Left-wing "logic"

[Billo_Really]

Oh snowflake....you are not only losing your shit again, but you are caught contradicting yourself yet again. Here you are in post #41 proclaiming "This is a country based on the rule of law" and insisting they must be enforced. Yet above you state "there are bigger problems". What an idiotic position. As if we can't walk and chew bubble gum at the same time (well, I mean, we know that Dumbocrats can't but Republicans are in charge now and we can).

Remind us again what you said earlier about hypocrisy and sin, son?[/QUOTE]So you think we should spend just as much time and energy enforcing parking violations as we do solving capital murder cases, domestic violence and tax fraud?

 

[task0778]

This really illustrates the astounding ignorance of Billo_Really and the depths of that ignorance. The poor little uneducated lad has no concept of "limited resources". We only have so much money in our economy and every single illegal alien needs some of it. We only have so much food and every single illegal alien needs some of it. We only have so much healthcare (available doctors, hospitals, etc.) and every single illegal alien needs some of it. We only have so much education (teachers, classrooms, etc.) and every single illegal alien is utilizing some of it. We only have so much judicial systems (judges, courts, etc,) and every single illegal alien is utilizing some of it.

Billo_Really is a typical marxist/socialist idiot. All ideology, no knowledge.

The reason there is so little to go around, is because of the top 1%, not the bottom 1%.

The top 1% of the people in this country, own 94% of the assets in this country. That's the real problem, not your made up immigrant bullshit.

94% of the assets? I don't think that's right.

 

[P@triot]

In this thread, the "state Supreme Court Justice" should shut her mouth because the feds have jurisdiction, but in another thread, you said the opposite...

"All President Trump has done so far is restore...power back to the states and back to the people."
​

I swear, you waffle more than IHOP!

Yeah? And? How does the first comment have anything to do with the second comment? Would you care to even attempt to explain such an irrational comment?

What a moron. Trump restoring constitutional government has nothing to do with this woman attempting to interfere with a constitutional responsibility of the federal government. Article I, Section 8 makes immigration the constitutional responsibility of the federal government, you nitwit.

 

[P@triot]

This really illustrates the astounding ignorance of Billo_Really and the depths of that ignorance. The poor little uneducated lad has no concept of "limited resources". We only have so much money in our economy and every single illegal alien needs some of it. We only have so much food and every single illegal alien needs some of it. We only have so much healthcare (available doctors, hospitals, etc.) and every single illegal alien needs some of it. We only have so much education (teachers, classrooms, etc.) and every single illegal alien is utilizing some of it. We only have so much judicial systems (judges, courts, etc,) and every single illegal alien is utilizing some of it.

Billo_Really is a typical marxist/socialist idiot. All ideology, no knowledge.

The reason there is so little to go around, is because of the top 1%, not the bottom 1%.

The top 1% of the people in this country, own 94% of the assets in this country. That's the real problem, not your made up immigrant bullshit.

Uh-oh....someone needed to move the goalposts after being smacked in the face by reality.

Snowflake - the top 1% do not own 94% of the food in America. The top 1% do not own 94% of the healthcare in America. The top 1% do not own 94% of the food in America. The top 1% do not own 94% of the justice system in America.

You continue to say the dumbest shit to defend an indefensible position. We are a nation of laws, we will enforce our immigration laws, and only an asshole, like you would insist that these criminals should allow to engage in their criminal activity without repercussions.

 

[P@triot]

She should want to get arrested. Remember? You gave a big (fake) patriotic speech about how we are a "nation of laws". As such, she she want to be arrested for her criminal actions so that the laws are properly enforced and obeyed.

So you're claiming we're not a nation of laws?

Well we (Republicans) are a nation of laws. You marxist/socialist hatriots are not. You're sitting right here in this thread insisting that an illegal alien should not be arrested.

 

[danielpalos]

snippet from the Washington Post:

California’s top judge criticized federal immigration agents for using courthouses as “bait” — a place for “stalking” immigrants who “pose no risk to public safety.”

Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye wrote a letter Thursday to Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Department of Homeland Security Secretary John F. Kelly amid reports of federal agents going to courthouses and scouting for immigrants who are not in the country legally.

Such incidents have been reported in California, Texas, Oregon, Colorado and Arizona.

In the letter, Cantil-Sakauye requested that Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents stop arresting immigrants at courthouses.

“I am deeply concerned about reports from some of our trial courts that immigration agents appear to be stalking undocumented immigrants in our courthouses to make arrests,” she wrote. “… Courthouses should not be used as bait in the necessary enforcement of our country’s immigration laws.”

ICE spokeswoman Virginia Kice said immigration officers make arrests at courthouses only after exhausting other options.

“It’s important to note that many of the arrest targets ICE has sought out at or near courthouses are foreign nationals who have prior criminal convictions in the U.S.,” Kice said in a statement. “In years past, most of these individuals would have been turned over to ICE by local authorities upon their release from jail based on ICE detainers. … In such instances where deportation officers seek to conduct an arrest at a courthouse, every effort is made to take the person into custody in a secure area, out of public view, but this is not always possible.”

Kice said making an arrest at a courthouse eliminates the safety risks of detaining someone on the street.

California chief justice to ICE: Stop ‘stalking’ immigrants at courthouses


This is the Chief justice on the California Supreme Court. I would say it depends on the individual, are we talking about a violent person or a mother of 3 who is herself a victim. Look, the law is the law, and if local officials were turning over illegals to ICE like they should then all this stuff at the courthouse wouldn't be happening.

Persons at a State Courthouse are presumed innocent until proven guilty of a State crime.

 

[JoeB131]

I was never home schooled a single day in my life. I also did not attend a private school. I went to public school my entire life. Are there any other lies you would like to try telling? This is like the twelfth lie I've caught you in during the past 24 hours.

What? You went to a communist school where they took money from the "makers" in this society to give it to you?

 

[P@triot]

Persons at a State Courthouse are presumed innocent until proven guilty of a State crime.

Exacfly. So the person allegedly "beating" her may not even be beating her.

 

[Billo_Really]

94% of the assets? I don't think that's right.

You are correct. As of 2016, 10% of the population, own 76% of the wealth. Which is still pretty bad.

The richest 10% hold 76% of the wealth
​

And it is just going to get worse with the new Trump budget coming out.

 

[Billo_Really]

Well we (Republicans) are a nation of laws. You marxist/socialist hatriots are not. You're sitting right here in this thread insisting that an illegal alien should not be arrested.

No, you republicans are not a nation of laws. You republicans are nothing more than corporate bitches, doing what you're told, like good little whores.

You wanna tell me what marxism and socialism have to do with the issue of un-documented workers?

And no, I don't think she should have been arrested.

 

[12icer]

Home school
Where a "grade" is not a letter
of achievement,
but the level of dirt
you troll around in.​

Maybe true, were you home schooled? then how would you know anything about it lying liberal. I was schooled in the US armed forces education program designed to give exceptional students the best education in the world. Unlike public schooling they are not controlled by shit worthless liberal liars as staff. They teach REAL history, REAL science, REALLLY PROGRESSIVE subjects instead of regressive failure oriented socialist dumbdown classes, with no real scoring system. Sad that people like you are products of your destructive ignorance and low IQ.

 

[Billo_Really]

Yeah? And? How does the first comment have anything to do with the second comment? Would you care to even attempt to explain such an irrational comment?

In the first statement, you claim federal jurisdiction in the states; in the other statement, you speak of returning power to the states. You're talking about of both sides of your mouth.

What a moron. Trump restoring constitutional government has nothing to do with this woman attempting to interfere with a constitutional responsibility of the federal government. Article I, Section 8 makes immigration the constitutional responsibility of the federal government, you nitwit.

So you think a victim of domestic violence, interferes with the governments constitutional responsibility?

You're pretty sick, dude.

 

[P@triot]

94% of the assets? I don't think that's right.

You are correct. As of 2016, 10% of the population, own 76% of the wealth. Which is still pretty bad.

The richest 10% hold 76% of the wealth
​

And it is just going to get worse with the new Trump budget coming out.

What do you know....another post....another lie from Billo_Really.

 

[P@triot]

In the first statement, you claim federal jurisdiction in the states

Uh...no snowflake. I did no such thing (and never would). I seriously cannot tell if you're just a pathological liar or if your reading comprehension is simply this atrocious. Either way, everything you post is 100% misinformation and is just ruining threads.

 

[P@triot]

And no, I don't think she should have been arrested.

Of course not - because you are a lawless left-wing prick. I got you contradicting yourself when you gave a FAKE speech about being a "nation of laws" and then you turn around and insist that a criminal shouldn't be arrested.

 

[P@triot]

What a moron. Trump restoring constitutional government has nothing to do with this woman attempting to interfere with a constitutional responsibility of the federal government. Article I, Section 8 makes immigration the constitutional responsibility of the federal government, you nitwit.

So you think a victim of domestic violence, interferes with the governments constitutional responsibility?

This poor lad has a severe reading comprehension. No wonder he has to vote Dumbocrat. He simply could not survive on his own. Snowflake - how could (and I quote) "a victim of domestic violence" possibly interfere with constitutional responsibilities of the federal government? The two are completely unrelated. It's as idiotic as stating "when a butterfly flaps it wings, it prevents an automobile from starting".

If anyone is "interfering" with the constitutional responsibilities of the federal government, it is the idiot left-wing judge who wants to proclaim that criminals should not be arrested in and around a courthouse in California.

 

[P@triot]

So you think we should spend just as much time and energy enforcing parking violations as we do solving capital murder cases, domestic violence and tax fraud?

No snowflake. We should spend as much time and money as necessary to enforce all laws. In most cases, we spend more money and more time on parking violations because they are far more prominent than murder cases, nitwit.

If there should come a time that murders exceed parking violations, then we should increase the amount of time and money spent on murders. This is a pretty simple concept that could only confuse a left-wing hatriot.

 

[P@triot]

I would like to introduce everyone to the lies of Billo_Really. In post #41 he emphatically states that we are a nation of laws, and that as such, anyone who doesn't support enforcing the law "doesn't embrace American values". But then in post #76 he states that nobody should enforce immigration laws as they are (and I quote) "no big god-damn" deal.

And if that country has a tyrannical ruler who thinks its okay to abuse women, where's the recourse there? This is a country based on the rule of law and anyone who thinks its okay to deny someone due process of law, doesn't embrace American values.

You must really hate this country if you insist on wasting all of our time and resources on this non-issue of un-documented aliens? People coming into the country to take minimum wage jobs are no big god-damn threat to Americans, you stupid bitch! There are much bigger problems this country is facing than your little immigrant fetish.

So by his own words and his own position, Billo_Really does not embrace American values. A typical anti-American, left-wing hatriot.

 

[P@triot]

And if that country has a tyrannical ruler who thinks its okay to abuse women, where's the recourse there? This is a country based on the rule of law and anyone who thinks its okay to deny someone due process of law, doesn't embrace American values.

You must really hate this country if you insist on wasting all of our time and resources on this non-issue of un-documented aliens? People coming into the country to take minimum wage jobs are no big god-damn threat to Americans, you stupid bitch! There are much bigger problems this country is facing than your little immigrant fetish.

If we are a "nation of laws" (as we should be) then we enforce all laws. Not just the one's that a nobody like Billo_Really wants enforced.

 

[Billo_Really]

If we are a "nation of laws" (as we should be) then we enforce all laws. Not just the one's that a nobody like Billo_Really wants enforced.

Have you ever gotten away with driving over the speed limit, change lanes without signalling or rolled through a stop sign, then no, not all laws are enforced. You break the law every time you log in to this website by verbally abusing other posters, no cops are at your door.

There's a big law against domestic violence, you're arguing against the enforcement of that law by demanding lesser offenses get priority.