- Moderator
- #61
First step in being trustworthy is being sane.
That gives Romney a leg up over at least part of the field.
Democrats will never admit that he has that leg up over Obama.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
First step in being trustworthy is being sane.
That gives Romney a leg up over at least part of the field.
It's all about beating Obama. Romney is the candidate by default, but if Obama is reelected, the country is over.
It's not about beating Obama, it's about electing someone we can trust to do the right things rather than cave in and I'm sorry but Mitt is far from being that person. If it's all about beating Obama then you're part of the problem and that is a sad platform to run off.
Anybody who thinks Romney is very different from Obama will be sorely disappointed if he wins. It's not even because of the Obamacare/Romneycare issue, which I highly doubt will be resolved if Romney wins with a straight up repeal.
I doubt the man will do anything different from Bush, or Obama. Just like McCain was no different from them, and Perry is no different from them. These people will do nothing to change the country, what is needed is drastic changes soon .....
Romney can't win the GOP nomination without the support of The Tea Party - and most of them consider him to be nothing better than a "Democrat in sheeps clothing!"I'd rather have four years of Marxist Obama not getting what he wants then 4 years of socialist lite Romney getting it. Did you learn nothing from the eight disastrous years of the W administration?
when "push-comes-to-shove," the present conservative crowd is more interested in remaining ideologically "pure" than winning.[/b]
There is no "far liberal" counterpart that is even a distant 2nd to matching the power and political influence of The Tea Party!when "push-comes-to-shove," the present conservative crowd is more interested in remaining ideologically "pure" than winning.
I think this is also true of the far liberal population as well. The REAL problem is that it's starting to seem like both camps are the far sides of the spectrum are increasingly stubborn when it comes to pushing their hopes of extremist candidates.
I read an article not long ago suggesting that the US populace seems to be starting to favor a more Westminster style of legislature, with a "government" that runs the show and an "opposition." Maybe it's time the US starts considering a restructuring of our government?
It's all about beating Obama. Romney is the candidate by default, but if Obama is reelected, the country is over.
It's all about beating Obama. Romney is the candidate by default, but if Obama is reelected, the country is over.
He's a Mormon. The base of the GOP will never get behind a Mormon. See 2008 GOP ticket if you don't believe me....
I think we're over that, look at the polls.
Beating Obama is the overriding obsession.
It's all about beating Obama. Romney is the candidate by default, but if Obama is reelected, the country is over.
He's a Mormon. The base of the GOP will never get behind a Mormon. See 2008 GOP ticket if you don't believe me....
Obama is a black man. Once upon a time it was said that the country would never get behind a black man.
It was once said that the country would never get behind a Catholic.
I like Romney, I hope he gets the nomination. Just read this morning that he's pulled back out in front of the pack, with Perry taking a nosedive. I'm not a big fan of Obama. But I think it's silly to say that the country is "over" if he get's reelected. That's like all the liberal wing nuts in 2004 saying the same about Bush getting re-elected.
You're just still upset because you won't see a Palin / Obama debate.
The mainstream conservative spin begins. "Pick Romney, he ain't so bad" is their meme. Why are mainstream Republicans pushing Romney? Because he's a corporate tool, of course. The banks LOVE him. He's their kind of guy...he ships jobs overseas too.
It's all about beating Obama. Romney is the candidate by default, but if Obama is reelected, the country is over.
The mainstream conservative spin begins. "Pick Romney, he ain't so bad" is their meme. Why are mainstream Republicans pushing Romney? Because he's a corporate tool, of course. The banks LOVE him. He's their kind of guy...he ships jobs overseas too.
It's all about beating Obama. Romney is the candidate by default, but if Obama is reelected, the country is over.
Uhhhmmm. No.
Application denied.
The point of the primaries is to pick the best possible candidate, not JUST the one who you imagine has the "best chance" to knock the other side's incumbent out of the box.
If push comes to shove, I'll support Gov. Romney. But he is not my preference.
He does rank higher than Huntsman or Dr. Paul, though. Even then, it's a close call.
It's all about beating Obama. Romney is the candidate by default, but if Obama is reelected, the country is over.
Cain is a 10fold better fit!
If we don't elect Cain we will miss out big time!
It's not about beating Obama, it's about electing someone we can trust to do the right things rather than cave in and I'm sorry but Mitt is far from being that person. If it's all about beating Obama then you're part of the problem and that is a sad platform to run off.Anybody who thinks Romney is very different from Obama will be sorely disappointed if he wins. It's not even because of the Obamacare/Romneycare issue, which I highly doubt will be resolved if Romney wins with a straight up repeal.
I doubt the man will do anything different from Bush, or Obama. Just like McCain was no different from them, and Perry is no different from them. These people will do nothing to change the country, what is needed is drastic changes soon .....Romney can't win the GOP nomination without the support of The Tea Party - and most of them consider him to be nothing better than a "Democrat in sheeps clothing!"I'd rather have four years of Marxist Obama not getting what he wants then 4 years of socialist lite Romney getting it. Did you learn nothing from the eight disastrous years of the W administration?
I agree that Romney is the one and only Republican candidate capable of appealing to America's political center and beating Obama, BUT when "push-comes-to-shove," the present conservative crowd is more interested in remaining ideologically "pure" than winning.
It's not about beating Obama, it's about electing someone we can trust to do the right things rather than cave in and I'm sorry but Mitt is far from being that person. If it's all about beating Obama then you're part of the problem and that is a sad platform to run off.
Romney can't win the GOP nomination without the support of The Tea Party - and most of them consider him to be nothing better than a "Democrat in sheeps clothing!"I'd rather have four years of Marxist Obama not getting what he wants then 4 years of socialist lite Romney getting it. Did you learn nothing from the eight disastrous years of the W administration?
I agree that Romney is the one and only Republican candidate capable of appealing to America's political center and beating Obama, BUT when "push-comes-to-shove," the present conservative crowd is more interested in remaining ideologically "pure" than winning.
The tea party is all about beating Obama, even if it means getting behind Romney.
It's all about beating Obama. Romney is the candidate by default, but if Obama is reelected, the country is over.
Uhhhmmm. No.
Application denied.
The point of the primaries is to pick the best possible candidate, not JUST the one who you imagine has the "best chance" to knock the other side's incumbent out of the box.
If push comes to shove, I'll support Gov. Romney. But he is not my preference.
He does rank higher than Huntsman or Dr. Paul, though. Even then, it's a close call.
I like Romney more than Huntsman, Paul, and that other libertarian idiot.
Newt is the best guy for the job, but he can't win a general, and niether can Cain, Perry, or Bachman.
What should we do? Give up the whitehouse to a dangerous Marxist, because the candidate we have, that is the only one that can win, isn't conservative enough?
Administrations that have failed historically, have done the most damage in the second term, George W. Bush included...
The difference between first term Obama and second term Obama, is in his second term he's going to try and do only what he wants, because he won't need to worry about another election.