Judicial Watch: FBI Uncovers New Clinton Emails

Little Trumpsters definitely wear selective blinders.
They go batty with Clinton's emails but turn a blind eye to the Stonewall King.
No other president has stonewalled an investigation as much as Trump. Would an innocent person frantically stonewall, if they had nothing to hide?
Nixon didn't come close to Trump's stonewalling.
Bill Clinton didn't come close to Trump's stonewalling.
Obama didn't come close to Trump's stonewalling.
Even Hillary hasn't come close to Trump's stonewalling.
You Little Trumpsters are nothing but a bad joke. Good job! :happy-1:
so what is it when you turn a blind eye to what she did? or worse, make excuses to allow her to do things NO ONE should allow trump to do? now if trump deletes videos, recordings or the like and then orders the drive destroyed, call me.

til then this is politics as fucking usual.
 
Regardless of what that loon Tom Fitton, is telling you, .
Whoever is telling the truth is a loon or a conspiracy theorist to you.
We get it.

Tom Fitton is a loon who has been obsessed with the Clintons for YEARS, bringing lawsuit after lawsuit, and losing ALL OF THEM. None of his so-called investigations or law suits have lead to anything, other than FOI orders which turn up NOTHING:

Judicial Watch - Media Bias/Fact Check

  • Overall, we rate Judicial Watch Questionable based on extreme right wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories and a very poor fact check record.
. . . .

A factual search reveals a horrible track record with fact checking. Below is a small sample of their failed fact checks by IFCN fact checkers


and last but not least:

Judicial Watch has made numerous false and unsubstantiated claims, with a “vast majority” of their lawsuits dismissed. They describe themselves as “a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.”

I rest my case.
 
Regardless of what that loon Tom Fitton, is telling you, .
Whoever is telling the truth is a loon or a conspiracy theorist to you.
We get it.

Tom Fitton is a loon who has been obsessed with the Clintons for YEARS, bringing lawsuit after lawsuit, and losing ALL OF THEM. None of his so-called investigations or law suits have lead to anything, other than FOI orders which turn up NOTHING:

Judicial Watch - Media Bias/Fact Check

  • Overall, we rate Judicial Watch Questionable based on extreme right wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories and a very poor fact check record.
. . . .

A factual search reveals a horrible track record with fact checking. Below is a small sample of their failed fact checks by IFCN fact checkers


and last but not least:

Judicial Watch has made numerous false and unsubstantiated claims, with a “vast majority” of their lawsuits dismissed. They describe themselves as “a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.”

I rest my case.
Love your 'unbiased' source.

CNN Bias and Credibility Rating - Media Bias/Fact Check
  • Overall, we rate CNN left biased based on editorial positions that consistently favors the left, while straight news reporting falls left-center through bias by omission. We also rate them Mostly Factual in reporting, rather than High due to misleading information presented by guests as well as a few failed fact checks by TV hosts. However, news reporting on the website tends to be be properly sourced with minimal failed fact checks.:auiqs.jpg::laugh::lol::lmao::laughing0301:
 
  • I rest my case....
  • Fox News - Media Bias/Fact Check
  • Overall, we rate Fox News strongly Right-Biased due to editorial positions and story selection that favors the right. We also rate them Mixed factually based on poor sourcing and the spreading of conspiracy theories that later must be retracted after being widely shared. Further, Fox News would be rated a Questionable source based on numerous failed fact checks by hosts and pundits, however straight news reporting is generally reliable, therefore we rate them Mixed for factual reporting.
 
  • I rest my case....
  • Fox News - Media Bias/Fact Check
  • Overall, we rate Fox News strongly Right-Biased due to editorial positions and story selection that favors the right. We also rate them Mixed factually based on poor sourcing and the spreading of conspiracy theories that later must be retracted after being widely shared. Further, Fox News would be rated a Questionable source based on numerous failed fact checks by hosts and pundits, however straight news reporting is generally reliable, therefore we rate them Mixed for factual reporting.

These ratings are absolutely correct. Despite Trump's cries of "fake news", it is in fact FOX which routinely fails fact checks and has been sued for blatantly false stories. Hannity was sent "on vacation" after his smear of Seth Rich and claims that Rich was the source of the DNC email hacking.
 
  • I rest my case....
  • Fox News - Media Bias/Fact Check
  • Overall, we rate Fox News strongly Right-Biased due to editorial positions and story selection that favors the right. We also rate them Mixed factually based on poor sourcing and the spreading of conspiracy theories that later must be retracted after being widely shared. Further, Fox News would be rated a Questionable source based on numerous failed fact checks by hosts and pundits, however straight news reporting is generally reliable, therefore we rate them Mixed for factual reporting.

These ratings are absolutely correct. Despite Trump's cries of "fake news", it is in fact FOX which routinely fails fact checks and has been sued for blatantly false stories. Hannity was sent "on vacation" after his smear of Seth Rich and claims that Rich was the source of the DNC email hacking.
At least we have one thing in common.
Maybe if I got you stoned enough you'd see the light.
 
Wonder what size orange jumpsuit she will have, JUMBO, or Omar the tent maker size? And yes liberals, she STILL FASCINATES ME....how a piece of shit like her could skirt even COMEY'S naming over 200 felonies, absolutely NOTHING! Oh, you want me to play Comey's indictment again...glad you asked!



Judicial Watch ^ | November 27, 2019 | Staff

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today released a court filing that reveals the FBI found more Clinton emails it recently turned over to the State Department for review. In the November 15, 2019 filing, the State Department informs the court that the FBI located additional Clinton emails that potentially had not been previously released:

[T]he Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) recently sent [the State Department] additional documents as part of the ongoing inter-agency consultation process in connection with other FOIA litigation. [The State Department] is working to determine whether that set of documents includes any responsive, non-duplicative agency records that have not already been processed. [The State Department] will promptly update [Judicial Watch] and the Court once that initial review is complete.

The court ordered joint status report was filed in response to Judicial Watch’s May 6, 2015, FOIA lawsuit (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:15-cv-00687)). Judicial Watch’s FOIA lawsuit seeks all emails sent and received by Hillary Clinton and other records about her non-governmental email account.

Production of all Clinton emails concluded more than a year ago. Throughout the two plus years of processing and production, more and more emails would appear in addition to the 55,000 pages Clinton turned over to the State Department in December 2014. The FBI uncovered 72,000 pages of documents Clinton attempted to delete or did not otherwise disclose. Previously requested, the FBI was only able to recover or find approximately 5,000, including classified material, of the 33,000 government emails Clinton removed and tried to destroy. Earlier this year, Judicial Watch announced that it received 756 pages of emails that were among the materials Clinton tried to delete or destroy, several of which were classified and were transmitted over her unsecure, non-“state.gov” email system. Now again, it appears the FBI has uncovered more Clinton email documents.

Judicial Watch last week released FBI emails showing that the FBI’s top lawyer gave deferential treatment to the attorney representing Hillary Clinton’s top aides implicated in the mass deletion of Clinton’s emails.

“It is astonishing news that the FBI mysteriously found more Clinton emails. Were they on Anthony Weiner’s laptop? At James Comey’s house? Or on Peter Strzok’s cell phone?” asked Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “This disturbing development further highlights how the fix was in on the Clinton email scandal and why a criminal investigation needs to be reopened by Attorney General Barr.”

In separate Judicial Watch FOIA litigation, a federal court will soon rule on whether Hillary Clinton and her top aide can be questioned under oath by Judicial Watch lawyers about the email and Benghazi controversies. The court has already granted additional discovery to Judicial Watch.

The court ordered discovery into three specific areas: whether Secretary Clinton’s use of a private email server was intended to stymie FOIA; whether the State Department’s intent to settle this case in late 2014 and early 2015 amounted to bad faith; and whether the State Department has adequately searched for records responsive to Judicial Watch’s request. The court specifically ordered Obama administration senior State Department officials, lawyers and Clinton aides to be deposed or answer written questions under oath. The court ruled that the Clinton email system was “one of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency.” (This Judicial Watch FOIA lawsuit led directly to the disclosure of the Clinton email system in 2015.)

1yhw8v.jpg
 
It’s so odd to me that donations to the Clinton foundation dropped by like 70% after HIllary lost the election.

Hmmmm

I wonder why? Is it because she can’t sell political favors if she isn’t in office? Or is it because all disease and famine has been eradicated on planet earth?
Trump Ordered to Pay $2 Million Over Scam Foundation
Trump Ordered to Pay $2 Million Over Scam Charity

What does that have to do with the Clinton foundation?

Was Trump selling political favors to foreign actors through the charity?
No, he uses the whitehouse for that.
 

Comey is NOT about to be charged:

Inspector General Report Reveals Charges Against James Comey To Be Mind-Numbingly Stupid

If you actually read the 61-page IG report in full, though, it makes clear that not only did Trump fabricate the principal charge that Comey leaked classified information, but the secondary charge for which the IG has now slapped Comey’s wrist is mind-numbingly dumb.

Trump's investigations of Hillary's emails is a total bust. All three investigations cleared Clinton of all allegations. Trump is losing all of his court cases. Witnesses have to show up and testify. Impeachment is starting, and it's a slam dunk case. Guliani et al are looking at serious charges.
 
  • I rest my case....
  • Fox News - Media Bias/Fact Check
  • Overall, we rate Fox News strongly Right-Biased due to editorial positions and story selection that favors the right. We also rate them Mixed factually based on poor sourcing and the spreading of conspiracy theories that later must be retracted after being widely shared. Further, Fox News would be rated a Questionable source based on numerous failed fact checks by hosts and pundits, however straight news reporting is generally reliable, therefore we rate them Mixed for factual reporting.

These ratings are absolutely correct. Despite Trump's cries of "fake news", it is in fact FOX which routinely fails fact checks and has been sued for blatantly false stories. Hannity was sent "on vacation" after his smear of Seth Rich and claims that Rich was the source of the DNC email hacking.
Seems a catholic school has CNN on the ropes and that case is proceeding nicely.

That's a fact. Your shit is just rambling wo merit. Just hope.
 
Wonder what size orange jumpsuit she will have, JUMBO, or Omar the tent maker size? And yes liberals, she STILL FASCINATES ME....how a piece of shit like her could skirt even COMEY'S naming over 200 felonies, absolutely NOTHING! Oh, you want me to play Comey's indictment again...glad you asked!



Judicial Watch ^ | November 27, 2019 | Staff

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today released a court filing that reveals the FBI found more Clinton emails it recently turned over to the State Department for review. In the November 15, 2019 filing, the State Department informs the court that the FBI located additional Clinton emails that potentially had not been previously released:

[T]he Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) recently sent [the State Department] additional documents as part of the ongoing inter-agency consultation process in connection with other FOIA litigation. [The State Department] is working to determine whether that set of documents includes any responsive, non-duplicative agency records that have not already been processed. [The State Department] will promptly update [Judicial Watch] and the Court once that initial review is complete.

The court ordered joint status report was filed in response to Judicial Watch’s May 6, 2015, FOIA lawsuit (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:15-cv-00687)). Judicial Watch’s FOIA lawsuit seeks all emails sent and received by Hillary Clinton and other records about her non-governmental email account.

Production of all Clinton emails concluded more than a year ago. Throughout the two plus years of processing and production, more and more emails would appear in addition to the 55,000 pages Clinton turned over to the State Department in December 2014. The FBI uncovered 72,000 pages of documents Clinton attempted to delete or did not otherwise disclose. Previously requested, the FBI was only able to recover or find approximately 5,000, including classified material, of the 33,000 government emails Clinton removed and tried to destroy. Earlier this year, Judicial Watch announced that it received 756 pages of emails that were among the materials Clinton tried to delete or destroy, several of which were classified and were transmitted over her unsecure, non-“state.gov” email system. Now again, it appears the FBI has uncovered more Clinton email documents.

Judicial Watch last week released FBI emails showing that the FBI’s top lawyer gave deferential treatment to the attorney representing Hillary Clinton’s top aides implicated in the mass deletion of Clinton’s emails.

“It is astonishing news that the FBI mysteriously found more Clinton emails. Were they on Anthony Weiner’s laptop? At James Comey’s house? Or on Peter Strzok’s cell phone?” asked Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “This disturbing development further highlights how the fix was in on the Clinton email scandal and why a criminal investigation needs to be reopened by Attorney General Barr.”

In separate Judicial Watch FOIA litigation, a federal court will soon rule on whether Hillary Clinton and her top aide can be questioned under oath by Judicial Watch lawyers about the email and Benghazi controversies. The court has already granted additional discovery to Judicial Watch.

The court ordered discovery into three specific areas: whether Secretary Clinton’s use of a private email server was intended to stymie FOIA; whether the State Department’s intent to settle this case in late 2014 and early 2015 amounted to bad faith; and whether the State Department has adequately searched for records responsive to Judicial Watch’s request. The court specifically ordered Obama administration senior State Department officials, lawyers and Clinton aides to be deposed or answer written questions under oath. The court ruled that the Clinton email system was “one of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency.” (This Judicial Watch FOIA lawsuit led directly to the disclosure of the Clinton email system in 2015.)


Funny, wasn't Flynn CONVICTED for lying to the FBI?

Good thing the FBI was sure not to keep recordings of their interviews with Hillary!
 
  • I rest my case....
  • Fox News - Media Bias/Fact Check
  • Overall, we rate Fox News strongly Right-Biased due to editorial positions and story selection that favors the right. We also rate them Mixed factually based on poor sourcing and the spreading of conspiracy theories that later must be retracted after being widely shared. Further, Fox News would be rated a Questionable source based on numerous failed fact checks by hosts and pundits, however straight news reporting is generally reliable, therefore we rate them Mixed for factual reporting.

These ratings are absolutely correct. Despite Trump's cries of "fake news", it is in fact FOX which routinely fails fact checks and has been sued for blatantly false stories. Hannity was sent "on vacation" after his smear of Seth Rich and claims that Rich was the source of the DNC email hacking.
Seems a catholic school has CNN on the ropes and that case is proceeding nicely.

That's a fact. Your shit is just rambling wo merit. Just hope.

It is proceeding nicely. CNN has filed for dismissal, and is awaiting a ruling. The WAPO suit has already been dismissed.
 
  • I rest my case....
  • Fox News - Media Bias/Fact Check
  • Overall, we rate Fox News strongly Right-Biased due to editorial positions and story selection that favors the right. We also rate them Mixed factually based on poor sourcing and the spreading of conspiracy theories that later must be retracted after being widely shared. Further, Fox News would be rated a Questionable source based on numerous failed fact checks by hosts and pundits, however straight news reporting is generally reliable, therefore we rate them Mixed for factual reporting.

These ratings are absolutely correct. Despite Trump's cries of "fake news", it is in fact FOX which routinely fails fact checks and has been sued for blatantly false stories. Hannity was sent "on vacation" after his smear of Seth Rich and claims that Rich was the source of the DNC email hacking.
Seems a catholic school has CNN on the ropes and that case is proceeding nicely.

That's a fact. Your shit is just rambling wo merit. Just hope.

It is proceeding nicely. CNN has filed for dismissal, and is awaiting a ruling. The WAPO suit has already been dismissed.
Lord you don't even read. Judge is allowing it to proceed.

Catholic teen’s defamation suit against NBC moves forward | Sharyl Attkisson
 

Forum List

Back
Top