Courts which they did not.

As for abuse of power the question I pose to everyone that believe Trump is abusing his office need to answer which President has never abused the power of their office?

Jimmy Carter?

Finally, Democrats claim the evidence they have was enough for Conviction, so they should live by what they said because if not then they jumped the gun on this issue and messed it up for themselves and no it is not the GOP to fix their mistake!
 
Should we not see all the available evidence in a case of this import?
the evidence that was voted on sure. you should go talk to the left. they voted for this and it's obvious you think it's weak or doesn't do it. odd. hmmm then take the articles back and go get the witnesses you need and the gop need, investigate some more and revote. the senate isn't for that investigation, that's what the house is for. fk
So you only want SOME of the evidence.

I wonder why

No, what I want is Democrats to live by what they have said publicly and they stated there is enough evidence already to convict and remove Trump.

So are you disagreeing with their statements and believe more evidence?

I am not responding for the other poster but jumping in...
I want them to defend the articles and evidence they voted on. They don't get to say, but, but, but. No, they voted. Therefore, they were done.

The Obstruction of Congress was weak but I did call it before it happened because I knew that is what they were gunning for.

They can not scream Obstruction until they have exhausted the Courts which they did not.

As for abuse of power the question I pose to everyone that believe Trump is abusing his office need to answer which President has never abused the power of their office?

Jimmy Carter?

Finally, Democrats claim the evidence they have was enough for Conviction, so they should live by what they said because if not then they jumped the gun on this issue and messed it up for themselves and no it is not the GOP to fix their mistake!
well we know the GAO said obammy held aid seven times. Where were these fks then?
 
the evidence that was voted on sure. you should go talk to the left. they voted for this and it's obvious you think it's weak or doesn't do it. odd. hmmm then take the articles back and go get the witnesses you need and the gop need, investigate some more and revote. the senate isn't for that investigation, that's what the house is for. fk
So you only want SOME of the evidence.

I wonder why

No, what I want is Democrats to live by what they have said publicly and they stated there is enough evidence already to convict and remove Trump.

So are you disagreeing with their statements and believe more evidence?

I am not responding for the other poster but jumping in...
I want them to defend the articles and evidence they voted on. They don't get to say, but, but, but. No, they voted. Therefore, they were done.

The Obstruction of Congress was weak but I did call it before it happened because I knew that is what they were gunning for.

They can not scream Obstruction until they have exhausted the Courts which they did not.

As for abuse of power the question I pose to everyone that believe Trump is abusing his office need to answer which President has never abused the power of their office?

Jimmy Carter?

Finally, Democrats claim the evidence they have was enough for Conviction, so they should live by what they said because if not then they jumped the gun on this issue and messed it up for themselves and no it is not the GOP to fix their mistake!
well we know the GAO said obammy held aid seven times. Where were these fks then?

Anyone that said a bad thing about Obama was considered a racist... Now Obama is not friendly with Sanders or even Warren so maybe those that ignored his abuses will now start calling him out, but doubtful...
 
originally, turtle boy wasn't going to allow ANY evidence that the house had already but enough (R)s said that was wrong & he caved. not even wanting the evidence already gathered?

huh... why would that be? cause he knows what they already have is damaging?
you didn't answer the question loser fk. why do the left need more witnesses if their articles are so strong? explain

they want ALL the witness' to testify to corroborate the evidence & witness that have been presented. the bigger more LOGICAL question would be that:

WHY if donny had nothing to hide & them thar witness' that he's trying really really hard to stop from testifying, & all the hard copy evidence that shirley could set him free is being with held, is he hiding EVERYTHING?
then why didn't they bring them in prior to the vote? you know they voted right? please tell me you know this. Wasn't that the house job?

shaming something you can't control is very humorous. I tell you. Where's your remarks for Biden then?

because they are all tied up in court. mcghan was subpeaned in april & the decision is still in play & bolton's deputy, charles kupperman sued to not testify & bolton was gonna do the same & THAT decision was just made, where he lost but there was no real time table as to when that woulda happened. kupperman lost & that is why bolton now says he'll testify because he would have lost too.
nope, they never took it to court. The next step is to wait, not vote. so that's on them. not on the senate. sorry fk. And dude, you can rate smiley faces at me all you want, it's still a rating. And, ....I don't give a fk. you're the goof.

they didn't even bring subpoena's for all of what they supposedly wanted to question. dude, yo're such a loser.

mcghan sure was subpeaned & kupperman was as well. waiting was going to be a waste given their obvious behavior not to comply. that makes you a liar.

again.
 
You guys used to love Putin, until he told your man child where to go. After Obama wanted to give America to him.
Make stuff up much? WHO exactly “loved Putin”?
Quotes please

i know, right? gee, i remember when pootey poot gassd his own citizens out for the evening just enjoying themselves at the theater cause they were unlucky enough to have been caught up in a terrorist/hostage situation.

sure not much to love about a creature who could do that.
you must have missed this, which has been posted for so many times, but you're an idiot.



no.... believe me - i have SEEN that a million times because that is all you can dredge up. that WAS before all the sanctions withheld AND the spies thrown out, AND their compounds were closed down. now........... run along & get a link showing exactly what 'flexibility' that turned out to be. i've asked every time & nobody can show me.

lol. ya wonder why.

Obama did let Putin have the flexibility to interfere with our elections, I mean that's what you loons say.


no he didn't, & nobody said that. got any credible links to show that? no? no you say?

:abgg2q.jpg::afro::113:
 

Forum List

Back
Top