Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Your party registration is, not your actual vote. Can you assume usually? Probably a lot of the time. Unless you are registered as an independent.An individual's voting history is public recordIt's already online and considered public information..............
How far behind can the demand to know who one votes for, be?
It's already online and considered public information..............
Come again?????
Yep. That is all kinds of jacked up, innit?
How far behind can the demand to know who one votes for, be?
It's already online and considered public information..............
Your post claims that my vote is public information.
That's nonsense.
Voter Registration & Privacy
Database configuration issues expose 191 million voter records
Frequently Asked Questions | VoterRecords.com
Campaign limits. Public financing. Anything else is purely in the interests of a controlling élite.Our "political system" is so distorted and perverted by money and its associated influence, that the more transparency, the better.
Two things.Off to the Supreme Court! I would ignore that libtard judge and run the donor list through the shredder like Hillary did!
The Citizens United ruling says money is speech. It does not say that speech can be kept secret.
This is what the IRS investigations into 501(c) 4 PAC's was about during the Obama administration.
This isn't going to go away. Citizens United, as well as 501(c) 4 PAC's even being allowed to exist, will be under attack relentlessly, until they are eventually abolished. It could take years, but that doesn't matter. They are going away, and it's just a matter of when not if.
Your party registration is, not your actual vote. Can you assume usually? Probably a lot of the time. Unless you are registered as an independent.An individual's voting history is public recordHow far behind can the demand to know who one votes for, be?
It's already online and considered public information..............
Come again?????
Yep. That is all kinds of jacked up, innit?
How far behind can the demand to know who one votes for, be?
It's already online and considered public information..............
Your post claims that my vote is public information.
That's nonsense.
Voter Registration & Privacy
Database configuration issues expose 191 million voter records
Frequently Asked Questions | VoterRecords.com
That's enough information. You don't even have to be affiliated with a political party on this board and the assumptions, accusations, and insults are there.
Two things.Off to the Supreme Court! I would ignore that libtard judge and run the donor list through the shredder like Hillary did!
The Citizens United ruling says money is speech. It does not say that speech can be kept secret.
This is what the IRS investigations into 501(c) 4 PAC's was about during the Obama administration.
This isn't going to go away. Citizens United, as well as 501(c) 4 PAC's even being allowed to exist, will be under attack relentlessly, until they are eventually abolished. It could take years, but that doesn't matter. They are going away, and it's just a matter of when not if.
1. If you believe that, then you must be okay with the dissemination of information from the Clinton Campaign, as well as any information from the DNC.
2. To do this, heavy jail time should be given to anyone.....I mean ANYONE, who goes after the people on the donors' list. I mean even if you set out to destroy their reputation simply for giving money, then you should do 25 to life in jail.
No, what I am saying is that the left has an active campaign to silence anyone who does not agree with them and when they find out who is giving money to whom, they will deliberately set out to destroy them so that they won't have the resources to fight back. The whole reason that donation lists became private is just for that very reason.Two things.Off to the Supreme Court! I would ignore that libtard judge and run the donor list through the shredder like Hillary did!
The Citizens United ruling says money is speech. It does not say that speech can be kept secret.
This is what the IRS investigations into 501(c) 4 PAC's was about during the Obama administration.
This isn't going to go away. Citizens United, as well as 501(c) 4 PAC's even being allowed to exist, will be under attack relentlessly, until they are eventually abolished. It could take years, but that doesn't matter. They are going away, and it's just a matter of when not if.
1. If you believe that, then you must be okay with the dissemination of information from the Clinton Campaign, as well as any information from the DNC.
2. To do this, heavy jail time should be given to anyone.....I mean ANYONE, who goes after the people on the donors' list. I mean even if you set out to destroy their reputation simply for giving money, then you should do 25 to life in jail.
Two things. The Clinton campaign was over two years ago, of which she was subject to the same rules as every one else.
That was then. This is now.
If you believe that being transparent about where campaign donations come from will ruin someones reputation, then you are admitting that donations are being made for the express purpose of quid pro quo, and that bribery should be able to take place out of sight.
If everything is on the up and up, this shouldn’t be an issue. Unless of course you have something to hide.
