Judge tells republican party NO again

So what.

Hes in prison where he belongs.

How many Rs went to prison for tehir non stop cheating of the American people?
 
Election law professor Richard Hasen at University of California, Irvine described the ruling as a "huge win" for the Democratic Party. He said the Republican National Committee could file an emergency appeal to Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, who oversees the 3rd Circuit. Alternately, the committee could seek review by the full 3rd Circuit.

Impersonation fraud, which the ballot security measures target, is only a small fraction of voter fraud, the court noted in its opinion. More common types of fraud include corruption among election officials or attempts to manipulate absentee ballots, said Hasen, who has written a forthcoming book on the subject.

The case is Democratic National Committee et al v. Republican National Committee et al, U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit, No. 09-4615.


Republicans lose appeal on poll-watching tactics

described the ruling as a "huge win" for the Democratic Party

Of course it was.
Anything that makes fraud easier is a win for the Dems.
 
The Rs lost the case on the facts.


You on the right dont care about facts
 
Election law professor Richard Hasen at University of California, Irvine described the ruling as a "huge win" for the Democratic Party. He said the Republican National Committee could file an emergency appeal to Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, who oversees the 3rd Circuit. Alternately, the committee could seek review by the full 3rd Circuit.

Impersonation fraud, which the ballot security measures target, is only a small fraction of voter fraud, the court noted in its opinion. More common types of fraud include corruption among election officials or attempts to manipulate absentee ballots, said Hasen, who has written a forthcoming book on the subject.

The case is Democratic National Committee et al v. Republican National Committee et al, U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit, No. 09-4615.


Republicans lose appeal on poll-watching tactics

It seems that the result of the 1982 fabrication of 'convict' status list for a number of blacks the RNC agreed to return to court if the RNC wished any poll watching and/or fraud reducing measures.

Photo ID is a separate matter, but covered broadly by the decree.

Doesn't it appear that the RNC has correctly identified a problem...but Democrat-controlled court (I'm guessing) is using the 1982 decree agreement to block fraud reduction?


And, again, what problem do you have with photo ID?

There is no crimes for it to stop

its costs millions of tax payer dollars


It will keep legal American voters from voting.


Now answer my question.


Why do you refuse facts and instead use republican talking points in their place?
 
Election law professor Richard Hasen at University of California, Irvine described the ruling as a "huge win" for the Democratic Party. He said the Republican National Committee could file an emergency appeal to Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, who oversees the 3rd Circuit. Alternately, the committee could seek review by the full 3rd Circuit.

Impersonation fraud, which the ballot security measures target, is only a small fraction of voter fraud, the court noted in its opinion. More common types of fraud include corruption among election officials or attempts to manipulate absentee ballots, said Hasen, who has written a forthcoming book on the subject.

The case is Democratic National Committee et al v. Republican National Committee et al, U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit, No. 09-4615.


Republicans lose appeal on poll-watching tactics

It seems that the result of the 1982 fabrication of 'convict' status list for a number of blacks the RNC agreed to return to court if the RNC wished any poll watching and/or fraud reducing measures.

Photo ID is a separate matter, but covered broadly by the decree.

Doesn't it appear that the RNC has correctly identified a problem...but Democrat-controlled court (I'm guessing) is using the 1982 decree agreement to block fraud reduction?


And, again, what problem do you have with photo ID?

There is no crimes for it to stop

its costs millions of tax payer dollars


It will keep legal American voters from voting.


Now answer my question.


Why do you refuse facts and instead use republican talking points in their place?

It costs millions? Suddenly a liberal is worried about spending. LOL!
 
So what.

Hes in prison where he belongs.

How many Rs went to prison for tehir non stop cheating of the American people?

But....don't you Dems want convicts to vote, too?



"Several Democratic presidential candidates, including frontrunner Howard Dean, also support felon voting.

A cynic may be forgiven for suspecting that the motivation behind such support has as much to do with political expediency as principle.

Several recent studies contend that even allowing for their expected lower participation rates, the restoration of voting rights to felons would have shifted the outcome of a number of recent congressional elections. This tantalizes the felon-vote movement. But the movement receives its greatest inspiration from the 2000 election fiasco in Florida. Felon-vote proponents claim that had felons who have completed their sentences been permitted to vote in Florida, Gore would be president today. And they're probably right.

The restoration of voting rights to felons is decidedly unpopular with the electorate. For example, in 1998, more than 80 percent of Utah voters approved a measure to bar inmates from voting. In 2000, the Massachusetts electorate, among the most liberal in the country, voted for a constitutional amendment barring felon inmates from voting.
But overwhelming public opposition has not deterred felon-vote advocates. They've simply resorted to a receptive judiciary to achieve their objective

As David Lampo notes, these distinctions are immaterial to many felon-vote advocates. Their aim is nothing less than the wholesale restoration of voting rights to all convicts — and that suggests an agenda that's more partisan than altruistic.

Peter Kirsanow on Felon & Election 2004 on National Review Online
 
The American courts have repetedly found the republican party acting in illegal manners to keep Americans from voting.


Its cold hard court documented fact
 

Forum List

Back
Top