Liberals: Be Not Offended!

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 6, 2008
124,904
60,285
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
Can you imagine....Americans have turned over the political environs to a bunch who actually believe that it is government's obligation....not to mention ability.....to protect citizens from having their feelings hurt???


Did I miss this part of the Constitution..."Be Not Offended"?


1. Yet, the dominant political party/worldview promises to do just that. 'Your widdle feeling hurt? Or might be hurt? Well....we'll put in place rules, regulations, speech codes, 'trigger warnings,' ....and, don't forget the mantra that the Democrats provided during the Clarence Thomas nomination, that the accusation of criminal wrongdoing , namely the unproved sexual harassment claims of one Anita Hill....even though Ms. Hill couldn't prove her accusation, that didn't matter.

Nah....here's what mattered:
"The nature of the evidence is irrelevant. It's the seriousness of the charge."



2. For conservatives, traditionalists, the lesson is very different.
My fav radio host, Dennis Prager explained a valuable lesson in life he learned early in his high school career. His Jewish school taught Hebrew subjects in the first half of the day, and the public school curriculum later. In the middle, the boys were required to participate in prayers.

On one day, young Dennis approached the Rabbi, and said something that the Rabbi had never, in his long life, heard:
"Rabbi," Prager said, "I'm not in the mood for prayers today."


The Rabbi stroked his long beard, and said two words, that Prager professed, changed his life.

The religious leader said: "So what?"
And that is the lesson. Your mood, the way you feel, even if you are 'offended.' has no effect on the rest of the world, or how you go about your day.


And that is the view that our Liberal pals should incorporate.
The world need not heed your being offended.
Deal with it.




3. "On campuses there are speech codes, ...."free speech zones," and a host of "anti-discrimination" policies that discriminate against people who dissent from lefty groupthink. Christian and conservative groups have been denied official university status by student government organizations for holding views not in line with liberal dogma.

The illiberal left's attempts to control the public debate are frequently buttressed by a parade of childish grievances. They portray life's vagaries as violations of their basic human rights and demand the world stop traumatizing them..."
Kirsten Powers, "The Silencing: How The Left Is Killing Free Speech"


By this weakening of the American character.....crushed by words.....they have taken the 'can do generation,' and produced the 'pajama boy generation.'

Woe is us.
 
1. Yet, the dominant political party/worldview promises to do just that. 'Your widdle feeling hurt? Or might be hurt? Well....we'll put in place rules, regulations, speech codes, 'trigger warnings,' ....and, don't forget the mantra that the Democrats provided during the Clarence Thomas nomination, that the accusation of criminal wrongdoing , namely the unproved sexual harassment claims of one Anita Hill....even though Ms. Hill couldn't prove her accusation, that didn't matter.

.

Oh dear, were Clarence Thomas's feelings hurt?
 
Liberals actually set policies to restrict religious and conservative dissidents.

What were the policies that you're suggesting Clarence Thomas set?
 
Hey sugar tits, back in the day any swinging dick could approach you in the work place and tell you he'd use your thighs as a nice pair of ear warmers. Then the bleeding vagina squad came in to tell guys they shouldnt comment on the secretaries huge rack and wonder if her nips look like hershey kisses or saucers.

All because some chick didnt want to be offended. Thats terrible and I agree with the OP. Women need to get over it and realize that we're looking and talking about their ass cheeks. BIG DEAL! RIGHT?
 
1. Yet, the dominant political party/worldview promises to do just that. 'Your widdle feeling hurt? Or might be hurt? Well....we'll put in place rules, regulations, speech codes, 'trigger warnings,' ....and, don't forget the mantra that the Democrats provided during the Clarence Thomas nomination, that the accusation of criminal wrongdoing , namely the unproved sexual harassment claims of one Anita Hill....even though Ms. Hill couldn't prove her accusation, that didn't matter.

.

Oh dear, were Clarence Thomas's feelings hurt?



So....there were no restrictive policies set in motion by Clarence Thomas?

You simply provided a bogus post in your failed attempt to provide cover for Leftist fascists?
 
Hey sugar tits, back in the day any swinging dick could approach you in the work place and tell you he'd use your thighs as a nice pair of ear warmers. Then the bleeding vagina squad came in to tell guys they shouldnt comment on the secretaries huge rack and wonder if her nips look like hershey kisses or saucers.

All because some chick didnt want to be offended. Thats terrible and I agree with the OP. Women need to get over it and realize that we're looking and talking about their ass cheeks. BIG DEAL! RIGHT?

Awesome.
 
4. Can you imagine what universities have become under Liberal domination? Open debate is out of the question.
As is free speech.

In fact, they feel it necessary to protect the delicate minds of their captives from having to consider anything outside of the orthodoxy!



"They insist colleges provide "trigger warning" on syllabi to prevent them from stumbling upon a piece of literature that might deal with controversial issues...that could upset them.....that will invoke symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)....

....as reading The Great Gatsby, seeing a statue of an underwear-clad man, or passing an anti-abortion demonstration.....[it might be] lethal to their psychological well being."
Powers, Op. Cit., p. 6



a. " Let me give you a little tip: if you want liberalism to continue in this country, you have to realize that liberal students are being let down by their professors! They have liberal school teachers, and read the liberal press! Because of this weak preparation, they are unable to argue, to think beyond the first knee-jerk impulse. They can’t put together a logical thought. Now, compare that to a college Republican…"
Coulter



They can only be 'offended.'

Or....the feminist war-cry..."That's not funny!"
 
Can you imagine....Americans have turned over the political environs to a bunch who actually believe that it is government's obligation....not to mention ability.....to protect citizens from having their feelings hurt???


Did I miss this part of the Constitution..."Be Not Offended"?


1. Yet, the dominant political party/worldview promises to do just that. 'Your widdle feeling hurt? Or might be hurt? Well....we'll put in place rules, regulations, speech codes, 'trigger warnings,' ....and, don't forget the mantra that the Democrats provided during the Clarence Thomas nomination, that the accusation of criminal wrongdoing , namely the unproved sexual harassment claims of one Anita Hill....even though Ms. Hill couldn't prove her accusation, that didn't matter.

Nah....here's what mattered:
"The nature of the evidence is irrelevant. It's the seriousness of the charge."



2. For conservatives, traditionalists, the lesson is very different.
My fav radio host, Dennis Prager explained a valuable lesson in life he learned early in his high school career. His Jewish school taught Hebrew subjects in the first half of the day, and the public school curriculum later. In the middle, the boys were required to participate in prayers.

On one day, young Dennis approached the Rabbi, and said something that the Rabbi had never, in his long life, heard:
"Rabbi," Prager said, "I'm not in the mood for prayers today."


The Rabbi stroked his long beard, and said two words, that Prager professed, changed his life.

The religious leader said: "So what?"
And that is the lesson. Your mood, the way you feel, even if you are 'offended.' has no effect on the rest of the world, or how you go about your day.


And that is the view that our Liberal pals should incorporate.
The world need not heed your being offended.
Deal with it.




3. "On campuses there are speech codes, ...."free speech zones," and a host of "anti-discrimination" policies that discriminate against people who dissent from lefty groupthink. Christian and conservative groups have been denied official university status by student government organizations for holding views not in line with liberal dogma.

The illiberal left's attempts to control the public debate are frequently buttressed by a parade of childish grievances. They portray life's vagaries as violations of their basic human rights and demand the world stop traumatizing them..."
Kirsten Powers, "The Silencing: How The Left Is Killing Free Speech"


By this weakening of the American character.....crushed by words.....they have taken the 'can do generation,' and produced the 'pajama boy generation.'

Woe is us.
Not this liberal; women are welcome to come right up to me and tell me when it is my turn to use them, simply for the moral Goodness of true witness bearing as a moral and ethic in modern times.
 
You simply provided a bogus post in your failed attempt to provide cover for Leftist fascists?

Eh, fascists are right wing

It's evil commies that are left wing

:alcoholic:


Actually, no.

Fascists, communists, Nazis, Liberals, Progrssives, all have the belief in big government and the collective.

None of the above stand for the individual and freedom.
 
Liberals actually set policies to restrict religious and conservative dissidents.

Yup!

Those liberals were the Founding Fathers and that policy is called the 1st Amendment.

You should ask one of your teachers to explain it to you one day.

Especially the part about freedom FROM religion.
:clap:
 
You simply provided a bogus post in your failed attempt to provide cover for Leftist fascists?

Eh, fascists are right wing

It's evil commies that are left wing

:alcoholic:


Actually, no.

Fascists, communists, Nazis, Liberals, Progrssives, all have the belief in big government and the collective.

None of the above stand for the individual and freedom.
I am sorry you feel that whey about Reagan, he increased the size of the govt...And the collective called the military...
 
Liberals actually set policies to restrict religious and conservative dissidents.

Yup!

Those liberals were the Founding Fathers and that policy is called the 1st Amendment.

You should ask one of your teachers to explain it to you one day.

Especially the part about freedom FROM religion.


Probably the biggest lie you liars tell.

No, the name Liberal was stolen by communist/socialist John Dewey, and applied to the Socialist Party.


Let's see if you have any ability to learn:

"How Socialist John Dewey Switched Labels
by Jim Peron
  1. Pity the poor liberal. And I mean the real liberal. Not the modern watered-down socialist who calls himself a liberal but a real, honest, classical liberal. There is so much confusion over the term and real liberals have allowed fake liberals to get away with this subtle destruction of the language.
  2. The classical liberals proposed laissez faire and this led to prosperity. The economics of 19th century liberalism brought about a major increase in the standard of living of all people. Thus real liberalism produced the effects which socialists dreamed their system would provide.
    1. Many socialists wanted prosperity and thought socialism would lead to such results faster than classical liberalism. But at the same time many socialists saw their ideology as a means of grabbing power for themselves and it was the power, not the promised prosperity, which attracted them.
  3. [Socialists] knew that liberalism had a good reputation with the working classes — the very audience which they were targeting. The idea was to adopt the name liberal to describe socialism. Socialism, as socialism, was harder to sell. But by taking a name they did not deserve they felt they could make political gains on the backs of classical liberalism. And they did.
  4. In the United States, where liberalism most clearly reversed its meaning, in common parlance, it was the socialist John Dewey who openly promoted the idea of stealing the liberal label. Dewey, in his book Individualism Old and New argued that liberal individualism had in fact disappeared and been replaced by state capitalism and that collectivism already existed in America." http://orlingrabbe.com/lfetimes/liberal_confusion.htm
 
Hmmm, so my friend that teaches rhetoric at OU is letting his pupils down by not teaching them to argue?


You mean not teaching them the truth.

Doing so might cost him his career.

“The Death of Feminism,” by Phyllis Chesler


1. Academic feminists who received tenure, promotion, and funding, tended to be pro-abortion, pro-pornography (anti-censorship), pro-prostitution (pro-sex workers), pro-surrogacy, and anti-colonialist, anti-imperialist, and anti-American…proponents of simplistic gender-neutrality (women and men are exactly the same) or essentialist: men and women are completely different, and women are better. They are loyal to their careers and their cliques, not to the truth. [In their writing, they] have pretended that brilliance and originality can best be conveyed in a secret, Mandarin language that absolutely no one, including themselves, can possibly understand…and this obfuscation of language has been employed to hide a considerable lack of brilliance and originality and to avoid the consequences of making oneself clear.
“The Death of Feminism,” by Professor Phyllis Chesler
 
You simply provided a bogus post in your failed attempt to provide cover for Leftist fascists?

Eh, fascists are right wing

It's evil commies that are left wing

:alcoholic:


Actually, no.

Fascists, communists, Nazis, Liberals, Progrssives, all have the belief in big government and the collective.

None of the above stand for the individual and freedom.
I am sorry you feel that whey about Reagan, he increased the size of the govt...And the collective called the military...


What a dumb post.

But....clearly, the best you can do.
 
You simply provided a bogus post in your failed attempt to provide cover for Leftist fascists?

Eh, fascists are right wing

It's evil commies that are left wing

:alcoholic:


Actually, no.

Fascists, communists, Nazis, Liberals, Progrssives, all have the belief in big government and the collective.

None of the above stand for the individual and freedom.
I am sorry you feel that whey about Reagan, he increased the size of the govt...And the collective called the military...


What a dumb post.

But....clearly, the best you can do.
And he supported Social Security.....
 
PC always has some weird revisionist history available for any occasion. Like so many conservatives, she's terribly offended by reality.


I searched you post for examples that support same....

...you seem to have forgotten to include any.
 

Forum List

Back
Top