Kavanaugh/Ford Opinon threads from Saturday, Sept 23, 2018

[playtime]

uh-huh. i pity any so called 'conservatives' on this this thread. hopefully none of you have daughters.

i wonder if any of that ilk also believe that a 'man' shouldn't be charged with raping his wife after she refuses him.... that rape doesn't exist in a 'marriage'.

Are you bringing family into this discussion?

rhe·tor·i·cal
rəˈtôrək(ə)l/
adjective
adjective: rhetorical

1. relating to or concerned with the art of rhetoric.
   "repetition is a common rhetorical device"
   synonyms: stylistic, oratorical, linguistic, verbal
   "rhetorical devices"
   • expressed in terms intended to persuade or impress.
     "the rhetorical commitment of the government to give priority to primary education"
     synonyms: extravagant, grandiloquent, magniloquent, high-flown, orotund, bombastic, grandiose, pompous, pretentious, overblown, oratorical, turgid, flowery, florid; More
     informalhighfalutin;
     rarefustian
     "rhetorical hyperbole"
   • (of a question) asked in order to produce an effect or to make a statement rather than to elicit information.

Really? IT was a backhanded insult.

I do have daughters and they both think that Ford is full of shit.

sorry if you were, snowflake. i wonder if maybe dr. ford has daughters...

 

[Camp]

uh-huh. i pity any so called 'conservatives' on this this thread. hopefully none of you have daughters.

i wonder if any of that ilk also believe that a 'man' shouldn't be charged with raping his wife after she refuses him.... that rape doesn't exist in a 'marriage'.

Are you bringing family into this discussion?

rhe·tor·i·cal
rəˈtôrək(ə)l/
adjective
adjective: rhetorical

1. relating to or concerned with the art of rhetoric.
   "repetition is a common rhetorical device"
   synonyms: stylistic, oratorical, linguistic, verbal
   "rhetorical devices"
   • expressed in terms intended to persuade or impress.
     "the rhetorical commitment of the government to give priority to primary education"
     synonyms: extravagant, grandiloquent, magniloquent, high-flown, orotund, bombastic, grandiose, pompous, pretentious, overblown, oratorical, turgid, flowery, florid; More
     informalhighfalutin;
     rarefustian
     "rhetorical hyperbole"
   • (of a question) asked in order to produce an effect or to make a statement rather than to elicit information.

Really? IT was a backhanded insult.

I do have daughters and they both think that Ford is full of shit.

Why do you keep bringing up your daughters? Are you baiting?

 

[Darkwind]

uh-huh. i pity any so called 'conservatives' on this this thread. hopefully none of you have daughters.

i wonder if any of that ilk also believe that a 'man' shouldn't be charged with raping his wife after she refuses him.... that rape doesn't exist in a 'marriage'.

Are you bringing family into this discussion?

rhe·tor·i·cal
rəˈtôrək(ə)l/
adjective
adjective: rhetorical

1. relating to or concerned with the art of rhetoric.
   "repetition is a common rhetorical device"
   synonyms: stylistic, oratorical, linguistic, verbal
   "rhetorical devices"
   • expressed in terms intended to persuade or impress.
     "the rhetorical commitment of the government to give priority to primary education"
     synonyms: extravagant, grandiloquent, magniloquent, high-flown, orotund, bombastic, grandiose, pompous, pretentious, overblown, oratorical, turgid, flowery, florid; More
     informalhighfalutin;
     rarefustian
     "rhetorical hyperbole"
   • (of a question) asked in order to produce an effect or to make a statement rather than to elicit information.

Really? IT was a backhanded insult.

I do have daughters and they both think that Ford is full of shit.

sorry if you were, snowflake. i wonder if maybe dr. ford has daughters...

Does she? I don't know. I hope that she taught them not to be drunken sluts while in their school years.

 

[Darkwind]

uh-huh. i pity any so called 'conservatives' on this this thread. hopefully none of you have daughters.

i wonder if any of that ilk also believe that a 'man' shouldn't be charged with raping his wife after she refuses him.... that rape doesn't exist in a 'marriage'.

Are you bringing family into this discussion?

rhe·tor·i·cal
rəˈtôrək(ə)l/
adjective
adjective: rhetorical

1. relating to or concerned with the art of rhetoric.
   "repetition is a common rhetorical device"
   synonyms: stylistic, oratorical, linguistic, verbal
   "rhetorical devices"
   • expressed in terms intended to persuade or impress.
     "the rhetorical commitment of the government to give priority to primary education"
     synonyms: extravagant, grandiloquent, magniloquent, high-flown, orotund, bombastic, grandiose, pompous, pretentious, overblown, oratorical, turgid, flowery, florid; More
     informalhighfalutin;
     rarefustian
     "rhetorical hyperbole"
   • (of a question) asked in order to produce an effect or to make a statement rather than to elicit information.

Really? IT was a backhanded insult.

I do have daughters and they both think that Ford is full of shit.

Why do you keep bringing up your daughters? Are you baiting?

No, she brought it up as a backhanded way to insult people who disagree with her. It is a not very clever way to skirt the family rule.

 

[playtime]

uh-huh. i pity any so called 'conservatives' on this this thread. hopefully none of you have daughters.

i wonder if any of that ilk also believe that a 'man' shouldn't be charged with raping his wife after she refuses him.... that rape doesn't exist in a 'marriage'.

Are you bringing family into this discussion?

He is commenting on Donald Trump raping his wife maybe.

hoping none of you have daughters isn't about Trump.

oh please... i did not bring 'family' into it. but if it makes you feel better then report me then if you think i targeted anyone specific.

Did I say anyone specific? It was a backhanded insult using family as a means of guilt. I also said nothing of reporting you.

Just deal with the fact that you're getting nasty because you're losing the argument.

i am getting nasty because i am a female & have been & know others who have been in similar situations. not many females are lucky enough to have been untouched by the same kind of scenario . which is what i was alluding to in my rhetorical statement. btw- how do you know whether or not I have any daughters?

you don't. there is no argument to win or lose here, buttercup.

 

[playtime]

uh-huh. i pity any so called 'conservatives' on this this thread. hopefully none of you have daughters.

i wonder if any of that ilk also believe that a 'man' shouldn't be charged with raping his wife after she refuses him.... that rape doesn't exist in a 'marriage'.

Are you bringing family into this discussion?

rhe·tor·i·cal
rəˈtôrək(ə)l/
adjective
adjective: rhetorical

1. relating to or concerned with the art of rhetoric.
   "repetition is a common rhetorical device"
   synonyms: stylistic, oratorical, linguistic, verbal
   "rhetorical devices"
   • expressed in terms intended to persuade or impress.
     "the rhetorical commitment of the government to give priority to primary education"
     synonyms: extravagant, grandiloquent, magniloquent, high-flown, orotund, bombastic, grandiose, pompous, pretentious, overblown, oratorical, turgid, flowery, florid; More
     informalhighfalutin;
     rarefustian
     "rhetorical hyperbole"
   • (of a question) asked in order to produce an effect or to make a statement rather than to elicit information.

Really? IT was a backhanded insult.

I do have daughters and they both think that Ford is full of shit.

sorry if you were, snowflake. i wonder if maybe dr. ford has daughters...

Does she? I don't know. I hope that she taught them not to be drunken sluts while in their school years.

^^^ LOL ^^^ & there it is.

 

[Darkwind]

Are you bringing family into this discussion?

He is commenting on Donald Trump raping his wife maybe.

hoping none of you have daughters isn't about Trump.

oh please... i did not bring 'family' into it. but if it makes you feel better then report me then if you think i targeted anyone specific.

Did I say anyone specific? It was a backhanded insult using family as a means of guilt. I also said nothing of reporting you.

Just deal with the fact that you're getting nasty because you're losing the argument.

i am getting nasty because i am a female & have been & know others who have been in similar situations. not many females are lucky enough to have been untouched by the same kind of scenario . which is what i was alluding to in my rhetorical statement. btw- how do you know whether or not I have any daughters?

you don't. there is no argument to win or lose here, buttercup.

Funny, all the women I know, and I know a LOT of women, all have managed to avoid being assaulted; sexually or otherwise.

But if they had, every one of them would have taken it to the police immediately. Hell, many of them would have taken it to their boyfriend and the police would then be involved in an assault of an entirely different nature.

Real women don't let men assault them and then go hide. Strong women fight back -- during and after -- the assault.

 

[Darkwind]

Are you bringing family into this discussion?

rhe·tor·i·cal
rəˈtôrək(ə)l/
adjective
adjective: rhetorical

1. relating to or concerned with the art of rhetoric.
   "repetition is a common rhetorical device"
   synonyms: stylistic, oratorical, linguistic, verbal
   "rhetorical devices"
   • expressed in terms intended to persuade or impress.
     "the rhetorical commitment of the government to give priority to primary education"
     synonyms: extravagant, grandiloquent, magniloquent, high-flown, orotund, bombastic, grandiose, pompous, pretentious, overblown, oratorical, turgid, flowery, florid; More
     informalhighfalutin;
     rarefustian
     "rhetorical hyperbole"
   • (of a question) asked in order to produce an effect or to make a statement rather than to elicit information.

Really? IT was a backhanded insult.

I do have daughters and they both think that Ford is full of shit.

sorry if you were, snowflake. i wonder if maybe dr. ford has daughters...

Does she? I don't know. I hope that she taught them not to be drunken sluts while in their school years.

^^^ LOL ^^^ & there it is.

Hey, her own words. She had 64 sexual encounters from high school to college.

 

[flewism]

uh-huh. i pity any so called 'conservatives' on this this thread. hopefully none of you have daughters.

i wonder if any of that ilk also believe that a 'man' shouldn't be charged with raping his wife after she refuses him.... that rape doesn't exist in a 'marriage'.

I'll tell you what the last thing my daughters need is any of your valueless pity.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

This woman's entire story is suspect and would never hold up in a court of law.

Nope not ever. You can't go into count with zero evidence and a story full of holes. Even a first year law student will tell you that

 

[playtime]

He is commenting on Donald Trump raping his wife maybe.

hoping none of you have daughters isn't about Trump.

oh please... i did not bring 'family' into it. but if it makes you feel better then report me then if you think i targeted anyone specific.

Did I say anyone specific? It was a backhanded insult using family as a means of guilt. I also said nothing of reporting you.

Just deal with the fact that you're getting nasty because you're losing the argument.

i am getting nasty because i am a female & have been & know others who have been in similar situations. not many females are lucky enough to have been untouched by the same kind of scenario . which is what i was alluding to in my rhetorical statement. btw- how do you know whether or not I have any daughters?

you don't. there is no argument to win or lose here, buttercup.

Funny, all the women I know, and I know a LOT of women, all have managed to avoid being assaulted; sexually or otherwise.

But if they had, every one of them would have taken it to the police immediately. Hell, many of them would have taken it to their boyfriend and the police would then be involved in an assault of an entirely different nature.

Real women don't let men assault them and then go hide. Strong women fight back -- during and after -- the assault.

of course you think like that.... of course.

do you feel the same about all those boys that haven't come fwd against diddling priests until years later?

real men don't assault women.

 

[playtime]

uh-huh. i pity any so called 'conservatives' on this this thread. hopefully none of you have daughters.

i wonder if any of that ilk also believe that a 'man' shouldn't be charged with raping his wife after she refuses him.... that rape doesn't exist in a 'marriage'.

I'll tell you what the last thing my daughters need is any of your valueless pity.

such anger. tsk tsk tsk.

 

[flewism]

uh-huh. i pity any so called 'conservatives' on this this thread. hopefully none of you have daughters.

i wonder if any of that ilk also believe that a 'man' shouldn't be charged with raping his wife after she refuses him.... that rape doesn't exist in a 'marriage'.

I'll tell you what the last thing my daughters need is any of your valueless pity.

such anger. tsk tsk tsk.

Not at all just comical relief , please continue.

 

[RealDave]

But only if you're a Conservative, of course. I mean, of course.

This is your daily reminder that if you're a Democrat, you can beat up your girlfriend on Domestic Violence charges and the Left won't whisper a peep. Heck, you can engage in shenanigans in the Oval Office with an intern and be impeached and STILL be lauded as a great statesman decades later.

But if your record is spotless save for one woman who says, 36 years later, that you once did things with her she didn't like, when you were both drunk and you were 17--your ship is sunk. Butamotral person in Trump. You ekected the most vile, disgusted, wioman abusing .. again: only if you're Conservative. This would be laughed off if you were a Democrat, because of COURSE you did those things.

They'd call you Uncle Brett for it. Maybe they'd wonder why you didn't drive her into a lake.

You Conservatives re-elected David Vitter when Spitzer was ousted. Conservatives voted Donald Trump, the most vile, amoral, women abusers of all time. Trump had an affair with a porn star, Edwards was ousted. You ignore that Kavaugh was a drunk in high school & tried to rape a girl.
Don't lie & pretend that Conservatives are the party of family values.

 

[Darkwind]

hoping none of you have daughters isn't about Trump.

oh please... i did not bring 'family' into it. but if it makes you feel better then report me then if you think i targeted anyone specific.

Did I say anyone specific? It was a backhanded insult using family as a means of guilt. I also said nothing of reporting you.

Just deal with the fact that you're getting nasty because you're losing the argument.

i am getting nasty because i am a female & have been & know others who have been in similar situations. not many females are lucky enough to have been untouched by the same kind of scenario . which is what i was alluding to in my rhetorical statement. btw- how do you know whether or not I have any daughters?

you don't. there is no argument to win or lose here, buttercup.

Funny, all the women I know, and I know a LOT of women, all have managed to avoid being assaulted; sexually or otherwise.

But if they had, every one of them would have taken it to the police immediately. Hell, many of them would have taken it to their boyfriend and the police would then be involved in an assault of an entirely different nature.

Real women don't let men assault them and then go hide. Strong women fight back -- during and after -- the assault.

of course you think like that.... of course.

do you feel the same about all those boys that haven't come fwd against diddling priests until years later?

real men don't assault women. do you think real

All those boys who came forward had proof. Those that came later had a claim on 'prior behavior' of the preists.

Does Ford have any of that?

I think like what? I had a lot of women when I was young. Not 64 of them, and I WAS a slut. lol

Look, you have 64 sexual exploits in 4 to 6 years, you don't get the 'fine upstanding citizen' award.

If that is what she wanted to be, good on her. However, that does work against her credibility, which is already approaching zero.

 

[playtime]

uh-huh. i pity any so called 'conservatives' on this this thread. hopefully none of you have daughters.

i wonder if any of that ilk also believe that a 'man' shouldn't be charged with raping his wife after she refuses him.... that rape doesn't exist in a 'marriage'.

I'll tell you what the last thing my daughters need is any of your valueless pity.

such anger. tsk tsk tsk.

Not at all just comical relief , please continue.

'ill tell you what'

uh-huh. sure it wasn't.

 

[RealDave]

uh-huh. i pity any so called 'conservatives' on this this thread. hopefully none of you have daughters.

i wonder if any of that ilk also believe that a 'man' shouldn't be charged with raping his wife after she refuses him.... that rape doesn't exist in a 'marriage'.

0

Marriage is implied consent.

Only in ignorant redneck land

 

[playtime]

oh please... i did not bring 'family' into it. but if it makes you feel better then report me then if you think i targeted anyone specific.

Did I say anyone specific? It was a backhanded insult using family as a means of guilt. I also said nothing of reporting you.

Just deal with the fact that you're getting nasty because you're losing the argument.

i am getting nasty because i am a female & have been & know others who have been in similar situations. not many females are lucky enough to have been untouched by the same kind of scenario . which is what i was alluding to in my rhetorical statement. btw- how do you know whether or not I have any daughters?

you don't. there is no argument to win or lose here, buttercup.

Funny, all the women I know, and I know a LOT of women, all have managed to avoid being assaulted; sexually or otherwise.

But if they had, every one of them would have taken it to the police immediately. Hell, many of them would have taken it to their boyfriend and the police would then be involved in an assault of an entirely different nature.

Real women don't let men assault them and then go hide. Strong women fight back -- during and after -- the assault.

of course you think like that.... of course.

do you feel the same about all those boys that haven't come fwd against diddling priests until years later?

real men don't assault women. do you think real

All those boys who came forward had proof. Those that came later had a claim on 'prior behavior' of the preists.

Does Ford have any of that?

I think like what? I had a lot of women when I was young. Not 64 of them, and I WAS a slut. lol

Look, you have 64 sexual exploits in 4 to 6 years, you don't get the 'fine upstanding citizen' award.

If that is what she wanted to be, good on her. However, that does work against her credibility, which is already approaching zero.

she has medical notes from 2012... long before any of this came to light. PTSD is a very complicated issue.

 

[night_son]

But only if you're a Conservative, of course. I mean, of course.

This is your daily reminder that if you're a Democrat, you can beat up your girlfriend on Domestic Violence charges and the Left won't whisper a peep. Heck, you can engage in shenanigans in the Oval Office with an intern and be impeached and STILL be lauded as a great statesman decades later.

But if your record is spotless save for one woman who says, 36 years later, that you once did things with her she didn't like, when you were both drunk and you were 17--your ship is sunk. But again: only if you're Conservative. This would be laughed off if you were a Democrat, because of COURSE you did those things.

They'd call you Uncle Brett for it. Maybe they'd wonder why you didn't drive her into a lake.

The radical, revolutionary Left has not changed the ethos of their ideology in nearly three centuries. From the beginning of the 18th century, their ideology has foremost held that the very laws and moral codes of a targeted people or nation which most define it must be used against it to tear it apart from the inside, to soften those laws and moral codes so the radical Left can rewrite them. As it was then, so it is now. Condemn Professor Ford, and a radical Leftist will insist you do not care about the rights of your own daughter or mother. Accuse her of lying, and a Leftist revolutionary will attack your Identity Group, if possible, or otherwise will resort their pathetically infamous No True Scotsman fallacy. They use our most beloved amendments and laws and moral codes against us, on a daily basis, in a relentless attempt to redefine and strip away the foundations of our American civilization.

 

[Darkwind]

Did I say anyone specific? It was a backhanded insult using family as a means of guilt. I also said nothing of reporting you.

Just deal with the fact that you're getting nasty because you're losing the argument.

i am getting nasty because i am a female & have been & know others who have been in similar situations. not many females are lucky enough to have been untouched by the same kind of scenario . which is what i was alluding to in my rhetorical statement. btw- how do you know whether or not I have any daughters?

you don't. there is no argument to win or lose here, buttercup.

Funny, all the women I know, and I know a LOT of women, all have managed to avoid being assaulted; sexually or otherwise.

But if they had, every one of them would have taken it to the police immediately. Hell, many of them would have taken it to their boyfriend and the police would then be involved in an assault of an entirely different nature.

Real women don't let men assault them and then go hide. Strong women fight back -- during and after -- the assault.

of course you think like that.... of course.

do you feel the same about all those boys that haven't come fwd against diddling priests until years later?

real men don't assault women. do you think real

All those boys who came forward had proof. Those that came later had a claim on 'prior behavior' of the preists.

Does Ford have any of that?

I think like what? I had a lot of women when I was young. Not 64 of them, and I WAS a slut. lol

Look, you have 64 sexual exploits in 4 to 6 years, you don't get the 'fine upstanding citizen' award.

If that is what she wanted to be, good on her. However, that does work against her credibility, which is already approaching zero.

she has medical notes from 2012... long before any of this came to light. PTSD is a very complicated issue.

And those have been disputed. If I recall, the medical notes don't actually name anyone.

You have a link to the hard copy of the notes with Kavanaugh's name in them? Understand, that in itself isn't proof.