Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well if cannabis can actually stop the growth of cancer tumors, then why isn't the American Cancer Society all over this? All the years that they have raised money through their charity, you would think they would fund a scientific research team to work on serums to test on cancer patients.
They're working on it... and so is Big Pharma. They want to corral the positive effects in a manner that they can capitalize on. What good would it do them to prove marijuana cures cancer if they can't corner the market on it?
Testing to see if someone is high is harder than drunk. And neither should be driving...
About 12 years ago they tested some people driving on pot and none of them drove worse on pot, and some drove better.
Spelling marijuana with an h in place of the j is not mis-spelling. It is an alternate spelling, typically used by British writers (et al) to emulate the h sound as in the Latin pronunciation, e.g., juana.Hold it, you cannot click on them and read them. Marijuana is even misspelled on one of them.
Why it was misspelled, I'm not quite sure.
Does Mr. Shitman realize he is a running joke on this board?
Shocking some potheads claim otherwise via some blog.
Next, you'll be using that man love boy organization proof that pedophiles aren't bad people.
So much for your BBC mockumentary...
Study Debunks Claim That Pot Smoking Causes Mental Illness | NORML Blog, Marijuana Law Reform
Shocking that you dismiss the verifiable research done at the Keele University Medical School and published in the peer-reviewed scientific journal Schizophrenia Research as the ramblings of some blog.
Don't tell me, I know. The research isn't worth a fuck unless it comports to your preconceived notions, right?
You're STILL a moron, GB, and you continue to prove it with every post you make.
Spelling marijuana with an h in place of the j is not mis-spelling. It is an alternate spelling, typically used by British writers (et al) to emulate the h sound as in the Latin pronunciation, e.g., juana.Hold it, you cannot click on them and read them. Marijuana is even misspelled on one of them.
Why it was misspelled, I'm not quite sure.
More substance use is not better.
banning or outlawing a popular substance or culture only drives it underground. Keeping it legal or in the open allows better observation and control.
So then by that "logic", we should immediately legalize rape & murder.
....VICES, here.....
Does Mr. Shitman realize he is a running joke on this board?
That's half the entertainment him and Truthmatters...Both from the same idiot village.
Nice try...marijuana has direct damage to the brain....
Shocking some potheads claim otherwise via some blog.
Next, you'll be using that man love boy organization proof that pedophiles aren't bad people.
So much for your BBC mockumentary...
Study Debunks Claim That Pot Smoking Causes Mental Illness | NORML Blog, Marijuana Law Reform
Shocking that you dismiss the verifiable research done at the Keele University Medical School and published in the peer-reviewed scientific journal Schizophrenia Research as the ramblings of some blog.
Don't tell me, I know. The research isn't worth a fuck unless it comports to your preconceived notions, right?
You're STILL a moron, GB, and you continue to prove it with every post you make.
. . . . . .
1) Drug war is a waste of time...its lost. Long gone
2) If you believe in less gov't intrusion then you in no way can be against the legalization of pot. What one does in their own house is no business of any one else's...if you are for less gov't that is.
3) Legalization would help create jobs. People could grow it. People could sell it. Businesses could be created
4) Morals and capitalism dont mix. Never have. Never will. Look at what happens on wall street. Talk about corruption and illegal actions.
Well if cannabis can actually stop the growth of cancer tumors, then why isn't the American Cancer Society all over this? All the years that they have raised money through their charity, you would think they would fund a scientific research team to work on serums to test on cancer patients.
They're working on it... and so is Big Pharma. They want to corral the positive effects in a manner that they can capitalize on. What good would it do them to prove marijuana cures cancer if they can't corner the market on it?
So, what I'm reading and correct me if I'm wrong, Big Pharma and ACS are looking for a big payday when their are actually folks out there suffering? I mean if they could first provide results as proof then wouldn't they capitalize on it? And I don't mean results on lab animals. Actually cancer patients.
OK rational answer...God instructed Adam and Eve not to eat from one tree, everything else was ok. But Eve went ahead and ate one anyway and convinced Adam it was ok, just because The Serpent told Eve not to worry, that it was ok. Of course God found out. Now, God is law of the land and has created a perfect world.Save your fairy-tales for Sunday.
We're trying to be rational, here.
Did you even read GuyPinestra question? He brought up God and Eve? Thanks for playing though.
I've been 'lighting up' for almost 45 years, and I've been asking this same question for that same amount of time.
And now we see why GuyPinestra is the cop-hating epic asshole that he is... Police officers enforce the law, and little "internet tough-Guy" here doesn't like the laws.
......BEEN THERE!!!!!!!!!!!!
Boy, if this doesn't explain everything. Shaman-the-stupid here uses comedians for his source of information.
They're working on it... and so is Big Pharma. They want to corral the positive effects in a manner that they can capitalize on. What good would it do them to prove marijuana cures cancer if they can't corner the market on it?
So, what I'm reading and correct me if I'm wrong, Big Pharma and ACS are looking for a big payday when their are actually folks out there suffering? I mean if they could first provide results as proof then wouldn't they capitalize on it? And I don't mean results on lab animals. Actually cancer patients.
The ACS supports further trials and has no financial stake in their outcome. Big Pharma, on the other hand, only wants trials in which their synthesized compounds are used, because only with THOSE products can they make any money.
And if you think Merck or any of the others give a fuck about people suffering you should probably think again. Look at the damage they have done to people with the last 20 years worth of pharmaceutical products. They don't care about people, and their lawsuit payouts are considered a normal expense of 'doing business'.
no one has ever died from smoking pot
being put in jail for pot is more dngerous to ypur health than smoking pot
legalize or decriminalize already
Nobody may have died directly from pot, but under the influence, marijuana has been shown to degrade short-term memory, concentration, judgment, and coordination at complex tasks including driving. Which ultimately can cause accident, injury or even death.
Testing to see if someone is high is harder than drunk. And neither should be driving...
About 12 years ago they tested some people driving on pot and none of them drove worse on pot, and some drove better.
Boy, if this doesn't explain everything. Shaman-the-stupid here uses comedians for his source of information. And he fries his brain.
No wonder he's a mumbling, bumbling, stumbling, fumbling buffoon of an idiot in every post he makes. Anyone thinks comedians are a good source of information for policy debate needs to go on ignore (ove that feature - not having to see the idiot ramblings of people like this).
At least I don't have to bump into him in heaven.
