Liberal Protest In Pittsburg

So as a result our peaceful protests of a growing government, a growing defecit, and a soon to follow growing tax burden those of us who went to and are going to future tea parties are called:

The president called me:
A Liar
Ignorant
Uniformed
The speaker of the house called me
Nazi
Astroturf
Paid republican shill
The Fringe liberal media (nbc, msnbc, nyt) called me
Terrorist
Racist
Redneck
Teabagger(which is actually a compliment)
Ignorant
Stupid
Misguided
and they repeated the speaker and president's sentiments, which is how i learned of them.


Yet there is no attempt to discredit these violent anti-government protestors. Why is one anti-govt group attacked and slandered while the other anti-govt group is considered acceptable?

They aren't smart enough to be violent. Anti-government? I'm willing to bet these wannabes eagerly accept their college grants and whatever else they can get their hands on lol.
 
Absolutely! His anti-establishment, anti-capitalism rhetoric has been hateful and inciting.

And, no one can tell me that the timeing of this violence in Pittsburgh and the release of is inciting film is any coincidence. It is a direct causation!

Every G-20/G-8 summit has these types of protests. Pittsburgh was no exception.

I live in Pittsburgh and can tell you truthfully that the violence was wrought by Anarchists, not the vast majority of the protesters.

You need to disassociate from them, not just blame them.

How can you disassociate from something you have nothing to do with?
 
Yet, Michael Moore's anti-capitalist film, an anarchist's dream, was just realeased. He has incited this violence.

Why would an "anti-capitalist" film be an anarchist's dream? Anarchism is an opposition to government, not to capitalism.
 
Ya'll librals are bad to tear up Pittsburg. Really bad. Conservative Protesters don't act like that. Shame on yas
 
Yet, Michael Moore's anti-capitalist film, an anarchist's dream, was just realeased. He has incited this violence.

Why would an "anti-capitalist" film be an anarchist's dream? Anarchism is an opposition to government, not to capitalism.
Capitalism is part of our system. Communists and socialists are anti-capitalist. It's all Michael Moore's hate speech inciting this. How could it not be? His film was just released. No coincidence there.
 
Yet, Michael Moore's anti-capitalist film, an anarchist's dream, was just realeased. He has incited this violence.

Why would an "anti-capitalist" film be an anarchist's dream? Anarchism is an opposition to government, not to capitalism.

Capitalism is part of our system. It's all Michael Moore's hate speech inciting this. How could it not be? His film was just released. No coincidence there.

Once again, capitalism is not government.
 
Yet, Michael Moore's anti-capitalist film, an anarchist's dream, was just realeased. He has incited this violence.

Why would an "anti-capitalist" film be an anarchist's dream? Anarchism is an opposition to government, not to capitalism.
Capitalism is part of our system. Communists and socialists are anti-capitalist. It's all Michael Moore's hate speech inciting this. How could it not be? His film was just released. No coincidence there.

yep and the tv stations he appeared on are complicit too. Pure Hate speeck.
 
Why would an "anti-capitalist" film be an anarchist's dream? Anarchism is an opposition to government, not to capitalism.

Capitalism is part of our system. It's all Michael Moore's hate speech inciting this. How could it not be? His film was just released. No coincidence there.

Once again, capitalism is not government.
Not what I said.

Once again, it is part of our system. Socialists and communists are anti-capitalism. Michael Moore's newly released film is anti-capitalism. He is inciting this violence. Hate Speech.
 
Maggie is acknowledging that the Anarchist Crowd is uncontrollable and hurtful.

Not acknowledging, accusing falsely.

No, Intense is correct. Comparing them to the teabaggers can't be done. I didn't like the fact that some of the baggers carried weapons, but at least it was all for show and their demonstration was peaceful. These people in Pittsburgh were begging for a showdown with the police and if they hadn't been outnumbered, undoubtedly would have got their wish.

Nah. They would have pissed their pants if there'd been a 'showdown'.
 
Capitalism is part of our system. It's all Michael Moore's hate speech inciting this. How could it not be? His film was just released. No coincidence there.

Once again, capitalism is not government.
Not what I said.

Once again, it is part of our system. Socialists and communists are anti-capitalism. Michael Moore's newly released film is anti-capitalism. He is inciting this violence. Hate Speech.

Anarchists are not communists. In fact, they're about as far from communism as you can get.
 
Once again, capitalism is not government.
Not what I said.

Once again, it is part of our system. Socialists and communists are anti-capitalism. Michael Moore's newly released film is anti-capitalism. He is inciting this violence. Hate Speech.

Anarchists are not communists. ....
Not what I said.

Can you find some logical issues in the posts I keep making?

You don't need strawmen to demonstrate any issues.

Just curious.
 
No strawman involved. You keep claiming that the protests are "anti-capitalist" in nature, even though those protesting are anarchists.
 
Not what I said.

Once again, it is part of our system. Socialists and communists are anti-capitalism. Michael Moore's newly released film is anti-capitalism. He is inciting this violence. Hate Speech.

Anarchists are not communists. ....
Not what I said.

Can you find some logical issues in the posts I keep making?

You don't need strawmen to demonstrate any issues.

Just curious.

You're not making sense.

If you want them to be liberals, then fine... they're liberals. If that makes you all happy, it's all good.

But they aren't socialists and they aren't communists.
 
Anarchists are not communists. ....
Not what I said.

Can you find some logical issues in the posts I keep making?

You don't need strawmen to demonstrate any issues.

Just curious.

You're not making sense.

If you want them to be liberals, then fine... they're liberals. If that makes you all happy, it's all good.

But they aren't socialists and they aren't communists.
And I didn't say they were socialists or communists. That's a strawman.
 
Not what I said.

Can you find some logical issues in the posts I keep making?

You don't need strawmen to demonstrate any issues.

Just curious.

You're not making sense.

If you want them to be liberals, then fine... they're liberals. If that makes you all happy, it's all good.

But they aren't socialists and they aren't communists.
And I didn't say they were socialists or communists. That's a strawman.

It's as if you think your posts exist in a vacuum.

Once again, it is part of our system. Socialists and communists are anti-capitalism.
 

Forum List

Back
Top