- Dec 29, 2008
- 36,358
- 19,261
- 1,905
No, I think we can all agree that YOU are the idiot. Take your racism somewhere else, douche bag.Any white police officer still voluntarily working for the Ferguson , MO police department is an idiot.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No, I think we can all agree that YOU are the idiot. Take your racism somewhere else, douche bag.Any white police officer still voluntarily working for the Ferguson , MO police department is an idiot.
well actions like these leave the possibility open that the police weren't entirely unbiased in their investigation.And what will YOU say if he's found not guilty? The jury was bought off?This is the equivalent of if people had been buying Casey Anthony wrist bands before her trial had begun. Absurd.
Yeah....all those minorities went to the riot/loot fest and all they got was the lousy t-shirt.....that and of course everything they could steal.
You're pathetic.....
Boy will these people feel really fucking stupid if Wilson is found guilty.
does that make sense to you?
Isnt the purpose of bracelets like that to show support for a particular cause? If so, don't you think that supporting an innocent man who is your friend and coworker is a good cause?I would have to agree that it is a foolish thing to let the officers wear on duty. This police department has mishandled the whole situation. C'mon guys, you should think about shit like this before you do it. Why not just wear a blue bracelet if it is that important to you. To be that brazen is not gonna endear you to the natives and only serve to make a bad situation that much worse.
You are peace officers, not billboards. And you should know better. Look at the community you are serving.
DOJ should not have to intervene. The Chief and senior ranking officers should have not ever let it get to that point.
What if they are being railroaded by the public? People always like to assume that the public is always right, but what the hell man, they called this poor cop a murderer on day one. The public is the enemy sometimes, and this is one of those times. The police probably feel like this is one of the few ways they can fight back against the uninformed lynch mob.They are police officers. They are supposed to be unbiased and it shows a real gap of professionalism. The police are so "danger averse" that something like this would only invite more hostility. Its foolish. That police chief is a serious stooge to let his officers do this.
Our president is supposed to be unbiased too, and do what's best for the country. Does he? No. Does the left complain? No. So do they have any room to bitch about wrist bands? No.They are police officers. They are supposed to be unbiased and it shows a real gap of professionalism. The police are so "danger averse" that something like this would only invite more hostility. Its foolish. That police chief is a serious stooge to let his officers do this.
The officer is presumed innocent. Although within the limits of the law, I seriously doubt he is. He panicked and killed that kid is my guess. All the evidence paints a bad picture for this officer.
What first amendment?
Who said you have a First Amendment right on your employer's time?
Since when did the DOJ have anything to do with the local police?
holder was the guy who got Elian Gonzalez deported
Uh, no. Wrong administration. Bill Clinton was the president that ordered the deportation of Elian Gonzalez and Janet Reno the AG that carried it out.
I think if it's wrong for the officers to wear these bracelets, because it shows support for a side, then it's also wrong for Captain Ron Johnson to march with the protesters. If it's wrong, it's all wrong, and they should all stay neutral.
They are showing support for a coworker and still treating everybody the same.sad that you don't understand why the police force can't have it's officers showing bias while in uniform.Sounds like a restriction of first amendment rights.[
no, they get to protect them for others, but they don't get to say what they want while in uniform.
they are to be impartial upholders of the law.
Sad that you support that.
this is not a hard concept. they are everyone's police. they can't be the democratic police, the republican police, the white power police, the black power police, the communist police, the capitalist police, the gay police, the straight police, the christian police, the atheist police, the old people police, the teenager police...
they need to be just the police, treating everyone the same.
The other officers are presuming him innocent, as is the law.They are police officers. They are supposed to be unbiased and it shows a real gap of professionalism. The police are so "danger averse" that something like this would only invite more hostility. Its foolish. That police chief is a serious stooge to let his officers do this.
The officer is presumed innocent. Although within the limits of the law, I seriously doubt he is. He panicked and killed that kid is my guess. All the evidence paints a bad picture for this officer.
I call anybody under 30 "a kid", but I still expect everybody 18 or older to act like an adult and be treated like an adult.18 year olds are kids. within the law they are adults, so I will concede that point. But we both know a 18 year is a kid.