Libs said Goldwater was "unfit", and literally Hitler

There are allegations that LBJ's black bag operatives bugged Goldwater's plane but the Washington Post didn't care. Everything that the media accused Nixon of doing was rampant in the LBJ administration but LBJ was a democrat and could count on support from the drooling fools in the media. The notorious "daisy commercial" was the nail in the Goldwater coffin but ironically, LBJ's arranged conflict in Vietnam would lead to more American deaths than Korea.

That's curious since it was the media coverage of Vietnam that did him in. "If I've lost Cronkheit I've lost America", something like that.

Speaking of Vietnam that started with Eisenhower's Sec of State. You could look it up.

LBJ really didn't need a "nail in Goldwater's coffin". He was going to win easily, mostly fueling on sympathy out of the Kennedy assassination. Goldwater was in effect a sacrificial lamb. It was the biggest landslide ever.

Personally I thought the Repubs could have made it far more interesting had they nominated Margaret Chase Smith, but they didn't.
 
Last edited:
Barry Goldwater was the target of television's first, and arguably most effective smear campaigns, the 'Daisy Ad'.



That's not a "smear". A smear is when you besmirch somebody's name with some bullshit -- e.g. "born in Kenya". You can't do that with speculation.
 
Where are these "Libs" your title claims?



Hm?


Did you just ..... "forget" to bring them? Or did your dog eat your homework?

He means dumbfuck Stalinists like you. Granted you are the most anti-liberal piles of shit in the universe. But you vile Marxist fucks used the same level of demagoguery against Goldwater, Nixon, Reagan, and Bush Jr. as you vomit out at Trump.

You are truly vermin, enemies of America.

A broken clock can be right once in awhile, they were right about Bush Jr.
Not that he was a Nazi, okay, but that he was a bad man, and a disaster to the economy.
 
There are allegations that LBJ's black bag operatives bugged Goldwater's plane but the Washington Post didn't care. Everything that the media accused Nixon of doing was rampant in the LBJ administration but LBJ was a democrat and could count on support from the drooling fools in the media. The notorious "daisy commercial" was the nail in the Goldwater coffin but ironically, LBJ's arranged conflict in Vietnam would lead to more American deaths than Korea.

That's curious since it was the media coverage of Vietnam that did him in. "If I've lost Cronkheit I've lost America", something like that.

Speaking of Vietnam that started with Eisenhower's Sec of State. You could look it up.

LBJ really didn't need a "nail in Goldwater's coffin". He was going to win easily, mostly fueling on sympathy out of the Kennedy assassination. Goldwater was in effect a sacrificial lamb. It was the biggest landslide ever.

Personally I thought the Repubs could have made it far more interesting had they nominated Margaret Chase Smith, but they didn't.
You want to blame Eisenhower for Vietnam? Why not JFK? The media never questioned LBJ's bogus Tonkin Gulf crisis even though in retrospect it was easily debunked. The dirty little secret was that the slimy degenerate lazy media merely rubber stamped everything democrats ever did until it became obvious that LBJ wouldn't run for reelection and Nixon would easily win.
 
There are allegations that LBJ's black bag operatives bugged Goldwater's plane but the Washington Post didn't care. Everything that the media accused Nixon of doing was rampant in the LBJ administration but LBJ was a democrat and could count on support from the drooling fools in the media. The notorious "daisy commercial" was the nail in the Goldwater coffin but ironically, LBJ's arranged conflict in Vietnam would lead to more American deaths than Korea.

That's curious since it was the media coverage of Vietnam that did him in. "If I've lost Cronkheit I've lost America", something like that.

Speaking of Vietnam that started with Eisenhower's Sec of State. You could look it up.

LBJ really didn't need a "nail in Goldwater's coffin". He was going to win easily, mostly fueling on sympathy out of the Kennedy assassination. Goldwater was in effect a sacrificial lamb. It was the biggest landslide ever.

Personally I thought the Repubs could have made it far more interesting had they nominated Margaret Chase Smith, but they didn't.
You want to blame Eisenhower for Vietnam? Why not JFK? The media never questioned LBJ's bogus Tonkin Gulf crisis even though in retrospect it was easily debunked. The dirty little secret was that the slimy degenerate lazy media merely rubber stamped everything democrats ever did until it became obvious that LBJ wouldn't run for reelection and Nixon would easily win.

I blame Dulles for Vietnam, but Eisenhower enabled him. And it sure as hell didn't start with the Gulf of Tonkin.

Oh by the way Nixon didn't "easily win" at all. He squeaked in with something like 43% of the vote. Not real good at this history stuff are ya.

Meanwhile we continue to sit and we continue to wait for that link about "Libs" from the OP. And we continue to enjoy a crickets concert.
 
1406353_600.jpg


CEWMu59WMAAbR5-.jpg


he seemed pretty lucid to me..........



At the time he ran for President, he was widely condemned by Liberals and RINOs and considered to be Literally Hitler.

Liberals have never compromised, not one bit. If you listened to the Democrat debate last month- they are all 100% in favor of Gay Marriage, 100% in favor of Abortion on Demand, 100% in favor of the Green New Deal, Medicare for All and much higher tax rates.

No room at all for compromise with the Democrat Party.

If someone doesn't want Gay Marriage legal, they have no place in the DP, even if they agree with all kinds of socialist bullshit.

duh. because that's the platform. the (R) platform is anti choice, endorse for profit healthcare & are pro 2nd amendment with no ban of assault weapons.

:rofl:

You're almost as dumb as Pogo.



Fucking retard.


tweet.png


transparent-clock-backwards-1.gif


:113:
 
the (R) platform is anti choice, endorse for profit healthcare & are pro 2nd amendment with no ban of assault weapons.
all you did was accuse them of being capitalists who defend the constitution while standing in opposition to something that cannot be found anywhere in the constitution.

uh-huh... when will you willingly start to pay extra for the po po or your local fire depts ? don't they deserve to make a profit?

& if you can find where it says in the constitution the right to invade ones' privacy, i'll be happy to read it.

speaking of the constitution... if ones' individual right to bear arms should be unfettered, why is it illegal to own something like a bazooka? lol... lol... lol....
 
uh-huh... when will you willingly start to pay the po po or your local fire depts' ? don't they deserve to make a profit?

& if you can find where it says in the constitution the right to invade ones' privacy, i'll be happy to read it.

speaking of the constitution... if ones' individual right to bear arms should be unfettered, why is it illegal to own something like a bazooka? lol... lol... lol....
This is whats left of the liberal argument when CNN goes to commercial
 
uh-huh... when will you willingly start to pay the po po or your local fire depts' ? don't they deserve to make a profit?

& if you can find where it says in the constitution the right to invade ones' privacy, i'll be happy to read it.

speaking of the constitution... if ones' individual right to bear arms should be unfettered, why is it illegal to own something like a bazooka? lol... lol... lol....
This is whats left of the liberal argument when CNN goes to commercial

oh i see.... you can't answer them thar quesions, so go immediately to deflection.
 
oh i see.... you can't answer them thar quesions, so go immediately to deflection.
I'll admit I can't answer thpreamble of the constitutuion.em...what I wanna see is the poster who can:booze:

so you gots nuthin but rw talking points. got it.

when will you willingly start to pay extra for the po po or your local fire depts ? don't they deserve to make a profit?

they don't deserve to make a profit, because of societal greater good 'promoting the general welfare' thingy found in the preamble of the constituion.

& if you can find where it says in the constitution the right to invade ones' privacy, i'll be happy to read it.

of course you can't find it, cause it ain't there. that was an easy one to answer & i know why you didn't even try.

speaking of the constitution... if ones' individual right to bear arms should be unfettered, why is it illegal to own something like a bazooka? lol... lol... lol....

because even washington had lawful, constitutional gun control regs... that's why.
 
so you gots nuthin but rw talking points. got it.

when will you willingly start to pay extra for the po po or your local fire depts ? don't they deserve to make a profit?

they don't deserve to make a profit, because of societal greater good 'promoting the general welfare' thingy found in the preamble of the constituion.

& if you can find where it says in the constitution the right to invade ones' privacy, i'll be happy to read it.

of course you can't find it, cause it ain't there. that was an easy one to answer & i know why you didn't even try.

speaking of the constitution... if ones' individual right to bear arms should be unfettered, why is it illegal to own something like a bazooka? lol... lol... lol....

because even washington had lawful, constitutional gun control regs... that's why.
lol...and now I have a question p-time...are you taking credit for the questions or the answers?
 
1406353_600.jpg


CEWMu59WMAAbR5-.jpg


he seemed pretty lucid to me..........



At the time he ran for President, he was widely condemned by Liberals and RINOs and considered to be Literally Hitler.

Liberals have never compromised, not one bit. If you listened to the Democrat debate last month- they are all 100% in favor of Gay Marriage, 100% in favor of Abortion on Demand, 100% in favor of the Green New Deal, Medicare for All and much higher tax rates.

No room at all for compromise with the Democrat Party.

If someone doesn't want Gay Marriage legal, they have no place in the DP, even if they agree with all kinds of socialist bullshit.

duh. because that's the platform. the (R) platform is anti choice, endorse for profit healthcare & are pro 2nd amendment with no ban of assault weapons.

:rofl:

You're almost as dumb as Pogo.



Fucking retard.


tweet.png


transparent-clock-backwards-1.gif


:113:


I'm sure that has some meaning in the squirming maggots that substitute for a brain in you... :dunno:
 
because even washington had lawful, constitutional gun control regs... that's why.


So what?


The Liberals aren't interested in any kind of good faith gun control regulations.

They are interested in getting the camel's nose inside the tent and to push the country down the slippery slope.

Back in 1993, William Jefferson Clinton imposed Draconian bans against so-called assault weapons, if you'll remember.

But what you probably don't remember is that Violence continued afterwards as criminals were not bound by these extreme measures.

And what you also probably fail to remember is the fact that the ink wasn't even dry on this piece of extremism and the Brady Bunch and other gun Control Freaks were pushing for even crazier, more extreme laws. Indeed it was a slippery slope and libs considered this to be just a "first step". Libs didn't even want to give this a chance "to work".
 
uh-huh... when will you willingly start to pay extra for the po po or your local fire depts ? don't they deserve to make a profit?

& if you can find where it says in the constitution the right to invade ones' privacy, i'll be happy to read it.

speaking of the constitution... if ones' individual right to bear arms should be unfettered, why is it illegal to own something like a bazooka? lol... lol... lol....

We already pay for police and fire, stupid fuck. Those are local services.

As for a bazooka (is it 1941?) those are MUNITIONS, not arms.

The reason you don't understand things is simply because you're stupid.
 
so you gots nuthin but rw talking points. got it.

when will you willingly start to pay extra for the po po or your local fire depts ? don't they deserve to make a profit?

they don't deserve to make a profit, because of societal greater good 'promoting the general welfare' thingy found in the preamble of the constituion.

& if you can find where it says in the constitution the right to invade ones' privacy, i'll be happy to read it.

of course you can't find it, cause it ain't there. that was an easy one to answer & i know why you didn't even try.

speaking of the constitution... if ones' individual right to bear arms should be unfettered, why is it illegal to own something like a bazooka? lol... lol... lol....

because even washington had lawful, constitutional gun control regs... that's why.
lol...and now I have a question p-time...are you taking credit for the questions or the answers?

since i posted both at this par-tic-u-lar time.... i would say both.
 
1406353_600.jpg


CEWMu59WMAAbR5-.jpg


he seemed pretty lucid to me..........



At the time he ran for President, he was widely condemned by Liberals and RINOs and considered to be Literally Hitler.

Liberals have never compromised, not one bit. If you listened to the Democrat debate last month- they are all 100% in favor of Gay Marriage, 100% in favor of Abortion on Demand, 100% in favor of the Green New Deal, Medicare for All and much higher tax rates.

No room at all for compromise with the Democrat Party.

If someone doesn't want Gay Marriage legal, they have no place in the DP, even if they agree with all kinds of socialist bullshit.

duh. because that's the platform. the (R) platform is anti choice, endorse for profit healthcare & are pro 2nd amendment with no ban of assault weapons.

:rofl:

You're almost as dumb as Pogo.



Fucking retard.


tweet.png


transparent-clock-backwards-1.gif


:113:


I'm sure that has some meaning in the squirming maggots that substitute for a brain in you... :dunno:


give it some time, oh poorly educated one that trump loves long time... the lightbulb might flicker long enough.
 
At the time he ran for President, he was widely condemned by Liberals and RINOs and considered to be Literally Hitler.

Liberals have never compromised, not one bit. If you listened to the Democrat debate last month- they are all 100% in favor of Gay Marriage, 100% in favor of Abortion on Demand, 100% in favor of the Green New Deal, Medicare for All and much higher tax rates.

No room at all for compromise with the Democrat Party.

If someone doesn't want Gay Marriage legal, they have no place in the DP, even if they agree with all kinds of socialist bullshit.

duh. because that's the platform. the (R) platform is anti choice, endorse for profit healthcare & are pro 2nd amendment with no ban of assault weapons.

:rofl:

You're almost as dumb as Pogo.



Fucking retard.


tweet.png


transparent-clock-backwards-1.gif


:113:


I'm sure that has some meaning in the squirming maggots that substitute for a brain in you... :dunno:


give it some time, oh poorly educated one that trump loves long time... the lightbulb might flicker long enough.


Not everyone can match your three years of primary education.

I know that you think you're clever - but trust me in this, you're not.
 

Forum List

Back
Top