Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It is the acceptance of sinful things overall since the 1960's and for the 1st time in our history we have jailed a person for her religious beliefs rather than trying to work out a compromise like other States have done.
That is hatred all the way around on both sides.
First, that woman was charged with contempt of court, not for her religious belief! You are distorting the facts. To a real person of Faith, that is gross error in His eyes.
Second, the woman had worked in that office for many years when her own mother had been the elected Clerk, and knew the responsibilities of the Clerk very well. Then she was ELECTED and took the OATH as the Clerk. Do Christians taking OATHS and swearing to God that they will carry out their duties faithfully have a RIGHT to break that OATH because of anything they might have an objection to may arise?
In that case, there are only two PROPER alternatives for a person of Faith to do. One is to either do it or resign. She did neither and she was dead wrong and so are you!
If I were a jaded character, I'd say she was looking to cash in for a book deal, movies rights or something of that nature. But of course I'm not like her!
Her religious beliefs are what led to her being jailed and they changed the rules in the middle of the game. SSM wasn't "legal" when she was elected, in fact it was banned in KY
You are making a chicken and egg argument that is irrelevant! It makes no sense to argue an alleged faithful Christian who takes an OATH before her God to FAITHFULLY execute her duties and then OPENLY AND WILLFULLY FORSAKES THAT OATH on the same grounds of ALLEGED Christian beliefs. That is the highest of hypocrisies!
But the duties has been changed since she took the oath.
Previous Marriages:
Rowan County will require documentation to prove a previous marriage has been dissolved either through death or divorce.
He who holds the gold makes the rules. She broke the rules, and now sits in jail. Just another criminal as far as most are concerned...It is the acceptance of sinful things overall since the 1960's and for the 1st time in our history we have jailed a person for her religious beliefs rather than trying to work out a compromise like other States have done.
That is hatred all the way around on both sides.
First, that woman was charged with contempt of court, not for her religious belief! You are distorting the facts. To a real person of Faith, that is gross error in His eyes.
Second, the woman had worked in that office for many years when her own mother had been the elected Clerk, and knew the responsibilities of the Clerk very well. Then she was ELECTED and took the OATH as the Clerk. Do Christians taking OATHS and swearing to God that they will carry out their duties faithfully have a RIGHT to break that OATH because of anything they might have an objection to may arise?
In that case, there are only two PROPER alternatives for a person of Faith to do. One is to either do it or resign. She did neither and she was dead wrong and so are you!
If I were a jaded character, I'd say she was looking to cash in for a book deal, movies rights or something of that nature. But of course I'm not like her!
She was charged with contempt of court because she refused to give marriage licenses to same sex couples which is her religious believe.
It should have been handled like it has been done in other States, where someone else could give them out not her being jailed.
Yup, that was an option, but she had ordered her staff NOT TO ISSUE licenses to same sex couples wishing to be married. She forced the issue and now she is paying the piper!
Yep
Just like any other protester who has stood up for their Constitutional rights.
Maine, Alaska, Oklahoma, Kentucky and Nevada, ranked at the top
for divorces, while Utah, Wyoming and Arkansas - which had the
highest marriage rates - were also higher than average in marital
breakups. New Jersey, Connecticut, Massachusetts and New York
ranked among the lowest in divorces.
The Bible was written by and edited by men. Men make mistakes. Times change. Jesus brought about changes... and even said there would be more.First, that woman was charged with contempt of court, not for her religious belief! You are distorting the facts. To a real person of Faith, that is gross error in His eyes.
Second, the woman had worked in that office for many years when her own mother had been the elected Clerk, and knew the responsibilities of the Clerk very well. Then she was ELECTED and took the OATH as the Clerk. Do Christians taking OATHS and swearing to God that they will carry out their duties faithfully have a RIGHT to break that OATH because of anything they might have an objection to may arise?
In that case, there are only two PROPER alternatives for a person of Faith to do. One is to either do it or resign. She did neither and she was dead wrong and so are you!
If I were a jaded character, I'd say she was looking to cash in for a book deal, movies rights or something of that nature. But of course I'm not like her!
Her religious beliefs are what led to her being jailed and they changed the rules in the middle of the game. SSM wasn't "legal" when she was elected, in fact it was banned in KY
You are making a chicken and egg argument that is irrelevant! It makes no sense to argue an alleged faithful Christian who takes an OATH before her God to FAITHFULLY execute her duties and then OPENLY AND WILLFULLY FORSAKES THAT OATH on the same grounds of ALLEGED Christian beliefs. That is the highest of hypocrisies!
God's law trumps human law. Your argument has failed
You pay your taxes to Caesar do you not, and you give to Him what is His. You are deluding yourself and deflecting because your arguments have been faulty!
The Bible clearly states we are to follow human law UNLESS it is in contradiction to God's law. The Bible makes it clear homosexuality is a sin and abomination. You lose, toad
The Bible was written by and edited by men. Men make mistakes. Times change. No one is hurt by monogamous same sex marriages. Folks like you need to put your hate away.Her religious beliefs are what led to her being jailed and they changed the rules in the middle of the game. SSM wasn't "legal" when she was elected, in fact it was banned in KY
You are making a chicken and egg argument that is irrelevant! It makes no sense to argue an alleged faithful Christian who takes an OATH before her God to FAITHFULLY execute her duties and then OPENLY AND WILLFULLY FORSAKES THAT OATH on the same grounds of ALLEGED Christian beliefs. That is the highest of hypocrisies!
God's law trumps human law. Your argument has failed
You pay your taxes to Caesar do you not, and you give to Him what is His. You are deluding yourself and deflecting because your arguments have been faulty!
The Bible clearly states we are to follow human law UNLESS it is in contradiction to God's law. The Bible makes it clear homosexuality is a sin and abomination. You lose, toad
It is the acceptance of sinful things overall since the 1960's and for the 1st time in our history we have jailed a person for her religious beliefs rather than trying to work out a compromise like other States have done.
That is hatred all the way around on both sides.
First, that woman was charged with contempt of court, not for her religious belief! You are distorting the facts. To a real person of Faith, that is gross error in His eyes.
Second, the woman had worked in that office for many years when her own mother had been the elected Clerk, and knew the responsibilities of the Clerk very well. Then she was ELECTED and took the OATH as the Clerk. Do Christians taking OATHS and swearing to God that they will carry out their duties faithfully have a RIGHT to break that OATH because of anything they might have an objection to may arise?
In that case, there are only two PROPER alternatives for a person of Faith to do. One is to either do it or resign. She did neither and she was dead wrong and so are you!
If I were a jaded character, I'd say she was looking to cash in for a book deal, movies rights or something of that nature. But of course I'm not like her!
Her religious beliefs are what led to her being jailed and they changed the rules in the middle of the game. SSM wasn't "legal" when she was elected, in fact it was banned in KY
You are making a chicken and egg argument that is irrelevant! It makes no sense to argue an alleged faithful Christian who takes an OATH before her God to FAITHFULLY execute her duties and then OPENLY AND WILLFULLY FORSAKES THAT OATH on the same grounds of ALLEGED Christian beliefs. That is the highest of hypocrisies!
But the duties has been changed since she took the oath.
And that had what impact on her two options to either comply with the responsibilities and requirements of her ELECTED POSITION or resign? She took the OATH OF OFFICE to faithfully execute her responsibilities. Laws change all the time so what does that have to do with her job description or her OATH?
First, that woman was charged with contempt of court, not for her religious belief! You are distorting the facts. To a real person of Faith, that is gross error in His eyes.
Second, the woman had worked in that office for many years when her own mother had been the elected Clerk, and knew the responsibilities of the Clerk very well. Then she was ELECTED and took the OATH as the Clerk. Do Christians taking OATHS and swearing to God that they will carry out their duties faithfully have a RIGHT to break that OATH because of anything they might have an objection to may arise?
In that case, there are only two PROPER alternatives for a person of Faith to do. One is to either do it or resign. She did neither and she was dead wrong and so are you!
If I were a jaded character, I'd say she was looking to cash in for a book deal, movies rights or something of that nature. But of course I'm not like her!
Her religious beliefs are what led to her being jailed and they changed the rules in the middle of the game. SSM wasn't "legal" when she was elected, in fact it was banned in KY
You are making a chicken and egg argument that is irrelevant! It makes no sense to argue an alleged faithful Christian who takes an OATH before her God to FAITHFULLY execute her duties and then OPENLY AND WILLFULLY FORSAKES THAT OATH on the same grounds of ALLEGED Christian beliefs. That is the highest of hypocrisies!
God's law trumps human law. Your argument has failed
You pay your taxes to Caesar do you not, and you give to Him what is His. You are deluding yourself and deflecting because your arguments have been faulty!
The Bible clearly states we are to follow human law UNLESS it is in contradiction to God's law. The Bible makes it clear homosexuality is a sin and abomination. You lose, toad
How about Jesus? Do you take direction from him? Is he important to you?The Bible was written by and edited by men. Men make mistakes. Times change. No one is hurt by monogamous same sex marriages. Folks like you need to put your hate away.You are making a chicken and egg argument that is irrelevant! It makes no sense to argue an alleged faithful Christian who takes an OATH before her God to FAITHFULLY execute her duties and then OPENLY AND WILLFULLY FORSAKES THAT OATH on the same grounds of ALLEGED Christian beliefs. That is the highest of hypocrisies!
God's law trumps human law. Your argument has failed
You pay your taxes to Caesar do you not, and you give to Him what is His. You are deluding yourself and deflecting because your arguments have been faulty!
The Bible clearly states we are to follow human law UNLESS it is in contradiction to God's law. The Bible makes it clear homosexuality is a sin and abomination. You lose, toad
LOL I don't take direction from you. Understand this, you're not important to me.
Her religious beliefs are what led to her being jailed and they changed the rules in the middle of the game. SSM wasn't "legal" when she was elected, in fact it was banned in KY
You are making a chicken and egg argument that is irrelevant! It makes no sense to argue an alleged faithful Christian who takes an OATH before her God to FAITHFULLY execute her duties and then OPENLY AND WILLFULLY FORSAKES THAT OATH on the same grounds of ALLEGED Christian beliefs. That is the highest of hypocrisies!
God's law trumps human law. Your argument has failed
You pay your taxes to Caesar do you not, and you give to Him what is His. You are deluding yourself and deflecting because your arguments have been faulty!
The Bible clearly states we are to follow human law UNLESS it is in contradiction to God's law. The Bible makes it clear homosexuality is a sin and abomination. You lose, toad
I see no contradiction there at all between what I and you wrote. Here is the point you refuse to acknowledge.
IF she had been following those words after she had taken that OATH, she would have resigned. She would have been keeping her faith all the way around. Doing what she did compromised her alleged faith in the eyes of a lot of folks.
How about Jesus? Do you take direction from him? Is he important to you?The Bible was written by and edited by men. Men make mistakes. Times change. No one is hurt by monogamous same sex marriages. Folks like you need to put your hate away.God's law trumps human law. Your argument has failed
You pay your taxes to Caesar do you not, and you give to Him what is His. You are deluding yourself and deflecting because your arguments have been faulty!
The Bible clearly states we are to follow human law UNLESS it is in contradiction to God's law. The Bible makes it clear homosexuality is a sin and abomination. You lose, toad
LOL I don't take direction from you. Understand this, you're not important to me.
“He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.” [John 8:7 KJV]
“Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.” [Matthew 22:37-40 KJV]
Let No One Disqualify You Therefore let no one pass judgment on you in questions of food and drink, or with regard to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath.These are a shadow of the things to come, but the substance belongs to Christ.Let no one disqualify you, insisting on asceticism and worship of angels, going on in detail about visions, puffed up without reason by his sensuous mind, and not holding fast to the Head, from whom the whole body, nourished and knit together through its joints and ligaments, grows with a growth that is from God. (Colossians 2:16-19 ESV)
Think that over. He's pointing out three of the old rules and telling them to "let no one pass judgment on you regarding those rules... However, he follows with stating that these are a shadow of things to come.. IOW there may be more rules that should not be judged by man, and the substance of which should or should not be judge by man belongs to Christ, not man. You'll note he's not talking about the commandments but rather these types of jewish rules. You'll note that the rule about gays is right next to the rule about pork.
Yes, and the law against gays came from old jewish rabbinical law. FYI christians were jews at the time of christ. Colossians 2:16-19 ESV points out that the substance belongs to Christ. Not the Jewish rabbis of yore.How about Jesus? Do you take direction from him? Is he important to you?The Bible was written by and edited by men. Men make mistakes. Times change. No one is hurt by monogamous same sex marriages. Folks like you need to put your hate away.You pay your taxes to Caesar do you not, and you give to Him what is His. You are deluding yourself and deflecting because your arguments have been faulty!
The Bible clearly states we are to follow human law UNLESS it is in contradiction to God's law. The Bible makes it clear homosexuality is a sin and abomination. You lose, toad
LOL I don't take direction from you. Understand this, you're not important to me.
“He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.” [John 8:7 KJV]
“Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.” [Matthew 22:37-40 KJV]
Let No One Disqualify You Therefore let no one pass judgment on you in questions of food and drink, or with regard to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath.These are a shadow of the things to come, but the substance belongs to Christ.Let no one disqualify you, insisting on asceticism and worship of angels, going on in detail about visions, puffed up without reason by his sensuous mind, and not holding fast to the Head, from whom the whole body, nourished and knit together through its joints and ligaments, grows with a growth that is from God. (Colossians 2:16-19 ESV)
Think that over. He's pointing out three of the old rules and telling them to "let no one pass judgment on you regarding those rules... However, he follows with stating that these are a shadow of things to come.. IOW there may be more rules that should not be judged by man, and the substance of which should or should not be judge by man belongs to Christ, not man. You'll note he's not talking about the commandments but rather these types of jewish rules. You'll note that the rule about gays is right next to the rule about pork.
Dude, don't try and go Biblical on me because all I will do is point out that the Bible is clear homosexuality is a sin and abomination. Now go away
PS Eating pork is no longer a sin and never was for Gentiles, you're using Mosaic and Old Covenant law
He who holds the gold makes the rules. She broke the rules, and now sits in jail. Just another criminal as far as most are concerned...It is the acceptance of sinful things overall since the 1960's and for the 1st time in our history we have jailed a person for her religious beliefs rather than trying to work out a compromise like other States have done.
That is hatred all the way around on both sides.
First, that woman was charged with contempt of court, not for her religious belief! You are distorting the facts. To a real person of Faith, that is gross error in His eyes.
Second, the woman had worked in that office for many years when her own mother had been the elected Clerk, and knew the responsibilities of the Clerk very well. Then she was ELECTED and took the OATH as the Clerk. Do Christians taking OATHS and swearing to God that they will carry out their duties faithfully have a RIGHT to break that OATH because of anything they might have an objection to may arise?
In that case, there are only two PROPER alternatives for a person of Faith to do. One is to either do it or resign. She did neither and she was dead wrong and so are you!
If I were a jaded character, I'd say she was looking to cash in for a book deal, movies rights or something of that nature. But of course I'm not like her!
She was charged with contempt of court because she refused to give marriage licenses to same sex couples which is her religious believe.
It should have been handled like it has been done in other States, where someone else could give them out not her being jailed.
Yup, that was an option, but she had ordered her staff NOT TO ISSUE licenses to same sex couples wishing to be married. She forced the issue and now she is paying the piper!
Yep
Just like any other protester who has stood up for their Constitutional rights.
Yes, and the law against gays came from old jewish rabbinical law. FYI christians were jews at the time of christ.How about Jesus? Do you take direction from him? Is he important to you?The Bible was written by and edited by men. Men make mistakes. Times change. No one is hurt by monogamous same sex marriages. Folks like you need to put your hate away.The Bible clearly states we are to follow human law UNLESS it is in contradiction to God's law. The Bible makes it clear homosexuality is a sin and abomination. You lose, toad
LOL I don't take direction from you. Understand this, you're not important to me.
“He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.” [John 8:7 KJV]
“Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.” [Matthew 22:37-40 KJV]
Let No One Disqualify You Therefore let no one pass judgment on you in questions of food and drink, or with regard to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath.These are a shadow of the things to come, but the substance belongs to Christ.Let no one disqualify you, insisting on asceticism and worship of angels, going on in detail about visions, puffed up without reason by his sensuous mind, and not holding fast to the Head, from whom the whole body, nourished and knit together through its joints and ligaments, grows with a growth that is from God. (Colossians 2:16-19 ESV)
Think that over. He's pointing out three of the old rules and telling them to "let no one pass judgment on you regarding those rules... However, he follows with stating that these are a shadow of things to come.. IOW there may be more rules that should not be judged by man, and the substance of which should or should not be judge by man belongs to Christ, not man. You'll note he's not talking about the commandments but rather these types of jewish rules. You'll note that the rule about gays is right next to the rule about pork.
Dude, don't try and go Biblical on me because all I will do is point out that the Bible is clear homosexuality is a sin and abomination. Now go away
PS Eating pork is no longer a sin and never was for Gentiles, you're using Mosaic and Old Covenant law
Not to you, but he matters to God eh? I wonder, do you? As a child of God, you need to be spanked...Understand this, you're not important to me.
Once again...I am not judging the people of 1776Actually, we were talking about what God thinks
Try to keep up
Wrong, the earlier posts were discussing the FACT that our constitution was based on Judeo/Christian principles and that founders recognized God as the giver of all good things.
Secondarliy we were talking about the morals and ethics of the time, and that they differ from the morals and ethics of today. Miley Cyrus and Beyonce would have probably been burned as witches in the 1700s. In the 1200s they would have been beheaded. Today they are "role models".
Please try to keep up with the thread before you butt in
This particular discussion related to the statement that God was directly involved in our winning the Revolutionary War and the writing of the Constitution
No it wasn't and it never was about that.
That was how it was twisted.
They don't understand the difference of having helping hand and direct involvement or direct writing.
My guestion was....Why would God get involved in a document written by a slaveholder and incorporating the institution of slavery into a new nation?
Because in those times the general belief was that slavery was an acceptable way of life. Again you are trying to judge the people of 1776 by the morals of 2015.
Other than you being sassy, you're just wrong. I'm not blabbering. FYI you're hate is showing. How many gays have you personally condemned? Or do you just exploit anonymity over the internet to express your hate?Yes, and the law against gays came from old jewish rabbinical law. FYI christians were jews at the time of christ.How about Jesus? Do you take direction from him? Is he important to you?The Bible was written by and edited by men. Men make mistakes. Times change. No one is hurt by monogamous same sex marriages. Folks like you need to put your hate away.
LOL I don't take direction from you. Understand this, you're not important to me.
“He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.” [John 8:7 KJV]
“Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.” [Matthew 22:37-40 KJV]
Let No One Disqualify You Therefore let no one pass judgment on you in questions of food and drink, or with regard to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath.These are a shadow of the things to come, but the substance belongs to Christ.Let no one disqualify you, insisting on asceticism and worship of angels, going on in detail about visions, puffed up without reason by his sensuous mind, and not holding fast to the Head, from whom the whole body, nourished and knit together through its joints and ligaments, grows with a growth that is from God. (Colossians 2:16-19 ESV)
Think that over. He's pointing out three of the old rules and telling them to "let no one pass judgment on you regarding those rules... However, he follows with stating that these are a shadow of things to come.. IOW there may be more rules that should not be judged by man, and the substance of which should or should not be judge by man belongs to Christ, not man. You'll note he's not talking about the commandments but rather these types of jewish rules. You'll note that the rule about gays is right next to the rule about pork.
Dude, don't try and go Biblical on me because all I will do is point out that the Bible is clear homosexuality is a sin and abomination. Now go away
PS Eating pork is no longer a sin and never was for Gentiles, you're using Mosaic and Old Covenant law
LOL You have no idea what you're blabbering about.
Other than you being sassy, you're just wrong. I'm not blabbering. FYI you're hate is showing.Yes, and the law against gays came from old jewish rabbinical law. FYI christians were jews at the time of christ.How about Jesus? Do you take direction from him? Is he important to you?LOL I don't take direction from you. Understand this, you're not important to me.
“He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.” [John 8:7 KJV]
“Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.” [Matthew 22:37-40 KJV]
Let No One Disqualify You Therefore let no one pass judgment on you in questions of food and drink, or with regard to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath.These are a shadow of the things to come, but the substance belongs to Christ.Let no one disqualify you, insisting on asceticism and worship of angels, going on in detail about visions, puffed up without reason by his sensuous mind, and not holding fast to the Head, from whom the whole body, nourished and knit together through its joints and ligaments, grows with a growth that is from God. (Colossians 2:16-19 ESV)
Think that over. He's pointing out three of the old rules and telling them to "let no one pass judgment on you regarding those rules... However, he follows with stating that these are a shadow of things to come.. IOW there may be more rules that should not be judged by man, and the substance of which should or should not be judge by man belongs to Christ, not man. You'll note he's not talking about the commandments but rather these types of jewish rules. You'll note that the rule about gays is right next to the rule about pork.
Dude, don't try and go Biblical on me because all I will do is point out that the Bible is clear homosexuality is a sin and abomination. Now go away
PS Eating pork is no longer a sin and never was for Gentiles, you're using Mosaic and Old Covenant law
LOL You have no idea what you're blabbering about.
I agree, we are not talking about what God thinks. We are talking about what the people of the time believed. But I guess that whole line of thought is beyond your simple mind.
Actually, we were talking about what God thinks
Try to keep up
Wrong, the earlier posts were discussing the FACT that our constitution was based on Judeo/Christian principles and that founders recognized God as the giver of all good things.
Secondarliy we were talking about the morals and ethics of the time, and that they differ from the morals and ethics of today. Miley Cyrus and Beyonce would have probably been burned as witches in the 1700s. In the 1200s they would have been beheaded. Today they are "role models".
Please try to keep up with the thread before you butt in
This particular discussion related to the statement that God was directly involved in our winning the Revolutionary War and the writing of the Constitution
No it wasn't and it never was about that.
That was how it was twisted.
They don't understand the difference of having helping hand and direct involvement or direct writing.
My guestion was....Why would God get involved in a document written by a slaveholder and incorporating the institution of slavery into a new nation?
What part of my statement confused you where I said that "christians were jews at the time of christ." Chump? Educate me? On what? Your complete lack of reading comprehension?Other than you being sassy, you're just wrong. I'm not blabbering. FYI you're hate is showing.Yes, and the law against gays came from old jewish rabbinical law. FYI christians were jews at the time of christ.How about Jesus? Do you take direction from him? Is he important to you?
“He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.” [John 8:7 KJV]
“Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.” [Matthew 22:37-40 KJV]
Let No One Disqualify You Therefore let no one pass judgment on you in questions of food and drink, or with regard to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath.These are a shadow of the things to come, but the substance belongs to Christ.Let no one disqualify you, insisting on asceticism and worship of angels, going on in detail about visions, puffed up without reason by his sensuous mind, and not holding fast to the Head, from whom the whole body, nourished and knit together through its joints and ligaments, grows with a growth that is from God. (Colossians 2:16-19 ESV)
Think that over. He's pointing out three of the old rules and telling them to "let no one pass judgment on you regarding those rules... However, he follows with stating that these are a shadow of things to come.. IOW there may be more rules that should not be judged by man, and the substance of which should or should not be judge by man belongs to Christ, not man. You'll note he's not talking about the commandments but rather these types of jewish rules. You'll note that the rule about gays is right next to the rule about pork.
Dude, don't try and go Biblical on me because all I will do is point out that the Bible is clear homosexuality is a sin and abomination. Now go away
PS Eating pork is no longer a sin and never was for Gentiles, you're using Mosaic and Old Covenant law
LOL You have no idea what you're blabbering about.
Well chump I hate to burst your bubble but the Old Testament and writings took place around 4,000 BC....Christianity didn't come about until around 33 AD. See your problem here? I doubt it but hey I gave a shot at educating you.
