Just How Bad Was It? Just How Good Is It?

[Votto]

AND NO, WE WILL NOT RAISE THE MINIMUM WAGE AT MCDONALD'S!

If you do, where are the poor folk going to eat?

 

[bedowin62]

you're making a fool of yourself again trying to show a causal relationship that just isnt there; the rich getting richer didnt make the poor poorer. @ Campbell

 

[Campbell]

you're making a fool of yourself again trying to show a causal relationship that just isnt there; the rich getting richer didnt make the poor poorer. @ Campbell

What it did was make the rich richer. How about you explain to me what's the difference. We're headed for a Lord/Serf society which is exactly what those at the top have been trying to do. Don't push it too far......it ends in revolution. I don't think you would like that. I don't think you have a set of balls and you damn sure wouldn't fight.

 

[TNHarley]

you're making a fool of yourself again trying to show a causal relationship that just isnt there; the rich getting richer didnt make the poor poorer. @ Campbell

What it did was make the rich richer. How about you explain to me what's the difference. We're headed for a Lord/Serf society which is exactly what those at the top have been trying to do. Don't push it too far......it ends in revolution. I don't think you would like that. I don't think you have a set of balls and you damn sure wouldn't fight.

Lord/Serf?
The irony in that is fuckin amazing. A leftist talking about a 2 class society

 

[Wildman]

explain this please,

Americans Not in Labor Force Exceed 93 Million for First Time; 62.7% Labor Force Participation Matches 37-Year Low

and this too!!

(CNSNews.com) - The number of Americans 16 years and older who did not participate in the labor force--meaning they neither had a job nor actively sought one in the last four weeks--rose from 92,898,000 in February to 93,175,000 in March, according to data released today by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

That is the first time the number of Americans out of the labor force has exceeded 93 million.

Also from February to March, the labor force participation rate dropped from 62.8 percent to 62.7 percent, matching a 37-year low.

in your next OP, please try to be a bit more intelligent...., OK??

 

[Campbell]

you're making a fool of yourself again trying to show a causal relationship that just isnt there; the rich getting richer didnt make the poor poorer. @ Campbell

That's definitely not what the stats show. When the rich were granted tax cuts two major things happened:

We went in debt:
..........................Total U S Debt...........................

09/30/2014 $17,824,071,380,733.82
09/30/2013 $16,738,183,526,697.32
09/30/2012 $16,066,241,407,385.89
09/30/2011 $14,790,340,328,557.15
09/30/2010 $13,561,623,030,891.79
09/30/2009 $11,909,829,003,511.75(80% Of All Debt Across 232 Years Borrowed By Reagan And Bushes)
09/30/2008 $10,024,724,896,912.49(Times Square Debt Clock Modified To Accommodate Tens of Trillions)
09/30/2007 $9,007,653,372,262.48
09/30/2006 $8,506,973,899,215.23
09/30/2005 $7,932,709,661,723.50
09/30/2004 $7,379,052,696,330.32
09/30/2003 $6,783,231,062,743.62(Second Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)
09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16
09/30/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06(First Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)
09/30/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86(Administration And Congress Arguing About How To Use Surplus)
09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43(First Surplus Generated...On Track To Pay Off Debt By 2012)
09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32
09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38 ( Debt Quadrupled By Reagan/Bush41)
09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66
09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03
09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25
09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32
09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16
09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00
09/30/1986 $2,125,302,616,658.42
09/30/1985 $1,823,103,000,000.00
09/30/1984 $1,572,266,000,000.00
09/30/1983 $1,377,210,000,000.00
09/30/1982 $1,142,034,000,000.00(Total Debt Passes $1 Trillion)(Reagan Slashed Tax Rates To Pre Depression Levels)
09/30/1981 $997,855,000,000.00

AND THE POOR GOT POORER WHEN ADJUSTED FOR INFLATION:

 

[jwoodie]

Horse Shit!!

To which of Obama's policies are you referring?

 

[Campbell]

Horse Shit!!

To which of Obama's policies are you referring?

Evidently you can't(or didn't) read it...the charts ended while Bush was still president.

When the rich were granted tax cuts two major things happened:

We went in debt:
..........................Total U S Debt...........................

09/30/2014 $17,824,071,380,733.82
09/30/2013 $16,738,183,526,697.32
09/30/2012 $16,066,241,407,385.89
09/30/2011 $14,790,340,328,557.15
09/30/2010 $13,561,623,030,891.79
09/30/2009 $11,909,829,003,511.75(80% Of All Debt Across 232 Years Borrowed By Reagan And Bushes)
09/30/2008 $10,024,724,896,912.49(Times Square Debt Clock Modified To Accommodate Tens of Trillions)
09/30/2007 $9,007,653,372,262.48
09/30/2006 $8,506,973,899,215.23
09/30/2005 $7,932,709,661,723.50
09/30/2004 $7,379,052,696,330.32
09/30/2003 $6,783,231,062,743.62(Second Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)
09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16
09/30/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06(First Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)
09/30/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86(Administration And Congress Arguing About How To Use Surplus)
09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43(First Surplus Generated...On Track To Pay Off Debt By 2012)
09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32
09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38 ( Debt Quadrupled By Reagan/Bush41)
09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66
09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03
09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25
09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32
09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16
09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00
09/30/1986 $2,125,302,616,658.42
09/30/1985 $1,823,103,000,000.00
09/30/1984 $1,572,266,000,000.00
09/30/1983 $1,377,210,000,000.00
09/30/1982 $1,142,034,000,000.00(Total Debt Passes $1 Trillion)(Reagan Slashed Tax Rates To Pre Depression Levels)
09/30/1981 $997,855,000,000.00

AND THE POOR GOT POORER WHEN ADJUSTED FOR INFLATION:

 

[bedowin62]

you're making a fool of yourself again trying to show a causal relationship that just isnt there; the rich getting richer didnt make the poor poorer. @ Campbell

What it did was make the rich richer. How about you explain to me what's the difference. We're headed for a Lord/Serf society which is exactly what those at the top have been trying to do. Don't push it too far......it ends in revolution. I don't think you would like that. I don't think you have a set of balls and you damn sure wouldn't fight.

i'm in the military you moron; and yes i've been to iraq. but you didnt even know that before regurgitating stupid shit you've been spoon-fed and isnt even true in the first place about how Repubicans dont serve..you're a complete idiot and who am i to stop you from making a fool of yourself daily??

 

[bedowin62]

the richest got richer and the poorest got poorer ON THE PROGRESSIVE WATCH; BOTH AT A FASTER PACE UNDER PROGRESSIVES THAN UNDER REPUBLICANS

you have charts and shit but you cant change FACTS, actual facts; you can only throw up another chart trying to blame the failures on the PROGRESSIVE WATCH on others

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

THOSE WERE ALL MCDONALD'S JOBS!!!

First!

Guess you got a lot of competition now eh

 

[jwoodie]

Horse Shit!!

To which of Obama's policies are you referring?

Evidently you can't(or didn't) read it.

Actually, I was making a tongue-in-cheek comment about your response (#16) regarding the Cash For Clunkers program.

But since you keep reposting your laughable chart,* why don't you explain exactly how "tax cuts for the rich" cause larger deficits (when most of these tax cuts result in increased tax revenues)?

*According to this chart, billion dollar deficits are worse than trillion dollar deficits!

 

[Campbell]

you're making a fool of yourself again trying to show a causal relationship that just isnt there; the rich getting richer didnt make the poor poorer. @ Campbell

What it did was make the rich richer. How about you explain to me what's the difference. We're headed for a Lord/Serf society which is exactly what those at the top have been trying to do. Don't push it too far......it ends in revolution. I don't think you would like that. I don't think you have a set of balls and you damn sure wouldn't fight.

i'm in the military you moron; and yes i've been to iraq. but you didnt even know that before regurgitating stupid shit you've been spoon-fed and isnt even true in the first place about how Repubicans dont serve..you're a complete idiot and who am i to stop you from making a fool of yourself daily??

Hang around as long as you like. You're not talking to a spring chicken. I was in the military 1957 to 1964. Why do you think Nixon ended the draft? That's right sport's fans.....so the rich folks would never have to serve in the military. It's not rocket science. Today the kids of the rich go to ivy league schools and the poor kids who can't afford college join the military. DUUUUUHHH!!!!!

 

[bedowin62]

you're making a fool of yourself again trying to show a causal relationship that just isnt there; the rich getting richer didnt make the poor poorer. @ Campbell

What it did was make the rich richer. How about you explain to me what's the difference. We're headed for a Lord/Serf society which is exactly what those at the top have been trying to do. Don't push it too far......it ends in revolution. I don't think you would like that. I don't think you have a set of balls and you damn sure wouldn't fight.

i'm in the military you moron; and yes i've been to iraq. but you didnt even know that before regurgitating stupid shit you've been spoon-fed and isnt even true in the first place about how Repubicans dont serve..you're a complete idiot and who am i to stop you from making a fool of yourself daily??

Hang around as long as you like. You're not talking to a spring chicken. I was in the military 1957 to 1964. Why do you think Nixon ended the draft? That's right sport's fans.....so the rich folks would never have to serve in the military. It's not rocket science. Today the kids of the rich go to ivy league schools and the poor kids who can't afford college join the military. DUUUUUHHH!!!!!

good one old idiot!! is that why the democrat and korean war hero charlie rangel proposed a new draft?




before voting AGAINST HIS OWN BILL............................TWICE?????