Did the girl by any chance force Polanski to sodomize her at gunpoint? Did she by any chance steal his wallet? Those are things he would have no control over. He did, however, have control over his dick, so really bad comparison. But let's look at it, since you brought it up.
Think it over carefully. In essence, you're saying that a rape victim is responsible for being raped if she dresses a certain way, or drinks too much, or walks alone at night. She might be foolish, she might be "asking for it", but the rapist is the one who chooses to commit the crime.
Polanski knew she was underage, he knew what he was doing is wrong, and he chose to do it anyway
again- the sex was consensual, so it wasn't rape.
You can call this girl a 'victim' all day, but she knew what she was doing.
She had done it before. Well, maybe not the butt stuff. We know you get all upset about the butt stuff.
I've asked before, and you ignored, can a 13 year old girl really have consensual relations in a situation where she has no power, is under the influence of a Quaalude, and is being pressured by a middle aged man who is not taking 'no' for an answer?
Your disdain (look up the word if you wonder what it means) for young teenaged girls won't let you consider the question. You note (apparently approvingly) that historical figures had sex with young girls and that supposedly makes what Polanski did okay. Do you maintain that those girls also knew what they were doing and had truly consensual relations with those historical figures?
Now, did you do your homework and write down what those trigger words made you feel?