Lies? Legal Ruling-Immigration-Politics: Washington Times: Judge Hanen
Judge Andrew Hanen s opinion in Texas v. United States
Federal judge blocks immigrant benefits SCOTUSblog
"Judge Hanen ruled that Texas and more than two dozen other states had standing to bring the lawsuit."
"Judge cites executive overreach, burden on states in halting Obama amnesty"
Judge Andrew Hanen s Obama amnesty ruling cites executive overreach burden on states - Washington Times
Huh? Amnesty? States other than Texas have standing?"Judge cites executive overreach, burden on states in halting Obama amnesty"
Judge Andrew Hanen s Obama amnesty ruling cites executive overreach burden on states - Washington Times
Judge Andrew Hanen s opinion in Texas v. United States
Federal judge blocks immigrant benefits SCOTUSblog
Ultimately, the judge found that only one border state — Texas — did have the right to file the legal challenge
much of the opinion is a memorandum strewn with political rants more than legal argument. Why do rightwing news sources feel the need to misrepresent and lie so blatantly? It will only dumb down the base of their audience?