Liberals Trying To Start A Race War Over Ferguson

[Manonthestreet]

 

[Disir]

8216 That was very tense Ferguson crowd surrounds man it alleges is KKK member Twitchy

 

[TemplarKormac]

"Liberals Trying To Start A Race War Over Ferguson"

I would say they already have.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

"Liberals Trying To Start A Race War Over Ferguson"

I would say they already have.

What you would say has already been said for you, by Fox and Friends.

 

[Katzndogz]

It's the jury system they want to do away with. It has failed them by finding non blacks innocent. The Duke Lacrosse boys walked. George Zimmerman walked. Darren Wilson didn't even have enough evidence to charge. Justice by mob. Instantly. No expensive trials.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

It's the jury system they want to do away with. It has failed them by finding non blacks innocent. The Duke Lacrosse boys walked. George Zimmerman walked. Darren Wilson didn't even have enough evidence to charge. Justice by mob. Instantly. No expensive trials.

The men who killed little black girls walked. That's life in racist America...

 

[Clementine]

Many in the media have proven to us that facts will not get in the way of their agenda. How can anyone believe anything they report after this display of dishonest reporting? Some on the left are doing a bang up job of constantly escalating the anger and violence in Ferguson. Despite so few being killed by cops, and most being justified shootings, they still push the notion that cops are all white racists. Only the ignorant buy into their hype and, sadly, there are many idiots. They would be the ones stealing and destroying businesses in Ferguson. No intelligent person would behave that way.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

"Liberals Trying To Start A Race War Over Ferguson"

Actually the OP has started a thread that fails as a straw man fallacy.

 

[Stephanie]

If the radical libs keep it up, they're going to start to lose the support of the average Democrat voter...they are beginning to shake their head in wonder at the dishonest lengths some are willing to go to in order to divide our country. These agitators have little in common with the true heroes of the Civil Rights Movement...those people truly had to fear for their lives on a dramatically different level, and they helped make people aware of real injustices in a way that garnered support and led to a positive evolution on changing hearts and minds. So many of the race baiters and opportunists are just too filled with hate to be interested in any sort of peace.

They already are with this last election. Kicked Democrats out of power in just SIX years of Obama's rein of terror. Now they are paying us back for it. This time it's not closing off our parks and memorials, they are bringing mobs of gangs into our cities and towns.

 

[BluesLegend]

So a city run by Democrats = Republicans are racist that's just how dishonest the left is.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Liberals hate whites. The plan was always to do what they did in south Africa here.

it is starting.

 

[Clementine]

Obama's Remarks on Ferguson Grand Jury Designed to 'Feed the Rage'

By Jack Coleman | November 25, 2014 | 8:20 PM EST

Seldom-heard praise for President Obama from Rush Limbaugh today -- wrapped within withering analysis of Obama's disingenuous remarks last night after a grand jury decided against indicting Ferguson, Mo., police officer Darren Wilson for the shooting death of Michael Brown in August.

Yet again, Obama fails to live up to his billing as a unifying figure, Limbaugh pointed out. Instead, he's just the opposite (audio) --

The grand jury system, I was kind of surprised. I know the legal beagles that I've listened to, a lot of legal people for whom I have great respect said, Rush, this is a slam dunk. There is, we've seen the evidence, as much as we've seen and as much as we've heard about, the testimony, there's no way this cop gets indicted. And I said yeah but that's not the way things happen in the country anymore. Everybody, episodes like this need sacrificial lambs and everybody's going to be focused on keeping the peace and everybody's going to be focused on, you know, just make the problem go away.

So I was surprised, grand jury system worked, despite enormous pressures exerted by the president's representative, Eric Holder, the attorney general. A police officer was not indicted and the president let it be known last night that if some people don't think justice was done, he understands. If some people are deeply upset and they don't think justice happened last night or the last two months, then he understands they're being upset. I think he missed a golden opportunity, I can't tell you how many golden opportunities this man has missed. He missed an opportunity last night, if he really cared about unity, he could have done a lot for it last night. If he really cares about bringing people together, if he really cares about a functioning, orderly society, even if he wants to transform it, he had a golden opportunity last night -- and he punted. He had 20 minutes of inane ramblings that were designed subtly to feed the rage. And he could have done so much. You do have to admit that he is, when he applies himself, a very persuasive and talented speaker and orator, when he applies himself. If it's on the teleprompter and the words he wants to use are there, then he can do it really well. Didn't even try. Didn't even try, it was just the exact opposite, it was so disappointing to me.

But then I had to stop and realize, that's not what Obama's about. Obama, transforming America, he knows it's going to be messy and he knows it's going to be filled with strife and he knows there's going to be a certain amount of chaos, that's unavoidable given the scope of the change he desires. He knows people aren't going to just sit idly by and let it happen, they're going to fight it, those who don't agree with it. And that is what community organizers do, they agitate, and that's what Obama sadly did last night was agitate. And he had a chance, he had a golden opportunity to do exact opposite, and he - didn't - even - try.

You see, to me what happened in Ferguson last night -- if you say, as the president did, it's an understandable reaction that there are Americans deeply upset, even angry, it's an understandable reaction -- how is it understandable? What if the rage and what if the anger is not legitimate? What if it's the product of, this is my whole point, the Democrat party, the American left, has created in its base supporters a degree of anger and rage that borders on the irrational. And they do it about everything! They do it about the Iraq war, they're doing it about the war on terror, they're doing it about virtually everything! And they keep their base supporters in a fevered pitch where their base supporters think virtually everybody is out to get 'em, that the deck is so unfairly stacked that they don't even have a chance, even with a man who is as historic as president, the first African-American. That doesn't even matter. You create this hopelessness, you create a circumstance where the foregone conclusion is disaster.

But why should the reaction last night be understandable when it isn't, really. I have to define understandable in the way Obama meant it. He meant it in a way of justifying it and that's where he missed a golden opportunity, but this is unnecessary and it's not going to change anything. It's not going to improve circumstances for anybody, it's going to make them worse for practically everybody involved -- other than the people that benefit from this. Who benefits from this chaos? Who benefits from this strife? Who benefits from the continuing racial strife in America? Who benefits from this? If you answer that question, you'll find out who's responsible for it. And don't doubt somebody benefits from it or it wouldn't happen.​

Yeah, he definitely has you in mind, Al Sharpton.



Right out of the gate when Obama made his remarks last night after the grand jury's decision was announced, he referred to two different responses -- "There are Americans who agree with it and there are Americans who are deeply disappointed, even angry. It's an understandable reaction."

... While agreeing with the grand jury is simply not an "understandable reaction," at least not to Obama and like-minded leftists. The signal is duly sent to the mob -- rampage away. After all, looting is merely socialism in a hurry.

Still, this pales compared to the shabby editorializing of NBC Nightly News anchor Brian Williams when he reported that the grand jury "failed" to bring charges against Officer Wilson. Kinda like when the U.S. Senate "failed" to convict Clinton in 1999?

- See more at: Rush Limbaugh Obama s Remarks on Ferguson Grand Jury Designed to Feed the Rage

Excellent article. Obama has blown it every time he's had an opportunity to unite. But then, that has never been the goal or the teleprompter would have had him say different things than he did. I totally agree that him finding the rioters' reaction understandable is the same as encouraging more of it. Agreeing with the grand jury is what everyone should find understandable because facts are not something a reasonable person can or should disagree with. Violence like we've seen in Ferguson is not understandable nor is it acceptable. It's should be condemned, but some on the left refuse to do that. Obama half-heartedly, and late in the game, asked for peaceful protests. Then he turns around and shows sympathy, even empathy, for those who just can't accept the truth and react in the most negative manner possible.

Holder will still investigate and that isn't meant to appease protesters, rather it's meant to keep them angry and keep this issues alive. What will happen when Holder can't twist facts enough to justify prosecuting the cop? Will he hope people will forget eventually or will they always use this to stir anger? I can see this being referred to years from now as proof that cops are racist. Doesn't matter what the truth is, just gotta keep the anger going.

Reporters have gone just as crazy as the protesters in covering this. None of the libs are saying how horrible the protesters are for destroying businesses of innocent people. They just whine about the grand jury failing them. It's like some have too much invested in this to back down and somehow it's easier for them to ignore evidence than admit that they've been wrong all these weeks.

 

[BallsBrunswick]

I don't think it's that liberals hate whites, at least the smart ones. It's that liberals need a big boogeyman to push their bullshit and gain power. By vilifying white men, they can justify anything and brow beat anyone who disagrees with them. Meanwhile they use this logic in order to attain power or justify their disappointment in themselves.

 

[The Rabbi]

"Liberals Trying To Start A Race War Over Ferguson"

Actually the OP has started a thread that fails as a straw man fallacy.

Seems like every thread that presents evidence you dont like gets labeled a "strawman fallacy."
I dont think that term means what you think it means.

 

[Geaux4it]

Michael Brown died for your sins. Black on black crime is the bigger issue, why no riots on that?

Oh yes! Why no riots on that. My goodness dear me!

Funny how the left has used your tactic of 'deflection'.That's what the liberal brain does since it can't process the difference between wrong and right. It's just not possible.

-Geaux

 

[Geaux4it]

"Liberals Trying To Start A Race War Over Ferguson"

Actually the OP has started a thread that fails as a straw man fallacy.

No, it stands as fact. Until blacks decide to police their own, they will continue to submit to the masters

-Geaux

 

[Mac1958]

.

The division pimps are winning.

The predictable and obvious result of Identity Politics.

.

 

[007]

"Liberals Trying To Start A Race War Over Ferguson"

Actually the OP has started a thread that fails as a straw man fallacy.

Seems like every thread that presents evidence you dont like gets labeled a "strawman fallacy."
I dont think that term means what you think it means.

It means liberals continue to lie about their agenda, because they know that if the [Gruber]: "STUPID people" actually found out about their real agenda, no one would support them. Even the progs here know they're lying and very few buy their shit, but they do it anyway. They have to. They're slimy, pathetic, two faced, race baiting garbage.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Michael Brown died for your sins. Black on black crime is the bigger issue, why no riots on that?

Oh yes! Why no riots on that. My goodness dear me!

Funny how the left has used your tactic of 'deflection'.That's what the liberal brain does since it can't process the difference between wrong and right. It's just not possible.

-Geaux

I don't think you know who is who and I know that you have a hard time recognizing sarcasm. Try once again.

 

[Geaux4it]

Michael Brown died for your sins. Black on black crime is the bigger issue, why no riots on that?

Oh yes! Why no riots on that. My goodness dear me!

Funny how the left has used your tactic of 'deflection'.That's what the liberal brain does since it can't process the difference between wrong and right. It's just not possible.

-Geaux

I don't think you know who is who and I know that you have a hard time recognizing sarcasm. Try once again.

Again, I recognize it as I just pointed it out to you.

I'll slow down for you next time

-Geaux