Liberal Protest In Pittsburg

2 million American tea party protestors go to Washington to protest the government they are peaceful and even clean up their trash before they leave..

Q: What do liberals call them?
A: NAZIS

Socialist anti-American, anti-capitalist maniacs go to g20 summit to "protest" they engage in destruction of private and public property, attack police and other acts of violence, and mayhem.

Q: What do liberals call them?
A: COMRADE!

Oh that reminds me
Bill Ayers our very own, terrorist, speaking on education at Perdue University. :cuckoo: ....
'Scuse me. That's Purdue University. And, there was quite a protest against the terrorist pig and pice of shit. It takes a lot for Purdue students to protest.

No, it is now Perdue as in CHICKEN :eusa_angel:
 
oh shit, like your playing nice is going to stop the DUmmies from sticking the right with the neo nazis and blah blah blah ,, haven't you seen them drag Tim McVeighs rotten old bones out and fling them in your face. This riot in Pittsburg belongs to the liberals,


Yeah, intellectual honesty is overrated. We gotta stick it to the DUmmies!

You're part of the problem Willow.









glad you think so libral
And you spell it "libral" too? Ain't you witty?
 
Oh that reminds me
Bill Ayers our very own, terrorist, speaking on education at Perdue University. :cuckoo: ....
'Scuse me. That's Purdue University. And, there was quite a protest against the terrorist pig and pice of shit. It takes a lot for Purdue students to protest.

No, it is now Perdue as in CHICKEN :eusa_angel:
Shall we take this outside? Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.............................................
 
2 million American tea party protestors go to Washington to protest the government they are peaceful and even clean up their trash before they leave..

Q: What do liberals call them?
A: NAZIS

Socialist anti-American, anti-capitalist maniacs go to g20 summit to "protest" they engage in destruction of private and public property, attack police and other acts of violence, and mayhem.

Q: What do liberals call them?
A: COMRADE!

Oh that reminds me
Bill Ayers our very own, terrorist, speaking on education at Perdue University. :cuckoo: ....
'Scuse me. That's Purdue University. And, there was quite a protest against the terrorist pig and pice of shit. It takes a lot for Purdue students to protest.

Why did you feel the need to snip most of my post and spell "excuse", without the E? :doubt:
 
Oh that reminds me
Bill Ayers our very own, terrorist, speaking on education at Perdue University. :cuckoo: ....
'Scuse me. That's Purdue University. And, there was quite a protest against the terrorist pig and pice of shit. It takes a lot for Purdue students to protest.

Why did you feel the need to snip most of my post and the spell "excuse", without the E? :doubt:
"Cuz I'm a Purdue alum and that was the only part of your post with which I had any issue. I cut off the 'E' because I'm typing colloquially (?????)

The Purdue fan is one of the most self-depricating there is. Just so you know; I hope you can figure out the tone.

And, for that terrorist pig and piece of shit to get Purdue students to protest is a big deal. As I said, the students there rarely protest a thing. In fact, during the Viet Nam war, the biggest protest was a marshmallow throwing war between the civie students and the ROTCs.

So, the protest is a big deal, in my book.
 
'Scuse me. That's Purdue University. And, there was quite a protest against the terrorist pig and pice of shit. It takes a lot for Purdue students to protest.

Why did you feel the need to snip most of my post and the spell "excuse", without the E? :doubt:
"Cuz I'm a Purdue alum and that was the only part of your post with which I had any issue. I cut off the 'E' because I'm typing colloquially (?????)

The Purdue fan is one of the most self-depricating there is. Just so you know; I hope you can figure out the tone.

And, for that terrorist pig and piece of shit to get Purdue students to protest is a big deal. As I said, the students there rarely protest a thing. In fact, during the Viet Nam war, the biggest protest was a marshmallow throwing war between the civie students and the ROTCs.

So, the protest is a big deal, in my book.


Well, that is nice and all, but my point is that the media and the left does not think it is a big deal. And by the way. You do not have to be so snooty, or do ya?
 
Why did you feel the need to snip most of my post and the spell "excuse", without the E? :doubt:
"Cuz I'm a Purdue alum and that was the only part of your post with which I had any issue. I cut off the 'E' because I'm typing colloquially (?????)

The Purdue fan is one of the most self-depricating there is. Just so you know; I hope you can figure out the tone.

And, for that terrorist pig and piece of shit to get Purdue students to protest is a big deal. As I said, the students there rarely protest a thing. In fact, during the Viet Nam war, the biggest protest was a marshmallow throwing war between the civie students and the ROTCs.

So, the protest is a big deal, in my book.


Well, that is nice and all, but my point is that the media and the left does not think it is a big deal. And by the way. You do not have to be so snooty, or do ya?
That's snooty?

You're reading WAY too much into my two posts.

Pffft.
 
You know who's to blame for the violence in Pittsburgh? Michael Moore. That's right, Michael Moore. What with all his inciteful, hateful rhetoric against capitalism...
Absolutely! His anti-establishment, anti-capitalism rhetoric has been hateful and inciting.

And, no one can tell me that the timeing of this violence in Pittsburgh and the release of is inciting film is any coincidence. It is a direct causation!
 


Liberals? OMG, you just keep getting dumber and dumber. They are ANTI-GOVERNMENT anarchists, genius.

Thank you!
I mean really...how stupid are you people??
:clap2:



Not to stupid to know that when you librals protest the town is gonna get torn down, burned down and lots of people are going to go to jail. Contrast that to we meek and mild Republicans.
 
The point is that Anarchists - or college kids out for a good time who think they're Anarchists - aren't "lliberals" (in the contemporary American sense). Trying to equate Anarchists with, say left wing Democrats, is erroneous at best and a blatant lie at worst.
 
The point is that Anarchists - or college kids out for a good time who think they're Anarchists - aren't "lliberals" (in the contemporary American sense). Trying to equate Anarchists with, say left wing Democrats, is erroneous at best and a blatant lie at worst.
I've seen their position described as both left and right. Your description fits. As does their being put into the left category - they are not conservatives at all. Right/conservatives here.
 
The point is that Anarchists - or college kids out for a good time who think they're Anarchists - aren't "lliberals" (in the contemporary American sense). Trying to equate Anarchists with, say left wing Democrats, is erroneous at best and a blatant lie at worst.

did ya ever meet an anarchist that wasn't a libral, come on you guys and quit blowing smoke.
 
Here's an interesting piece on left and right wing. Historic and present day considerations may move the description completely from one end to the other. It's worth reading the entire piece, IMO.
....

They are both relative and receive their specific meaning only within a given historical
context. The revolutionaries of former times, as for instance, the European National
Liberals of the 19th century, do not seem very revolutionary today — quite the contrary! —
just as .today's reactionaries would have been considered very revolutionary 200 years
ago. When the Communists took over in Russia in 1917 they did so as revolutionaries out
to overthrow an ineffective and corrupt regime, whereas today they represent the
reactionary establishment facing a new revolutionary challenge.

In our time the traditional left wing is predominantly Marxist — even to such a degree
that the very term "left wing" is thought to be synonymous with the word "Marxist." This,
of course, has no basis in reality. Any revolutionary is a left-winger — it is just that the
Marxists have had so little competition that they have been able to appropriate the term.
On the other side of the political spectrum we have the right wing, consisting of
reactionaries who want to preserve the present society and the so-called Christian
civilization of the West with its materialism and capitalism. The rightwingers stand up for
traditional patriotic values: they are good Christians and good citizens who defend the
Constitution and are loyal to their country and their monarch, if they have one. They are
willing to go to war against any other nation to assert the greatness of their own — even if
it means waging a nuclear war against another White country if they think its system of
government threatens their own domestic order, no matter how corrupt and degenerate it
may be. They are for an economy based on unrestricted free enterprise, regardless of the
.consequences, but they resent the Liberal trend in politics as well as immigration and
racial integration, because they fear any changes that could upset the order to which they are accustomed.

....
Full text of "National Socialism: A Left-Wing Movement"
 
well the obamalama in his own words admits to seeking out "anarchists and radicals" and I can guarandamnteeya they weren't republicans.. so ya'll librals stop tearing up Pittsburg. ya hear?
 
So a few college kids act out and now all liberals are hypocrites, socialists, communists, and terrorists. Way to be partisan hacks about it.

That's not what they're saying. They're saying the left on this board are hypocritical. They douched us because we dared to march peacefully on Washington. But they won't say a word about these assholes. Every weird murder that comes up, they attribute to the fact that tea parters "incite" such behavior. But they won't say a word about the behavior of their own ideological brothers.

Because they're NOT our "brothers." Jeezus, where the hell are you people educated? Google the G-8 summits in London, Rome, and elsewhere. Are you suggesting that "liberal" democrats exclusively from the United States caused those riots too?
The libs totally own these protesters. These protestors are not conservatives. Denial not only does nothing to change that fact, but it makes your post look stupid.
 
No, they're not conservatives. But the left isn't a solid bloc either (nor is the right). These folks, supposedly (I still think they're playing at anarchist) are Anarchists. Anarchists aren't part of the "liberal" left, they're out on the far left and I mean the real far left.
 

Forum List

Back
Top