Keith Olbermann Ratings Sinking

Olbermann, Maddow, and Anderson Cooper have all taken considerable ratings plunges.

Maddow is down 65% in the critical 25-54 age category.

CNN's AC-360 are down an overall 50%.

Olbermann is down over 30% in the 25-54 demographic.

Meanwhile, Fox News ratings continue upward - up nearly 25% since last year, with more viewers than CNN and MSNBC combined, and 9 of the top 10 daytime weedkay primetime slots. O'Reilly has nearly 2 million more viewers than Olbermann day to day. Olbermann's show is a distant 10th in overall ratings, and has continued to shed viewers year-to-year.

Anderson Cooper's ratings decline has been so significant, his contract will likely be significantly reduced, or dropped altogether.

Fox rules.

Fucked News...........the only place where neither the owner (Rupert Murdoch), nor many of the anchors (Glenn Beck, Bill O'Reilly, Geraldo, Hannity, et al), have stated their preference for facts.

Matter of fact, all of them have been heard at one time to say that "facts aren't important when reporting the news".

Besides.........Glenn Beck is a pompous asshole who I hope ends up in a car wreck, and is injured badly enough that he ends up working the docks, blowing longshoremen for candy bars and spare change.

I guess you don't know what a news anchor is, none that you mentioned are news anchors. They all have their own shows and freely state that they speak their opinions. Jeez!:cuckoo:
 
If I were being cynical and sarcastic I would say that liberal thinking people have better things to do than to watch TV all the time, I would add to that that right wing wingnuts of the conservative republican bent have nothing better to do and need something to think about or to fill the empty space that contains their brain, but I won't....

ROFL... Well that's as flaccid a rationalization as any of the above...

The FACT is that Olberman's ratings have ALWAYS trailed Fox... and by no small margin.

The Left and their media was successful in converting the 'publics' perception of 'The Bush Economy' as 'the worst since the great depression...' of course that was back when unemployment was 4%... The left came to power in substantial numbers in 06... since then unemployment has doubled... The price of fuel doubled... the housing market crashed... and the budget deficit which the Left CROWED ABOUT; hysterically relating themselves as being fiscally responsible is four times what it was in the WORST year of the Bush administration; and of course <<PROFITABLE>> Chrysler and GM dealerships are being DESTROYED, STOLEN... the very concepts of CONTRACTS is being ripped from the culture and America is heading down the path THROUGH Fascism, at full steam towards unbridled Socialism.

So what you're seeing in the crippled ratings of Leftwing media, is the certainty that the a-political, those who bought into the AUDACITY OF HOPE for CHANGE, don't much care for the Change that has come about and are turning to News and commentary which better reflects their values.

And as the details of the 're-organization' of Chrysler and GM come to the surface... and as 10s of thousands of Dealerships disappear; and those hundreds of thousands of jobs evaporate... FOR NO REASON, except the BOY King's desire to RE-DISTRIBUTE the wealth... The 2010 elections will make the 1994 return of the legislature to Conservatism look like a tiny blip on the radar.

Now HOPEFULLY, we'll get CONSERVATIVES in those offices and NOT the "CENTRISTS and MODERATES" who fed the GOP the ass beating they received in 06 and 08... That the GOP will realize that all the 'voices of Moderation' which have all song from the same sheet music, touting the Centrist views of McCain... ARE THE SAME ONE'S THAT WERE VOITING AGAINST HIM in 2008; the SAME ONES that provided us with all this Marxist (read: Progressive) CHANGE.

And through those Conservatives, RIP OUT and UNDO, every stitch of this Anti-American, cultural subversion that the BOY King and her minions have foisted upon us.

THEN and ONLY THEN, does the US have a CHANCE to turn this CATASTROPHE around.
 
Last edited:
  • Thanks
Reactions: 007
Olbermann, Maddow, and Anderson Cooper have all taken considerable ratings plunges.

Maddow is down 65% in the critical 25-54 age category.

CNN's AC-360 are down an overall 50%.

Olbermann is down over 30% in the 25-54 demographic.

Meanwhile, Fox News ratings continue upward - up nearly 25% since last year, with more viewers than CNN and MSNBC combined, and 9 of the top 10 daytime weedkay primetime slots. O'Reilly has nearly 2 million more viewers than Olbermann day to day. Olbermann's show is a distant 10th in overall ratings, and has continued to shed viewers year-to-year.

Anderson Cooper's ratings decline has been so significant, his contract will likely be significantly reduced, or dropped altogether.

Fox rules.

Fucked News...........the only place where neither the owner (Rupert Murdoch), nor many of the anchors (Glenn Beck, Bill O'Reilly, Geraldo, Hannity, et al), have stated their preference for facts.

Matter of fact, all of them have been heard at one time to say that "facts aren't important when reporting the news".

Besides.........Glenn Beck is a pompous asshole who I hope ends up in a car wreck, and is injured badly enough that he ends up working the docks, blowing longshoremen for candy bars and spare change.

Well there ya have it... Another offering of Compassion and "Tolerance of differing ideas' from one of our in-house ideological leftists... and this after espousing outright LIES...

The fact is that no-one in Fox News, from Murdoch on down has ever stated anything which could lead ANY reasonably intelligent individual to conclude that Fox News is disinterested in "FACTS"... it's a lie... an overt deception... advanced by a liar; whose only purpose here is to DECEIVE.

But it serves as a BEAUTIFUL example of why Olberman and company are losing market share by the GROSS... even those who didn't care 4 months ago... are now being sufficiently effected, that "CARE" doesn't even BEGIN TO DESCRIBE their new found CONCERN.
 
MSNBC #2 in Total Viewers and Adults 25-54,

#1 News Network Among Young Viewers, Adults 18-34, in Primetime


NEW YORK &#8211; June 2, 2009 &#8211; For the third consecutive month, MSNBC out-rated CNN in primetime among the key Adults 25-54 demographic in primetime and out-rated CNN in total viewers for the second time in three months, according to Nielsen Media Research data for the month of May. MSNBC was also the #1 cable news network among younger viewers, Adults 18-34. &#8220;Countdown with Keith Olbermann&#8221; continues to dominate CNN&#8217;s &#8220;Campbell Brown: No Bias No Bull&#8221; at 8 p.m., beating CNN for the 15th consecutive month among A25-54 and total viewers. &#8220;The Rachel Maddow Show&#8221; out-rated CNN&#8217;s &#8220;Larry King Live&#8221; for the seventh time in eight months in A25-54, while &#8220;Hardball with Chris Matthews&#8221; also out-rated CNN in total viewers and A25-54 at 7 p.m

MSNBC Beats CNN In Primetime Again
 
Still.........how can you trust FIXED News? Rupert Murdoch has publicly stated that he's not concerned with facts!

And.........without facts, how the fuck can you report the news accurately?
 
The FACT is that Olberman's ratings have ALWAYS trailed Fox... and by no small margin.

What does that prove? Simply that a lot more people listen to Fox News than to Keith Olberman. Does that mean that Fox News is "better"? No. It simply means that more people listen to it. And, parenthetically, it should be noted that Fox News is a 24-7 operation. Olberman is not.

The majority of people in this country probably prefer country and western music to a Mozart symphony. Does that mean that country and western music is "better" than Mozart?

This propensity of the Right to utilize the "majority rules" or "might makes right" standards in matters of subjective determination, never ceases to amuse me.
 
Last edited:
The FACT is that Olberman's ratings have ALWAYS trailed Fox... and by no small margin.

What does that prove? Simply that a lot more people listen to Fox News than to Keith Olberman. Does that mean that Fox News is "better"? No. It simply means that more people listen to it. And, parenthetically, it should be noted that Fox News is a 24-7 operation. Olberman is not.

The majority of people in this country probably prefer country and western music to a Mozart symphony. Does that mean that country and western music is "better" than Mozart?

This propensity of the Right to utilize the "majority rules" or "might makes right" standards in matters of subjective determination, never ceases to amuse me.

Olberman goes up against O'Reilly.

O'Reilly has 2 million more viewers than Olbermann - far more than double Olberman.

Olberman's numbers have been in steady decline - and even more so Maddow's numbers.

Fox rules.
 
The FACT is that Olberman's ratings have ALWAYS trailed Fox... and by no small margin.

What does that prove? Simply that a lot more people listen to Fox News than to Keith Olberman. Does that mean that Fox News is "better"? No. It simply means that more people listen to it. And, parenthetically, it should be noted that Fox News is a 24-7 operation. Olberman is not.

The majority of people in this country probably prefer country and western music to a Mozart symphony. Does that mean that country and western music is "better" than Mozart?

This propensity of the Right to utilize the "majority rules" or "might makes right" standards in matters of subjective determination, never ceases to amuse me.

Olberman goes up against O'Reilly.

O'Reilly has 2 million more viewers than Olbermann - far more than double Olberman.

Olberman's numbers have been in steady decline - and even more so Maddow's numbers.

Fox rules.

Hate and fear mongoring sells, no wonder Fox is on top.
 
What does that prove? Simply that a lot more people listen to Fox News than to Keith Olberman. Does that mean that Fox News is "better"? No. It simply means that more people listen to it. And, parenthetically, it should be noted that Fox News is a 24-7 operation. Olberman is not.

The majority of people in this country probably prefer country and western music to a Mozart symphony. Does that mean that country and western music is "better" than Mozart?

This propensity of the Right to utilize the "majority rules" or "might makes right" standards in matters of subjective determination, never ceases to amuse me.

Olberman goes up against O'Reilly.

O'Reilly has 2 million more viewers than Olbermann - far more than double Olberman.

Olberman's numbers have been in steady decline - and even more so Maddow's numbers.

Fox rules.

Hate and fear mongoring sells, no wonder Fox is on top.

C'mon - is that as narrow a world view as you can muster?

The very same could apply to MSNBC by a great many others.

The fact remains, Fox News is #1 - and it's not even close.

9 of the top 10 news programs are on Fox.

It has been an amazing success story...
 
MSNBC #2 in Total Viewers and Adults 25-54,

#1 News Network Among Young Viewers, Adults 18-34, in Primetime


NEW YORK – June 2, 2009 – For the third consecutive month, MSNBC out-rated CNN in primetime among the key Adults 25-54 demographic in primetime and out-rated CNN in total viewers for the second time in three months, according to Nielsen Media Research data for the month of May. MSNBC was also the #1 cable news network among younger viewers, Adults 18-34. “Countdown with Keith Olbermann” continues to dominate CNN’s “Campbell Brown: No Bias No Bull” at 8 p.m., beating CNN for the 15th consecutive month among A25-54 and total viewers. “The Rachel Maddow Show” out-rated CNN’s “Larry King Live” for the seventh time in eight months in A25-54, while “Hardball with Chris Matthews” also out-rated CNN in total viewers and A25-54 at 7 p.m

MSNBC Beats CNN In Primetime Again

oh neat ........
 
The FACT is that Olberman's ratings have ALWAYS trailed Fox... and by no small margin.

What does that prove? Simply that a lot more people listen to Fox News than to Keith Olberman. Does that mean that Fox News is "better"? No. It simply means that more people listen to it. And, parenthetically, it should be noted that Fox News is a 24-7 operation. Olberman is not.

The majority of people in this country probably prefer country and western music to a Mozart symphony. Does that mean that country and western music is "better" than Mozart?

This propensity of the Right to utilize the "majority rules" or "might makes right" standards in matters of subjective determination, never ceases to amuse me.
Oh, so Keith Olberdouche and that Rachel Maddow guy now compare favorably to Mozart?!?!?

There really is no end to the haughty self-congratulation of you dickweeds, is there??
 
What does that prove? Simply that a lot more people listen to Fox News than to Keith Olberman. Does that mean that Fox News is "better"? No. It simply means that more people listen to it. And, parenthetically, it should be noted that Fox News is a 24-7 operation. Olberman is not.

The majority of people in this country probably prefer country and western music to a Mozart symphony. Does that mean that country and western music is "better" than Mozart?

This propensity of the Right to utilize the "majority rules" or "might makes right" standards in matters of subjective determination, never ceases to amuse me.

Olberman goes up against O'Reilly.

O'Reilly has 2 million more viewers than Olbermann - far more than double Olberman.

Olberman's numbers have been in steady decline - and even more so Maddow's numbers.

Fox rules.

Hate and fear mongoring sells, no wonder Fox is on top.

Well if that were true MSNBC's number would be through the roof...
 
The FACT is that Olberman's ratings have ALWAYS trailed Fox... and by no small margin.

What does that prove? Simply that a lot more people listen to Fox News than to Keith Olberman. Does that mean that Fox News is "better"? No. It simply means that more people listen to it. And, parenthetically, it should be noted that Fox News is a 24-7 operation. Olberman is not.

The majority of people in this country probably prefer country and western music to a Mozart symphony. Does that mean that country and western music is "better" than Mozart?

This propensity of the Right to utilize the "majority rules" or "might makes right" standards in matters of subjective determination, never ceases to amuse me.


Only because your station of choice sucks ass. It really doesn't amuse you lefties though,it bugs you. If it didn't ,we wouldn't constantly have all these FOX news is BAAAADDD threads, with you pantywaists whining about it constantly. But I will let you save face with your elitist drivel if it makes you "feel" better about yourself.
 
I believe that MSN's ratings were highest just prior to the election & then fell off a cliff. Regardless even then, they were still miles behind FOX & CNN. Keith Olbermann--with that incredibly "mean" look on his face got to go after C--h----e---n---e--y with his conspiracy theories for many years--who is no longer a story for him. He was great entertainment for the mentally weak.

To answer the author's question: Wouldn't the bankrupt rating of Olbermann & really all of MSN/NBC indicate that most liberals do not pay attention to news? Most are probably back with watching "dancing with the stars & American idol."
 
Last edited:
I believe that MSN's ratings were highest just prior to the election & then fell off a cliff. Regardless even then, they were still miles behind FOX & CNN. Keith Olbermann--with that incredibly "mean" look on his face got to go after C--h----e---n---e--y with his conspiracy theories for many years--who is no longer a story for him. He was great entertainment for the mentally weak.

To answer the author's question: Wouldn't the bankrupt rating of Olbermann & really all of MSN/NBC indicate that most liberals do not pay attention to news? Most are probably back with watching "dancing with the stars & American idol."


Sad but very true!

:lol:
 
The FACT is that Olberman's ratings have ALWAYS trailed Fox... and by no small margin.

What does that prove? Simply that a lot more people listen to Fox News than to Keith Olberman. Does that mean that Fox News is "better"? No. It simply means that more people listen to it. And, parenthetically, it should be noted that Fox News is a 24-7 operation. Olberman is not.

The majority of people in this country probably prefer country and western music to a Mozart symphony. Does that mean that country and western music is "better" than Mozart?

This propensity of the Right to utilize the "majority rules" or "might makes right" standards in matters of subjective determination, never ceases to amuse me.

Olberman goes up against O'Reilly.

O'Reilly has 2 million more viewers than Olbermann - far more than double Olberman.

Olberman's numbers have been in steady decline - and even more so Maddow's numbers.

Fox rules.

O'Reilly is big with old people.

Olbermann leads among people younger than 54.

Gradually O'Reilly's viewers will die off.
 
What does that prove? Simply that a lot more people listen to Fox News than to Keith Olberman. Does that mean that Fox News is "better"? No. It simply means that more people listen to it. And, parenthetically, it should be noted that Fox News is a 24-7 operation. Olberman is not.

The majority of people in this country probably prefer country and western music to a Mozart symphony. Does that mean that country and western music is "better" than Mozart?

This propensity of the Right to utilize the "majority rules" or "might makes right" standards in matters of subjective determination, never ceases to amuse me.

Olberman goes up against O'Reilly.

O'Reilly has 2 million more viewers than Olbermann - far more than double Olberman.

Olberman's numbers have been in steady decline - and even more so Maddow's numbers.

Fox rules.

O'Reilly is big with old people.

Olbermann leads among people younger than 54.

Gradually O'Reilly's viewers will die off.

Better check your info again.

Also - you are suggesting people will stop aging.

C'mon Chris - don't join the ever growing moron crowd in here.

Think before you post...

http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/ratings/

The aged 25 - 54 demo, O'Reilly beats Olberman nearly 2 to 1.

I hope you don't make a habit of posting false information Chris. Your reputation could really suffer...
 
Last edited:
Do you want to know WHY FAUX Noise is number one in the ratings? Simple..........Rush Limbidiot and the ditto heads.

You DO realize that a "ditto head" is someone who thinks EXACTLY like Limbidiot, right? And.......that makes them a clone of Limbidiot, and therefore willing to listen to news that contains a few facts, but mainly only the ones and snippets of ones that can be bent around to serve the purposes of the Repugnican Party.

Much better to be an Independent. That way, you get to think for yourself.
 

Forum List

Back
Top