Siete
Platinum Member
- May 19, 2014
- 34,325
- 3,988
- 1,130
there's a reason it's called the laffer curve
in an effort to be more honest, they considered calling it the giggle curve.
should have been called the idiot curve.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
there's a reason it's called the laffer curve
in an effort to be more honest, they considered calling it the giggle curve.
And they almost never have.cons insist that lower taxes grow the economy and lead to higher govt revenue in the face of pervasive and repeated evidence they don't
see also: brownbackistan aka kansas
I have notthing against the idiot curve. Except it never, ever workesSays the idiot.there's a reason it's called the laffer curve
in an effort to be more honest, they considered calling it the giggle curve.
should have been called the idiot curve.
Reagan failed in his duty to be a check and balance to the spendthrift congress. And, the trillions racked up during Obama were mostly passed first by a GOP-majority congress.And just who was responsible for that spending? Recall that all spending is authorized by the House of Representatives. Who had control of the House at the time? It was the Democrats. Also, I can't remember if happened under Reagan, or one of the Bushes. I believe it was Bush. Congress promised to cut spending if Bush would raise taxes. He raised taxes, but Congress broke their promise and went on a spending spree. Face it. Every economic woe we suffer from is a result of the Democrats.
better leave all those red states alone blues ,,,they'll get angry and won't accept any more blue states moneyFine we'll cut all the welfare for you worthless freeloaders to pay for the tax cut, happy now?
Really the heritage foundation.
The economy has changed since Reagan, and also he left triple the debt, and Bush Sr had to raise rates and also Clinton.
But then, they have always hated the truth. It gets in the way of their favorite hobby. Destroying America.
Why else would they be opposed to tax cuts? Here is the historical truth about the effects of tax cuts on the economy.
Read it and weep, liberal snowflakes.
The Historical Lessons of Lower Tax Rates
Booming economy? Where did you get that Idea? It's better since Trump took over, but It's hardly booming. When we get above an annual GDP growth of three percent, you may correctly apply that term to the economy.tac cuts with a booming economy?/ A good thing ?? Only in repub worldBut then, they have always hated the truth. It gets in the way of their favorite hobby. Destroying America.
Why else would they be opposed to tax cuts? Here is the historical truth about the effects of tax cuts on the economy.
Read it and weep, liberal snowflakes.
The Historical Lessons of Lower Tax Rates
The heritage foundation from 15 years ago.
Desperate much
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Really the heritage foundation.
The economy has changed since Reagan, and also he left triple the debt, and Bush Sr had to raise rates and also Clinton.
The laws of economics don't change, moron.
better leave all those red states alone blues ,,,they'll get angry and won't accept any more blue states moneyFine we'll cut all the welfare for you worthless freeloaders to pay for the tax cut, happy now?
The president doesn't raise rates, and furthermore the people who do raise the rates do so independently of any presidentReally the heritage foundation.
The economy has changed since Reagan, and also he left triple the debt, and Bush Sr had to raise rates and also Clinton.
The president doesn't raise rates, and furthermore the people who do raise the rates do so independently of any presidentReally the heritage foundation.
The economy has changed since Reagan, and also he left triple the debt, and Bush Sr had to raise rates and also Clinton.
Technically the point still standsThe president doesn't raise rates, and furthermore the people who do raise the rates do so independently of any presidentReally the heritage foundation.
The economy has changed since Reagan, and also he left triple the debt, and Bush Sr had to raise rates and also Clinton.
I think she was speaking of tax rates
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
But then, they have always hated the truth. It gets in the way of their favorite hobby. Destroying America.
Why else would they be opposed to tax cuts? Here is the historical truth about the effects of tax cuts on the economy.
Read it and weep, liberal snowflakes.
The Historical Lessons of Lower Tax Rates
Really the heritage foundation.
The economy has changed since Reagan, and also he left triple the debt, and Bush Sr had to raise rates and also Clinton.
The laws of economics don't change, moron.
no the laws dont change, and thats exactly why trickle down has failed fro the last 50 years .. you idiot.
tac cuts with a booming economy?/ A good thing ?? Only in repub worldBut then, they have always hated the truth. It gets in the way of their favorite hobby. Destroying America.
Why else would they be opposed to tax cuts? Here is the historical truth about the effects of tax cuts on the economy.
Read it and weep, liberal snowflakes.
The Historical Lessons of Lower Tax Rates
The heritage foundation from 15 years ago.
Desperate much
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
cause he chose Steve Mnuchin because he was an economist?The president doesn't raise rates, and furthermore the people who do raise the rates do so independently of any presidentReally the heritage foundation.
The economy has changed since Reagan, and also he left triple the debt, and Bush Sr had to raise rates and also Clinton.
not enough to turn them blue Bet we even have quite a few repub moochers in blue states too BUT the point was red states are the takers and blue the givers and frankly between you and I I think that's BSbetter leave all those red states alone blues ,,,they'll get angry and won't accept any more blue states moneyFine we'll cut all the welfare for you worthless freeloaders to pay for the tax cut, happy now?
Plenty of worthless mooching deadbeat Dem's living in red states Eddie.
What does that have to do with anything? I thought that pick sucked anywaycause he chose Steve Mnuchin because he was an economist?The president doesn't raise rates, and furthermore the people who do raise the rates do so independently of any presidentReally the heritage foundation.
The economy has changed since Reagan, and also he left triple the debt, and Bush Sr had to raise rates and also Clinton.