- Sep 12, 2008
- 14,201
- 3,567
- 185
Thats a common technique.
I issue you the same challenge I gave Dante.... Find an actual thesis and argument that we can discuss beyond the level of `Republicans are _______________` (Fill in pejorative de jour. )
Until then, I will respond in kind. Paul Krugman is a Sirocco... A hot dry desert wind that goes on forever and makes for madness.
I am shocked!
I am shocked that USMB's esteemed Professor of English didn't pick up on the fact that I called him a something or other 'pedantic' and not 'pedant'
*grin
<snark>I sent you off with a request, and you vanished for 30 hours in quest of what I asked for, which was to find any semantic meaning to your original post. anything at all.
After 30 hours, you come back with this.
I asked Zona to do the same thing. He couldn't either.
The three of us have come to the conclusion that there is no more to Krugman's original statement than you will find in one of the moldy cheetos under your desk.
Three of us have gone in search and found nothing.</snark>
Is this really all you got?
Is there so little to you that you admire a vacuum so much?
If you admire Vacuums.... Go admire this one.
This vacuum does honest work. Something Krugman does not.
Last edited: