Judicial Tyranny

[longknife]

Another judicial body tramples all over the First Amendment in a effort to save the reputation of baby-killing Planned Parenthood.


Court Bars Pro-Life Group From Releasing New Planned Parenthood Videos in California


The Los Angeles Superior Court issued an order Wednesday that restricts the pro-life group Center for Medical Progress from releasing any video that includes leaders of StemExpress taken at a restaurant in May.


I can't find the ruling or any reasoning on the court's part for issuing it. Read more @ Court Bars Pro-Life Group From Releasing New Planned Parenthood Videos in California - The Gateway Pundit

Nine More Videos On Planned Parenthood Baby Parts Selling Ready To Drop @ Nine More Videos On Planned Parenthood Baby Parts Selling Ready To Drop Weasel Zippers probably why the court order.

 

[Jackson]

Sure would like to know what is the basis of that decision. Is it a state that required the person being taped to have knowledge it was being done?

 

[Preacher]

Release it anyways.

 

[Derideo_Te]

The 1st Amendment doesn't cover libel.

Since PP can prove that the original videos were intended to libel them they can legitimately block the release of any other materials from the same source.

The onus is now on the defendants to prove to the court that what they intend to release is not libelous.

That is going to be a hard bar to get over since they are already in the wrong over the first one.

 

[Derideo_Te]

Release it anyways.

In which case they will go to jail for contempt of court.

 

[Preacher]

Release it anyways.

In which case they will go to jail for contempt of court.

Doubt it would happen. I mean if tyrant in the robe wants to be kicked off the bench go ahead but we still have first amendment in this country.

 

[Derideo_Te]

Release it anyways.

In which case they will go to jail for contempt of court.

Doubt it would happen. I mean if tyrant in the robe wants to be kicked off the bench go ahead but we still have first amendment in this country.

Contempt of court is not tyranny, it is the Law of the Land.

 

[Roadrunner]

The 1st Amendment doesn't cover libel.

Since PP can prove that the original videos were intended to libel them they can legitimately block the release of any other materials from the same source.

The onus is now on the defendants to prove to the court that what they intend to release is not libelous.

That is going to be a hard bar to get over since they are already in the wrong over the first one.

The truth is always libel to you assholes.

 

[Derideo_Te]

The 1st Amendment doesn't cover libel.

Since PP can prove that the original videos were intended to libel them they can legitimately block the release of any other materials from the same source.

The onus is now on the defendants to prove to the court that what they intend to release is not libelous.

That is going to be a hard bar to get over since they are already in the wrong over the first one.

The truth is always libel to you assholes.

You and the truth have never even shared the same planetary orbit.

 

[Dana7360]

Another judicial body tramples all over the First Amendment in a effort to save the reputation of baby-killing Planned Parenthood.


Court Bars Pro-Life Group From Releasing New Planned Parenthood Videos in California


The Los Angeles Superior Court issued an order Wednesday that restricts the pro-life group Center for Medical Progress from releasing any video that includes leaders of StemExpress taken at a restaurant in May.


I can't find the ruling or any reasoning on the court's part for issuing it. Read more @ Court Bars Pro-Life Group From Releasing New Planned Parenthood Videos in California - The Gateway Pundit

Nine More Videos On Planned Parenthood Baby Parts Selling Ready To Drop @ Nine More Videos On Planned Parenthood Baby Parts Selling Ready To Drop Weasel Zippers probably why the court order.

When someone breaks the law the results of their crimes are subject to the law.

The organization that illegally recorded people broke the law and their video rightly shouldn't be allowed to be shown in the media.

Why do you use lies to defend criminals?

 

[Dana7360]

Release it anyways.

In which case they will go to jail for contempt of court.

Doubt it would happen. I mean if tyrant in the robe wants to be kicked off the bench go ahead but we still have first amendment in this country.

You show you don't know the laws of our nation or you just believe those who agree with your views are exempt from our laws.

The court blocked any release of those tapes. To release them would be a crime. The person who committed that crime will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

It doesn't matter if their views are the same as yours. The law applies to everyone. Not just those who disagree with your views.

 

[martybegan]

The 1st Amendment doesn't cover libel.

Since PP can prove that the original videos were intended to libel them they can legitimately block the release of any other materials from the same source.

The onus is now on the defendants to prove to the court that what they intend to release is not libelous.

That is going to be a hard bar to get over since they are already in the wrong over the first one.

How is using people's own words "libel"

And the onerous when it comes to prior restraint is ALWAYS on the government, and has to be a really good reason to pass constitutional muster. All that happened here is the Biotech company got lucky with a judge and got a temp restraining order before a real court decides the filming group did nothing wrong.

 

[martybegan]

Another judicial body tramples all over the First Amendment in a effort to save the reputation of baby-killing Planned Parenthood.


Court Bars Pro-Life Group From Releasing New Planned Parenthood Videos in California


The Los Angeles Superior Court issued an order Wednesday that restricts the pro-life group Center for Medical Progress from releasing any video that includes leaders of StemExpress taken at a restaurant in May.


I can't find the ruling or any reasoning on the court's part for issuing it. Read more @ Court Bars Pro-Life Group From Releasing New Planned Parenthood Videos in California - The Gateway Pundit

Nine More Videos On Planned Parenthood Baby Parts Selling Ready To Drop @ Nine More Videos On Planned Parenthood Baby Parts Selling Ready To Drop Weasel Zippers probably why the court order.

When someone breaks the law the results of their crimes are subject to the law.

The organization that illegally recorded people broke the law and their video rightly shouldn't be allowed to be shown in the media.

Why do you use lies to defend criminals?

California's recording laws are pretty strict, but the recording was done in a public place, i.e. a restaurant, so confidentiality isn't an issue.

The Pro Life org did it's legal homework.

 

[martybegan]

Release it anyways.

In which case they will go to jail for contempt of court.

Doubt it would happen. I mean if tyrant in the robe wants to be kicked off the bench go ahead but we still have first amendment in this country.

You show you don't know the laws of our nation or you just believe those who agree with your views are exempt from our laws.

The court blocked any release of those tapes. To release them would be a crime. The person who committed that crime will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

It doesn't matter if their views are the same as yours. The law applies to everyone. Not just those who disagree with your views.

Release it anyways.

In which case they will go to jail for contempt of court.

Doubt it would happen. I mean if tyrant in the robe wants to be kicked off the bench go ahead but we still have first amendment in this country.

You show you don't know the laws of our nation or you just believe those who agree with your views are exempt from our laws.

The court blocked any release of those tapes. To release them would be a crime. The person who committed that crime will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

It doesn't matter if their views are the same as yours. The law applies to everyone. Not just those who disagree with your views.

it stopped temporarily the release of one part of one tape, and on very shaky constitutional grounds.

 

[Preacher]

Release it anyways.

In which case they will go to jail for contempt of court.

Doubt it would happen. I mean if tyrant in the robe wants to be kicked off the bench go ahead but we still have first amendment in this country.

You show you don't know the laws of our nation or you just believe those who agree with your views are exempt from our laws.

The court blocked any release of those tapes. To release them would be a crime. The person who committed that crime will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

It doesn't matter if their views are the same as yours. The law applies to everyone. Not just those who disagree with your views.

First amendment trumps the tyrant in the robes opinion. Period. Oh and 4th video was released today

 

[Katzndogz]

This is the age of information. The information does not have to be released publicly to be released.

 

[Dana7360]

Release it anyways.

In which case they will go to jail for contempt of court.

Doubt it would happen. I mean if tyrant in the robe wants to be kicked off the bench go ahead but we still have first amendment in this country.

You show you don't know the laws of our nation or you just believe those who agree with your views are exempt from our laws.

The court blocked any release of those tapes. To release them would be a crime. The person who committed that crime will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

It doesn't matter if their views are the same as yours. The law applies to everyone. Not just those who disagree with your views.

First amendment trumps the tyrant in the robes opinion. Period. Oh and 4th video was released today

No it doesn't. When a crime is committed the results of that crime are subject to the law. The first amendment doesn't allow people to break the law.

The people who made those videos broke the law and if one was released today the people who released it will probably be prosecuted to the fullest extend of the law and probably will end up going to jail.

 

[Preacher]

Release it anyways.

In which case they will go to jail for contempt of court.

Doubt it would happen. I mean if tyrant in the robe wants to be kicked off the bench go ahead but we still have first amendment in this country.

You show you don't know the laws of our nation or you just believe those who agree with your views are exempt from our laws.

The court blocked any release of those tapes. To release them would be a crime. The person who committed that crime will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

It doesn't matter if their views are the same as yours. The law applies to everyone. Not just those who disagree with your views.

First amendment trumps the tyrant in the robes opinion. Period. Oh and 4th video was released today

No it doesn't. When a crime is committed the results of that crime are subject to the law. The first amendment doesn't allow people to break the law.

The people who made those videos broke the law and if one was released today the people who released it will probably be prosecuted to the fullest extend of the law and probably will end up going to jail.

No one broke the law.

 

[Derideo_Te]

In which case they will go to jail for contempt of court.

Doubt it would happen. I mean if tyrant in the robe wants to be kicked off the bench go ahead but we still have first amendment in this country.

You show you don't know the laws of our nation or you just believe those who agree with your views are exempt from our laws.

The court blocked any release of those tapes. To release them would be a crime. The person who committed that crime will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

It doesn't matter if their views are the same as yours. The law applies to everyone. Not just those who disagree with your views.

First amendment trumps the tyrant in the robes opinion. Period. Oh and 4th video was released today

No it doesn't. When a crime is committed the results of that crime are subject to the law. The first amendment doesn't allow people to break the law.

The people who made those videos broke the law and if one was released today the people who released it will probably be prosecuted to the fullest extend of the law and probably will end up going to jail.

No one broke the law.

If you are under a court restraining order and you violate that order you have broken the law.

Obviously you don't have a clue how the laws works, do you?

 

[Preacher]

Doubt it would happen. I mean if tyrant in the robe wants to be kicked off the bench go ahead but we still have first amendment in this country.

You show you don't know the laws of our nation or you just believe those who agree with your views are exempt from our laws.

The court blocked any release of those tapes. To release them would be a crime. The person who committed that crime will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

It doesn't matter if their views are the same as yours. The law applies to everyone. Not just those who disagree with your views.

First amendment trumps the tyrant in the robes opinion. Period. Oh and 4th video was released today

No it doesn't. When a crime is committed the results of that crime are subject to the law. The first amendment doesn't allow people to break the law.

The people who made those videos broke the law and if one was released today the people who released it will probably be prosecuted to the fullest extend of the law and probably will end up going to jail.

No one broke the law.

If you are under a court restraining order and you violate that order you have broken the law.

Obviously you don't have a clue how the laws works, do you?

Judges opinion is not law. First amendment is law. Learn the difference.