Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
[Q
When shooters use AR style weapons they kill and injure more. .
Where the hell did you come up with that silliness?
Only about 1% of all gunshot deaths are caused by AR-15 or other firearms that the Moon Bats call "assault weapons".
The great majority of gun deaths are caused by cheap handguns shot by druggies, gangbangers and minority thugs in Democrat controlled big city shitholes.
They are trying to focus on mass public shootings because they want to ban AR-15s......knowing that if we allow them to ban those rifles, they can come back and demand that all other semi-automatic rifles, pistols and shotguns can be banned since they are operate the same way.
First.....none of the weapons you listed are "Assault Weapons," so you aren't even addressing the topic..... and the rifles used are not "more deadly," than pistols or shotguns. How deadly a weapon is depends on who they are used against and the location....... 2 pistols in Virginia Tech killed 32 people....the rifle you want banned killed only 3 at Gilroy......location, not the rifle, is the main determinant of deaths.
These assault style weapons when used in mass shootings average out more killed and wounded. I'm sorry you can't reconcile that.
They had more kills because the targets they chose were gun free zones....and they learned from previous shooters.......again....since you seem a little slow on the uptake.....any of the shootings done with rifles could have been done with pistols.......the only exception is Vegas because the long range of the attack........
In fact......outside of the exception of the Vegas shooting, with 4oo yard shooting distance......Virginia Tech had the highest number of dead, at 32 with 2 pistols.....Luby's cafe, with 2 pistols had 24, Sandy Hook with the rifle had 26, and could have been done with pistols...the only reason Sandy Hook had so many deaths is the shooter planned the attack and targeted the smallest, most helpless children in the school.....
You have no argument that is rational.......
Oh, I didn't realize that only assault style weapons were used in gun free zones. BS.
Assault style weapons are used in 25% of mass shootings and responsible for 40% of those killed and 69% of those who are wounded.
And with the lone exception of Vegas...Pistols killed the more people than rifles have.....32...the most in any shooting that didn't require 400 yard shots......
They are not Assault Style weapons.......and ladders kill more people than all Rifles do......combined......bicycles kill more people every single year than all rifles do......
You have no rational argument...
Per the link I had provided assault style weapons have been used in 25% of all mass shootings yet responsible for 40% of those killed and 69% of those injured. You seem to be incapable of responding to this.
EDIT: Since Columbine
You are ~600x more likely to be murdered with a handgun than with an 'assault weapon' in a mass shootingThese same idiots have no clue where the most gun deaths in this country takes place and what kind of firearms are used.
They think it is an Obama redneck White guy with an AR-15 when in reality is much more likely to be an Obama voting Black druggie with a stolen handgun.
[QU
It is as rational as your argument is.........
Total killed by rifles in mass public shootings in 2019..... 73.
Total number of just AR-15 rifles in the country....over 18 million.
Total killed by ladders....300.
Total killed by bicycles...345.
If it is the number killed each year, you need to demand ladders and bicycles be banned...according to your argument.
Correct.They are trying to focus on mass public shootings because they want to ban AR-15s....
They know the only way they can advance their agenda is to prey on the emotions of the ignorant.
First.....none of the weapons you listed are "Assault Weapons," so you aren't even addressing the topic..... and the rifles used are not "more deadly," than pistols or shotguns. How deadly a weapon is depends on who they are used against and the location....... 2 pistols in Virginia Tech killed 32 people....the rifle you want banned killed only 3 at Gilroy......location, not the rifle, is the main determinant of deaths.
These assault style weapons when used in mass shootings average out more killed and wounded. I'm sorry you can't reconcile that.
They had more kills because the targets they chose were gun free zones....and they learned from previous shooters.......again....since you seem a little slow on the uptake.....any of the shootings done with rifles could have been done with pistols.......the only exception is Vegas because the long range of the attack........
In fact......outside of the exception of the Vegas shooting, with 4oo yard shooting distance......Virginia Tech had the highest number of dead, at 32 with 2 pistols.....Luby's cafe, with 2 pistols had 24, Sandy Hook with the rifle had 26, and could have been done with pistols...the only reason Sandy Hook had so many deaths is the shooter planned the attack and targeted the smallest, most helpless children in the school.....
You have no argument that is rational.......
Oh, I didn't realize that only assault style weapons were used in gun free zones. BS.
Assault style weapons are used in 25% of mass shootings and responsible for 40% of those killed and 69% of those who are wounded.
And with the lone exception of Vegas...Pistols killed the more people than rifles have.....32...the most in any shooting that didn't require 400 yard shots......
They are not Assault Style weapons.......and ladders kill more people than all Rifles do......combined......bicycles kill more people every single year than all rifles do......
You have no rational argument...
Per the link I had provided assault style weapons have been used in 25% of all mass shootings yet responsible for 40% of those killed and 69% of those injured. You seem to be incapable of responding to this.
EDIT: Since Columbine
And, apparently, you cannot tell us why this matters.Per the link I had provided assault style weapons have been used in 25% of all mass shootings yet responsible for 40% of those killed and 69% of those injured. You seem to be incapable of responding to this.
Correct.They are trying to focus on mass public shootings because they want to ban AR-15s....
They know the only way they can advance their agenda is to prey on the emotions of the ignorant.
I don't really have an agenda other than a real, better background check system. I'm not for an assault weapons ban as I think we're beyond that now. So, save the agendas for someone else.
And yet, others do.I don't really have an agenda....Correct.They are trying to focus on mass public shootings because they want to ban AR-15s....
They know the only way they can advance their agenda is to prey on the emotions of the ignorant.
These assault style weapons when used in mass shootings average out more killed and wounded. I'm sorry you can't reconcile that.
They had more kills because the targets they chose were gun free zones....and they learned from previous shooters.......again....since you seem a little slow on the uptake.....any of the shootings done with rifles could have been done with pistols.......the only exception is Vegas because the long range of the attack........
In fact......outside of the exception of the Vegas shooting, with 4oo yard shooting distance......Virginia Tech had the highest number of dead, at 32 with 2 pistols.....Luby's cafe, with 2 pistols had 24, Sandy Hook with the rifle had 26, and could have been done with pistols...the only reason Sandy Hook had so many deaths is the shooter planned the attack and targeted the smallest, most helpless children in the school.....
You have no argument that is rational.......
Oh, I didn't realize that only assault style weapons were used in gun free zones. BS.
Assault style weapons are used in 25% of mass shootings and responsible for 40% of those killed and 69% of those who are wounded.
And with the lone exception of Vegas...Pistols killed the more people than rifles have.....32...the most in any shooting that didn't require 400 yard shots......
They are not Assault Style weapons.......and ladders kill more people than all Rifles do......combined......bicycles kill more people every single year than all rifles do......
You have no rational argument...
Per the link I had provided assault style weapons have been used in 25% of all mass shootings yet responsible for 40% of those killed and 69% of those injured. You seem to be incapable of responding to this.
EDIT: Since Columbine
I did respond.....those killed would have been killed had they used pistols or shotguns.......so the rifle isn't the issue...the gun free status of the location....and how long it takes someone to shoot back to stop them is the issue.
No. You have not.I have several times, I don't think you've responded to any of the times I've answered that.And, apparently, you cannot tell us why this matters.Per the link I had provided assault style weapons have been used in 25% of all mass shootings yet responsible for 40% of those killed and 69% of those injured. You seem to be incapable of responding to this.
Correct.They are trying to focus on mass public shootings because they want to ban AR-15s....
They know the only way they can advance their agenda is to prey on the emotions of the ignorant.
I don't really have an agenda other than a real, better background check system. I'm not for an assault weapons ban as I think we're beyond that now. So, save the agendas for someone else.
Correct.They are trying to focus on mass public shootings because they want to ban AR-15s....
They know the only way they can advance their agenda is to prey on the emotions of the ignorant.
I don't really have an agenda other than a real, better background check system. I'm not for an assault weapons ban as I think we're beyond that now. So, save the agendas for someone else.
What background check system do you want....
Keeping in mind that the current, mandatory, federal background check system is ignored by criminals...who use straw buyers who can pass any background check...or they steal their guns......and those who do mass public shootings can pass background checks.....or the government screws up.......
How does the fact 'assault weapons' were used in these shootings negate the claim than other weapons could have been used to the same effect?They had more kills because the targets they chose were gun free zones....and they learned from previous shooters.......again....since you seem a little slow on the uptake.....any of the shootings done with rifles could have been done with pistols.......the only exception is Vegas because the long range of the attack........
In fact......outside of the exception of the Vegas shooting, with 4oo yard shooting distance......Virginia Tech had the highest number of dead, at 32 with 2 pistols.....Luby's cafe, with 2 pistols had 24, Sandy Hook with the rifle had 26, and could have been done with pistols...the only reason Sandy Hook had so many deaths is the shooter planned the attack and targeted the smallest, most helpless children in the school.....
You have no argument that is rational.......
Oh, I didn't realize that only assault style weapons were used in gun free zones. BS.
Assault style weapons are used in 25% of mass shootings and responsible for 40% of those killed and 69% of those who are wounded.
And with the lone exception of Vegas...Pistols killed the more people than rifles have.....32...the most in any shooting that didn't require 400 yard shots......
They are not Assault Style weapons.......and ladders kill more people than all Rifles do......combined......bicycles kill more people every single year than all rifles do......
You have no rational argument...
Per the link I had provided assault style weapons have been used in 25% of all mass shootings yet responsible for 40% of those killed and 69% of those injured. You seem to be incapable of responding to this.
EDIT: Since Columbine
I did respond.....those killed would have been killed had they used pistols or shotguns.......so the rifle isn't the issue...the gun free status of the location....and how long it takes someone to shoot back to stop them is the issue.
Really? GO over every mass shooting since 1999, which were used by assault style weapons and those used with other types and get back to me.
I've told you several times why I think it matters, you've ignored it.No. You have not.I have several times, I don't think you've responded to any of the times I've answered that.And, apparently, you cannot tell us why this matters.Per the link I had provided assault style weapons have been used in 25% of all mass shootings yet responsible for 40% of those killed and 69% of those injured. You seem to be incapable of responding to this.
Not once.
Not once have you told us why the fact assault style weapons have been used in 25% of all mass shootings yet responsible for 40% of those killed and 69% of those injured matters.
Disagree? Feel free to cite the post and quote the text.
As it is impossible to legally avoid the background checks required by federal law, there is no loopholeA better collaborative system between states and the federal government, get rid of gun show/private sale loop holes.
They had more kills because the targets they chose were gun free zones....and they learned from previous shooters.......again....since you seem a little slow on the uptake.....any of the shootings done with rifles could have been done with pistols.......the only exception is Vegas because the long range of the attack........
In fact......outside of the exception of the Vegas shooting, with 4oo yard shooting distance......Virginia Tech had the highest number of dead, at 32 with 2 pistols.....Luby's cafe, with 2 pistols had 24, Sandy Hook with the rifle had 26, and could have been done with pistols...the only reason Sandy Hook had so many deaths is the shooter planned the attack and targeted the smallest, most helpless children in the school.....
You have no argument that is rational.......
Oh, I didn't realize that only assault style weapons were used in gun free zones. BS.
Assault style weapons are used in 25% of mass shootings and responsible for 40% of those killed and 69% of those who are wounded.
And with the lone exception of Vegas...Pistols killed the more people than rifles have.....32...the most in any shooting that didn't require 400 yard shots......
They are not Assault Style weapons.......and ladders kill more people than all Rifles do......combined......bicycles kill more people every single year than all rifles do......
You have no rational argument...
Per the link I had provided assault style weapons have been used in 25% of all mass shootings yet responsible for 40% of those killed and 69% of those injured. You seem to be incapable of responding to this.
EDIT: Since Columbine
I did respond.....those killed would have been killed had they used pistols or shotguns.......so the rifle isn't the issue...the gun free status of the location....and how long it takes someone to shoot back to stop them is the issue.
Really? GO over every mass shooting since 1999, which were used by assault style weapons and those used with other types and get back to me.
This is a lie.I've told you several times why I think it matters, you've ignored it.No. You have not.I have several times, I don't think you've responded to any of the times I've answered that.And, apparently, you cannot tell us why this matters.Per the link I had provided assault style weapons have been used in 25% of all mass shootings yet responsible for 40% of those killed and 69% of those injured. You seem to be incapable of responding to this.
Not once.
Not once have you told us why the fact assault style weapons have been used in 25% of all mass shootings yet responsible for 40% of those killed and 69% of those injured matters.
Disagree? Feel free to cite the post and quote the text.
How does the fact 'assault weapons' were used in these shootings negate the claim than other weapons could have been used to the same effect?Oh, I didn't realize that only assault style weapons were used in gun free zones. BS.
Assault style weapons are used in 25% of mass shootings and responsible for 40% of those killed and 69% of those who are wounded.
And with the lone exception of Vegas...Pistols killed the more people than rifles have.....32...the most in any shooting that didn't require 400 yard shots......
They are not Assault Style weapons.......and ladders kill more people than all Rifles do......combined......bicycles kill more people every single year than all rifles do......
You have no rational argument...
Per the link I had provided assault style weapons have been used in 25% of all mass shootings yet responsible for 40% of those killed and 69% of those injured. You seem to be incapable of responding to this.
EDIT: Since Columbine
I did respond.....those killed would have been killed had they used pistols or shotguns.......so the rifle isn't the issue...the gun free status of the location....and how long it takes someone to shoot back to stop them is the issue.
Really? GO over every mass shooting since 1999, which were used by assault style weapons and those used with other types and get back to me.
As it is impossible to legally avoid the background checks required by federal law, there is no loopholeA better collaborative system between states and the federal government, get rid of gun show/private sale loop holes.
How are you not aware of this?
