Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Nope, my logic is nothing like that. Aside from the fact that you ran away from answering my questions, there is a world of difference between assuming the risks of voluntarily climbing a ladder, with involuntarily being murdered by a nut with a weapon designed to kill.You're still persisting with this idiocy??Where the hell did you come up with that silliness?
Only about 1% of all gunshot deaths are caused by AR-15 or other firearms that the Moon Bats call "assault weapons".
The great majority of gun deaths are caused by cheap handguns shot by druggies, gangbangers and minority thugs in Democrat controlled big city shitholes.
Mass shootings, if you've been paying attention you'd know that.
Mass public shootings in 2019....10. 73 killed total.
Mass public shootings in 2018....12. 93 killed total.
Ladders kill over 300 every single year.
Bicycles kill over 300 every single year.
Cars kill over 38,000 every single year and a rental truck, in one attack, killed 86 and wounded 435.
Not matter how nice ladders, bicycles and trucks are, you can't ignore how many people they kill every single year......
How many people fired an AR-15 in 2019?
How many people climbed a ladder in 2019?
Total number of people killed in mass public shootings all gun types.....73. (2019)
Total number of people killed on ladders....300.
18 million guns, 4 used illegally in 2019.......you want to ban them all.
So...according to your logic, those 300 deaths, which outnumber all rifle killings, means we need to ban ladders.
That is your logic, not mine.
[Q
No, you clearly own this one, loon.
Can you answer this question for me?
There are about 1.5 million swimming pools in the US. Typically in a year about a thousand people die in drownings in backyard swimming pools.
I have a swimming pool.
There are about 18 million AR-15s in the US.
In a typical year less than 100 people are killed by AR-15s.
I have 30 AR-15s.
The question: What is more likely to cause a death, my swimming pool or my AR-15s?
It is not a trick question.
[Q
No, you clearly own this one, loon.
Can you answer this question for me?
There are about 1.5 million swimming pools in the US. Typically in a year about a thousand people die in drownings in backyard swimming pools.
I have a swimming pool.
There are about 18 million AR-15s in the US.
In a typical year less than 100 people are killed by AR-15s.
I have 30 AR-15s.
The question: What is more likely to cause a death, my swimming pool or my AR-15s?
It is not a trick question.
Where do you live?
[Q
No, you clearly own this one, loon.
Can you answer this question for me?
There are about 1.5 million swimming pools in the US. Typically in a year about a thousand people die in drownings in backyard swimming pools.
I have a swimming pool.
There are about 18 million AR-15s in the US.
In a typical year less than 100 people are killed by AR-15s.
I have 30 AR-15s.
The question: What is more likely to cause a death, my swimming pool or my AR-15s?
It is not a trick question.
Where do you live?
Florida.
Now answer my question.
[Q
No, you clearly own this one, loon.
Can you answer this question for me?
There are about 1.5 million swimming pools in the US. Typically in a year about a thousand people die in drownings in backyard swimming pools.
I have a swimming pool.
There are about 18 million AR-15s in the US.
In a typical year less than 100 people are killed by AR-15s.
I have 30 AR-15s.
The question: What is more likely to cause a death, my swimming pool or my AR-15s?
It is not a trick question.
Where do you live?
Ah, Florida. I guess you don't mind the local laws and regulations for your pool. Which as the point was previously made, something you voluntarily use and not involuntarily used against you.
[Q
No, you clearly own this one, loon.
Can you answer this question for me?
There are about 1.5 million swimming pools in the US. Typically in a year about a thousand people die in drownings in backyard swimming pools.
I have a swimming pool.
There are about 18 million AR-15s in the US.
In a typical year less than 100 people are killed by AR-15s.
I have 30 AR-15s.
The question: What is more likely to cause a death, my swimming pool or my AR-15s?
It is not a trick question.
Where do you live?
Ah, Florida. I guess you don't mind the local laws and regulations for your pool. Which as the point was previously made, something you voluntarily use and not involuntarily used against you.
That is not an answer to my question.
I'll ask it again: What is more dangerous, my swimming pool or my AR-15s?
Yes, dead is dead. But one is my choice and one isn't. It's not my problem the difference is too complex for young feeble brain.Nope, my logic is nothing like that. Aside from the fact that you ran away from answering my questions, there is a world of difference between assuming the risks of voluntarily climbing a ladder, with involuntarily being murdered by a nut with a weapon designed to kill.You're still persisting with this idiocy??Mass shootings, if you've been paying attention you'd know that.
Mass public shootings in 2019....10. 73 killed total.
Mass public shootings in 2018....12. 93 killed total.
Ladders kill over 300 every single year.
Bicycles kill over 300 every single year.
Cars kill over 38,000 every single year and a rental truck, in one attack, killed 86 and wounded 435.
Not matter how nice ladders, bicycles and trucks are, you can't ignore how many people they kill every single year......
How many people fired an AR-15 in 2019?
How many people climbed a ladder in 2019?
Total number of people killed in mass public shootings all gun types.....73. (2019)
Total number of people killed on ladders....300.
18 million guns, 4 used illegally in 2019.......you want to ban them all.
So...according to your logic, those 300 deaths, which outnumber all rifle killings, means we need to ban ladders.
That is your logic, not mine.
When you die it doesn't make much difference if you assuming risks or if it is an non assumed risk, does it? You are still fucking dead, aren't you?
You have never studied risk assessment, have you?
By the way, there is no Constitutional right to own a ladder but there is one to keep and bear arms. You have read the Constitution, haven't you?
Yes, dead is dead. But one is my choice and one isn't. It's not my problem the difference is too complex for young feeble brain.Nope, my logic is nothing like that. Aside from the fact that you ran away from answering my questions, there is a world of difference between assuming the risks of voluntarily climbing a ladder, with involuntarily being murdered by a nut with a weapon designed to kill.You're still persisting with this idiocy??Mass public shootings in 2019....10. 73 killed total.
Mass public shootings in 2018....12. 93 killed total.
Ladders kill over 300 every single year.
Bicycles kill over 300 every single year.
Cars kill over 38,000 every single year and a rental truck, in one attack, killed 86 and wounded 435.
Not matter how nice ladders, bicycles and trucks are, you can't ignore how many people they kill every single year......
How many people fired an AR-15 in 2019?
How many people climbed a ladder in 2019?
Total number of people killed in mass public shootings all gun types.....73. (2019)
Total number of people killed on ladders....300.
18 million guns, 4 used illegally in 2019.......you want to ban them all.
So...according to your logic, those 300 deaths, which outnumber all rifle killings, means we need to ban ladders.
That is your logic, not mine.
When you die it doesn't make much difference if you assuming risks or if it is an non assumed risk, does it? You are still fucking dead, aren't you?
You have never studied risk assessment, have you?
By the way, there is no Constitutional right to own a ladder but there is one to keep and bear arms. You have read the Constitution, haven't you?
Yup, I was right. You're completely incapable of comprehending the difference between an accidental non-criminal death, with murder.Yes, dead is dead. But one is my choice and one isn't. It's not my problem the difference is too complex for young feeble brain.Nope, my logic is nothing like that. Aside from the fact that you ran away from answering my questions, there is a world of difference between assuming the risks of voluntarily climbing a ladder, with involuntarily being murdered by a nut with a weapon designed to kill.You're still persisting with this idiocy??
How many people fired an AR-15 in 2019?
How many people climbed a ladder in 2019?
Total number of people killed in mass public shootings all gun types.....73. (2019)
Total number of people killed on ladders....300.
18 million guns, 4 used illegally in 2019.......you want to ban them all.
So...according to your logic, those 300 deaths, which outnumber all rifle killings, means we need to ban ladders.
That is your logic, not mine.
When you die it doesn't make much difference if you assuming risks or if it is an non assumed risk, does it? You are still fucking dead, aren't you?
You have never studied risk assessment, have you?
By the way, there is no Constitutional right to own a ladder but there is one to keep and bear arms. You have read the Constitution, haven't you?
Most of the people that die in accidents would probably tell you they didn't make a choice to do anything stupid.
Most people that get killed by firearms die in these big city Democrat controlled shitholes. I would be assuming a risk if I walked down a Chicago or Baltimore back street after dark. Or being involved in drugs, or belong to a gang because that is where the great majority of those gun crimes takes place.
The people in the Texas church made the decision to minimize their risk by taking responsibility for their own safety and that greatly reduced the number of deaths that could have happen.
Life is a risk.
You live in a country that has the Constitutional right to keep and bear arms. If you don't want to assume the risk of living with that individual Liberty may I suggest that you move elsewhere?
Yes, dead is dead. But one is my choice and one isn't. It's not my problem the difference is too complex for young feeble brain.Nope, my logic is nothing like that. Aside from the fact that you ran away from answering my questions, there is a world of difference between assuming the risks of voluntarily climbing a ladder, with involuntarily being murdered by a nut with a weapon designed to kill.You're still persisting with this idiocy??
How many people fired an AR-15 in 2019?
How many people climbed a ladder in 2019?
Total number of people killed in mass public shootings all gun types.....73. (2019)
Total number of people killed on ladders....300.
18 million guns, 4 used illegally in 2019.......you want to ban them all.
So...according to your logic, those 300 deaths, which outnumber all rifle killings, means we need to ban ladders.
That is your logic, not mine.
When you die it doesn't make much difference if you assuming risks or if it is an non assumed risk, does it? You are still fucking dead, aren't you?
You have never studied risk assessment, have you?
By the way, there is no Constitutional right to own a ladder but there is one to keep and bear arms. You have read the Constitution, haven't you?
Most of the people that die in accidents would probably tell you they didn't make a choice to do anything stupid.
Most people that get killed by firearms die in these big city Democrat controlled shitholes. I would be assuming a risk if I walked down a Chicago or Baltimore back street after dark. Or being involved in drugs, or belong to a gang because that is where the great majority of those gun crimes takes place.
The people in the Texas church made the decision to minimize their risk by taking responsibility for their own safety and that greatly reduced the number of deaths that could have happen.
Life is a risk.
You live in a country that has the Constitutional right to keep and bear arms. If you don't want to assume the risk of living with that individual Liberty may I suggest that you move elsewhere?
[Q
A swimming pool in your own home is more dangerous to you.
Yup, I was right. You're completely incapable of comprehending the difference between an accidental non-criminal death, with murder.Yes, dead is dead. But one is my choice and one isn't. It's not my problem the difference is too complex for young feeble brain.Nope, my logic is nothing like that. Aside from the fact that you ran away from answering my questions, there is a world of difference between assuming the risks of voluntarily climbing a ladder, with involuntarily being murdered by a nut with a weapon designed to kill.Total number of people killed in mass public shootings all gun types.....73. (2019)
Total number of people killed on ladders....300.
18 million guns, 4 used illegally in 2019.......you want to ban them all.
So...according to your logic, those 300 deaths, which outnumber all rifle killings, means we need to ban ladders.
That is your logic, not mine.
When you die it doesn't make much difference if you assuming risks or if it is an non assumed risk, does it? You are still fucking dead, aren't you?
You have never studied risk assessment, have you?
By the way, there is no Constitutional right to own a ladder but there is one to keep and bear arms. You have read the Constitution, haven't you?
Most of the people that die in accidents would probably tell you they didn't make a choice to do anything stupid.
Most people that get killed by firearms die in these big city Democrat controlled shitholes. I would be assuming a risk if I walked down a Chicago or Baltimore back street after dark. Or being involved in drugs, or belong to a gang because that is where the great majority of those gun crimes takes place.
The people in the Texas church made the decision to minimize their risk by taking responsibility for their own safety and that greatly reduced the number of deaths that could have happen.
Life is a risk.
You live in a country that has the Constitutional right to keep and bear arms. If you don't want to assume the risk of living with that individual Liberty may I suggest that you move elsewhere?
You freaks are truly fucked in the head.
[Q
A swimming pool in your own home is more dangerous to you.
That is correct.
In the county I live in there are thousands of swimming pools. In 2019 14 people died in swimming deaths.
I don't know how many AR-15s in my county but I suspect is several times the number of swimming pools.
In 2019 one person was killed with an AR-15. It was a home invasion where a pregnant girl used the AR to shoot one of the invaders that had beat up her husband. You may have read about it because it made national news.
Swimming pools are much more dangerous. That one AR death was in fact an innocent person defending their home.
Yup, I was right. You're completely incapable of comprehending the difference between an accidental non-criminal death, with murder.Yes, dead is dead. But one is my choice and one isn't. It's not my problem the difference is too complex for young feeble brain.Nope, my logic is nothing like that. Aside from the fact that you ran away from answering my questions, there is a world of difference between assuming the risks of voluntarily climbing a ladder, with involuntarily being murdered by a nut with a weapon designed to kill.Total number of people killed in mass public shootings all gun types.....73. (2019)
Total number of people killed on ladders....300.
18 million guns, 4 used illegally in 2019.......you want to ban them all.
So...according to your logic, those 300 deaths, which outnumber all rifle killings, means we need to ban ladders.
That is your logic, not mine.
When you die it doesn't make much difference if you assuming risks or if it is an non assumed risk, does it? You are still fucking dead, aren't you?
You have never studied risk assessment, have you?
By the way, there is no Constitutional right to own a ladder but there is one to keep and bear arms. You have read the Constitution, haven't you?
Most of the people that die in accidents would probably tell you they didn't make a choice to do anything stupid.
Most people that get killed by firearms die in these big city Democrat controlled shitholes. I would be assuming a risk if I walked down a Chicago or Baltimore back street after dark. Or being involved in drugs, or belong to a gang because that is where the great majority of those gun crimes takes place.
The people in the Texas church made the decision to minimize their risk by taking responsibility for their own safety and that greatly reduced the number of deaths that could have happen.
Life is a risk.
You live in a country that has the Constitutional right to keep and bear arms. If you don't want to assume the risk of living with that individual Liberty may I suggest that you move elsewhere?
You freaks are truly fucked in the head.
[Q
A swimming pool in your own home is more dangerous to you.
That is correct.
In the county I live in there are thousands of swimming pools. In 2019 14 people died in swimming deaths.
I don't know how many AR-15s in my county but I suspect is several times the number of swimming pools.
In 2019 one person was killed with an AR-15. It was a home invasion where a pregnant girl used the AR to shoot one of the invaders that had beat up her husband. You may have read about it because it made national news.
Swimming pools are much more dangerous. That one AR death was in fact an innocent person defending their home.
Gosh you managed to clip my post so as to not answer it. Not surprised.
No mention of the safety measures the government requires you to take for your pool? Or that your pool can't hurt others outside of your home? Or that more people (especially children) will use a pool than shoot an AR-15?
I'm not even arguing for an assault weapons ban, just the honesty that they are in fact more dangerous than other guns and that their use increases the number of people killed or wounded per incident.
[Q
A swimming pool in your own home is more dangerous to you.
That is correct.
In the county I live in there are thousands of swimming pools. In 2019 14 people died in swimming deaths.
I don't know how many AR-15s in my county but I suspect is several times the number of swimming pools.
In 2019 one person was killed with an AR-15. It was a home invasion where a pregnant girl used the AR to shoot one of the invaders that had beat up her husband. You may have read about it because it made national news.
Swimming pools are much more dangerous. That one AR death was in fact an innocent person defending their home.
Gosh you managed to clip my post so as to not answer it. Not surprised.
No mention of the safety measures the government requires you to take for your pool? Or that your pool can't hurt others outside of your home? Or that more people (especially children) will use a pool than shoot an AR-15?
I'm not even arguing for an assault weapons ban, just the honesty that they are in fact more dangerous than other guns and that their use increases the number of people killed or wounded per incident.
