Liberals are really gonna hate this.

[RWNJ]

But then, they have always hated the truth. It gets in the way of their favorite hobby. Destroying America.

Why else would they be opposed to tax cuts? Here is the historical truth about the effects of tax cuts on the economy.

Read it and weep, liberal snowflakes.

The Historical Lessons of Lower Tax Rates

 

[Penelope]

Really the heritage foundation.

The economy has changed since Reagan, and also he left triple the debt, and Bush Sr had to raise rates and also Clinton.

 

[jillian]

But then, they have always hated the truth. It gets in the way of their favorite hobby. Destroying America.

Why else would they be opposed to tax cuts? Here is the historical truth about the effects of tax cuts on the economy.

Read it and weep, liberal snowflakes.

The Historical Lessons of Lower Tax Rates

from the heritage foundation?

funny.... you didn't like their health care plan when it was called the ACA.

just saying.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

But then, they have always hated the truth. It gets in the way of their favorite hobby. Destroying America.

Why else would they be opposed to tax cuts? Here is the historical truth about the effects of tax cuts on the economy.

Read it and weep, liberal snowflakes.

The Historical Lessons of Lower Tax Rates

The heritage foundation from 15 years ago.

Desperate much


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[miketx]

But then, they have always hated the truth. It gets in the way of their favorite hobby. Destroying America.

Why else would they be opposed to tax cuts? Here is the historical truth about the effects of tax cuts on the economy.

Read it and weep, liberal snowflakes.

The Historical Lessons of Lower Tax Rates

The problem which you will no doubt came to see is true, is that no one anywhere in the known universe can tell liberals the truth about anything that does not fit their agenda.

 

[eddiew37]

But then, they have always hated the truth. It gets in the way of their favorite hobby. Destroying America.

Why else would they be opposed to tax cuts? Here is the historical truth about the effects of tax cuts on the economy.

Read it and weep, liberal snowflakes.

The Historical Lessons of Lower Tax Rates

The heritage foundation from 15 years ago.

Desperate much


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

tac cuts with a booming economy?/ A good thing ?? Only in repub world

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Reagan's economic policy failed because he and Tip O'Neill gave each other reach-arounds and spent like a couple of trust-fund kids. That and Amnesty are the reasons I rank Reagan as a mid-level president, at best. He just seemed like a good president because Jimmy Fucking Carter sucked 10 miles of donkey anus.

Tax cuts AND spending cuts make for good economic policy, the like of which we have not seen since Calvin Coolidge.

 

[Astrostar]

But then, they have always hated the truth. It gets in the way of their favorite hobby. Destroying America.

Why else would they be opposed to tax cuts? Here is the historical truth about the effects of tax cuts on the economy.

Read it and weep, liberal snowflakes.

The Historical Lessons of Lower Tax Rates

The problem which you will no doubt came to see is true, is that no one anywhere in the known universe can tell liberals the truth about anything that does not fit their agenda.

Reminds you of President for Life Trump doesn't it?

 

[RWNJ]

But then, they have always hated the truth. It gets in the way of their favorite hobby. Destroying America.

Why else would they be opposed to tax cuts? Here is the historical truth about the effects of tax cuts on the economy.

Read it and weep, liberal snowflakes.

The Historical Lessons of Lower Tax Rates

The heritage foundation from 15 years ago.

Desperate much


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

tac cuts with a booming economy?/ A good thing ?? Only in repub world

Booming economy? Where did you get that Idea? It's better since Trump took over, but It's hardly booming. When we get above an annual GDP growth of three percent, you may correctly apply that term to the economy.

 

[Siete]

poor misguided RW Trumpbots.

Trump adds $1.5 Billion to the debt with a tax cut and they get all giddy.

make that $1.5 TRILLION $$$$

 

[BlindBoo]

What not to love about giving the corporations an the uber wealth investor class a permanent tax cut without taking away the deductions like they promised, and giving lowly working class a small temporary cut with a larger increase in a few years.

We all know Deficits and the Debt don't matter with the GOP in office, they only matter when it's the Dems in office.

Wake up America, get the oligarchs out.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

poor misguided RW Trumpbots.

Trump adds $1.5 Billion to the debt with a tax cut and they get all giddy.

To be fair, 1.5 Billion is pocket change compared to the spending of the last administration, with the help of the dog shit GOP congress.

 

[RWNJ]

Reagan's economic policy failed because he and Tip O'Neill gave each other reach-arounds and spent like a couple of trust-fund kids. That and Amnesty are the reasons I rank Reagan as a mid-level president, at best. He just seemed like a good president because Jimmy Fucking Carter sucked 10 miles of donkey anus.

Tax cuts AND spending cuts make for good economic policy, the like of which we have not seen since Calvin Coolidge.

And just who was responsible for that spending? Recall that all spending is authorized by the House of Representatives. Who had control of the House at the time? It was the Democrats. Also, I can't remember if happened under Reagan, or one of the Bushes. I believe it was Bush. Congress promised to cut spending if Bush would raise taxes. He raised taxes, but Congress broke their promise and went on a spending spree. Face it. Every economic woe we suffer from is a result of the Democrats.

 

[bendog]

But then, they have always hated the truth. It gets in the way of their favorite hobby. Destroying America.

Why else would they be opposed to tax cuts? Here is the historical truth about the effects of tax cuts on the economy.

Read it and weep, liberal snowflakes.

The Historical Lessons of Lower Tax Rates

You devious devil, you.

 

[Siete]

poor misguided RW Trumpbots.

Trump adds $1.5 Billion to the debt with a tax cut and they get all giddy.

To be fair, 1.5 Billion is pocket change compared to the spending of the last administration, with the help of the dog shit GOP congress.

its Trillion ... mea culpa.

 

[RWNJ]

But then, they have always hated the truth. It gets in the way of their favorite hobby. Destroying America.

Why else would they be opposed to tax cuts? Here is the historical truth about the effects of tax cuts on the economy.

Read it and weep, liberal snowflakes.

The Historical Lessons of Lower Tax Rates

You devious devil, you.

The truth is never devious.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

But then, they have always hated the truth. It gets in the way of their favorite hobby. Destroying America.

Why else would they be opposed to tax cuts? Here is the historical truth about the effects of tax cuts on the economy.

Read it and weep, liberal snowflakes.

The Historical Lessons of Lower Tax Rates

I don't hate this. In fact I love it because you just made a damned fool of your self. You just proved that it's you and your ilk who hate the truth. The Heritage foundation? Really? Here is a dose of the truth:

Tax Rates During the Best Years for Economic Growth

Discussion: The tax rate for the top income tax bracket was much higher than it is today for most of modern history and economic growth was generally faster when it was quite a bit higher than it is today.

However, it is important to note that the marginal rate for the top income tax bracket is not a perfect measure of the tax burden of the rich. A better measure would compare the effective tax rate on all types of income for the rich. Unfortunately, that data is not available going back very many years, so we need to live with a rough approximation. Luckily, the top tax rate has generally tended to rise and fall roughly along with the capital gains rate and the estate tax, and to have an inverse relationship to the number of deductions and loopholes the rich take advantage of. When the politicians have been inclined to reduce the taxes of the rich, they have typically reduced them in all of those ways and vice versa.

Of course, high taxes on the rich (or any bracket) does not in and of itself increase economic growth. Taking money out of the economy in the form of taxation always slows economic growth. But, raising tax revenues allows the government to spend, which always boosts economic growth, and the data does suggest that a dollar in government spending tends to do more good for the economy than a dollar in income for the rich. It is, however, possible that the relationship is not causal at all and that the high tax rates are a response to economic growth rather than a cause. But, at the very least, the data proves beyond a doubt that much higher taxes on the rich than we have today can be compatible with much faster economic growth than we have today.

 

[bendog]

If you marry younger woman as a second wife/trade-in, make sure she thinks your vasectomy is irreversible.

 

[Siete]

tax cuts and trickle down economics have been the RW's mantra for decades.

50 years of their mantra failing them, and they're still too damn dumb to STFU.

"TOO DAMN DUMB" IS WHY THEY'RE RW'S.

 

[Dragonlady]

But then, they have always hated the truth. It gets in the way of their favorite hobby. Destroying America.

Why else would they be opposed to tax cuts? Here is the historical truth about the effects of tax cuts on the economy.

Read it and weep, liberal snowflakes.

The Historical Lessons of Lower Tax Rates

The problem which you will no doubt came to see is true, is that no one anywhere in the known universe can tell liberals the truth about anything that does not fit their agenda.

The Historical Lessons of Lower Yax Rates shows how desperately wrong that 1980’s piece has been.

Twice since the Heritage Foundation published this piece, taxes have been lowered three times. On the first two occasions, this lead to higher unemployment, increased poverty, and a destabilization of the stock market. Deficits doubled, then tripled.

The third instance just happened. First comes the deficit spending spree goosing the economy just enough to get people’s hopes up and get them to vote Republican this fall. Then reality sets in as consequences of stupid budget tricks come home to roost.