PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #81
Creating a past by one thinking how they would have wanted the past to be is not education. So if you didn't rely on "think history" where might you find some more authentic history?OK, OK I deny posts 16, 17 and 18. Whatever they were.How many Germans were interred inReally funny stuff.
Don't give up the day job.
Oh...and, as you've found,....every bit of the history as I report is is accurate, true and correct.
So we agree that your inability to deny posts #16-17-and -18 amounts to an admission that Franklin Delano Roosevelt was every bit the bigot and racist that I claimed he was?
Excellent.
Soooo.....what does that say about the "historians" you keep agreeing with?
And here we see the result of a poster whose education has been centered on allowing others to do his thinking for him.
Why are you back????
I certainly must have shaken your understanding of the use of 'great,' as I have proven that your 'great' love, FDR, was a boilerplate bigot and racist.
And...shown, that leaving judgments of 'greatness' to so-called 'historians' was one of the 'greatest' mistakes of your shallow life.
The only saving of your worldview would be to state that, while everything I've revealed about Roosevelt is true and correct, you still believe that his pluses outnumber his minuses.
The danger, of course, is that you might have to actually think at that point....exposing yourself to a possible aneurysm.