Klayman to seek indictment of Justices Roberts and Kagan

Discussion in 'Law and Justice System' started by edthecynic, Jun 28, 2012.

  1. edthecynic
    Offline

    edthecynic Censored for Cynicism

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    26,655
    Thanks Received:
    3,085
    Trophy Points:
    260
    Ratings:
    +5,725
    Klayman to seek indictment of Justices Roberts and Kagan before Citizens Grand Jury

    Both Violated Their Oath of Office and Ethics Rules in Obamacare Decision

    (Washington, D.C., June 28, 2012). Today, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Elena Kagan have violated their oath of office to uphold the rule of law and the U.S. Constitution. Roberts’ majority opinion upholding Obamacare was not only legally wrong, but the chief justice’s failure to disqualify Justice Elena Kagan from sitting and ruling on the case – given her textbook conflict of interest in participating in the crafting of the legislation while she was Obama’s Solicitor General of the U.S. Justice Department – shows a clear-cut violation of the justices' oath of office.

    Larry Klayman, founder of Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch, had moved to have the justices disqualify Kagan. The motion and amicus brief which followed were “thrown in the trash” by Chief Justice Roberts, his having stated in the Court’s annual report that he and his fellow justices are not bound by the Canons of Judicial Ethics that govern other judges. Thus, according to Roberts, justices can do no wrong under any circumstances.

    Klayman issued this statement in light of these facts. “Chief Justice Roberts and his colleague must now be held to account to the American people. By refusing to disqualify Kagan and then writing the majority opinion which upholds the unconstitutional violation of the freedoms the Constitution grants to We the People, Roberts and Kagan have violated their oath of office and must be subject to possible indictment by a Citizens Grand Jury. Ironically, the Court has previously held that the grand jury belongs to the people, and not the other three branches of government. Following established grand jury procedures, I will empanel a grand jury in Florida and seek the indictment of Chief Justice Roberts and Kagan. The Framers of our Constitution created the Citizens Grand Jury for the people as found in the 5th Amendment. By so doing, they created a legal mechanism to hold corrupt judges and politicians accountable under our criminal laws, thereby hoping to avoid another revolution as occurred in 1776."

    To schedule an interview with Mr. Klayman contact Adrienne Mazzone at (561) 750- 9800 x210 or AMazzone@transmediagroup.com
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. Liability
    Offline

    Liability Locked Account. Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    Messages:
    35,447
    Thanks Received:
    5,049
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Mansion in Ravi's Head
    Ratings:
    +5,063
    Sounds pretty stupid. Sorta like edthesickdick.
     
  3. California Girl
    Offline

    California Girl BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    50,337
    Thanks Received:
    8,960
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +8,965
    What more can you expect of someone with his level of 'cynicism'. His username, like his sig, is utter bullshit. He's a left wing borg.
     
  4. edthecynic
    Offline

    edthecynic Censored for Cynicism

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    26,655
    Thanks Received:
    3,085
    Trophy Points:
    260
    Ratings:
    +5,725
    WOW!
    All that for simply posting the Teabaggers' reaction to the verdict!
    Thank you! :badgrin:
     
  5. Mad Scientist
    Offline

    Mad Scientist Deplorable Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    23,940
    Thanks Received:
    5,212
    Trophy Points:
    270
    Ratings:
    +7,684
    Yeah that's a great idea, give Obama two more SC appointments.
     
  6. Dante
    Offline

    Dante On leave Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2008
    Messages:
    52,463
    Thanks Received:
    3,324
    Trophy Points:
    1,825
    Location:
    On leave
    Ratings:
    +6,054
    :eek:
     
  7. Big Black Dog
    Offline

    Big Black Dog Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Messages:
    22,921
    Thanks Received:
    5,113
    Trophy Points:
    260
    Ratings:
    +5,733
    Link?
     
  8. theDoctorisIn
    Offline

    theDoctorisIn Senior Mod Staff Member Senior USMB Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2009
    Messages:
    30,025
    Thanks Received:
    5,799
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    East, but still West
    Ratings:
    +11,974
    That's fucking hilarious!

    I really hope they try that.
     
  9. edthecynic
    Offline

    edthecynic Censored for Cynicism

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    26,655
    Thanks Received:
    3,085
    Trophy Points:
    260
    Ratings:
    +5,725
  10. Rshermr
    Offline

    Rshermr VIP Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2012
    Messages:
    5,804
    Thanks Received:
    287
    Trophy Points:
    85
    Location:
    LaConner, WA
    Ratings:
    +855
    You gotta be kidding. SC justices are not subject to ANY restrictions. For christs sake, thomas' wife heads up a tea party group. We have seen justices attending functions and vacationing with people who they are involved directly with cases that they are judging. unlike any other level of court, there are no ethics rules.

    Roberts was the guy pushing hardest for Citizens United. You seriously believe he is a liberal. Get a grip. Truth is, the only surprise is that one conservative judge followed the law. That is the shocker.
     

Share This Page