Libs are so anti Business

[RDD_1210]

What if you got what you wanted and all big business went away or government got in control would you be happy then?

What if you got all that you wanted and the government was dissolved and everyone was left to fend for themselves?

By George you got it!

The very essense of Conservatism!

Get mine..close the door.

It's fun taking things to the extremes!

 

[Full-Auto]

Hookay.

The onus is on you dufus, as you made the claim.

Ah.

Refute this "idiocy"..

But besides the danger of a direct mixture of Religion & civil Government, there is an evil which ought to be guarded against in the indefinite accumulation of property from the capacity of holding it in perpetuity by ecclesiastical corporations. The power of all corporations, ought to be limited in this respect. The growing wealth acquired by them never fails to be a source of abuses.- James Madison

"If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen."
Samuel Adams

“The only possible Way then of preserving the Balance of Power on the side of equal Liberty and public Virtue,is to make the Acquisition of Land easy to every Member of Society: to make a Division of the Land into Small Quantities, So that the Multitude may be possessed of landed Estates.” - John Adams

Double dog dare ya.

Self explanitory...which also explains why you dont get it.

 

[California Girl]

Tolerance != Acceptance.

That work for you?

Of course it works for me. I have no issue with gay people. You clearly do, since you use accusations of being 'gay' as an 'insult'. Why is it an insult? Is there something wrong with being gay?

So, don't give me your bullshit about 'tolerance' or 'acceptance'. You hate gay people - you have proven it with your "insults".

I have no issues with gay people in general.

Only the ones asking for a "swallow".

I gotta decline.

Like lets say a fat slob wants to get with you..and pesters you for sex..

I'm sure you have nothing against heterosexual fat slobs per se..

But you gotta decline..cause that's not how you roll.

And if they keep it up..you gotta get a little more forceful.

No?

But what I don't do.... I don't accuse everyone who disagrees with me of being a 'heterosexual fat slob'. Nor do I judge all 'heterosexual fat slobs' as being the same.

You, on the other hand, will sink to any level just to "insult" someone. You've called me a racist, a terrorist, a Nazi lover, etc etc etc. You know I am none of these things, yet you say it anyway. Why? Why is it ok to lie in order to score some mythical 'point'?

 

[Steelplate]

lol, swallow. In the 1700s the european spectrum was all that was known. there was no modern american spectrum in the 1700s...so conservatism was the aristocracy, but CLASSICAL LIBERALISM was the american patriots...as time went on starting with teddy and wilson, progressivism hijacked the term and thus classical liberalism in america became conservatism (trying to conserve american founding principles), and liberalism became american socialism. ANY political science professor would back this up, as would anyone who knows how to use google.

And today, Conservatism is owned and funded by the modern day aristocracy.. Huge multinational Corporations, Banking, Wall Street, and a handful of industries(energy, telecomm, health Care, etc). People like you are pages in their court, hoping to become a squire someday, so you bow down to them in reverence and fear.

 

[Full-Auto]

Of course it works for me. I have no issue with gay people. You clearly do, since you use accusations of being 'gay' as an 'insult'. Why is it an insult? Is there something wrong with being gay?

So, don't give me your bullshit about 'tolerance' or 'acceptance'. You hate gay people - you have proven it with your "insults".

I have no issues with gay people in general.

Only the ones asking for a "swallow".

I gotta decline.

Like lets say a fat slob wants to get with you..and pesters you for sex..

I'm sure you have nothing against heterosexual fat slobs per se..

But you gotta decline..cause that's not how you roll.

And if they keep it up..you gotta get a little more forceful.

No?

But what I don't do.... I don't accuse everyone who disagrees with me of being a 'heterosexual fat slob'. Nor do I judge all 'heterosexual fat slobs' as being the same.

You, on the other hand, will sink to any level just to "insult" someone. You've called me a racist, a terrorist, a Nazi lover, etc etc etc. You know I am none of these things, yet you say it anyway. Why? Why is it ok to lie in order to score some mythical 'point'?

Now thats easy to answer.......................

 

[California Girl]

lol, swallow. In the 1700s the european spectrum was all that was known. there was no modern american spectrum in the 1700s...so conservatism was the aristocracy, but CLASSICAL LIBERALISM was the american patriots...as time went on starting with teddy and wilson, progressivism hijacked the term and thus classical liberalism in america became conservatism (trying to conserve american founding principles), and liberalism became american socialism. ANY political science professor would back this up, as would anyone who knows how to use google.

And today, Conservatism is owned and funded by the modern day aristocracy.. Huge multinational Corporations, Banking, Wall Street, and a handful of industries(energy, telecomm, health Care, etc). People like you are pages in their court, hoping to become a squire someday, so you bow down to them in reverence and fear.

Likewise with Liberalism. How can you not see that? How the hell can you call it out on one side and not on the other?

 

[Sallow]

The onus is on you dufus, as you made the claim.

Ah.

Refute this "idiocy"..

But besides the danger of a direct mixture of Religion & civil Government, there is an evil which ought to be guarded against in the indefinite accumulation of property from the capacity of holding it in perpetuity by ecclesiastical corporations. The power of all corporations, ought to be limited in this respect. The growing wealth acquired by them never fails to be a source of abuses.- James Madison

"If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen."
Samuel Adams

“The only possible Way then of preserving the Balance of Power on the side of equal Liberty and public Virtue,is to make the Acquisition of Land easy to every Member of Society: to make a Division of the Land into Small Quantities, So that the Multitude may be possessed of landed Estates.” - John Adams

Double dog dare ya.

Self explanitory...which also explains why you dont get it.

So..

You got nuthin'.

Kind of reminds me of "The T" without the frothing anger or the booze.

 

[RDD_1210]

lol, swallow. In the 1700s the european spectrum was all that was known. there was no modern american spectrum in the 1700s...so conservatism was the aristocracy, but CLASSICAL LIBERALISM was the american patriots...as time went on starting with teddy and wilson, progressivism hijacked the term and thus classical liberalism in america became conservatism (trying to conserve american founding principles), and liberalism became american socialism. ANY political science professor would back this up, as would anyone who knows how to use google.

And today, Conservatism is owned and funded by the modern day aristocracy.. Huge multinational Corporations, Banking, Wall Street, and a handful of industries(energy, telecomm, health Care, etc). People like you are pages in their court, hoping to become a squire someday, so you bow down to them in reverence and fear.

Likewise with Liberalism. How can you not see that? How the hell can you call it out on one side and not on the other?

Funny, coming from you.

 

[Sallow]

Of course it works for me. I have no issue with gay people. You clearly do, since you use accusations of being 'gay' as an 'insult'. Why is it an insult? Is there something wrong with being gay?

So, don't give me your bullshit about 'tolerance' or 'acceptance'. You hate gay people - you have proven it with your "insults".

I have no issues with gay people in general.

Only the ones asking for a "swallow".

I gotta decline.

Like lets say a fat slob wants to get with you..and pesters you for sex..

I'm sure you have nothing against heterosexual fat slobs per se..

But you gotta decline..cause that's not how you roll.

And if they keep it up..you gotta get a little more forceful.

No?

But what I don't do.... I don't accuse everyone who disagrees with me of being a 'heterosexual fat slob'. Nor do I judge all 'heterosexual fat slobs' as being the same.

You, on the other hand, will sink to any level just to "insult" someone. You've called me a racist, a terrorist, a Nazi lover, etc etc etc. You know I am none of these things, yet you say it anyway. Why? Why is it ok to lie in order to score some mythical 'point'?

Generally you start the name calling.

And now you are whining?

Oh gosh.

I know you have a pussy..but please don't be one.

 

[Full-Auto]

Ah.

Refute this "idiocy"..




Double dog dare ya.

Self explanitory...which also explains why you dont get it.

So..

You got nuthin'.

Kind of reminds me of "The T" without the frothing anger or the booze.

LOL When you get to proving your premise, the refutation becomes self evident.

Hit your head this morning?

 

[Liberty]

swallow? you illiterate?

In the 1700s the european spectrum was all that was known. there was no modern american spectrum in the 1700s...so conservatism was the aristocracy, but CLASSICAL LIBERALISM was the american patriots...as time went on starting with teddy and wilson, progressivism hijacked the term and thus classical liberalism in america became conservatism (trying to conserve american founding principles), and liberalism became american socialism. ANY political science professor would back this up, as would anyone who knows how to use google.

In the 1700s the european spectrum was all that was known. there was no modern american spectrum in the 1700s...so conservatism was the aristocracy, but CLASSICAL LIBERALISM was the american patriots...as time went on starting with teddy and wilson, progressivism hijacked the term and thus classical liberalism in america became conservatism (trying to conserve american founding principles), and liberalism became american socialism. ANY political science professor would back this up, as would anyone who knows how to use google.

In the 1700s the european spectrum was all that was known. there was no modern american spectrum in the 1700s...so conservatism was the aristocracy, but CLASSICAL LIBERALISM was the american patriots...as time went on starting with teddy and wilson, progressivism hijacked the term and thus classical liberalism in america became conservatism (trying to conserve american founding principles), and liberalism became american socialism. ANY political science professor would back this up, as would anyone who knows how to use google.

In the 1700s the european spectrum was all that was known. there was no modern american spectrum in the 1700s...so conservatism was the aristocracy, but CLASSICAL LIBERALISM was the american patriots...as time went on starting with teddy and wilson, progressivism hijacked the term and thus classical liberalism in america became conservatism (trying to conserve american founding principles), and liberalism became american socialism. ANY political science professor would back this up, as would anyone who knows how to use google.

 

[Liberty]

And today, Conservatism is owned and funded by the modern day aristocracy.. Huge multinational Corporations, Banking, Wall Street, and a handful of industries(energy, telecomm, health Care, etc). People like you are pages in their court, hoping to become a squire someday, so you bow down to them in reverence and fear.

Likewise with Liberalism. How can you not see that? How the hell can you call it out on one side and not on the other?

Funny, coming from you.

so immelt and soros are conservatives? lolz

 

[Sallow]

LOL When you get to proving your premise, the refutation becomes self evident.

Hit your head this morning?

Prove what?

 

[RDD_1210]

Likewise with Liberalism. How can you not see that? How the hell can you call it out on one side and not on the other?

Funny, coming from you.

so immelt and soros are conservatives? lolz

WTF? How do you even reach that conclusion from what I said?

 

[Sallow]

swallow? you illiterate?

Naw..I can read fine.

Answer is still no. You cannot gargle my cum.

Gay boi.

I'll help you though..you seem desperate.

New York Gay Bars - GayCities New York

 

[Full-Auto]

LOL When you get to proving your premise, the refutation becomes self evident.

Hit your head this morning?

Prove what?

 

[Sallow]

Funny, coming from you.

so immelt and soros are conservatives? lolz

WTF? How do you even reach that conclusion from what I said?

Oh don't worry..

Aside from being a desperate gay boi, he cherry picks through the interwebz and makes vast logical leaps.

 

[Steelplate]

lol, swallow. In the 1700s the european spectrum was all that was known. there was no modern american spectrum in the 1700s...so conservatism was the aristocracy, but CLASSICAL LIBERALISM was the american patriots...as time went on starting with teddy and wilson, progressivism hijacked the term and thus classical liberalism in america became conservatism (trying to conserve american founding principles), and liberalism became american socialism. ANY political science professor would back this up, as would anyone who knows how to use google.

And today, Conservatism is owned and funded by the modern day aristocracy.. Huge multinational Corporations, Banking, Wall Street, and a handful of industries(energy, telecomm, health Care, etc). People like you are pages in their court, hoping to become a squire someday, so you bow down to them in reverence and fear.

Likewise with Liberalism. How can you not see that? How the hell can you call it out on one side and not on the other?

Liberalism? Not nearly as much. I mean, don't get me wrong... I've repeatedly said that we need to get the money out of politics.. even in this thread. I have repeatedly called for publicly funded elections. The way I see it is this... both sides are corrupted by the same people you want to give MORE power to. Liberals want those people to have less power.

therefore, I side with liberals. Furthermore... Liberals don't hate poor people and want to see safety nets destroyed, programs that the working class have been paying into all their lives dismantled, and all of it privatized so some other greedy fuck can make a nice profit off of it.

Yes, both sides are in bed with "big money"... but one side actually believes they should run things.

 

[cootydog]

Liberals aren't "anti-business". Capitalism is a liberal idea. It was started by Liberals.

What liberals don't really find much use for is Aristocracy, Plutocracy and Corporatism.

Those are things Conservatives love.

swallow or spitz or whatever your a moron
Aristocracy is exactly what the rich liberals are dumbass. here I have a treat for you this has nothing to do with the post and is just a personal attack on a moron by an asshole, me.

You only need a low dose of these products. One study found that a dose of 0.1mg provided effective relief from vaginal dryness caused by liberalism. When you start using vaginal cream, you apply a small dab just inside your liberal vagina daily for three or four weeks. Then you can reduce your use to once or twice a week. If you apply it daily for more than four to six weeks, it becomes less effective. It's important to remember that this is not a lubricant. You should use K-Y Jelly or Astroglide or another type of lubricant before taking it up the asss by Obama and the liberals, and no the BUSH has nothing to do with it.

 

[cootydog]

this site is over run with cry baby liberals lmao they are too funny