Liberal media caught in another blatant lie: National Mall was FULL during Trump's inauguration

[Faun]

Don THE Con's fist is in the same position, there are 2 cameras in 2 different positions shooting the liar at the same time. DUH!

When the NYT published that photo, they said it was taken 45 minutes BEFORE Trump started speaking.

Now it seems that the latest frantic lie from our southpaw friends is that the end of the speech was the only time he held his fist up like that. Where they get this alt-fact is not explained. Since the photo was taken 45 minutes before the speech, was Trump even out in his seat on stage yet? Surely cameras were on him all the time, wherever he was. Any chance he was saluting his team or congratulating someone? Or do the liberals "know" he "never does that"? (Would the liberals lie? )

Dumbfuck, that photo is not from The NY Times. How many times are you going demonstrate you have no clue what you're talking about. These photos were taken by Reuters photographer Lucas Jackson.

The Photo Details That Show the Truth About Inauguration Attendance

 

[Siete]

Don THE Con's fist is in the same position, there are 2 cameras in 2 different positions shooting the liar at the same time. DUH!

When the NYT published that photo, they said it was taken 45 minutes BEFORE Trump started speaking.

Now it seems that the latest frantic lie from our southpaw friends is that the end of the speech was the only time he held his fist up like that. Where they get this alt-fact is not explained. Since the photo was taken 45 minutes before the speech, was Trump even out in his seat on stage yet? Surely cameras were on him all the time, wherever he was. Any chance he was saluting his team or congratulating someone? Or do the liberals "know" he "never does that"? (Would the liberals lie? )

Dumbfuck, that photo is not from The NY Times. How many times are you going demonstrate you have no clue what you're talking about. These photos were taken by Reuters photographer Lucas Jackson.

The Photo Details That Show the Truth About Inauguration Attendance

little squirrel food has issues .. most nut cases do.

 

[Little-Acorn]

Dumbfuck, that photo is not from The NY Times.

(Yawn) Time to slap down another desperate liberal attempt to pretend something is wrong.

As I said, the photo was published by the New York Times. See link below.

Poor little faun, don't you get tired of having your nose rubbed in your own literary excrement time after time? Dogs usually take the hint after the first few times. Why can't you?

Original New York Times story showing the photo, including the caption stating that it was taken 45 minutes BEFORE Trump's speech:

Trump’s Inauguration vs. Obama’s: Comparing the Crowds

 

[Little-Acorn]

Actually, I don’t mind poor little faun’s repeated desperate attempts to fool people into thinking his various lies (pick one) are true. He simply provides normal people with opportunity after opportunity, to display the proof that his sniveling little fibs are just that, fibs.

Here's the picture again, showing Trump addressing the COMPLETELY FULL mall during his inauguration.
You know, the picture the liberal fanatics like poor little faun are trying so desperately to pretend doesn't exist. Because it disproves their lie that the mall was only 1/3 full.

Thanks for the chance to post it here again!

 

[edthecynic]

Dumbfuck, that photo is not from The NY Times.

(Yawn) Time to slap down another desperate liberal attempt to pretend something is wrong.

As I said, the photo was published by the New York Times. See link below.

Poor little faun, don't you get tired of having your nose rubbed in your own literary excrement time after time? Dogs usually take the hint after the first few times. Why can't you?

Original New York Times story showing the photo, including the caption stating that it was taken 45 minutes BEFORE Trump's speech:

Trump’s Inauguration vs. Obama’s: Comparing the Crowds

It doesn't matter how many times you lie about the photos I and Faun posted, they just make you a serial liar like Don THE Con. The photos in the NY Times were from the "58th Presidential Inaugural Committee" according to your OWN link. the photos Faun and I posted were taken by Reuters photographer Lucas Jackson. NOT the same photos, NOT taken at the same time as the NY Times photos. The Jackson photos were taken DURING Tramp's speech. The pathological liar can clearly be seen on the monitor screens and the closed captions for the deaf can be seen at the bottom of the screens so you can actually tell exactly where in his speech he was at the time of the photo.

I know that Trumpists, like Tramp, live to lie, but at this point you are making a bigger fool of yourself than a Don THE Con tweet!

The Photo Details That Show the Truth About Inauguration Attendance

 

[Faun]

Dumbfuck, that photo is not from The NY Times.

(Yawn) Time to slap down another desperate liberal attempt to pretend something is wrong.

As I said, the photo was published by the New York Times. See link below.

Poor little faun, don't you get tired of having your nose rubbed in your own literary excrement time after time? Dogs usually take the hint after the first few times. Why can't you?

Original New York Times story showing the photo, including the caption stating that it was taken 45 minutes BEFORE Trump's speech:

Trump’s Inauguration vs. Obama’s: Comparing the Crowds

You're simply too rightarded.

I keep posting a photo provided by a Reuters photographer which was clearly taken after Trump began speaking since he can be seen speaking in the photo.

You keep posting a photo provided by the 58th Presidential Inaugural Committee and clearly taken before Trump began speaking.

And just as crystal clear, you're too senile to comprehend the two photographs are not one in the same.

Apparently, you can't defend your nonsense, which is also crystal clear, since you can't handle the reality that Trump's crowd was nowhere near as big as Obama's...

 

[Faun]

Actually, I don’t mind poor little faun’s repeated desperate attempts to fool people into thinking his various lies (pick one) are true. He simply provides normal people with opportunity after opportunity, to display the proof that his sniveling little fibs are just that, fibs.

Here's the picture again, showing Trump addressing the COMPLETELY FULL mall during his inauguration.
You know, the picture the liberal fanatics like poor little faun are trying so desperately to pretend doesn't exist. Because it disproves their lie that the mall was only 1/3 full.

Thanks for the chance to post it here again!

LOL

You can post that photo all you want ... just as I can post this photo, taken while Trump was speaking, proving beyond any shadow of a doubt that Trump's turnout was significantly smaller than Obama's...

 

[Little-Acorn]

Actually, I don’t mind poor little faun’s repeated desperate attempts to fool people into thinking his various lies (pick one) are true, such as pretending his photo published by the NYT was taken "as Trump was speaking". Even though the NYT itself admits it was taken 45 minutes before Trump's speech. Something that has been pointed out repeatedly to poor little faun, and which he continues to desperately ignore.

Poor little faun simply provides normal people with opportunity after opportunity, to display the proof that his sniveling little fibs are just that, fibs.

Here's the picture again, showing Trump addressing the COMPLETELY FULL mall during his inauguration.
You know, the picture the liberal fanatics like poor little faun are trying so desperately to pretend doesn't exist. Because it disproves their lie that the mall was only 1/3 full.

 

[Little-Acorn]

BTW, I found some video of poor little faun, keeping fighting long after he has lost, as though he still has a valid point somehow:



(With captions suitable for the illegal aliens his party keeps allowing to enter and stay in the country)

 

[Faun]

Actually, I don’t mind poor little faun’s repeated desperate attempts to fool people into thinking his various lies (pick one) are true, such as pretending his photo published by the NYT was taken "as Trump was speaking".

Now you're flat out lying. I actually said the picture I posted was not the one from The NY Times. Your lie exposes even you know you lost this argument.

 

[edthecynic]

Actually, I don’t mind poor little faun’s repeated desperate attempts to fool people into thinking his various lies (pick one) are true, such as pretending his photo published by the NYT was taken "as Trump was speaking". Even though the NYT itself admits it was taken 45 minutes before Trump's speech. Something that has been pointed out repeatedly to poor little faun, and which he continues to desperately ignore.

Actually it has been pointed out to you that Faun's photo is NOT from the NY Times, and Don THE Con can be seen on the monitors making the fist he made at the very end of his speech. The closed captions for the deaf on one screen says, "God bless you, and God bless America., 2 other screens say, "America," which were his final words.

 

[Reasonable]

Lots of liberals have been stridently insisting that the Mall was half empty or worse during Trump's inauguration. They point to photos displayed by the New York Times and other liberal rags as "proof", showing most of the Mall empty.

But CNN has developed a photo technique they call "Gigapixel", which takes a photo of a very large area, with such precision that you can zoom in and see individual faces. They used it while Trump was giving his inaugural address.

Unfortunately, CNN was so eager to show off their new technology, they forgot to get their stories straight with the other media outlets first. You have to go to the website and pivot the picture back and forth. And when you do, at one end you can see Trump standing at the dais alone, giving his speech to the audience. And if you swing it the other way and zoom out, you can see that the National Mall is COMPLETELY FULL except for two small sections that were 75% full. That's easily a million people.

No wonder Trump's people ripped the media a new one (again). The NYTimes was manufacturing fake news (again) designed to make Trump look bad (again), and they got caught red-handed (again).

A small line near the bottom of the NYT article explains the lie: They admit that their half-empty picture was taken nearly an hour before Trump was inaugurated, and that people were still coming in. Why they call that picture "Trump's Inauguration" is not explained.

When you ask someone how many people came to Trump's inauguration, you're not asking how many showed up an hour early. You're asking how many were there. The NYT tried to substitute the hour-earlier picture for an actual picture of the inauguration. But CNN showed an actual picture of the inauguration, in terrific detail... thus blowing the New York Times' lie out of the water.

For the New York Times' fake picture, see Trump’s Inauguration vs. Obama’s: Comparing the Crowds

And for CNN's true picture taken an hour later, see Gigapixel: The inauguration of Donald Trump .

Remember to zoom the CNN picture in and out so you can see Trump giving his speech (which pinpoints what time it was taken), and you can also see that the entire Mall is jammed to the rafters.

File this under the same crap heading as " Trump really didn't mock the handicapped."
Obama's crowd was more than twice of the whiny little bitch's.
He couldn't handle it THUS you assholes can't handle it..

 

[Faun]

Lots of liberals have been stridently insisting that the Mall was half empty or worse during Trump's inauguration. They point to photos displayed by the New York Times and other liberal rags as "proof", showing most of the Mall empty.

But CNN has developed a photo technique they call "Gigapixel", which takes a photo of a very large area, with such precision that you can zoom in and see individual faces. They used it while Trump was giving his inaugural address.

Unfortunately, CNN was so eager to show off their new technology, they forgot to get their stories straight with the other media outlets first. You have to go to the website and pivot the picture back and forth. And when you do, at one end you can see Trump standing at the dais alone, giving his speech to the audience. And if you swing it the other way and zoom out, you can see that the National Mall is COMPLETELY FULL except for two small sections that were 75% full. That's easily a million people.

No wonder Trump's people ripped the media a new one (again). The NYTimes was manufacturing fake news (again) designed to make Trump look bad (again), and they got caught red-handed (again).

A small line near the bottom of the NYT article explains the lie: They admit that their half-empty picture was taken nearly an hour before Trump was inaugurated, and that people were still coming in. Why they call that picture "Trump's Inauguration" is not explained.

When you ask someone how many people came to Trump's inauguration, you're not asking how many showed up an hour early. You're asking how many were there. The NYT tried to substitute the hour-earlier picture for an actual picture of the inauguration. But CNN showed an actual picture of the inauguration, in terrific detail... thus blowing the New York Times' lie out of the water.

For the New York Times' fake picture, see Trump’s Inauguration vs. Obama’s: Comparing the Crowds

And for CNN's true picture taken an hour later, see Gigapixel: The inauguration of Donald Trump .

Remember to zoom the CNN picture in and out so you can see Trump giving his speech (which pinpoints what time it was taken), and you can also see that the entire Mall is jammed to the rafters.

File this under the same crap heading as " Trump really didn't mock the handicapped."
Obama's crowd was more than twice of the whiny little bitch's.
He couldn't handle it THUS you assholes can't handle it..

That will be Trump's next investigation.